Vertiti Scrutator
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2016
- Messages
- 163
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
"recently Rudra is not very effective" - wow an armchair specialist who wasn't there is going to tell how effective a system is HAHAHAHA!!! ... all i said that frame is not located at that base hence the Mi35. is used. Only a few no. are inducted so far and all are in the western sector, not operating in Kashmir! .. So stop being an idiot and ask why not use them. Second it isn't the worst attack. Do loss of life is regrettable and wish that the outcome was better ! STILL NO aviation Assets were even close to in danger (of which were the main target of the attackers)
What are the earlier variants of the AH-1 called??? isn't almost the same frame as the viper? U need to put ur cone of visibility to your own test !? show us how can an EO mounted very High on nose of VIPER/COBRA!! when is point down over the barrel of the canon??? and behind??? from above the cannon? will your sketch shows us that?! u know how EO works or just assuming?... u are really a total Idiot! Airforce around the world uses drones and dedicated surveillance frames ... BUT na use attack copper!!! ... lol ... funny!.
Guerrilla warfare in Kashmir.... u really an idiot to use the rudra for scouting Thank God the IA is not U when they have other assets to do surveillance
Case and point
This variant can give FAR better field of view than ANY attack copper. The IA is not the US Army to shoot first, shoot some more and then ask questions!
Please do tell why have Kiowas with over the rotor EO pod at all, was in the inventory when the Apache can do all the work??? + i have given many other examples other copper with the EO pod mounted differently why is that so???
And you sketch !!... do Tell everyone here that is a Mountain a 2 dimension object? can you so-called cone of visibility also 100% cover the entire area? or it too would have to move to over the entire mountain to cover it sufficient!y??
The Rudra/ LCH primary role anti armour/ stike and will operate in pairs or more with other frames
You indeed are such a COMPLETE IDIOT to suggest that Rudra will need another helicopter alongside that will have its EO pod pointing downwards!! Why cannot Rudra have its own EO pod oriented that way??? Morons like you (having folded and strapped up one leg), huddle with another moron doing the same and collectively think you then have two legs to walk!!!
Do you even listen to your own self??? Perhaps you should and spare the rest of the world from your stinking breath!!
There were Cobras, then SuperCobras and then Vipers. For morons like you Su-27, Su-30, Su-35 are all the same!! That's right, details don't matter to you; you just like to fling your turds in all directions!!!
In all that incoherent mouth-frothing vituperation you still haven't mentioned how a downward pointing EO pod is detrimental to anything that Rudra/LCH will be tasked with. I am saying that with downward orientation it can do all it can do (with upward pointing orientation ) and MUCH MORE!!! Don't know what your issue is?? Other than some blind faith in something illogical!
In the 'mountain' sketch I provided, a downward pointing EO pod can easily rotate to scan the entire valley - bottom and the sides of the valley (the sketch shows a cross section of the valley - I understand that low IQ folks like you might need better visual aids but I don't have much time for morons like you). The Current Rudra/LCH will just fly over and not be able to see anything in the valley. Instead of hurling all those insults why don't you illustrate how Rudra/LCH will do the job?? Oh right, in your world there will be a separate helo with downward pointing EO, that will be flying alongside Rudra/LCH - but it would a complete sin to orient the pod that way on Rudra/LCH itself.
Can you categorically state that the design of the most-used, most-successful attack helicopters like Apache, Mi-35 etc are all wrong? They were all morons to orient it that way? Would you suggest that Apache, Mi-35, Viper etc should also redo their EO pod mounts to facilitate star gazing and selfie taking?
As regards your question about Kiowas, US Army always wanted a scouting helicopter that would hide below tree line but look over it. Kiowa was not introduced into service despite having Apache - you're completely wrong!! It was introduced in the 60s way before the Apaches. Eventually the Apaches also got their own mast mounted 'on looker' (the Longbow radar). Not sure what any of it has to do with restricting the Rudra/LCH pilot's view to the possible enemy targets below?? Apache Longbow has a mast mounted FCR, and also an EO pod that's pointed downwards!!
With Rudra/LCH, the enemy will simply have to hide behind a boulder or inside a ditch and the helo could approach it from miles away, fly over the target and miss seeing the target completely. The enemy can make use of this weakness immensely!!! It is complete nonsense that targets should always be acquired via drones or satellites. Attack helicopters actively seek out targets and attack.
Last edited: