What's new

Future of moodI jee,s air shakti & its effects on PAF !

Status
Not open for further replies.
@WebMaster @Oscar

same news,different thread,again.. :tsk::tsk:

Please merge it.
My thread is running with a different angle , & its been started way before !
So chill out , enjoy the good day the best ever strategic decesion of moodi jee ?lolzz
 
. .
Indian Navy's Air wing is capable of taking care of entire PAF. So no need to Cheer for Pakistanis.
Don't worry soon , it will be flying with world war 2 era mustangs , moodi jee like that ?
 
.
Dawn News
  • HOME
    Modi pushes 'obsolete' made-in-India plane on reluctant military Dawn PUBLISHED ABOUT 10 HOURS AGO
    • NEW DELHI: India's government has turned down its military's request to expand the acquisition of 36 fighter planes from Dassault Aviation SA to plug vital gaps, officials said, nudging it to accept an indigenous combat plane 32 years in the making.

      Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision, in line with his Make-in-India policy to encourage domestic industry, is a blow for not only the French manufacturer but also others circling over the Indian military aviation market worth billions of dollars.

      The push for India's struggling Tejas light combat aircraft (LCA) also comes at a time when the Indian Air Force (IAF) is at its weakest operational strength since the 1962 war against China, which is causing anxiety within military circles.

      Since it took over last year, the Modi administration has repeatedly said its overriding goal is to cut off the military's addiction to foreign arms which has made it the world's top importer.

      The air force wanted the government to clear an additional 44 Rafale medium multirole aircraft on top of the 36 that Modi announced during a visit to Paris this year that are to be bought off-the-shelf to meet its urgent requirements.

      Read: Rafale fighter jets deal between India and France in jeopardy

      But a defense ministry official said that Indian Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar had told the Indian air force that there weren't enough funds to expand the Rafale acquisition and that it must induct an improved version of the indigenous Tejas-Mark 1A.

      "The IAF (air force) needs to have a minimum number of aircraft at all times. The LCA is our best option at this stage, given our resource constraints," the defense official said.

      "The Rafale is our most expensive acquisition. The LCA is our cheapest in the combat category."

      India's air force says its requires 45 fighter squadrons to counter a "two-front collusive threat" from Pakistan and China. But it only has 35 active fighter squadrons, parliament's defense committee said in a report in April citing a presentation by a top air force officer.

      With the drawdown of Soviet-era MiG 21 planes under way, the air force would be down to 25 squadrons by 2022 at the current pace of acquisitions, it told the committee.

      Cleared by the government in 1983, the LCA designed by the government's Defense Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) was meant to be the backbone of the air force due for induction in 1994.

      Instead, it suffered years of delay and chaos with scientists trying to build the world's most modern light combat aircraft from scratch, including the engine.

      Eventually they scrapped the engine, turning to GE Aviation and lowering their ambitions for a state-of-the-art fighter. So far, only one aircraft has been produced and even that is awaiting final operational clearance, now delayed to early 2016.

      "In January this year, they had given one LCA ... which had not completed its flight testing. They handed over the papers to us. We do not make a squadron with one aeroplane. That is where we are," said an air force officer speaking on condition of anonymity.

      Safety concerns
      An independent investigation by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India into the LCA program identified 53 "shortfalls" in the plane. In a report in May, the auditor said that the plane wasn't as light as promised, the fuel capacity and speed were lower than required and there were concerns about safety.

      Retired Air Marshal M. Matheswaran, a former deputy chief of the Integrated Defense Staff, said the LCA was obsolete.

      "It is a very short-range aircraft which has no relevance in today's war fighting scenarios. If you are trying to justify this as a replacement for follow-on Rafales, you are comparing apples with oranges."

      He said the plane was at best a technology demonstrator on which Indian engineers could build the next series of aircraft, not something the air force could win a war with.

      "We would like to have the MMRCA (Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft) variety of aircraft. At least about six squadrons, to my mind," the head of the air force, Arup Raha, said at the weekend, referring to the Rafale class of fighters.

      But K. Tamilmani, the DRDO's aerospace chief, said the modified version of the Tejas addressed most of the Indian air force concerns. These included electronic warfare system, flight computer, radar and maintenance problems.

      "Almost all the problems get solved with the 1A. There will always be scope for improvement, but there are no flight safety issues," he said.

      State-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited would be able to ramp production to 16 a year by 2017 to meet the air force's demands, he said.

      "We Indians are extremely good at blaming each other - at blaming it all on Indian production."

