What's new

From ancient Hindutva civilization to Kashmir, humanity and women are oppressed

Incest is defined as the sexual relationship between close blood relatives who are forbidden by law to marry. While many developed nations around the world have criminalised incest, the Indian Penal Code contains no specific provision against this crime.
Now we can understand why devar bhabhi sex **** and stories so popular among indians. On quora I have read answers of many indians admitting having a sexual relationship with their mothers,sisters and daughter at some point in life. The recent trend of erotic web series in India such as ULLU app showed incest between groom and his mother in law on wedding night.
I think that's also the scientific reason behind the low IQ of many staunch hindu indians because they are after all the products of incest from generation to generation.

Devar Bhabhi sex is NOT incest you idiot.

Incest is sex among BLOOD relatives like marrying YOUR COUSIN and is the norm in pakistan.

But Its interesting to know Topics of your search interest in Quora and **** sites and apps.
 
.
Just the last part... it turns out while hindus were becoming courtiers in Muslim courts, they're simultaneously being duped by these slimy tongue brahmans...
Turns out these brahmans were hunting with wolves and running with hares!

They were not representative of the population, nor true interlocutors... by getting a seat in the court, they managed to keep the wedge between the truly marginalized and Islam... of course all that superstition and skulduggery played it's part too in keeping the masses in true bondage of mind and body.
Completely agree sir. Inevitably, brahminist groups had no desire to relinquish power over other hindus, hence they came to an agreement with mughals
 
.
Devar Bhabhi sex is NOT incest you idiot.

Incest is sex among BLOOD relatives like marrying YOUR COUSIN and is the norm in pakistan.

But Its interesting to know Topics of your search interest in Quora and **** sites and apps.
Yea not incest but that shows moral bankruptcy in indian society.You have no issues in screwing your blood brothers wife. And personally you seem to be supportive of it.
Unlike you we oppose cousin marriage here, specially the youth.
Actually you don't need to search quora for those,when 1.2 billion indian show their dark fantasies and culture it appears everywhere.
 
.
Completely agree sir. Inevitably, brahminist groups had no desire to relinquish power over other hindus, hence they came to an agreement with mughals

LOL. What is that "agreement" ?

That they can kill and rape brahmin women, destroy brahmin schools, destroy brahimn controlled temples , make them pay Jazia , kidnap and sell brahmin girls as slaves ?

What exactly did the Brahmins get in return ? :lol:
Yea not incest but that shows moral bankruptcy in indian society.You have no issues in screwing your blood brothers wife. And personally you seem to be supportive of it.
Unlike you we oppose cousin marriage here, specially the youth.
Actually you don't need to search quora for those,when 1.2 billion indian show their dark fantasies and culture it appears everywhere.

"moral bankruptcy" is a big world from a pakistani living in pakistan where more than 50% of your marriages are between First Cousins.

If you include second cousin marriages, the number rises to 61.2 %
:lol:


Statistically speaking this means there is a 50% chance that your father and mother are cousins. So spare us the moral sermons pervert.
 
Last edited:
.
LOL. What is that "agreement" ?

That they can kill and rape brahmin women, destroy brahmin schools, destroy brahimn controlled temples , make them pay Jazia , kidnap and sell brahmin girls as slaves ?

What exactly did the Brahmins get in return ? :lol:
Brahmins got to remain Brahmins. Everyone was happy.

Pontius Pilate had a similar policy with the Jews. Their priestly class remained in charge of Jewish affairs by striking a deal with Roman occupiers.

Vichy France struck a deal with the Nazis.

The formula is pretty straightforward; it's hardly a revolutionary "Chanakya" strategy of grand deception. But, credit where it's due I guess. Those brahminist clans were a clever bunch.
 
.
Statistically speaking this means there is a 50% chance that your father and mother are cousins. So spare us the moral sermons pervert.

Do you support the khap panchayats of Haryana who order the honor killing of a couple who are from the same caste / gotra etc ?
 
.
Brahmins got to remain Brahmins. Everyone was happy.

Pontius Pilate had a similar policy with the Jews. Their priestly class remained in charge of Jewish affairs by striking a deal with Roman occupiers.

Vichy France struck a deal with the Nazis.

The formula is pretty straightforward; it's hardly a revolutionary "Chanakya" strategy of grand deception. But, credit where it's due I guess. Those brahminist clans were a clever bunch.

This is truly incredible.

Now the muslims are taking credit for brahmins being Brahmins :cheesy:

Earlier some joker was taking credit for the Jewish Golden age :woot:

Next you will be taking credit for Hindus remaining Hindus :lol:

Is there ANYTHING in this world, you lot will not take credit for ? This is what happens when you have NO acheivement to your name. A truly pathetic existence.

I am surprised you have still not taken credit for the Chinese being chinese and for the rise of US.

You lot live in some Bizarre alternate universe where Fiction is reality and Facts and Logic don't matter.
Do you support the khap panchayats of Haryana who order the honor killing of a couple who are from the same caste / gotra etc ?

I support the Law and the Law should accommodate Hindu values in places where they live.

That way govt. will protect Hindu values and people don't have to take Justice into their own hands.
 
.
Now the muslims are taking credit for brahmins being Brahmins :cheesy:
Ermm. It's you who is claiming "ghazi this n ghazi that".

So actually, yes, mughals did permit brahmins to perpetuate brahminism.

Or are mughals defined as genociders only when it suits your narrative?

If they were brutal genociders with no known equal among a plethora of medieval tribes and nations all vying for control of the riches of the subcontinent, then they should be thanked for sparing the brahminist philosophy from their terrible wrath. Personally, I condemn the mughals for sparing and perpetuating the Aryan slave cult at the expense of true primordial Hinduism and animist faiths. But you should be grateful to them for their near divine act of mercy. Imagine if Cortez and the Spaniards or Genghis Khan had found your lot of human sacrificers before the mughals did! There wouldn't be a "secular republic of India" to even speak of.


Listen @Nityam ....We're sort of on the same page. We're both angry at the mughals ....for different reasons. There really is no need for us to bicker. Go ahead and scrap the Taj Mahal. You have my blessing. Just ask permission from the grand high council of esteemed white folks, and proceed as per your heart's content. It's not even a masjid for crying out loud so there is zero religious justification for keeping it.

Smash it.
 
.
Ermm. It's you who is claiming "ghazi this n ghazi that".

So actually, yes, mughals did permit brahmins to perpetuate brahminism.

Or are mughals defined as genociders only when it suits your narrative?

If they were brutal genociders with no known equal among a plethora of medieval tribes and nations all vying for control of the riches of the subcontinent, then they should be thanked for sparing the brahminist philosophy from their terrible wrath. Personally, I condemn the mughals for sparing and perpetuating the Aryan slave cult at the expense of true primordial Hinduism and animist faiths. But you should be grateful to them for their near divine act of mercy. Imagine if Cortez and the Spaniards or Genghis Khan had found your lot of human sacrificers before the mughals did! There wouldn't be a "secular republic of India" to even speak of.

Listen @Nityam ....We're sort of on the same page. We're both angry at the mughals ....for different reasons. There really is no need for us to bicker. Go ahead and scrap the Taj Mahal. You have my blessing. Just ask permission from the grand high council of esteemed white folks, and proceed as per your heart's content. It's not even a masjid for crying out loud so there is zero religious justification for keeping it.

Smash it.

It takes extreme Hubris to even claim the victims show gratitude to the perpetrators of centuries of Crime.

Its like the British asking that the Indians be grateful that they have Democracy at the end of their despotic rule.

To quote shashi tharoor,

"It’s a bit rich to oppress, enslave, kill, torture, maim people for 200 years and then celebrate the fact that they are democratic at the end of it. We were denied democracy, so we had snatch it, seize it from you "


Now extrapolate the same reply for 800 years and also add, we were sold as slaves, our culture denigrated, our temples destroyed, our institutions demolished and Women and children raped and sold in bazaars. And THEN contemplate the CONTEMPT we have for them and their religion. And for all those who claim we "acknowledge" their "mercy". DISGUSTING.

The very fact that you would ask me to even consider this shows how much scorn you have for the centuries of suffering of the Hindus. Its shows how deep rooted your Bigotry is.

That you would dare tell me that we are "on the same page" is laughable. We don't even live in the same Universe. And I am GLAD we don't.
 
.
"It’s a bit rich to oppress, enslave, kill, torture, maim people for 200 years and then celebrate the fact that they are democratic at the end of it. We were denied democracy, so we had snatch it, seize it from you "
You and Shashi can whatsapp me whenever this so-called democracy arrives in the Secular Republic. All you snatched hitherto was the right to be a good Brahmin. Neither the mughals nor the British could be bothered to eradicate this philosophy - a pox on them both!
 
.
It takes extreme Hubris to even claim the victims show gratitude to the perpetrators of centuries of Crime.

Its like the British asking that the Indians be grateful that they have Democracy at the end of their despotic rule.

To quote shashi tharoor,

"It’s a bit rich to oppress, enslave, kill, torture, maim people for 200 years and then celebrate the fact that they are democratic at the end of it. We were denied democracy, so we had snatch it, seize it from you "


Now extrapolate the same reply for 800 years and also add, we were sold as slaves, our culture denigrated, our temples destroyed, our institutions demolished and Women and children raped and sold in bazaars. And THEN contemplate the CONTEMPT we have for them and their religion. And for all those who claim we "acknowledge" their "mercy". DISGUSTING.

The very fact that you would ask me to even consider this shows how much scorn you have for the centuries of suffering of the Hindus. Its shows how deep rooted your Bigotry is.

That you would dare tell me that we are "on the same page" is laughable. We don't even live in the same Universe. And I am GLAD we don't.
So you're trying to say only Mughals were barbaric/cruel and brutal in India, only Hindus were the innocent, you didn't look how many rebellions by your Hindus during Mughal rules, and in Ancient worlds there were common trends to destroy temples, making slaves of the opponents, what so special about it??
 
.
You and Shashi can whatsapp me whenever this so-called democracy arrives in the Secular Republic. All you snatched hitherto was the right to be a good Brahmin. Neither the mughals nor the British could be bothered to eradicate this philosophy - a pox on them both!

Yeah, tough luck the genocidal plans of people like you could not be successful. Expect payback in time.
 
. . .
So you're trying to say only Mughals were barbaric/cruel and brutal in India, only Hindus were the innocent, you didn't look how many rebellions by your Hindus during Mughal rules, and in Ancient worlds there were common trends to destroy temples, making slaves of the opponents, what so special about it??

Mughals were the LAST of the islamic hoards who were barbaric and cruel and brutal.

Hindus who fought for their freedom and the freedom of their countrymen were HEROES.

Hindus NEVER destroyed temples or made slaves or killed civilians . Exceptions do not make the rule.

What the islamic invaders did to this civilization is UNFORGIVABLE. Hindus have remembered this for a 1000 years and we will continue to remember this for a 1000 years more. You better believe it.
then you're on the way to slowly disintegrates yourself in near future

lol. Give it your best shot.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom