What's new

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions-[Thread 2]

My Avatar is for my respect to my wife who gifted me to be called SAMPURNA . A man and a father
 
PAF has 110 F-16 :o:

now thats some news ...... brrrrrrr im so afraid ..... mummy bachaao :fie:


so DSI tech master is back :haha:

:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:

Reading issues? The INFRASTRUCTURE was there to accommodate 110 f-16s, there were 70 more to come that were embargoed after pressler amendment.
 
My Avatar is for my respect to my wife who gifted me to be called SAMPURNA . A man and a father
god bless you , your child and your wife with all the best of his love and care

Reading issues? The INFRASTRUCTURE was there to accommodate 110 f-16s, there were 70 more to come that were embargoed after pressler amendment.
last i remmeber pressler amendments were imposed on you after the demise of USSR in mid 1990s so what stopped you in going for the rest 70 after your nation started working again with the USA post 9/11 :pop:
 
god bless you , your child and your wife with all the best of his love and care


last i remmeber pressler amendments were imposed on you after the demise of USSR in mid 1990s so what stopped you in going for the rest 70 after your nation started working again with the USA post 9/11 :pop:

requirement of precision bombing TTP came in just one year back and the only capable plane they could manage was F16.
 
To Superboy.

re your POST

That explains why PAF just brought second hand battered to death used F16 from the might air force of Jordan.


F-16 is a size class above JF-17. :p: It's like, why does India want Rafale when India already uses Su-30.
 
^^behold indians here comes thunderring typhoons super high sky rocketting IQ holder and champion of DSI tech :haha:
 
Superboy can you elloborate us on pros and cons on performance in both subsonic and supersonic regime of an aircraft using DSI.


DSI is 21st century technology. It's like, why do people fly Boeing 787 rather than a prop powered airliner. Same idea. :enjoy:
 
DSI is 21st century technology. It's like, why do people fly Boeing 787 rather than a prop powered airliner. Same idea. :enjoy:

Dear sir i asked the percentage of performance increase using DSI and at what speed range in jf17 and please give some elaborate and technical answer. DSI design would be done by keeping the speed variable in mind as i told you it is difficult to design it but easy to manufacture. It is not just copy the design of another plane to any another one. The amount of air flow at variable speed variable has to kept in mind.


USA (Lockhed martin ) have been working in DSI concept since 90's and Chinese were all of a sudden able to come up with a production ready DSI intake on the FC-1 in the early 2000s when no other manufacturer in the world had even attempted this. WOW is it a coincidence or some people says idea as well as design and CFD data was in some way or the other stolen by the Chinese through industrial and academic espionage at Lockheed Martin and the research labs that worked on DSI. What DSI does is to reduce the RCS as the vanes and doors of variable inlets are a source of RCS. They tend to be at angles that can reflect radar waves back to the emitter. By eliminating those variable inlets and even the splitter plate, the DSI basically reduces the RCS a bit.It also is claimed to help improve power available to the pilot in the subsonic range a bit..but its not an improvement that warranted a complete change from the conventional inlet to the new DSI inlet..otherwise we would have f-22 Raptor with DSI or certainly f-18 and other fighter manufacturer designing or working on it.

Now since it is Tejas thread...... On the Tejas, the splitter plate and the bleed channel leading onto the top of the wing near the wing root does the same job as the DSI. The method used on the Tejas is not a complicated mechanical boundary layer control method. That splitter plate doesn't move forward or backward depending on the speed and altitude of operation. It is fixed, which means that it is uncomplicated and light weight but it also means that it puts a restriction on just how fast the LCA can go- in this case the top speed being set at Mach 1.6 or 1.8 (i am not in ADA).

Some previous generation aircraft used a more complicated, and heavier system called a variable inlet- for instance the Mirage-2000 with its "mouse" cone that can move in or out of the air intake depending on speed and altitude. By moderating the size of the intake through which the air would get inside the intake, the "mouse" would control the pressure inside the air channel near the compressor. If the air velocity was too high (supersonic) the "mouse" would come out, narrowing down the air intake and that way compress the air entering the intake, and in that way increase pressure at the cost of velocity. So there were two benefits- the air pressure in the air channel was higher (a higher Coefficient of Pressure is beneficial) and the air velocity was sub-sonic. Now why is it that you need sub-sonic velocity in the channel ? Because supersonic waves would create havoc with the compressor blades due to the shock waves that are associated with them. They could cause a compressor stall.

