What's new

Has India accepted Pakistan's conventional supremacy? May review No-first use policy.

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
India's statement regarding ‘no first use’ policy on nuclear weapons is irresponsible: foreign minister
Reuters | Dawn.comUpdated August 16, 2019
5d56f8946580a.jpg

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi addressing a press conference in Islamabad on Friday. — DawnNewsTV
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Friday termed the Indian defence minister's statement on a possible change in its 'no first use' policy of nuclear weapons as "shocking and irresponsible" .

Earlier in the day, the Indian defence minister had announced that despite the fact India has stuck to its commitment of 'no first use' of nuclear weapons, the future policy will depend on the situation, which analysts said introduced a level of ambiguity in a core national security doctrine.

In a press conference held in Islamabad, Foreign Minister Qureshi said that the Foreign Office had held deliberations on the statement by the Indian defence minister and formed a position on the matter.

He then proceeded to read out a response by the FO, which he said he was doing so that no verbal statement of his own can be misconstrued.

"The substance and timing of the Indian defence minister's statement is highly unfortunate and reflective of India's irresponsible and belligerent behaviour. It further exposes the pretense of their no first use policy to which we have never accorded any credence," he said.

"'No first use' pledge is non verfiable and cannot be taken at face value. Especially when development of offensive capabilities and force postures belie such claims.

"Pakistan has always proposed measures relating to nuclear restraint in South Asia and has eschewed measures that are offensive in nature. Pakistan will continue to maintain a credible minimum deterrence posture," he said in conclusion.

India had declared itself a nuclear power after conducting underground tests in 1998 and Pakistan responded with its own tests shortly afterwards. Since then, nuclear experts say the rivals have been developing nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them.

On Friday, in a visit to Pokhran in western India, the site of the nuclear tests, Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh paid tribute to late former prime minister and revered leader of the ruling Hindu nationalists, Atal Behari Vajpayee, for making India into a nuclear power.

“Pokhran is the area which witnessed Atal Ji's firm resolve to make India a nuclear power and yet remain firmly committed to the doctrine of No First Use," said Singh.

“India has strictly adhered to this doctrine. What happens in future depends on the circumstances.”

At the time of the tests, India said it needed a deterrent against nuclear-armed China but it has also long been concerned about Pakistan's nuclear capabilities.

Comments aimed at Pakistan?
Shekhar Gupta, a political commentator and defence expert, said the government appeared to have an open mind on the issue of 'no first use' of nuclear arms and the comments could be aimed at Pakistan, which has said previously it needed to develop small nuclear weapons to deter a sudden attack by India.

“Rajnath Singh is measured and not given to loose talk or bluster. He isn't signalling a shift, but an open mind on the NFU (No First Use) inherited from Vajpayees Nuclear Doctrine,” he said on Twitter.

Tensions between the two countries have increased following India's move to revoke autonomy in the disputed region of Kashmir, the cause of two of their three wars. In February, Indian and Pakistani fighter jets clashed over the territory.

Vipin Narang, a nuclear affairs expert at MIT in the United States, said that Singh's comments were a sign the policy on 'no first use' could change in the future.

“Make no mistake: this is by far the highest official statement from the Raksha Mantri's (Defence Minister) mouth directly that India may not be forever bound by No First Use,” Narang said on Twitter.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1499826/india-says-may-rethink-no-first-use-policy-on-nuclear-weapons
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This indicates India has lost the confidence in its conventional capability and also its 2nd strike capabilities. It is a dangerous development for the world and poses a serious threat to the global peace.
 
Last edited:
UNSC about to meet and India goes nuclear.

As I said before world intervention is needed and India needs one to get out of Kashmir mess.
 
Look whos backed up!! It'll all go up on smoke before you try and cleanse Muslims from occupied Kashmir.

Only difference is there will be no one left to secure your borders. Pakistan borders will be consolidated including all Kashmir by friends if needed whilst India will be balkanised.
 
Re my earlier post. Trump just had telephonic conversation with PMIK.

PMIK going to address the nation tomorrow.
 
UNSC about to meet and India goes nuclear.

As I said before world intervention is needed and India needs one to get out of Kashmir mess.


What India 'needs' is what India doesn't 'want'.

But, yes, as war n peace said above, it's a sign of weakness. I mean conventionally Pakistan is outgunned, out-numbered already.

The NUTS are ruling India!!
 
Do u ppl think that Defence Minister's bayan about Nuclear policy means they would be defeated by Pakistan by conventional means?

@Mangus Ortus Novem @Maarkhoor @Windjammer @Oscar @Yaseen1 @Arsalan 345 @Windjammer @RIWWIR @Foxtrot Delta @Side-Winder

It's just statements. The "No First Use" policy is just to claim moral high ground, nothing else.

Do you think they will wait for Pakistan to launch Nuclear missiles if they are losing their territory?
 
Yes/no. I Don't think they ever had a 'no first use policy' their known for lying.
But now they are acknowleding our superiority just like they did with 'Agar Rafale hotey"

It's just statements. The "No First Use" policy is just to claim moral high ground, nothing else.

Do you think they will wait for Pakistan to launch Nuclear missiles if they are losing their territory?
Yeah I know. But this statement shows that India is afraid of Pakistan's conventional means
 
Folks, sometime back when attack were happening back to back, I predicted something major politically by India. It happened.

Let me make another predicion : this nuclear policy posturing is a rather intresting tool. It tells everyone that India will consider a nuclear war if any unwinnable situation happens - like Pakistan China combined battle or similar. It’s a way to build international pressure on China and Pakistan to avoid any conflict militarily with India. It’s a sign that India likes the status quo and will keep it that way.
 
But now they are acknowleding our superiority just like they did with 'Agar Rafale hotey"

Well I'm not a military expert, but they do have a huge conventional advantage. I think they were surprised on the 27th, and Pakistan still has many cards up their sleeves still to play. But we should NEVER underestimate our enemies.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom