What's new

Hafeez Sayeed praises congress and Bharka Dutt

May be her utility is over ; that is what is done to useless agents ; they are exposed

Their cover is blown

But this goes deeper. This is akin to a public execution. This (if true) is not as benign as letting go of an asset past its sell by date. This is a Mafia style execution.
 
But this goes deeper. This is akin to a public execution. This (if true) is not as benign as letting go of an asset past its sell by date. This is a Mafia style execution.

well, she does support terrorists.
Dumb terrorists threw her under the bus. That's what these guys do.
 
she should not have reacted at all... or said something funny... its not her fault that hafiz sayeed find congress and barkha reasonable..
there was no need to establish patriotic credential, you can never convince the nationalists.. and you look like dumb among liberals...
 
she should not have reacted at all... or said something funny... its not her fault that hafiz sayeed find congress and barkha reasonable..
there was no need to establish patriotic credential, you can never convince the nationalists.. and you look like dumb among liberals...

It's too late for Burkha...
She has lost her credibility completely.
 
It's too late for Burkha...
She has lost her credibility completely.
to nationalists... why is why she need not respond to hafeez sayeed.. its not as if nationalists will read her post and say.. 'no she has different way of seeing things but she means good for her country, obviously'..... it will be same. 'secret pakistani loving traitor ISI woman.. kill her'..... :)
 
to nationalists... why is why she need not respond to hafeez sayeed.. its not as if nationalists will read her post and say.. 'no she has different way of seeing things but she means good for her country, obviously'..... it will be same. 'secret pakistani loving traitor ISI woman.. kill her'..... :)

It's not just nationalists alone who are against Burkha and her gang.

I think this is where She and her ilk are getting the narrative wrong, in trying to club average Indian as nationalist and try to twist that word as a abuse.

With SM, the average person is able to get first hand information and discern on their own the truth. The relevancy of news channels is now more to do with the so called debates or getting opinions on news than the news itself.
Most people even before these channels know the news and any related information on it.

In this scenario the likes of Burkha has been found out completely. Remember Rajdeep US fiasco where he claimed some BJP Bkaht attacked him? In few hours the full video came out where Rajdeep could be seen attacking the guy first.

Similarly for every visit to Kanhayya's parents or Wani's father, the average Indian is yet to see Burkha and her ilk going to parents/children of Pandits, Police or Military who were brutally killed by the militants.

The hypocrisy charge is of their own making. Let's not attribute Burkha and her ilk's troubles to anyone else. They earned them over the years.
 
There is nothing like nationalists.
I think this is where She and her ilk are getting the narrative wrong.

With SM, the average person is able to get first hand information and discern on their own the truth. The relevancy of news channels is now more to do with the so called debates or getting opinions on news than the news itself.
Most people even before these channels know the news and any related information on it.

In this scenario the likes of Burkha has been found out completely. Remember Rajdeep US fiasco where he claimed some BJP Bkaht attacked him? In few hours the full video came out where Rajdeep could be seen attacking the guy first.

Similarly for every visit to Kanhayya's parents or Wani's father, the average Indian is yet to see Burkha and her ilk going to parents/children of Pandits, Police or Military who were brutally killed by the militants.

The hypocrisy charge is of their own making. Let's not attribute Burkha and her ilk's troubles to anyone else. They earned them over the years.
that still does not make her a pakistan loving ISI woman... who deserves death.. you will be surprised how many nationalists seriously believe that ...
she has a specific political view.. which influences her action... a right wing news anchor will probably be opposite... I will be very surprised if a right wing media goes to srinagar and interviews those injured in violence... and is actually sympathetic to them..
this is why we should watch multiple channels... including social media...

getting to know the truth is hard.. and there is a recent study that shows unfortunately people hold onto their own biased views if exposed to more data(by cherrypicking those that supports their ealier views)
 
that still does not make her a pakistan loving ISI woman... who deserves death.. you will be surprised how many nationalists seriously believe that ...
she has a specific political view.. which influences her action... a right wing news anchor will probably be opposite... I will be very surprised if a right wing media goes to srinagar and interviews those injured in violence...
this is why we should watch multiple channels... including social media... getting to know the truth is hard.. and there is a recent study that shows unfortunately people hold onto their own biased views if exposed to more data(by cherrypicking those that supports their ealier views)

There are extreme views on all sides.
You should ask some of the sickulars here about Arnab, you will get the same horrible views you are describing.

And no, there is no hiding for Burkha under the garb of political view.
When it's soldiers dying to protect your country and you peddle the narrative of a terrorist, it's NOT a political view.
When you prop up Kanhayya who openly belittles sacrifices of soldiers, that is NOT a political view.

I am surprised you can't differentiate between a political view and personal agenda!!
 
There are extreme views on all sides.
You should ask some of the sickulars here about Arnab, you will get the same horrible views you are describing.

And no, there is no hiding for Burkha under the garb of political view.
When it's soldiers dying to protect your country and you peddle the narrative of a terrorist, it's NOT a political view.
When you prop up Kanhayya who openly belittles sacrifices of soldiers, that is NOT a political view.

I am surprised you can't differentiate between a political view and personal agenda!!
soldiers and women are easy shields people use when to further their own agenda...

there is nothing wrong in investigating and not taking army's version as the whole truth... what exactly narrative of terrorist that she is spreading... that kashmiris pick up guns due to army's atrocities and their willingness to fight for independence using arms? everybody knows that.... some can accept and some cant.

We Indians completely remove any sense of logic and reason.. and go into sunny deol's 'no iff no butt' mode as soon as it is about army... I have seen it played out when they were demanding one rank one pay.... (and my god army men can appeal to emotions so effectively... )... how can you oppose <insert whatever sh*t army men say>', anybody who says that is a traitor... because they stand guard on border...

about kanhaya... a good portion of political class comes from mass agitation and student politics... challenging writ of the govt is part of the process.. george fernandes was arrested for conspiring to blow up railways... this is good and it gives vibrancy to out democracy.. I dont agree with kanhaya about everything he says but we need fresh blood...
 
Back
Top Bottom