What's new

Ghaher 313 fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iran should stick to the F-14. we should donate some spare parts and become friends :usflag:
you don't have any spare to donate . by the way you still owe us a brand new f-14a.
 
. .
what you mean we don't got any spare parts?
we'll give you F-14D instead
you don't have a functional f-14d and no we like f-14a ,it fly faster it fly higher. And its strange ,you didn't knew that after retiring f14 from your navy because you feared those spare fell in the hand of Iran you destroyed all the remaining f14 and all the spare you had even when Taiwan asked you to sell those plane and spare to them you refused .
 
.
you don't have a functional f-14d and no we like f-14a ,it fly faster it fly higher. And its strange ,you didn't knew that after retiring f14 from your navy because you feared those spare fell in the hand of Iran you destroyed all the remaining f14 and all the spare you had even when Taiwan asked you to sell those plane and spare to them you refused .

meh I thought we mothballed them or something
if Taiwan asked for them we only didn't give them it was because of China crying I bet :agree:
we should of gave them the blue prints and have them build them China style :enjoy:
 
.
:omghaha:

Q-313-4-460x320.jpg

For a second think that a country like Iran which possess a variety of fighters from both eastern and western blocks and enjoys a decent demmostic military industry can not notice what you pictured but you can ? it was just a mock-up planned for several years later , one day you'll be ashamed of urselves.
 
.
Some claim that the Shafaq was also a mockup
"In 2013, Iranian Internet users published pictures of a poster they spotted at defense expo. The poster described the efforts of personnel working in the mock-up shop at Malek Ashtar University—and included images of what appeared to be the full-scale, wooden Shafagh model under construction."
Alrighty dummy , every single fighter jet in the world passes the point when there is a need of building down-scaled or/and real scale mock-ups made of any material that is intended by the engineers and experts and scientists of the program .

of course most of the posters here don't know this cause their country didn't build any :(

here is a wooden mock-up of Canadian :lol: F-35 :lol: :lol:

800px-Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_mock-up_04.JPG


@Oscar and here is its fiber glass , cockpit of a joke which is built in the exact same way that qaher's mock-up was built :lol:

u didnt start to laugh at this did u ?

1280px-Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_mock-up_instrument_panel.JPG


f35-cockpit3.jpg


:-)

@Penguin

but when it comes to iran - the only muslim country which is actually doing some shyte worth being jealous of - u get all crazy and feel a sudden bowel movement forcing u to post 75 pages of none-sense SHIT and continue posting it ..... .

fact is : that we dont get a licence to build a chinese fighter and claim its "iranian" .

fact is : that we have more fighter projects going on than the whole military projects (all together) in the region (which is worth mentioning)

future fighters : Azarakhsh , saeghe (latest gen.) , Shafagh , kowsar88 , Gaher , .....

so who knows ? maybe one day this "Mock-up" pulls 12Gs while performing CAP over your sorry tushies? ;)

15~43.jpg


16~40.jpg


a pic of Shafagh's cockpit published a couple of days ago by TV :

vlcsnap-2014-08-29-12h40m47s53.jpg


its really interesting for me that people who spend the most time mocking such a project are the same people who's country is a scene of USAF parade of drones and fighters :lol::lol::lol:

the jokes on them isn't it ? :rolleyes:

laugh all u want if its of any conciliation to your pains :-)

after 75 pages u r posting the same shit all over - for an smart observer that says a freaking lot .

just in the past couple of days , we had BAVAR-373 unveiled , a couple of cruise missiles , a couple of drones , kowsar88 , PANHA's latest helo , SAYAD missiles capable of tracking BMs , J-90 turofan engine , RD-33 engine (RE) , ............

i wont get into the question "what in the shit ur country has done that u r laughing at iran ? " cause that would be a laughable comparison :-)


PEACE !! :bunny:

@Serpentine @kollang @SOHEIL @Gilamard @Ostad @rahi2357 @raptor22 @jack 86000 @hossein9 @New

@iranigirl2 @ResurgentIran

lets laugh together guys :enjoy:
 
Last edited:
.
Alrighty dummy , every single fighter jet in the world passes the point when there is a need of building down-scaled or/and real scale mock-ups made of any material that is intended by the engineers and experts and scientists of the program .

here is a wooden mock-up of Canadian :lol: F-35 :lol: :lol:

800px-Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_mock-up_04.JPG


@Oscar and here is its fiber glass , cockpit of a joke which is built in the exact same way that qaher's mock-up was built :lol:

u didnt start to laugh at this did u ?

1280px-Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_mock-up_instrument_panel.JPG


f35-cockpit3.jpg


:-)

@Penguin

but when it comes to iran - the only muslim country which is actually doing some shyte worth being jealous of - u get all crazy and feel a sudden bowel movement forcing u to post 75 pages of none-sense SHIT and continue posting it ..... .

fact is : that we dont get a licence to build a chinese fighter and claim its "iranian" .

fact is : that we have more fighter projects going on than the whole military projects (all together) in the region (which is worth mentioning)

future fighters : Azarakhsh , saeghe (latest gen.) , Shafagh , kowsar88 , Gaher , .....

so who knows ? maybe one day this "Mock-up" pulls 12Gs while performing CAP over your sorry tushies? ;)

15~43.jpg


16~40.jpg


a pic of Shafagh's cockpit published a couple of days ago by TV :

vlcsnap-2014-08-29-12h40m47s53.jpg


its really interesting for me that people who spend the most time mocking such a project are the same people who's country is a scene of USAF parade of drones and fighters :lol::lol::lol:

the jokes on them isn't it ? :rolleyes:


laugh all u want if its of any conciliation to your pains :-)

after 75 pages u r posting the same shit all over - for an smart observer that says a freaking lot .

just in the past couple of days , we had BAVAR-373 unveiled , a couple of cruise missiles , a couple of drones , kowsar88 , PANHA's latest helo , SAYAD missiles capable of tracking BMs , J-90 turofan engine , RD-33 engine (RE) , ............

i wont get into the question "what in the shit ur country has done that u r laughing at iran ? " cause that would be a laughable comparison :-)


PEACE !! :bunny:

@Serpentine @kollang @SOHEIL @Gilamard @Ostad @rahi2357 @raptor22 @jack 86000 @hossein9 @New

@iranigirl2 @ResurgentIran

lets laugh together guys :enjoy:
:tup:
 
.
meh I thought we mothballed them or something
if Taiwan asked for them we only didn't give them it was because of China crying I bet :agree:
we should of gave them the blue prints and have them build them China style :enjoy:

they were mothballed, then they discovered ppl trying to sell(illegally) parts to (probably)iran and decided to shred the rest.

and the ROC wouldnt want the f-14(unless maybe free) they are far more interested in upgraded or new f-16s. and im not sure what you mean by "build them China style", u mean large quantities? cause the ROC is no PRC, its manufacturing sector is no where near as large, nor do they have the cash to do this.

Now,you are trolling....
I don't know whats your problem with, Qaher?its's aerodynamic shape?then I should tell you that it's RC model DID Fly!that indicates that there is nothing wrong with its unusual shape.

Your problem is with its cockpit?then I should tell you that this was only a mock up and not a functional bird as it was admitted before.Qaher will have a cockpit similar to that of kowsar88 training jet which was unveilied several days ago .

I will report your post to weby if you go on with trollish words like "laughing stock".
.....................
Shafagh project is not stopped.

fyi, shape really has nothing to do with anything when talking about model airplanes, put enough power behind it and any shape can fly. this is much easier to do of course with foam models than metal and composite jets flying at mach speeds, the fact that a model flew does not tell us much, because we dont know how they built the model or anything else.

the cockpit, even for a mock up is pretty terrible
this is a f-35 mockup
Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_mock-up_instrument_panel.JPG

notice that everything is the right size, and no silly indicators limited to propeller plane speeds or other commercial equipment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SQ8
.
That thing doesn't fly.that moves on the surface.

Qaher RC was able to fly.so does its real-size model.thats it.intake size depends on engine type.how do you know Qaher's intakes are not suitable?do you have any fact to support your childish claim?weapon bay is placed at the button of the plane and that is enough space to load six R-73 missile(or two 2000 pound bomb).very identical to that of F-35.I didnt say Qaher' cockpit will be the same.It will be as modern as that of Kowsar88.

Basic physics will support that claim. Its called fluid dynamics.. Those intakes will take in less and less air(as if they are not tiny enough) as the angle of attack increases till they can no longer provide sufficient air for the engine which will flame out. So essentially , unless Iran wants a fighter that can only fly like a airliner(much more limited in certain regimes than that).

And enough space to load what!!?? :o:
Where will the engine go then? Do you even have an idea of size?

I mean there is patriotism to try and defend something but you guys sound worse than this fellow
baghdad-bob-no-infidels.jpg
 
. .
alpha angle is specially important during landing and >10G maneuvers like cobra maneuver , For Fvcks sake Gaher is a low-alt bomber not an Air-superiority fighter jet :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

that being said , iranian engineers managed to increase the alpha angle (angle of attack - AOA or
bccfc7022dfb945174d9bcebad2297bb.png
) of ghaher to 50 degrees . enough to engage any intercepting aircraft and to land in any situation performing desired maneuvers .

sorry to burst ur bubble buddy , but we are not kids here and everybody knows WTF AOA means :lol: . the jokes on google . LMAO

305px-Angle_of_attack.svg.png


D100_Feature_AOA_clip_image004.gif
 
. .
^^ as expected : OFF-TOPIC SHyT

what in the effing rat's *%*& these pics have to do with this topic ? delusional/confused and butt-hurt ?

such a funny combination ....
 
Last edited:
.
All F-14s (outside of Iran) have been scrapped.

The official final flight retirement ceremony was on 22 September 2006 at Naval Air Station Oceana, and was flown by Lt. Cmdr. Chris Richard and Lt. Mike Petronis as RIO in a backup F-14 after the primary aircraft experienced mechanical problems.[52][53] The actual last flight of an F-14 in U.S. service took place 4 October 2006, when an F-14D of VF-31 was ferried from NAS Oceana to Republic Airport on Long Island, New York.[53] The remaining intact F-14 aircraft in the U.S. were flown to and stored at the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group "Boneyard", at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona; as of 2007 the aircraft were to be shredded to prevent any components from being acquired by Iran.[54] In August 2009, the 309th AMARG announced that the last of the F-14's planned for scrapping were taking to HVF West, Tucson, Arizona for shredding. At that time only 11 F-14's remained in desert storage.[55]
Iran[edit]
Grumman F-14 Tomcat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Current Inventory Information: Friday August 15, 2014
Grumman F-14 Tomcat: 10 aircraft
F-14A version > 4
F-14B version > 2
F-14D version > 3
NF-14A version > 1
www.amarcexperience.com

^^ as expected : OFF-TOPIC SHyT

what in the effing rat's poop these pics have to do with this topic ? delusional/confused and butt-hurt ?

such a funny combination ....
Uhm, no, not off topic at all rating that the cockpit of said aircraft cannot hold a pilot, with comparative material. Please mind your language to avoid setting a bad example.
 
.
Uhm, no, not off topic at all rating that the cockpit of said aircraft cannot hold a pilot,
that makes it trolling then , since the cockpit of the "said aircraft" is a mock-up , not a real cockpit .

besides the fact that u have spewed this "fact" of yours in the past 75 pages or so
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom