Why India didn't go for French Or Russian Engines for LCA?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got it from the official Indian source, wikipedia, program started in 1984, isn't that 40 years +? And also wikipedia says 400 J-10s, the truth is nobody knows the exact figure but it could be more, who knows, definitely not in the dozen tho. LOL
Why India didn't go for French Or Russian Engines for LCA?
I think Vietnam should wait for made in India F-16, that will be little cheaper and battle proven. LCA is not a battle proven platform plus HAL is not producing it in large number at the moment.
But LCAs could be the best replacements for Mig-21, they are small and maneuverable. Plus no conditions attached with it. And at last these babies could cost around million 35-40 $ per jet with 4.5 gen specification i.e. MK-1A.
I think you guys can get Mk1A version which will get AESA and modern BVR-WVR with helmet mounted sight combo.
It will blend quite well with Su-s with Li-Lo deadly combo!
LCA costs around 24 million a piece. Vietnam should be interested in MK1-A which is more lethal and an apt replacement for your old machines.
You know probability? It's math.We have come a long way since then, also not a single Tejas fighter jet has been lost to an accident during its extensive flight tests during 3,000+ hours of sorties.
You know probability? It's math.
1. Vietnam tactic would be suddenly appear, hit and run. We don't give them heavy mission
2. Great support aftersale, and no condition attached is good,
3. Used F-16 cost more than 30 million, and may with condition, so this could be the candidate.
View attachment 325234
@Abingdonboy @Ankit Kumar 002 @anant_s @MilSpec @SpArK @Taygibay @zebra7 @all others
SAAB Game over in Parliament -- Official Confirmation
No Gripen or anything else ! [ In the name of co developing Tejas ]
Tejas Mark 1A
The first Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) – Tejas squadron has been formed on 1st July, 2016 with two LCA Initial Operational Configuration (IOC) Series Production Aircraft. Further, 18 more aircraft in IOC standard are planned for induction by 2018-19. This would be followed by 20 more aircraft in Final Operation Configuration (FOC) standard, which are planned for induction from year 2019.
There is no collaboration envisaged with any European Aircraft Manufacturer for development of Tejas Mark 1A.
Tejas MK1A is a 4.5 generation aircraft. There is a separate programme between Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) from Indian side and M/s Rosboronexport from the Russian side for Design and Development (D&D) of the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA).
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar in a written reply to Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh in Lok Sabha today.
****
NAMPI/RK
(Release ID :148815)
@PARIKRAMA @Abingdonboy
Also note its 20 IOC aircrafts + 20 FOC aircrafts , And then 80 MK1A Aircrafts.
Just wait a little more , the 2nd single engine contender which is creating so much pomp and show will again soon be proven wrong.Oh look, more propoganda from foreign arms manufactuerers fundamentally refuted- is anyone surprised at this poipro at how little credibility there are to those reports?
Just wait a little more , the 2nd single engine contender which is creating so much pomp and show will again soon be proven wrong.
No single engines are gonna be procured, but Super Hornet or a Russian option , IF THEY ARE SUBSTANTIALLY CHEAPER THAN RAFALE TO BE BUILT IN INDIA WITH INDUSTRIAL/TECHNOLOGICAL BENEFITS , may get a chance.
Just wait a little more , the 2nd single engine contender which is creating so much pomp and show will again soon be proven wrong.
No single engines are gonna be procured, but Super Hornet or a Russian option , IF THEY ARE SUBSTANTIALLY CHEAPER THAN RAFALE TO BE BUILT IN INDIA WITH INDUSTRIAL/TECHNOLOGICAL BENEFITS , may get a chance.
True is single engine fighter like f 16 or gripen is procured then you are killing Tejas which looks highly doubtful
so Rafale under MII in longer term, and super hornets or Russian one will be selected
At this point it is clear the most logical and simple solution is emerging as the most viable/likely outcome- no 2nd single engine fighter (for god's sake why would one be required now the LCA is in service?) and the Rafale MII.
Notice how none of the propoganda centres on a the twin-engined MII requirement as Dassualt have all but tied that up. Where is the news of the Super Hornet production line shifting to India? Is the dearth of such coverge because Dassualt are the only OEM (despite what SAB or OEM may claim) to have been allowed to progress a MII offer by the MoD?
For some reason SAAB and LM think they can arm-twist this GoI into killing off India's homegrown single engine fighter project all through the ruse of promoting "Make in India"- how ironic!
+ @Ankit Kumar 002 no new Russian jet deal is on the horizon with India beyond the FGFA. The MKI is already being produced in India in massive numbers (that will be increased yet further in the coming years) but India is more than aware of the hazards associated with dealing with the Russians and how deceptive the "cost" of their products can be.