What's new

Ghaher 313 fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.
0b03590bb898.jpg


45db0c184c94.jpg
 
. .
Wow! You guys are using civilian jet engines.

well , we learned it from you after all RQ-170 Use the same General Electric TF34 engine you used in this civilian beauties

800px-Viking_S-3B.jpg


800px-A-10_Thunderbolt_II_In-flight-2.jpg


an before you talk about that you used two engine and we are using one just remember your airplanes are at least 3 -4 time heavier than Ghaher .
 
.
well , we learned it from you after all RQ-170 Use the same General Electric TF34 engine you used in this civilian beauties

800px-Viking_S-3B.jpg


800px-A-10_Thunderbolt_II_In-flight-2.jpg


an before you talk about that you used two engine and we are using one just remember your airplanes are at least 3 -4 time heavier than Ghaher .
Wrong! The most likely engine is called the fj44 engine. They used this engine in the P-175 polecat, the Rq-3 Dark star, and unbuilt tier III or tier II programs, so why not the RQ? The TF-34 just doesn't fit the aircraft's dimensions.

http://aviationintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/lockheed_boeing_RQ-3A_darkstar_02-1.jpg
lockheed_boeing_RQ-3A_darkstar_02-1.jpg
 
.
Wrong! The most likely engine is called the fj44 engine. They used this engine in the P-175 polecat, the Rq-3 Dark star, and unbuilt tier III or tier II programs, so why not the RQ? The TF-34 just doesn't fit the aircraft's dimensions.

http://aviationintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/lockheed_boeing_RQ-3A_darkstar_02-1.jpg
lockheed_boeing_RQ-3A_darkstar_02-1.jpg

I didn't designed RQ-170 so I can't answer that but still the fact remain according to these and many other sources around the net RQ-170 must likely use TF-34 engine
Fulghum, David A.; Bill Sweetman (14 December 2009). "Stealth over Afghanistan". Aviation Week (McGraw-Hill): 26–27.
RQ-170 Sentinel Unmanned Aerial Vehicle - Airforce Technology



well I knew the engine is still classified for RQ-170 (Don't knew why as the plane itself totally get compromised in worst possible sort ) but if you have any source about that that FJ-44 claims I like to see it .
 
.
I didn't designed RQ-170 so I can't answer that but still the fact remain according to these and many other sources around the net RQ-170 must likely use TF-34 engine

RQ-170 Sentinel Unmanned Aerial Vehicle - Airforce Technology



well I knew the engine is still classified for RQ-170 (Don't knew why as the plane itself totally get compromised in worst possible sort ) but if you have any source about that that FJ-44 claims I like to see it .
I know I don't have any source but it is the most probable engine. I don't know why would the skunkworks team would put a fighter aircraft engine in a rapidly developed airframe whose point was to be cheap, it just doesn't make any sense. The dimensions of the TF-34 just doesn't add up either. Skunkworks uses the fj44 engine in the PHAE (Penetrating High Altitude Endurance) vehicle. You can read here my friend. :enjoy:

Tajn americk bezpilotn prieskumn lietadl kategrie stealth

What someone here said was true. People underestimate the civilian industry.
 
.
An interesting design. Looks to have been inspired from combination of Black Widow and F-35.
 
. .
I know I don't have any source but it is the most probable engine. I don't know why would the skunkworks team would put a fighter aircraft engine in a rapidly developed airframe whose point was to be cheap, it just doesn't make any sense. The dimensions of the TF-34 just doesn't add up either. Skunkworks uses the fj44 engine in the PHAE (Penetrating High Altitude Endurance) vehicle. You can read here my friend. :enjoy:

Tajn americk bezpilotn prieskumn lietadl kategrie stealth

What someone here said was true. People underestimate the civilian industry.

well ,still there is one problem . using FJ-44 won't make any sense tome , we don't have any sample of it if we let this RQ-170 aside on other hand we have many of J-85 engines which provide comparable or even better power that we knew and maintained for last 35 year . why not using a J-85 instead of FJ-44


By the way another Suggestion of the Engine for this plane that I encountered over the net is Garrett TFE731 and I think that may be more plausible as for Example Garrett TFE731-60 or Garrett TFE731-50 have a Diameter of only 70m and a thrust of around 20kn-21kn . which is more comparable with the need of a plane this size

by the way previously military airplanes like FMA IA 63 Pampa or Aero L-39 Albatros or Hongdu JL-8 or AIDC AT-3 or CASA C-101 have used some variant of Garrett TFE731


On Other hand FJ-44 provide 10kn which I doubt if it's enough for a single engine to be feasible for this plane specially if you look Polecat had two of these engines but they went with one engine for RQ-170 so they needed approximately twice the power so I guess it's the reason they changed the engine for RQ-170
 
.
i think it would be at lease 5 years before we see real size air craft flying
 
.
I think that Iran usually after 5-10 years after compeleting its basic military projects unveils them . just like azarakhsh and saegheh fighter jets which 10 years later unveiled them.
 
.
I'm an idiot when it comes to military hardware but I must say the craft looks absolutely dashing!
 
. .
When will ghaher313 be ready???
LOL, it is already ready based on Iranian officials quotes. They still claim that they showed a real fighter flying in their so called unveiling ceremony of Qaher-313. But, in fact, it is another fake mullah mock up, that's not gonna be used in the next 1000 yeras.
 
.
LOL, it is already ready based on Iranian officials quotes. They still claim that they showed a real fighter flying in their so called unveiling ceremony of Qaher-313. But, in fact, it is another fake mullah mock up, that's not gonna be used in the next 1000 yeras.


It will be a first jet which will melt down from its own burn....

Chicken getting ready to be roasted...
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom