What's new

From ancient Hindutva civilization to Kashmir, humanity and women are oppressed

Just wanted to say here that everything you have stated above is utter crap and far from the truth.

Now that you have said it, do you feel better ?

The only cure for your lake of knowledge is further study. Kufr is a Urdu word and its basically from Arabic language, literally means denial ، so it means denial of any religion or ideology. He who denies Hinduism is a kaafir for Hinduism and he who is against Islam is a kafir of Islam. KUFR means disbelief and one who denies is called a KAFIR

Means that anyone who denies ( does kufr) the teachings of Christianity or acting against Christianity. He is a disbeliever ( Kafir ) of Christianity. And he who does not adhere to the basic teachings of Hinduism is a practically denier ( kafir ) of Hinduism.

There is nothing called "Hinduism" for one to deny. That is why there is no Kufr or its equivalent in Hinduism. Hence No Kafir either.

Twisted minds who believe in one book are unable to grasp this simple concept and hence go round and round trying to impose islamic values on Hinduism.
yes i was fed this hindu propaganda as well until i came across some crucial evidence


“We know that Karunavajra saved the manuscript because he added a note in verse form,” said Dr Camillo Formigatti of the Sanskrit Manuscripts Project. “He states that he rescued the ‘Perfection of Wisdom, incomparable Mother of the Omniscient’ from falling into the hands of unbelievers who were most probably people of Brahmanical affiliation.”

-----

How did the "unbelievers" translate to "Brahmins" ?

Karunavjra made that entry in the 12th centruy. And you know what else happend in the 12th century ? Bakhtiyar Khilji invaded India and burnt down Nalanda University and Vikramshila Univesity.

You know how close Naland is to Nepal ?

In 1206 CE, Khilji amassed a large army to invade Tibet.

Still think the "unbelievers" who would destroy scriptures are Brahmins ?

there are even more instances where buddhists have declared hindus as non believers which in arabic equivalent of word kafir (non believer).

another evidence

View attachment 688039

What the Fcuk is this ?

All books mentioned are Hindu Scriptures and History books dealing with Genealogy of kings.

Looks like someone was trying to compile and recompile Hindu Scriptures.


here a hindu has declared Buddhists as heretics.


What is THIS ?

Where doe this have Hindus declaring Buddhists as Heretics ?
 
Last edited:
Now that you have said it, do you feel better ?



There is nothing called "Hinduism" for one to deny. That is why there is no Kufr or its equivalent in Hinduism. Hence No Kafir either.

Twisted minds who believe in one book are unable to grasp this simple concept and hence go round and round trying to impose islamic values on Hinduism.


My Dear

Is homosexuality permissible in Hinduism? I think not at all , So aren't the more than 100 million supporters of homosexuality in India denying the teachings of Hinduism? This is exactly how the proponents of homosexuality in the Western Christian world actually act against the holy teachings of Christianity. Holy Bible strictly prohibits homosexuality. So we will say they disbelieve (kufr) in their religious preachings

Isn't killing a man and raping a woman a crime in Hinduism? Yes of course in any religion , including Hinduism it is a crime. Don't those who kill Muslims in Kashmir deny the teachings of Hinduism? This is called denial ( KUFR) or disbelief in the teachings of the religion

I hope now u understand
 
My Dear

Is homosexuality permissible in Hinduism? I think not at all , So aren't the more than 100 million supporters of homosexuality in India denying the teachings of Hinduism? This is exactly how the proponents of homosexuality in the Western Christian world actually act against the holy teachings of Christianity. Holy Bible strictly prohibits homosexuality. So we will say they disbelieve (kufr) in their religious preachings

Isn't killing a man and raping a woman a crime in Hinduism? Yes of course in any religion , including Hinduism it is a crime. Don't those who kill Muslims in Kashmir deny the teachings of Hinduism? This is called denial ( KUFR) or disbelief in the teachings of the religion

I hope now u understand

Homosexuality is compared to having sex with a women when she is having her periods.

Its considered dirty and self indulgent.

But there is nothing that BANS or OUTLAWS it in Hinduism. It is left to the individuals choice, like everything else in Hinduism.

So you thought wrong. This is what happens when you try to view Hinduism with an islamic lens.

End up making foolish comments and ignorant statements.

Killing and Raping is a crime. But those who commit crime are not called "kufir" or disbelievers. They are called CRIMINALS.

I bet you still don't understand.
 
Homosexuality is compared to having sex with a women when she is having her periods.

Its considered dirty and self indulgent.

But there is nothing that BANS or OUTLAWS it in Hinduism. It is left to the individuals choice, like everything else in Hinduism.

So you thought wrong. This is what happens when you try to view Hinduism with an islamic lens.

End up making foolish comments and ignorant statements.

Killing and Raping is a crime. But those who commit crime are not called "kufir" or disbelievers. They are called CRIMINALS.

I bet you still don't understand.
Bharti, please go back and hang out with your own kind, because the stench of cow piss here is unbearable.
 
Bharti, please go back and hang out with your own kind, because the stench of cow piss here is unbearable.

Here is the smell of islamic values to help you breath easy.

Muslim girls harassed for not wearing burqa in UP
Officials warned the people of the area that those harassing the college girls will be booked and arrested.

veil, burqa

For representational purpose. (File photo | EPS)

BULANDSHAHR: The Muslim college girls in Bulandshahr district's Khurja have complained that they were being harassed by miscreants and forced to wear burqa.

The girls, on Monday, met the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Isha Priya and apprised her of the situation.


Acting swiftly on the complaint, the SDM, accompanied by Station House Officer (SHO) of the area, reached the locality where the girls were being harassed, and held a meeting with the residents.

The officials warned the people of the area that those harassing the college girls will be booked and arrested.

SDM Isha Priya said: "Some miscreants in Sarai Murtaza colony were harassing the girls and asking them to wear burqa. The girls told us that when their families had no problem in sending them college without a burqa, then how can these men raise questions?"

The SDM held a meeting with the locals and encouraged them to continue sending their daughters to college.

She said, "To begin with, we have just issued a warning to the accused, but, if they do not mend their ways, we will file a case and arrest them."

The local residents and religious heads of the community have assured the SDM and the police that the incident of harassment will not be repeated.


 
yes i was fed this hindu propaganda as well until i came across some crucial evidence


“We know that Karunavajra saved the manuscript because he added a note in verse form,” said Dr Camillo Formigatti of the Sanskrit Manuscripts Project. “He states that he rescued the ‘Perfection of Wisdom, incomparable Mother of the Omniscient’ from falling into the hands of unbelievers who were most probably people of Brahmanical affiliation.”

-----

there are even more instances where buddhists have declared hindus as non believers which in arabic equivalent of word kafir (non believer).

another evidence

View attachment 688039

here a hindu has declared Buddhists as heretics.

These type of third class site fake material is not relevant to the subject
 
Here is the smell of islamic values to help you breath easy.

Muslim girls harassed for not wearing burqa in UP
Officials warned the people of the area that those harassing the college girls will be booked and arrested.

veil, burqa

For representational purpose. (File photo | EPS)

BULANDSHAHR: The Muslim college girls in Bulandshahr district's Khurja have complained that they were being harassed by miscreants and forced to wear burqa.

The girls, on Monday, met the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Isha Priya and apprised her of the situation.


Acting swiftly on the complaint, the SDM, accompanied by Station House Officer (SHO) of the area, reached the locality where the girls were being harassed, and held a meeting with the residents.

The officials warned the people of the area that those harassing the college girls will be booked and arrested.

SDM Isha Priya said: "Some miscreants in Sarai Murtaza colony were harassing the girls and asking them to wear burqa. The girls told us that when their families had no problem in sending them college without a burqa, then how can these men raise questions?"

The SDM held a meeting with the locals and encouraged them to continue sending their daughters to college.

She said, "To begin with, we have just issued a warning to the accused, but, if they do not mend their ways, we will file a case and arrest them."

The local residents and religious heads of the community have assured the SDM and the police that the incident of harassment will not be repeated.


Listen indian, please be off to your own kind...
 
With the arrival of Islam, the open Hindu society changed from being liberal to one who also had to hide their females behind parda / burka.

When followers of Islam talk about female freedom i scratch my head...Pakistan is a parody of an Islamic Country. Talibans and ISIS are working to establish what is prescribed Islamic State as per their holy books. No music, no dance, keep long beards no education to femalles, marry as many females , kill them if they are without male family members, if they cannot get witness to rape than it is no raoe, khatna etc etc.
Oh yes, I keep forgetting....it wasn't brahminists and Aryans who enslaved Hindu natives, it was pesky muslims. It was Muslims who forced unwilling brahmins to preserve their caste hierarchy, despite their vehement objections and their stubborn desire to create an egalitarian merit-based society. Naughty Muslims, hindering well meaning brahmins like that.

We all know the mistake Islamic invaders made. They started to eradicate the slave system but I guess they got lazy and gave up.
 
...

We all know the mistake Islamic invaders made. They started to eradicate the slave system but I guess they got lazy and gave up.

Just the last part... it turns out while hindus were becoming courtiers in Muslim courts, they're simultaneously being duped by these slimy tongue brahmans...
Turns out these brahmans were hunting with wolves and running with hares!

They were not representative of the population, nor true interlocutors... by getting a seat in the court, they managed to keep the wedge between the truly marginalized and Islam... of course all that superstition and skulduggery played it's part too in keeping the masses in true bondage of mind and body.
 
Just the last part... it turns out while hindus were becoming courtiers in Muslim courts, they're simultaneously being duped by these slimy tongue brahmans...
Turns out these brahmans were hunting with wolves and running with hares!

They were not representative of the population, nor true interlocutors... by getting a seat in the court, they managed to keep the wedge between the truly marginalized and Islam... of course all that superstition and skulduggery played it's part too in keeping the masses in true bondage of mind and body.

So basically Islam and Muslims destroyed Hindu Temples, Destroyed schools and University's, Imposed 70% tax on farmers and Turned Temple Nun's in prostitutes and Sold and brought Hindu slave girls and children because of "brahmins" :lol:

And in fact the same thing continues in pakistan because of the "brahm;ins" in RAW and RSS / BJP "brahmins" :lol:

Amazing. Truly outstanding. Face of true islam.
 
So basically Islam and Muslims destroyed Hindu Temples, Destroyed schools and University's, Imposed 70% tax on farmers and Turned Temple Nun's in prostitutes and Sold and brought Hindu slave girls and children because of "brahmins" [emoji38]

And in fact the same thing continues in pakistan because of the "brahm;ins" in RAW and RSS / BJP "brahmins" [emoji38]

Amazing. Truly outstanding. Face of true islam.

Indian, please! Ask your forefathers who were willing collaborators... deflecting Islam and oppressing systematically...

As I see there still remain both rich and poor hindus in even todays Pakistan... what gives?

I would go in much detail on Mugal land reforms... but you're not here for academic reasons, are you...

Always hiding behind grimace smile to hide juvenility and perpetual low self esteem, now pass off smileys and lols elsewhere...
 
Indian, please! Ask your forefathers who were willing collaborators... deflecting Islam and oppressing systematically...

As I see there still remain both rich and poor hindus in even todays Pakistan... what gives?

I would go in much detail on Mugal land reforms... but you're not here for academic reasons, are you...

Always hiding behind grimace smile to hide juvenility and perpetual low self esteem, now pass off smileys and lols elsewhere...

"mughal Land reforms" :lol:

Is that what you call seizing of Hindu land ? LOL.

Collaborators ? That was before they know what islam was all about. Back then there was no internet to tell them about "religion of peace". Every "hindu" in the mughal court was a converted musli inr reality.

From "Mirza" Jai singh to Birbal who converted to "deen e illahi" and ws called the "court Jester" in Akbarnama.

Who were the Brahmins in Mughal courts ? :lol:
 
"mughal Land reforms" [emoji38]

Is that what you call seizing of Hindu land ? LOL.

Collaborators ? That was before they know what islam was all about. Back then there was no internet to tell them about "religion of peace". Every "hindu" in the mughal court was a converted musli inr reality.

From "Mirza" Jai singh to Birbal who converted to "deen e illahi" and ws called the "court Jester" in Akbarnama.

Who were the Brahmins in Mughal courts ? [emoji38]

Seizing?
Hindus lost! right?...
It would be a stretch calling it that even... Mugals stayed, right? Their land...
I am no defender of Mugals!
But, continue with names... and that even hindus rajas filling Mugal herems with their next of kin...
hindus definitely can cry for not getting any prominence or references but Shah Alam learns sanskrit? Interesting...

Anyways, enough waste of my time... continue with lols, I can't help your self esteem, no one can!
 
Seizing?
Hindus lost! right?...
It would be a stretch calling it that even... Mugals stayed, right? Their land...
I am no defender of Mugals!
But, continue with names... and that even hindus rajas filling Mugal herems with their next of kin...
hindus definitely can cry for not getting any prominence or references but Shah Alam learns sanskrit? Interesting...

Anyways, enough waste of my time... continue with lols, I can't help your self esteem, no one can!

Hindus WON , hence India.

Akbar followed the policy of Marrying the daughters of his enemies to make peace and expand the empire. Back then the Hindu kings were "secular". They did not see other Kings though the prism of religion. By the time they realized, the Hindus rose up in revolt and established the Sikh Empire, The Maratha Empire and the Vijayanagar Empire.

As for Shah Alam, here is what History says,

The Blinding of a Mughal emperor

In August 1788, the Red Fort in Delhi witnessed what one observer would recall as the most “unspeakable and indescribable" crimes. As in the previous year, the Rohilla chief, Ghulam Qadir, had descended on the Mughal capital, threatening to unleash chaos. While his last attempt had been aborted, thanks to Begum Samru, a dancing girl turned princess, nobody rode to Shah Alam II’s rescue on this occasion.

In fact, the officer in charge of the fort, despite orders to the contrary, threw open its gates, and 2,000 of Ghulam Qadir’s troops quickly took charge of the premises. Secure, the warlord made his way to the audience hall. And there, as William Dalrymple recounts in his splendid new book, The Anarchy, he “sat down on the cushions of the imperial throne", blowing smoke from a pipe into the face of the badshah of Hindustan.

Shah Alam had not had a particularly glorious career, but even with its general turbulence, this was unprecedented. It was decades since the empire of the Mughals had begun to unravel, but while the emperors had been reduced to ciphers, their dignity had never been so insolently offended. Shah Alam had tried in vain to reclaim power for the crown: For over a decade, he was not even in control of his capital, and, during his peregrinations, was forced (after military defeat) to grant governorship of the empire’s richest province to the East India Company (EIC). In 1772, he finally returned to Delhi, his general Najaf Khan bringing order to the surrounding regions. When the latter died, the Marathas stepped in to supply protection. For all his outward marks of authority, though, this came at the cost of giving free rein to Shivaji’s political heirs. As the contemporary chronicler Prem Kishor wrote, “The king (had) abandoned his sovereignty and taken up the ways of beggary."

As a man, Shah Alam was not, to be clear, all incompetence, but, as scion of the Mughals, he inspired little support. He was a poet of talent, writing verses in languages as diverse as Braj Bhasha and Persian. EIC officer Col Polier described him as “a good and benevolent man" so far as his private characteristics went, but acknowledged that he was not by any stretch a “great king". The English governor Warren Hastings, who refused to remit even the share of Bengal revenues that were due to the emperor, was more blunt: Shah Alam was merely a “wretched King of shreds and patches".

And, as Dalrymple reminds us, while others in theory paid homage to the crown, Tipu Sultan discarded even this pretence. Those who bowed before Shah Alam, announced Mysore’s sultan, “act through ignorance, since the real condition of the so-called Emperor is…(that he is) the servant of (the Marathas) at the monthly wages of ₹15,000".

And yet for all this contempt, Ghulam Qadir’s actions in 1788 sent shockwaves down the entire subcontinent: As the colonial-era historian W. Francklin wrote, to this man “it was reserved to…add the last outrage to the miseries of a long and most unfortunate reign". The sequence of events that confirmed the Rohilla as one of the worst villains of the 18th century is chilling. Soon after taking charge of the Red Fort, Ghulam Qadir had Shah Alam locked up, planting in his place another prince on the throne. But what the trespasser really wanted was gold, not empty titles and grants of land, and none of the coin heaped before him satisfied the demand. Old begums were dispossessed of their jewels, and even the officer who opened the fort gates paid up—threatened that he would be drowned in excrement, the latter surrendered his own money to escape this revolting fate.

Furious, Ghulam Qadir turned on the imperial family, which for all its bloody intrigues had never quite experienced what he now decided to unleash. Princes of royal blood, including sons and grandsons of Shah Alam, were dressed in drag and made to dance for the Rohilla troops. The emperor’s daughters were stripped, raped and humiliated. Even Malika-i-Zamani, the formidable widow of a previous emperor, Dalrymple writes, was left naked in the hot sun after failing to deliver to Ghulam Qadir the riches he believed she possessed. And finally, bringing to his presence Shah Alam himself, the “ferocious ruffian" had the emperor blinded. In some accounts, in fact, he sits himself on Shah Alam’s chest, scooping out the old man’s eyes with a dagger.

Theories abound on Ghulam Qadir’s diabolical ferocity. His father had rebelled several times against Delhi, and, after defeating him, Shah Alam had taken Ghulam Qadir, then eight or 10 years old, hostage. One apocryphal tale says that after seeing the uncommonly handsome boy, the emperor had him castrated, often making him dance in women’s clothes. In an account left behind by a disgruntled Mughal prince, there is a suggestion of something beyond a regular relationship between Shah Alam and the Rohilla boy. Even as the emperor described Ghulam Qadir as his “special son", wishing him great happiness in his poems, this contemporary noted that the boy suffered from ubnah, or “an itching in his behind", hinting that he was made to serve as the emperor’s catamite. This, more than mere ambition or greed, it is believed, explains the horrors Ghulam Qadir let loose in 1788 on Shah Alam and his children.

But the act was for the Rohilla a death sentence. The treatment of the emperor caused such outrage that aid was offered even from Kabul. The Maratha general, Mahadji Scindia, led a large force to Delhi, and while Ghulam Qadir escaped, he was cornered and captured in Mathura very soon. Placed in a cage, his ears, nose, lips and feet were cut off, one by one, each of these circulated in the Red Fort by the emperor. And finally, the story goes, Shah Alam, in whose reign the Mughals lost their final vestiges of power, received one last box, holding within it Ghulam Qadir’s eyes.

 
The violation of the sanctity of Muslim women by the Indian troops in occupied Kashmir today is in fact a reflection of the ancient and perpetual nature of Hindutva. The history of society bears witness to the fact that Hindutva society has always been the culprit and murderer of the sanctified woman.The facts of the ancient and modern Indian Hindutva society say that even the dignity of their own Hindu women was never protected from their horrors. The physical and spiritual humiliation inflicted by the earliest Hindu society on the vulnerable is the black chapter in history.

What the RSS terrorists and BJP’s extremist are doing with non-Hindu Indians in India today or what the Indian army and police do to Kashmiri Muslim women is the worst state terrorism. In fact this is the continuity of barbarian humiliation of women, and it has been a part of Hindu civilization since centuries.

The grand Mufti of Egypt, Dr. Ali Juma and many other historians write that in the ancient Hindu civilization, women were given the status of slaves. In some of its sects there was no difference between wife and sister. According to me this civilization may have been influenced by the traditions of the ancient Pharaoh kingdom, the Roman emperors and Greek royal families. History states that Raja Dahar also adopted this tradition.

The despicable practice of having relation with one's sisters and daughters (incest) in the West is very similar to the ancient Hindu culture. It should be noted that after the legalized homosexuality, the practice of incest is spreading fast in the West as well. It was a sign of the perversion of its faith that one considered relation with his mother, sister or daughter as a duty and a means of salvation to fulfill a woman's basic need. According to the Vedic injunctions, women could not touch any religious book. When they were widowed, they were forced to live as corpses.

Eastern and Western historians prove it. In ancient Hindu civilization, women were the victims of oppression and exploitation of their Hindutva rituals. The historian Westermarck writes that it was a religious tradition in ancient Hindu society that if a woman touched an idol, the deity and sanctity of that "sacred idol" was considered "extinct" and was thrown away.

After the partition, atrocities against women by Hindutva continue in all over India and especially with Muslim women in Kashmir. The spirit of Hindutva's oppression of women has infiltrated the Indian Army in Kashmir. Muslim women are victims of the worst human rights violations by Indian soldiers and police personnel. According to human right organizations many reports have been released regarding the elimination of violence against Kashmiri women.

According to reports, Indian troops have killed more than 100 thousands people, including more than 1,000 women in occupied Kashmir since last 20 years. Women and young girls are being abused, tortured, maimed and killed by Indian Army and other forces. Kashmiri women are the victims of the worst sexual violence in the world by Hindutva elements.

The reports stated that since 1989, 23000 women have been widowed and more than 12000 women were humiliated. Reports of gang-rape of 23 women of a village in Kupwara district of Kashmir were published by human rights organizations. According to a news website Al-Qamar, Indian police officers abducted and desecrated an eight year old girl Asifa Bano in Kathua two years ago.

The South Asian Wire reported that the Indian military uses rape of women as a weapon of war against freedom fighters. According to Human Rights Watch port, most of the abuses occurred during siege and search operations. According to another HRW’s report, security personnel in Kashmir have used rape as a counter-insurgency tactic. The South Asian Wire reports that the pattern of rape in Kashmir is very criminal and cruel. When soldiers enter civilian homes, they kill men before raping women.

A scholar, Shubh Mathur, described rapes of Muslim women as "an essential element of Indian military strategy in Kashmir". Why all this atrocities and brutal treatment of women is continued in Kashmir? The main reason is that oppression of women, violation of women's sanctity and oppression of non-Hindu religions is an ancient tradition of Hindutva civilization. Hindutva also wants to suppress Kashmir's freedom movement through atrocities and state terrorism in Kashmir.

The mission of the RSS in India is to crack down on non-Hindu minorities, especially Muslims. The BJP is sowing the seeds of religious hatred under the extremist Hindutva agenda. And the Indian arbitrariness and law enforcement agencies, enslaved by the RSS and the BJP, are committing the massacre of Kashmiri Muslims and the desecration of women as their holy religious duty.

The oppressed Muslims of Kashmir are waiting for the help from the world of human rights activists and the international community.

FAROOQ RASHID BUTT


Incest is defined as the sexual relationship between close blood relatives who are forbidden by law to marry. While many developed nations around the world have criminalised incest, the Indian Penal Code contains no specific provision against this crime.
Now we can understand why devar bhabhi sex **** and stories so popular among indians. On quora I have read answers of many indians admitting having a sexual relationship with their mothers,sisters and daughter at some point in life. The recent trend of erotic web series in India such as ULLU app showed incest between groom and his mother in law on wedding night.
I think that's also the scientific reason behind the low IQ of many staunch hindu indians because they are after all the products of incest from generation to generation.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom