When you accept something about you its no more revelations it becomes a fact of ur life .When u accept it then its logical u have to prove how you got it its not a rocket science .Burden of proof was on sharifs since they accept it as per whole bench asked them to present that why Qatri letter came its not IK or sheikh rasheed have to prove thats why sharifs r in hot water not providing any trail all they showed Qatri letter which 180 degree opposite what they claimed in parliment .
It is obvious that you cannot understand different between revelation and evidence. Evidence is not what you or i believe in, rather what you or i can prove it.
Panama leaks is revelation without evidence. If i print out leaks containing your name in the list, should that satisfy to account you based on the name in the leaks that cannot be verified on the court meaning i don't show up in court to vouch for my list with evidence to back with?
Panama leaks can be evidence only if those who leaked the panama leaks backs with the evidence. Until it is backed with evidence, it is considered leak at best which is deemed as weak in the eyes of the court. Those who posted the leaks cannot even show up in the court never mind bringing the evidence.
Imran Khan is using other trick which i believe you posted earlier in regards to getting the PMLN to prove innocent to clear the confusion,...etc, but that alone means Imran Khan has no evidence, hence using this tactics to win the case is the only way he can. Otherwise, PMLN would have been arrested or jailed by now, or better yet, resigned from the PM.
But we shall wait to find out more information in the on-going court. Although i am less optimistic given the case is riding on PMLN to prove their innocent which boils down only to PMLN now.
