Global Firepower - 2014 Ranks

[Commander T]

Thats right .That is the reasons for some countries considerably invested in CBG groups.Now only US have that capability.Within few years you can see China capability in that.At present case China also cant attack EU.Russia dont need navy .They can use their army.India may have 5CBG in around in 2035.But we strictly follow NAM.So it will stay in Indian Ocean



For fighting a long time war you need a strong economy.Italy's economy is strong and they dont run their economy through IMF or aid.I dont know about Pakistan.Technology also play a role in that.Well then you can imagine the outcome

you know kid either you are a genius or you need to improve your english

 

[jarves]

you know kid either you are a genius or you need to improve your english

The english he is writing is thousand times better than what most of the Chinese post here and is easily understandable.

 

[SrNair]

you know kid either you are a genius or you need to improve your english

Cant argue with facts.I understand your problem.My english is not that better But other peoples here can understand it .So I dont need your certificate.

 

[Neptune]

Thats right .That is the reasons for some countries considerably invested in CBG groups.Now only US have that capability.Within few years you can see China capability in that.At present case China also cant attack EU.Russia dont need navy .They can use their army.India may have 5CBG in around in 2035.But we strictly follow NAM.So it will stay in Indian Ocean



For fighting a long time war you need a strong economy.Italy's economy is strong and they dont run their economy through IMF or aid.I dont know about Pakistan.Technology also play a role in that.Well then you can imagine the outcome

5 cbgs? that's pretty good of Indian Navy. I do really like the Indian Navy. But only 3 things you guys lack I believe. 1- Medium utility helicopters (SeaKings are aged and Dhruv is light), 2- Tactical equipment of MARCOS needs to be upgraded not weapons wise. And last but not least for me... Please make shaving mandatory for all personnel bro

back to my questions, whats the formation of a CBG in IN doctrines, And what type of CV/CVNs will IN aquire/build?

 

[SrNair]

5 cbgs? that's pretty good of Indian Navy. I do really like the Indian Navy. But only 3 things you guys lack I believe. 1- Medium utility helicopters (SeaKings are aged and Dhruv is light), 2- Tactical equipment of MARCOS needs to be upgraded not weapons wise. And last but not least for me... Please make shaving mandatory for all personnel bro

back to my questions, whats the formation of a CBG in IN doctrines, And what type of CV/CVNs will IN aquire/build?

You are right.I think Medium utility helicopters is still design stage.I dont know whether MoD purchase systems from other countries.Seems they dont do that.No we cant enforce people from some community.

Indian carrier battle groups[edit]


A flotilla from the Indian Navy's Western Fleet escorts the aircraft carriers INS Viraatand INS Vikramaditya through the Arabian Sea in 2014.
The Indian Navy has been operating carrier battle groups since 1960s, with its first carrier battle group formed around the now decommissioned INS Vikrant.[4] As of 2014, the Indian Navy operates two carrier battle groups, one centered around INS Viraat and the other around INS Vikramaditya. Viraat is an updated Centaur-class light carrier originally built for the Royal Navy as HMS Hermes, which was laid down in 1944 and commissioned in 1959. It was purchased by India in 1986, and is expected to be decommissioned by 2020. India commissioned INS Vikramaditya in 2013 and will follow this with a third carrier, the new INS Vikrant in 2020. Whilst INSVikramaditya is a former Soviet Kiev-class aircraft carrier, the Admiral Gorshkov, INS Vikrant will be the first indigenous Indian aircraft carrier. India eventually will have three carrier battle groups by 2020, each centered around Vikrant, Vikramaditya and Vishal, the second Vikrant-class aircraft carrier.[5][6]

The Indian Navy's carrier battle group centered around Viraat consists of two destroyers, usually of the Delhi class (previously Rajputswere used), two or more frigates, usually of the Brahmaputra, Govavari or Nilgiri classes, and one support ship.[7][8]

The navy's new carrier battle group centered around Vikramaditya consists of the modern Kolkata class destroyers, Shivalik and Talwar-class frigates and new tankers.[7][8]

Carrier battle group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And it is may change in the future due to the purchasing of Arihant class nuclear submarine.

Vikrant-class aircraft carrier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here in this INS vishal is too advanced and may use nuclear propulsion and EMALS.

And follow on ACC larger than INS Vishal also planned.

 

[WAR-rior]

I do not think Pakistan is placed in the right spot

Any justification for your claim?

 

[Reviewer21]

sorry i cannot.....

Okay if we exclude Nuclear weapons, then?

 

[jarves]

Okay if we exclude Nuclear weapons, then?

He alreay knows that the list has been made without taking into account nuclear weapons.

 

[Reviewer21]

Cant argue with facts.I understand your problem.My english is not that better But other peoples here can understand it .So I dont need your certificate.

@sreekumar LOL either this guy don't understand english or is making excuses.

 

[GorkhaPride]

Afghanistan stronger then Nepal and Sri Lanka?

 

[Commander T]

Okay if we exclude Nuclear weapons, then?

look buddy, i am ranking pakistan above italy as if there is no alliance of italy neither of pakistan......and in idiviual capacity pakistan is more likely to survive a war or in case of direct war with no external support on either side pakistan is more liklely to win due to different factor because war is not just about how many weapons you do have......considering only weapon factor is just like LAB EXPERIMENT which is quite different from real world happenings.......and when you consider a global millitary ranking then you are actually talking about how likely is for a country to survive or win a war.....so in that case this ranking is strange..... winning or surviving a war is completly a different thing.....even if we just consider how many weapons a country has the just imagin that according to this ranking egypt has more weapons than canada ...lolx...this ranking has been made on account of how many weapons one country does have.....it,s strange....

 

[SrNair]

@sreekumar LOL either this guy don't understand english or is making excuses.

That guy cant argue with me.I can submit various facts.I know this game.

 

[TOPGUN]

Any justification for your claim?

I don't have to you give you any justification for any claim, Egypt is no where more powerful then Pakistan anyhow they whole list is not as correct it should be.

 

[waz]

There are nations on there with zero or a very limited strategic long range strike ability i.e. striking from a distance without putting your own forces at risk (ballistic missiles, cruise missiles). Even without the nuclear option the list is highly inaccurate, considering they are talking about "firepower".

 

[IndoUS]

People actually take this list seriously, there are so many inaccuracies in this list.