And the reason that previous generation aircraft featured such intakes is because there was a time when Mach 2 and Mach 2+ performance was considered important. So aircraft that needed to fly that fast needed this complicated inlet system to ensure that they could safely fly to Mach 2 or beyond without the engine compressor blades stalling. Another aircraft that would illustrate the inlet and the diverter is the MiG-23. The MiG-23s had this complicated inlet geometry. This is one of the essential differences between the MiG-23 and 27 which you can verify by a simple visual comparison since the fixed inlet diverter is smaller- the variable inlet was removed on the MiG-27 and in its place a fixed inlet was put. This restricted the MiG-27's max speed to below that of the MiG-23, but since the primary job of the MiG-27 was Strike, CAS and Interdiction it's top speed was not that important.

On the Tejas, the ASR would have specified a top speed in the range of Mach 1.6-8 or so. That would've meant that if the inlet was designed well then you could get to that speed without the variable geometry, which is why they don't have a variable inlet. But the problem with the design that they chose, of an intake that is shielded by the wing is that it restricts or "jams" the airflow between the splitter plate and the wing. In this region, they created a veritable "pocket" into which the boundary layer air would get jammed. Now, you cannot have air trapped in that pocket without giving it a path to flow down or up with a channel- so the bleed channel was provided onto the top of the wing. And it turned out to be a blessing as it now directed turbulent flow onto the top of the wing and generated vortex that helped keep the air boundary layer stay attached even at high alpha angles. This concept is quite unique amongst fighters (similar things are done on leading and even trailing edges, but not near the intake) and how successful it has been can be gauged by the fact that even the newest AMCA design (whose wind-tunnel model ) had a similar bleed channel.

Hope this will clear the DSI doubt !!
 
Last edited:
Post 720 : somone predicts LCA MkII in 2020.
Post 730 : same person predicts LCA MkII in 2025.

By that logic, since we are now at post 823, Tejas MkII is due in 2070? *
And with 5 years added every ten posts until induction, ( 2018 as per its
schedule ) it will fly after the Enterprise … NCC-1701-D in 2363?

That's saaaaaaad!

;) Tay.

* 2075 in 7 answers.
 
The first flight of Tejas mk2 is said to be in 2018 my guess is after that certification of airframe and avionics will take atleast 5 years so it will be year 2023 tejas mk2 will enter the service.

20 orders for tejas of ioc standard and 20 orders for tejas of foc standards and 16 twin seater will keep the tejas line busy. Tejas program is late with its schedule but not so late may be 3-4 year late. I really hope IAF order more trainer atleast 70 and Navy 30. The twin seater version could be used for the training of the pilots for SU 30MKI where the digital cockpit of the tejas can mimic su30 MKI and will increase the TSL technical service life of MKI. The trainer version can be used for CAS operation during the war time also. It has the great potential for the LIFT. And I think they are on the correct track which I was hoping.
 
Last edited:
USA (Lockhed martin ) have been working in DSI concept since 90's and Chinese were all of a sudden able to come up with a production ready DSI intake on the FC-1 in the early 2000s when no other manufacturer in the world had even attempted this. WOW is it a coincidence or some people says idea as well as design and CFD data was in some way or the other stolen by the Chinese through industrial and academic espionage at Lockheed Martin and the research labs that worked on DSI.


The US discloses everything it does. China does not. China works on a lot of stuffs, many not even the US does, without disclosing it. :azn: DSI can't be stolen. Every DSI plane has a different DSI design. JF-17, J-10B, J-20, F-35 all have different DSI designs, none of which would work on any other plane.

The first flight of Tejas mk2 is said to be in 2018


Even if LCA mk 2 can fly in 2018, which is doubtful, induction won't be until many years later. J-10B flew in 2008 but did not enter service until 2014, that's almost SIX years. LCA mk 2 changes the entire airframe, even bigger change than J-10A to J-10B. That's going to give HAL a ton of trouble. :sick: My estimate, LCA mk 2 fly after 2020 and enter service after 2025.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom