Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
Then the same question is relevant "how large is large for a religious symbol?
The whole point of adding a subjective "ostentatious" to the law is add a loophole for traditional Christian symbols, i.e. cross pendants, while outlawing traditional Muslim, Jewish, Sikh symbols, i.e. headscarf, turban, yarmulka.
Like I wrote, if you want to disallow religious symbols, just say so. What add a loophole?
The secular French wanted to discriminate in favor of Christians, while maintaining the fiction of a secular law.