What's new

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
^^ Weight reduction is a false bogey, used by morons in IAF to kill several world class "in-the-initial" stage projects from DRDO.

I give you simple example-

Plane A of country A weighs 5tons and flies at 350m/sec. and carries a payload of 6tons.

Plane B of country B weights 5.5tons and flies at 350m/sec. and carries a payload of 5.5tons.

Now, should country B's airforce reject the plane B just because it doesn't match performance metrics of Country A?

This is how morons in IAF do their maths. They reject wonderful home-made technology just because they are not mature enough to understand that if they don't support home-grown efforts now, it will be too late in future.

IAF thinkless tanks committed same mistake in 1960,70s by diverting huge funds from domestic R&D to Russia. And, now they are repeating the blunders by delaying AMCA by 5 years.
 
What's the suitability/feasibility of having LCA as a sort of dedicated light ground attack craft.

I think it's small size would be an advantage.
 
^ It's designed as an interceptor with very low payload, it has no role as an a2g fighter.
 
What's the suitability/feasibility of having LCA as a sort of dedicated light ground attack craft.

I think it's small size would be an advantage.

^ It's designed as an interceptor with very low payload, it has no role as an a2g fighter.


"The Tejas is single-engined multirole fighter which features a tailless, compound delta-wing planform and is designed with "relaxed static stability" for enhanced maneuverability.
Originally intended to serve as an air superiority aircraft with a secondary "dumb bomb" ground-attack role, the flexibility of this design approach has permitted a variety of guided air-to-surface and anti-shipping weapons to be integrated for more well-rounded multirole and multimission capabilities."

IAF's original requirements in the 80's were for an interceptor.

But after maturity in the program they gained confidence to increase the requirements to a multi-role aircraft. with greater A2G and anti ship capabilites
 
^ It's designed as an interceptor with very low payload, it has no role as an a2g fighter.

May be following Photos may clear you confusion

1) Tejas with Lightning Pod

http://*****************/wp-content/uploads/defenceresearch/ada/lightening%20pod%20on%20Tejas.jpg

2) Image of Tejas carrying Bombs



3) Again LCA with bombs, Missiles and droop tanks

LCA%2Bpre%2Bflight.JPG


4) LCA and it's weapon (Include bomb)

lca-6.jpg


5) Above image at diff angle(Now also show Rocket Launcher)

hal_tejas_l8.jpg


6) LCA Dropping Iron Bomb

http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/5954/img0445756363.jpg

Ok...............................................
 
LITENING targeting pod






LITENING pod on a F/A-18




The AN/AAQ-28(V) LITENING targeting pod is a precision targeting pod system currently operational with a wide variety of combat aircraft. LITENING significantly increases the combat effectiveness of the aircraft during day, night and under-the-weather conditions in the attack of ground and air[1] targets with a variety of standoff weapons (i.e., laser guided bombs, conventional bombs and GPS-guided weapons). The system was designed in Israel
 
^ It's designed as an interceptor with very low payload, it has no role as an a2g fighter.

thats a bit of mis-conception.

LCA was never meant to be an interceptor,instead meant to be a multi-role light-combat aircraft.

Its preference for a multi-mode radar says it all.

some circles in IAF even though of getting rid of Mig-27 with LCA as replacements.

Even LCA with is current configeration is a pretty good multi-role fighter( just has to demonstrate precision guided bombing and BVRAAM) with a decent Radar and targetting pods.

While LCA-MKII will bring in more features like AESA radar(which is undergoing testing),OLS/IRST,more advanced EW suit,..... ADA is wanting to match it capabilitites to a 4.5+ gen fighter(which says it all)
 
Actually, without Russian assitance. LCA will never get to fight in the air. Right now it has no hope. :( While JF-17 numbers have increased from 150 to 200-250. Thats what you call a successful aircraft.

how much indigenous is jf_17. its also using foreign engine and other system . and a lot of work by china.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom