It is not about supporting corrupt government as it is about supporting stability.
Of course, you already implied without hearing my side of story so i take it anything i say is likely to fall on deaf ears i presume.
Personal tactics is only your hope since that tactics you are employing boils down to the similar reasons for repeatedly u-turns which you guys turn to PMLN as comparison analysis last resort in order to evade the topic which is clearly the case here.
Because of Establishment, Bhutto became icon, legacy for the future generation of Bhutto, hence Benazir.
Zardari came to the powers through the deals with Musharraf for his exit-strategy which leaves much interpretation wide open in regards to suspicious timing of the murder of Benazir Bhutto.
Yes, thanks to PMLN. PMLN has huge history of launching military operation against MQM, and it was not coincident why recent military operation launched under PMLN with the cooperation of General Raheel sealed the fate of MQM.
Bear in mind that MQM was also dying in late 90s at the hand of PMLN until Musharraf's illegaly takeover revived MQM and allowed Karachi to progress in ruins.
Nawaz Sharif is democratically elected government. Meaning people chose him. And people chose him three times despite the presence of the establishment. Whereas for the establishment, they are dictators that imposed the authority many times against the wills of people.
Do you understand the different between dictatorship and democracy? The establishment is anti-democracy, not democratically elected government that is counting on the public votes for the next election as well.
Except everything that happened to Pakistan because of the establishment. The establishment took the control from the beginning, defamed the sister of the founder of Pakistan, hanged Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto to death, launched Blasphemy law, intervened and interrupted the process of democracy repeatedly including the recent year of 2014 that forced power-sharing agreement upon the democratically elected government against his wills.
Even today, the establishment controls the foreign policy. Because of the establishment, the democracy couldn't enjoy its stability and you complain why the democracy is unstable.
Pay attention to the quote. I feel like i might be debating with the clueless member. No offense.
Nawaz Sharif, Afghan Taliban, Blasphemy Law, MQM are the product of the establishment. It has always been that way and judging by recent events, it will remain the same judging by the forced power-sharing agreement against the wills of democratically elected government.
Such as? It would be nice to have examples. Lately, there has been false news based on the rumors.