      Dassault declined any comment on the government's decision to cap the Rafale fleet.

      A source close to Sweden's Saab, which has been pushing its Gripen light fighter, said that it was respectful of India's decision to try to develop its domestic military base.

      "There's still a huge gap that needs to be filled. We are marketing it (the Gripen) under the Make-in-India umbrella," he said. "Even if you add the seven squadrons of the Tejas, there is still a requirement (with MiGs retiring etc). It’s a question of timing. Can they build these for when they need them?"

      with that mind set where indian air force is going from now onwards ?
    • & what will be its implications on PAF ?
This is nothing to do with PAF. The true motive of this is to force Indian Government to release more funds.
On the other hand I think Make in India policy is a good thing. All the big powers in the world use their own military equipment rather than opting out for the best thing available. France, Germany, UK, China, Russia, US all use their own products, if they aren't the best they try to make them the best.
IA prefers T-90 over Arjun and IAF Rafale over Tejas. I am not saying Tejas is better or equal to rafale but at the moment IAF needs to show some faith in Tejas and HAL must try its best to start producing Tejas as per IAF requirements.
 
.
thing is hub bul watan pakistani internet fanboys in there anthosiasm to make fun of india and moodi have forgaotten the basic principals of defnce prepairdness and importence of internal strenth and value of local industry ... strange isnt it :azn:
Oh don't you know how many of our locally made JF17 inducted in PAF?
How many of LCA in yours ?
Its horrifying to know that , just now after Mr moodi s decesion , whole India is happy with the importance of the local manufacturing of its fighter jets ? Lolzz
he or you don't know how long INDIA is working on LCA & what's is the end result ?lolzz
 
. .
This is nothing to do with PAF. The true motive of this is to force Indian Government to release more funds.
On the other hand I think Make in India policy is a good thing. All the big powers in the world use their own military equipment rather than opting out for the best thing available. France, Germany, UK, China, Russia, US all use their own products, if they aren't the best they try to make them the best.
IA prefers T-90 over Arjun and IAF Rafale over Tejas. I am not saying Tejas is better or equal to rafale but at the moment IAF needs to show some faith in Tejas and HAL must try its best to start producing Tejas as per IAF requirements.
PAF is directly effected party in any case of IAF .
SURE A having own manufacturing capability of the fighter jets is awsome thing ?
But how long it will take INDIA to reach there ?
Let's make it hypothetical 10 years from now onwards , can THEY produce a single LCA sqdrn at least having the capability of a SU-24m ?
No they cant ?
So , that means INDIA will wait till another of 10 years , to have any conflict with any.one in the air ?lolzz
 
.
Oh don't you know how many of our locally made JF17 inducted in PAF?
How many of LCA in yours ?
Its horrifying to know that , just now after Mr moodi s decesion , whole India is happy with the importance of the local manufacturing of its fighter jets ? Lolzz
he or you don't know how long INDIA is working on LCA & what's is the end result ?lolzz
Kahan ho janab dikthe nahi ho aaj kaal.

Only 2 Janab this year and 2 next year excluding all prototypes. after 2017 the production of LCA mk1 or 1a whatever will rampup. India is very slow as compare to China, they should take leason from China and should send its deligation to Caltic China to improve HAL efficiency. See how they are struglling to deliver the product and China is producting the kits with good chinese packing material loaded on transport plane ready to be assembled in KAMRA. LOLZ
 
.
Kahan ho janab dikthe nahi ho aaj kaal.

Only 2 Janab this year and 2 next year excluding all prototypes. after 2017 the production of LCA mk1 or 1a whatever will rampup. India is very slow as compare to China, they should take leason from China and should send its deligation to Caltic China to improve HAL efficiency. See how they are struglling to deliver the product and China is producting the kits with good chinese packing material loaded on transport plane ready to be assembled in KAMRA. LOLZ
What about the whole dam wirrings & drawings HAL still didn't received from France ,Israel , Russia , Italy ?
Sure the postal system of India needs to be reformed at the standred of Pakistan ?
So then they can be able to produce something called LCA ?lolzz
 
.
My thread is running with a different angle , & its been started way before !
So chill out , enjoy the good day the best ever strategic decesion of moodi jee ?lolzz

LOL..different angle could've been brought in the same thread,no need for duplicate thread..

@WebMaster @Oscar

opening different threads intentionally is against forum rules,right??
 
.
Decisions made by moodi have been so harmful for India that maybe pretty soon Indians would start accusing him of being an ISI agent.

Historically Indians have a habit of blaming every thing that goes wrong in India on Pakistan.

Why should Mr Moodi be an exception.
 
.
LOL..different angle could've been brought in the same thread,no need for duplicate thread..

@WebMaster @Oscar

opening different threads intentionally is against forum rules,right??
My thread is for our Pakistanis ,, don't bother to post here , & go back to your section , I will see u there too ?
Stop dictating , PDF & its admin cause you are unable to defend your dam moodi jees stupid decesion ?lolzz
 
.
Kahan ho janab dikthe nahi ho aaj kaal.

Only 2 Janab this year and 2 next year excluding all prototypes. after 2017 the production of LCA mk1 or 1a whatever will rampup. India is very slow as compare to China, they should take leason from China and should send its deligation to Caltic China to improve HAL efficiency. See how they are struglling to deliver the product and China is producting the kits with good chinese packing material loaded on transport plane ready to be assembled in KAMRA. LOLZ

Quite an interesting point, well as far as the comparison of JF-17 and LCA goes, I've seen alot of the Indian members pointing the same thing again and again -- however like most of the other subjects the opinions of us members are tainted by patriotism ...

Some from the Pakistani side believe JF-17 is the "it" plane, that it is the cure for every problem that we face when it comes to IAF -- let's just start by admitting its not -- like every other aircraft it has its set of limitations that it has to face all of which are discussed to the death by critics and supporters alike on this forum ....

However when it comes to this "indigenous" battle, lets just say that a comparison is dishonest to begin with because one is supposedly an "indigenous" fighter project, the other from the outset has been termed a joint venture --

However when it comes to LCA and JFT, say project wise (Project A vs Project B), there is not even a comparison ---

JFT outperformed its expectations, it was supposed to be a low-mid tier economic fighter, yet today --- it just happens to be termed the "destiny of PAF" by none other then the airchief himself ... not simply because its a good platform, but for what it gives to PAF ... it gives a generation advantage over the fighters it replaces today ... It gives PAF the options to engage with other suppliers and integrate weapons of choice with freedom, it gives minimal problems when it comes to having strings attached ... it gives higher availability rates, low turn around times etc. ... and combine that with the fact that PAF is very pleased with the performance and the fact that it still remains true, to the original objectives of cost effectiveness that was laid down when the concept was conceived ...

For a nation like Pakistan, with no prior history of manufacturing jets at all, this is a MAJOR breakthrough and a success even if the indigenous content is 0.0000001% because it overshot the original goals that were laid down for it ..

However, when you look at LCA, you see the original idea revolving around having "indigenous" equipment, and with time lags that the project faced due to being committed to having that "indigenous content" the project fell apart ... to the point where the whole "indigenous content" objective took the back seat to short term fixes like getting inputs from industry giants just to get it work --- which I don't blame you for, because that would be the course of action any sane organization would take, after all there would be no use of "indigenous" equipment if it was a generation old when it was ultimately put in to service ... but ultimately, one of the main objectives of the project took a back seat, lets go further where is it now ... delayed again ... now the news is even more depressing -- The same IAF that was saying that it will take MK-II in numbers is now rumored to be settling for a less capable version in the MK-1 or a slightly upgraded MK-1A because the squadron strength of IAF is declining and you have a huge number of Mig-21's to replace and can't face any more delays ...

Now combine that with the fact that production in numbers is still a good 2 years away AT BEST --- what does it say about the project ?? -- that it's a success ?? now I wont say that it doesn't benefit your industry because that would be ignorant of me, however the fact remains that the LCA project wise is a laughing stock ...

these comparisons of .... "ohh look its more indigenous then your Thunder" are meaningless because the JFT is our first attempt at a fighter jet, India on the other hand already has the Marut experience --- and the project comparison puts LCA project to shame no matter how you look at it .... by the time the full blown production of the LCA starts, the JFT project would be in the initial phases of up gradation by half a generation over what it currently is ...
 
Last edited:
.
My thread is for our Pakistanis ,, don't bother to post here , & go back to your section , I will see u there too ?
Stop dictating , PDF & its admin cause you are unable to defend your dam moodi jees stupid decesion ?lolzz

atleast learn the english spelling you're writing before quoting me,please.and PDF is for everyone??Have problem with me??ask moderator to remove me.I also tagged moderators for fair reason,I'll see what action then take to "improve PDF"
 
.
atleast learn the english spelling you're writing before quoting me,please.and PDF is for everyone??Have problem with me??ask moderator to remove me.I also tagged moderators for fair reason,I'll see what action then take to "improve PDF"
Relax, chill
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom