Forgotten heroes- Sir Zafrullah Khan (rh)

[M. Sarmad]

He [Jesus] is a Sign of the Hour. Have no doubt about it. But follow me. This is a straight path. (Surat Az-Zukhruf, 43:61)

Why Jesus in Brackets ??????
read my previous post (at least this time plz)
anyways thanks for proving my point

 

[Zarvan]

Do not worry , I am not running any where . it is you who runs away every time . Copy pasting irrelevant stuff is "running away" actually , that you always do when you have no answer!! I can copy paste whole books in reply , but what would be the difference then ?? So meray Maulvi bhai , try to understand Islam , read a few things .. These Mullahs are liars

Mr I read Quran and Sunnah and Hadees and Life of Hazrat MUHAMMAD SAW on daily bases Mr and I know and study Islamic history too Mr it was Kharjis who denied Hadees in first place Mr and as for Mirza neither he was a Massiah nor he was a Mahdi HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW have already give details of them both and where they will appear and what will be the situation and what signs will their be
He [Jesus] is a Sign of the Hour. Have no doubt about it. But follow me. This is a straight path. (Surat Az-Zukhruf, 43:61)

Why Jesus in Brackets ??????
read my previous post (at least this time plz)
anyways thanks for proving my point

Mr because those dumbos like you never bother to know the detail of ayat for what it came for you are such dumb people

 

[M. Sarmad]

Mr because those dumbos like you never bother to know the detail of ayat for what it came for you are such dumb people

Zarvan calling others dumb !!!
Joke of the month

 

[Zarvan]

Zarvan calling others dumb !!!
Joke of the month

I have other words for Kharji and enemy of RASOOL SAW like you but I won't use them

 

[M. Sarmad]

I have other words for Kharji and enemy of RASOOL SAW like you but I won't use them

Listen , your ideological brothers known as TTP are Khawarij and dogs of hell . As I know you for sometime now , I know there is no point in discussing serious topics like history with you . I feel sorry for brain washed kids like you . But I am hopeful that Allah will guide you one day .I believe that You are not a bad guy

 

[Zarvan]

Listen , your ideological brothers known as TTP are Khawarij and dogs of hell . As I know you for sometime now , I know there is no point in discussing serious topics like history with you . I feel sorry for brain washed kids like you . But I am hopeful that Allah will guide you one day .I believe that You are not a bad guy

You are brothers and supporters of Kharjis you are denying Hadees just like Kharjis enemies of Islam and ALLAH and RASOOL SAW and I make Dua ALLAH will guide you one day and you will follow both Quran and Sunnah and stop being part of Kharjis

To what extent are hadiths reliable?

There is no reason why we should not rely on hadiths. As we have mentioned before, the Quran directs people to the Prophet saying, “Take what the Messenger assigns to you, and deny yourselves that which he withholds from you”. That is, the Quran always points to the Prophet as the secondary resource.

Secondly, the Prophet points to himself; he attracts attention to his Sunnah and states that Islam will continue with his Sunnah. For instance, Hazrat Prophet sends Muadh to Yemen. The Prophet asks him, “How will you act there?” Hazrat Muadh says, “I will act in accordance with the Quran”. Our Prophet asks, “What if you cannot find something in the Quran?” He says, “With your Sunnah and if I cannot find it in your Sunnah, with my ijtihad (deriving laws from the original sources)”. Our Prophet becomes pleased with his answers. That hadith is an evidence for the scholars of Islam. It is proof that Sunnah is evidence and that ijtihad is necessary. Thus, when the Prophet was alive, Sahaba knew hadiths as the secondary source.

Hazrat Umar narrates: “I have made a contract of alternation with a brother of mine. One day, he goes to the field and takes care of the field; I go to the Messenger of Allah and listen to him. In the evening, I inform my brother about what I saw and heard while I was with the Messenger of Allah. The next day, I go to the field and take care of the field; my brother goes to the Messenger of Allah and listens to him. In the evening, he informs me about what he saw and heard while he was with the Messenger of Allah. Thus, we have the opportunity to follow the Messenger of Allah closely.”

A Companion says: “I used to write whatever I heard from the Prophet. Some people said to me, ‘the Messenger of Allah is a human being too. Sometimes, he speaks when he is angry and sometimes, when he is calm. It is not true to write whatever he says.’ Thereupon, I gave up writing. However, I started to forget what I heard from the Prophet. Therefore, I went to the Prophet and told him about the issue. ‘O Messenger of Allah! I hear good things from you and I write them down but some people from Ansar said something. Therefore, I gave up writing. However, I feel uneasy when I do not write. What shall I do?’ the Messenger of Allah showed his blessed mouth and said, ‘Nothing other than truth comes out from this mouth. Write.’

Some people came to the Messenger of Allah and complained about their memory. He said to them, “Ask the help of your right hands” advising them to write down.

Let me say something else. Anas (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated a lot of hadiths and he is one of the seven people who narrated most hadiths. In a hadith I read in Mustadrak, Hazrat Anas says, “I wrote down hadiths from the Messenger of Allah during the day and I read them to him at night so that he would correct them.” That is, our Prophet corrected what he had written. After that, in the science of hadith, the students took the hadiths that they learned to their teachers and presented the hadiths to them. The students read the hadiths that they wrote and memorized before their teachers; the teachers corrected them and then gave the students diplomas.

Can we say that all hadiths are the interpretations of the Quran?

Yes we can.Our Prophet (pbuh)put the Quran into practice through his lifestyle. Therefore, the ideal lifestyle that the Quran wants from men is manifest in our Prophet (pbuh). If we consider it from the point of view of worshipping, our Prophet showed it how our worshipping towards Allah should be perfectly. Our Prophet carried out all kinds of worshipping in the perfect way. The worshipping of our Prophet is the perfect way of the worshipping that the Quran wants from us in all aspects. The same thing is valid for human relations too. Our Prophet showed us the best examples in his relationship with people and his neighbors. He also showed the best examples of husband and wife relationship. He showed us how to act towards children.

Thus, our Prophet (pbuh)represented practiced and showed the ideal of the Quran in all phases, sections and moments of his life. Muslims can take them exactly from the Prophet to the extent that they can. In a hadith, Hazrat Aisha expresses the ethics of the Prophet as, “His ethics was the ethics of the Quran.” Therefore, our Prophet explained the ethics of the Quran in terms of ethics. Maybe, he did not explain everything verbally but he practiced it. Every word, act and attitude of the Prophet is the interpretation of the spirit of the Quran.

On the other hand, he explained the stories about the previous nations. In hadiths, we can find some events about Hazrat Ibrahim (Abraham) that are not present in the Quran. Thus, we can find all of the lessons that the Quran wants to mention, to bring to mankind in terms of law, ethics and lifestyle in the life of Hazrat Prophet sometimes in his words, sometimes in his deeds and sometimes in his analyses.

The following is stated in the Quran, “eat and drink: but waste not by excess”. In another verse, squandering is forbidden. Squandering is the brother of wasting. Let us look at the practice of the Prophet to understand those two verses better:
Our Prophet put a clear limit to wasting; the most living example of it is wudu (ablution). When he made wudu, he used the water carefully so as not to waste it. He commanded us two wash our organs with three handfuls of water during wudu. To use more water is makrooh (abominable). He puts that limitation. One of the companions becomes surprised and asks: “O Messenger of Allah! Is it to save water?”. He answers, “No, even if you are near a river, you will wash your organs three times.”

I saw a narration from Abu ad-Darda in hadiths: “Once, our Prophet arrived at a river on the way to somewhere. They brought him a bowl of water from the river. He made wudu with it and some water remained. We would normally sprinkle it around. However, our Prophet says, “Go and pour it back to the river. It may be the drink of a creature in the future.”

If we eat more than we need, speak more than necessary, spend our time in vain, we waste them. They are the wasting that we cannot bring back. Lighting a match is also wasting. They are makrooh. The fact that our Prophet told us not to waste water while making wudu five times a day, he gave us the lesson of respecting nature. He teaches us that wasting is also a serious issue in other fields of life through the example of wudu.

Now, let us have a look at the explanation of the verse, “waste not by excess”. Thus, when we read a verse, we need to refer to the hadiths to see how that verse is explained. The larger our hadith culture is, the better we will understand the Quran. Can I say something like this as a conclusion? When we read a verse from the Quran, we should try to understand it from the translations and interpretations of the Quran.However, it should not be enough for us; we should increase our hadith culture. We should learn many hadiths and form our life through them. When we read the Quran like that, it will be as if we are learning the meaning of the Quran from the Prophet.

Absolutely. Our scholars who understood it like that, for instance, Tabari, wrote all of the hadiths that he remembered about a verse. Some people criticized Tabari because he reported many hadiths. Most of his interpretation of forty volumes is full of hadiths. However, when we refer to hadiths, we understand the verses better. The light that a hadith gives is different from the meaning that we deduce by contemplating. In my opinion, it is the best way to try to understand the Quran through hadiths.

Are the Sunnah and hadiths binding?

Does the Sunnah, the life of our Prophet bind Muslims; do they have to follow it?

We will deal with that issue in accordance with hadiths and the views of scholars.

 

[M. Sarmad]

I make Dua ALLAH will guide you

Lets leave it there . May Allah guide us to the right path (whichever it is) . Amen

for rest of your post , read this :
http://www.ahl-alquran.com/English/show_article.php?main_id=6001

 

[Pakistani E]

Mr this is not my personal opinion Mr these are facts what doesn't matter is those Kharjis who are denying Hadees and Sunnah from life of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW and Sahabas refuted them Hazrat UMAR RA kept reminding in his time to people as long as I follow Quran and Sunnah follow Me he ruled according to Quran and Sunnah both he made laws from Quran and Sunnah Mr and many Sahabas wrote Hadees from Him because NABI SAW himself told Sahabas to write hadees once he said to Hazrat Abdullah bin AMR RA
Write my Hadees by the one who has my life in his hand nothing comes from my mouth except haq ( Sunan Dawood )

A proof of the Finality of Prophethood (Khatmay-Nabuwwat)
Guided by irrefutable word of Allah(SWT) in the Holy Quran and numerous Hadith, Muslims around the world do uniformly believe that, after Prophet Muhammad(SAW), the chain of prophethood has come to an end. According to this fundamental belief, anyone who now claims to be a Prophet of God should be viewed as an impostor, whose claim is contrary to the teachings of Islam.
All Muslim scholars consider such self-proclaimed prophets misguided opportunists, who have doomed their souls for worldly gains. Sadly, those unfortunate individuals, who follow the man-made ideology of such opportunists, won't fair much better in the hereafter, unless they are awakened by the truth of Allah(SWT) and abbandon the teachings of their self-motivated leaders.



It is those who believe not in the Signs of Allah that forge falsehood: it is they who lie!
(The Holy Quran, An-Nahl 16:105)



Khatmay-Nabuwat in the Quran
Close to one hundred verses of the holy Quran, directly or indirectly, support the doctrine of the Finality of Prophethood.

Verse 40 of the Surah Al-Ahzab (33), for instance, highlights this teaching in clear terms.

Two translations of this Ayah follow:



O people! Muhammad has no sons among ye men, but verily, he is the Apostle of God and the last in the line of Prophets. And God is Aware of everything.

Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things. (The Holy Quran, Al-Ahzab 33:40)

Muslim Scholars, since the time of our beloved Prophet(SAW), have correctly understood this verse to indicate that no new Prophet or Messenger will be sent to humanity until the day of judgment.
[Read: The Interpretation of well-known Muslim Scholars].

Numerous verses of the Quran indicate that the teachings of Islam have been completed, perfected, and preserved and have been meant universally for all the Worlds. Such statements eliminate every reason for which a new prophet may need to be commissioned to humanity. In this regard, we can briefly mention:



And We have not sent you (O Muhammad) save as a bringer of good tidings and a warner unto all mankind; but most of mankind do not know.(The Holy Quran, Saba 34:28)



Say: "O men! I am sent unto you all, as the Messenger of Allah, to Whom belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth: there is no god but He: it is He That giveth both life and death. So believe in Allah and His Messenger, the Unlettered Prophet, who believeth in Allah and His words: follow him that (so) ye may be guided."(The Holy Quran, Al-Araf 7:158)



If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good).(The Holy Quran, Al-e-Imran 3:85)

The following portion of the last revealed verse of the Holy Quran is also a testimony that no Apostle with new instructions or interpretations of the holy Quran will ever need to be sent to the humanity:



This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed my favor upon you and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.
(The Holy Quran, Al-Maidah 5:3)

The following verses, which appear at the very beginning of the holy Quran, indicate the qualities of the individuals, who will benefit from the holy Quran, and have been given an assurance of salvation. In its concise and precise form, Quran makes clear that these include revelations up to the time of Prophet Muhammad(SAW), and precludes the possibility of any future revelations, prophets, or religions.



This is the Scripture whereof there is no doubt, a guidance unto those who fear Allah, believe in the Unseen, are steadfast in prayer, give charity from what We have provided for them, and believe in the Revelation sent to you (O Muhammad) and before you, and (in their hearts) have the assurance of the Hereafter. They are on (true) guidance, from their Lord, and it is these who shall be successful.
(The Holy Quran, Al-Bagara 2:2-5)

Khatmay-Nabuwat in Hadith of Prophet(SAW)
Many verses of the Holy Quran allude to the special wisdom bestowed on the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) to understand and explain the revelations included in the Holy Quran. For example, in verse 4 of chapter 14 of the Quran, we read:



And We never sent a messenger save with the language of his folk, that he [Hazrat Muhammad(SAW)] might make (the message) clear for them. Then Allah sendeth whom He will astray, and guideth whom He will. He is the Mighty, the Wise.
(The Holy Quran, Ibrahim 14:4)

The following teachings of Prophet Muhammad(SAW) deal with the issue of Finality of Prophethood. As apparent from the references, these Ahadith are authentic and have been recorded by many scholars and reported by numerous companions of the Prophet(SAW).



My position in relation to the prophets who came before me can be explained by the following example: A man erected a building and adorned this edifice with great beauty, but he left an empty niche, in the corner where just one brick was missing. People looked around the building and marveled at its beauty, but wondered why a brick was missing from that niche? I am like unto that one missing brick and I am the last in the line of the Prophets.
(Bukhari, Muslim,Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad, Tirmizi, Babu Khatimin-Nabiyyin, Musnad Abu Dawud Tayalisi)



God has bestowed upon me six favors which the former Prophets did not enjoy:

• I have been endowed with the gift of pithy and perfect speech.
  
  
• I was granted victory owing to my awe.
  
  
• The spoils of war were made lawful unto me.
  
  
• The whole earth has been made the place of worship for me and it has become the means of purification for me also. In other words, in my religion, offering of prayers is not confined to certain specified places of worship. Prayers can be offered at any place over the earth. And in case water is not available, it is lawful for my people to perform ablutions with earth (Tayammum) and to cleanse themselves with the soil, if water for bathing is scarce.
  
  
• I have been sent by Allah to carry His Divine message to the whole world.
  
  
• And the line of prophets has come to its final end in me.
  (Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah)

I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am the effacer and infidelity shall be erased through me; I am the assembler. People shall be assembled on Doomsday after my time. And I am the last in the sense that no prophet shall succeed me.
(Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Muatta')



You (Hazrat Ali) are related to me as Aaron was related to Moses (pbuh). But no Apostle will come after me.
(Bukhari, Muslim
Musnad recorded a similar hadith ending in 'Behold there is no prophethood after me.')



If ever there arose a person from among my people who would hold communion with God, it would be none else but 'Umar bin Khattab.
(Bukhari , Muslim, Tirmidhi)



We are the last (ummah) but will precede all on the Day of Resurrection except that the Book was given to them before us.
(Bukhari, Muslim)



The tribe of Israel was guided by prophets. When a prophet passed away, another prophet succeeded him. But no prophet will come after me; only caliphs will succeed me.
(Bukhari)



I am the last in line of the prophets of God and my Masjid is the last Masjid.
(Muslim)



The chain of Messengers and Prophets has come to an end. There shall be no Messenger nor Prophet after me.
(Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad, Anas bin Malik)



There will arise thirty impostors in my Ummah and each one of them will pronounce to the world that he is a prophet, but I am the last in the line of the Prophets of God and no Prophet will come after me.
(Abu Dawood, Tirmizi)



Allah will send no Apostle after me, but only Mubashshirat (Good vision or pious vision).
(Musnad Ahmad, Abu Tufail, Nasa'i, Abu Dawud)



No Prophet will come after me and there will, therefore, be no other community of followers of any new Prophet.
(Baihaqi, Tabarani)



God Almighty hath sent unto the world no apostle who did not warn his people about the appearance of Dajjal (Anti-Christ, but Dajjal did not appear in their time). I am the last in the line of Prophets and you are the last community of believers. Without doubt, then, Dajjal shall appear from amongst you.
(Ibn Majah)



I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. There will be no prophet after me.
(Musnad Ahmad)

These are just a brief listing of the authentic teachings of Hazrat Muhammad(SAW) available on the issue of the Finality of Prophethood; should a true believer have any doubt about the Finality of Prophethood?



It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path.
(The Holy Quran, Al-Ahzab 33:36)

The Historic Sermon of Prophet(SWT)
Hazrat Muhammad(SAW) saw it fit to mention this very important fact in his historic sermon, which was witnessed by over 120,000 individuals. Through it, he again warned the entire mankind to stay away from destructive man-made cults, in the following words:



...O People, no prophet or apostle will come after me, and no new faith will be born. Reason well, therefore, O People, and understand my words which I convey to you...
(Read: The Entire Sermon)

Should we not heed the prophets'(SAW) warnings and stay away from false prophets?



We sent no messenger save that he should be obeyed by Allah's leave. And if, when they had wronged themselves, they had but come unto thee and asked forgiveness of Allah, and asked forgiveness of the messenger, they would have found Allah Forgiving, Merciful. But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decidest, and submit with full submission.
(The Holy Quran, An-Nisa 4:64-65)

The Opinion of Great Scholars of Islam
Throughout the centuries, Muslim Scholars have unanimously supported the fundamental doctrine of Finality of Prophethood in Prophet Muhammad(SAW). So much so, that the entire Ummah has recognized anyone who claims to be a prophet (in any capacity), supports someone else's claim to prophethood, or views such claimant as a religious leader, to be an unbeliever (Kafir).
[Read: The Opinion of well-known Muslim Scholars].

Should we not accept the opinion of our knowledgeable Muslim Scholars?



O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination.
(The Holy Quran, An-Nisa, 4:59)

Dictionary Translation
Hoping to misguide individuals, who lack knowledge of linguistics and Arabic language, some unlearned opportunists have attempted to misinterprete the verse 33:40 of Al-Ahzab, which was mentioned earlier, since it is the best known verse in support of the doctrine of the Finality of Prophethood. Such individuals often claim the word khatam, in the context of the verse, to mean "stamp", "seal", "best", "decoration" or "ring"! They also claim that the word Nabiyyeen indicates the "law giving prophets".

The actual dictionary translations of the words khatam nabuwat, in this context, are as follows:

Khatam: Can be read in two ways: khatam, meaning last or seal; and khatim meaning seal or terminator.
The authorative dictionary of Lisanul-Arab indicates that both 'khatam' and 'khatim' mean "last of them" and the Qamoos dictionary says that it indicates the "last person", like a seal.

Nabuwat: Messengership; Prophethood of any kind, since all Messengers (rasuls or law giving prophets) are also Prophets.

In the word of Allah(SWT), the Quran was revealed in detail in the arabic language so Arabs would understand it without a problem. True to God's promise, no arabic speaking person will have a doubt of what is meant by Khatme-Nabuwat. Isn't it particularly amusing to find self-proclaimed "prophets", who according to historical records did not even have a working knowledge of the Arabic language, tried to reinterprete this verse?



Had We sent this as a Qur'an (in a language) other than Arabic they would have said: "Why are not its verses explained in detail? What! (a Book) not in Arabic and (a Messenger) an Arab?" Say: "It is a guide and a healing to those who believe; and for those who believe not there is a deafness in their ears and it is blindness in their (eyes); they are (as it were) being called from a place far distant!(The Holy Quran, Ha-Mim 41:44)
(12:2, 13:37, 16:103, 20:113, 26:195, 39:028, 41:003, 42:7, 43:3, and 46:12 also illuminate the point that proper knowledge of arabic language is required to avoid mistranslating/misinterpreting the Holy Quran.)

Conclusion
The sheer amount of evidence provided here should suffice to convince anyone believing in the divinity of Islam that the prophet Muhammad(SAW) was the last Prophet of God and that anyone with a claim to prophethood should be considered an outcast from Islam. No one can better state this fact, than Allah(SWT) himself:



Who doth more wrong than such as forge a lie against Allah or deny His Signs? But never will prosper those who sin.
(The Holy Quran, Yunus 10:60)



Those who believe not in the Signs of Allah, Allah will not guide them and theirs will be a grievous Penalty.
(The Holy Quran, An-Nahl 16:104)

Bear witness that we are Muslims and we have conveyed the true message of Allah so that you might benefit from it.



Therefore give admonition in case the admonition profits (the hearer). The admonition will be received by those who fear (Allah): But it will be avoided by those most unfortunate ones. Who will enter the Great Fire In which they will then neither die nor live.
(The Holy Quran, Al-A'la 87:9-13)

The Historic Sermon of Prophet Muhammad(SAW)
This sermon was delivered on the Ninth Day of Dhul-Hijjah 10 A.H. in the 'Uranah valley of Mount Arafat' in Mecca.
After praising and thanking Allah the Prophet (saws) said:

"O People, lend me an attentive ear, for I know not whether after this year, I shall ever be amongst you again. Therefore,listen to what I am saying to you very carefully and take these words to those who could not be present here today.

O People, just as you regard this month, this day, this city as Sacred, so regard the life and property of every Muslim as a sacred trust. Return the goods entrusted to you to their rightful owners. Hurt no one so that no one may hurt you. Remember that you will indeed meet your Lord, and that He will indeed reckon your deeds. Allah has forbidden you to take usury (interest), therefore all interest obligation shall henceforth be waived. Your capital, however, is yours to keep. You will neither inflict nor suffer any inequity. Allah has Judged that there shall be no interest and that all the interest due to Abbas Ibn 'Abd'al Muttalib (the deceased prophet's uncle) shall henceforth be waived.

Beware of Satan, for the safety of your religion. He has lost all hope that he will ever be able to lead you astray in big things, so beware of following him in small things.

O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have taken them as your wives only under Allah's trust and with His permission. If they abide by your right, then to them belongs the right to be fed and clothed in kindness. Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers. And it is your right that they do not make friends with any one of whom you do not approve, as well as never to be unchaste.

O People, listen to me in earnest, worship Allah, say your five daily prayers (Salah), fast during the month of Ramadan, and give your wealth in Zakat. Perform Hajj if you can afford to.

All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white - except by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly. Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves.

Remember, one day you will appear before Allah and answer your deeds. So beware, do not stray from the path of righteousness after I am gone.

People, no prophet or apostle will come after me and no new faith will be born. Reason well, therefore, O People, and understand words which I convey to you. I leave behind me two things, the Quran and my example, the Sunnah (Hadith), and if you follow these you will never go astray.

All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again; and may the last ones understand my words better than those who listen to me directly. Be my witness, O Allah, that I have conveyed your message to your people."

Islamic Belief of Finality of Prophethood
The holy Quran and the holy Prophet's Ahadith (teachings) eloquently prove that prophethood (nabuwwat and risalat) came to an end with our Prophet Muhammad(SAW). There are decisive verses to that effect. Being the last Prophet in the chain of prophethood, no one ever shall now succeed him to that status of dignity."Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things."(Holy Quran, 33:40)
Interpreters of the Holy Quran
All the interpreters of the Holy Quran agree on the meaning of Khatam-un-Nabieen that our Prophet(SAW) was the last of all prophets and none shall be exalted to the lofty position of prophethood after him. Here are a few examples:

Imam Hafiz Ibn-e-Katheer:

"This verse is conclusive of the precept that our Prophet(SAW) is the last and that there shall be no Nabi(Prophet) after him. When there shall be no Nabi to follow him, the ordainment of a Rasool (Messenger) can not arise by logic of anteriority because the status of a Rasool is more exclusive then that of a Nabi. EveryNabi is not a Rasool, but every Rasool is a Nabi. There exists a continuous and unbroken chain of citations of Ahadith from a large number of venerable Sahabah or Companions of the Prophet(Allah be pleased with them), that there shall be no Nabi or Rasool after Muhammad(SAW)".
(Tafseer Ibn-e-Khateer, Vol. 3, P. 453)
Imam Ghazali:

"No doubt the Ummah (all Muslims) has unanimously understood from this word (Khatam-un-Nabieen) and its circumstantial reference to mean non-existence of a Nabi or Rasool ever after Muhammad(SAW) and that (this word calls for) no reservation or tacit interpretation in it; hence its dissident is certainly the one who rejects the Ummah's unanimity". (Al Iqtisad fil Etiqad, P. 123)
Finality of Prophethood and Ahadith
The Prophet(SAW) unequivocally declared that he was the final Prophet. There are a large number of Ahadith to sustain this article of Islamic faith. Not only that but the Prophet(SAW) was also pleased to bring forth such expositions of this word (Khatam-un-Nabieen) that all doubts relating to his finality in prophethood stand void and misinterpretations exposed. Many people having theological distinctions to their credit have stressed upon the unbroken and consecutive nature of those Ahadith which concern finality of prophethood. Opinions of some of them are quoted below:

Hafiz Ibn-e-Hazam says on page 77 of his Kitab-ul-Fasl:

"All those personages who have dwelt upon the subject of Muhammad'(SAW) prophethood, his miracles and expounded the holy Quran, have stated that he(SAW) had informed that there would be no prophet after him".
Hafiz Ibne-Khateer writes under the caption, "finality of prophethood":

"And on this (Finality of Prophethood) there have come from Allah's Messenger(SAW) "mutawatir" (absolutely certain and numerous) Ahadith which have by an unbroken chain of his companions (Allah be pleased with them)".
Allama Syed Mahmood Aloosi writes in Tafseer Roohul-Mani:

"That he (Muhammad(SAW)) was the final prophet, is ordained by the Quran, acknowledged by the Sunnah and agreed upon by the Ummah; hence a claimant to the contrary will be (determined as) Kaffir (unbeliever) and put to death if he is persistent".
To conclude therefore finality of prophethood is an article of faith by the Qurans text and Mutawatir Ahadith. Some are reproduced below:

The Last Brick
The Prophet of God(SAW) affirmed:

"My position in relation to the prophets who came before me can be explained by the following example: A man erected a building and adorned this edifice with great beauty, but he left an empty niche, in the corner where just one brick was missing. People looked around the building and marveled at its beauty, but wondered why a brick was missing from that niche? I am like unto that one missing brick and I am the last in the line of the Prophets."
(Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib). This Hadith has also been related in Muslim, Tirmizi, and Musnad of Ahmad.
Line of Prophethood Terminated
The Holy Prophet(SAW) observed:

"God has bestowed upon me six favors which the former Prophets did not enjoy: (1) I have been endowed with the gift of pithy and perfect speech. (2) I was granted victory owing to my awe. (3) The spoils of war were made lawful unto me. (4) The whole earth has been made the place of worship for me and it has become the means of purification for me also. In other words in my religion, offering of prayers is not confined to certain specified places of worship. Prayers can be offered at any place over the earth. And in case water is not available it is lawful for my people to perform ablutions with earth (Tayammum) and to cleanse themselves with the soil if water for bathing is scarce. (5) I have been sent by Allah to carry His Divine message to the whole world. (6) And the line of prophets has come to its final end in me."
(Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah)
Address to Hazrat Ali

The Holy Prophet(SAW) told Hadrat 'Ali:
"You are related to me as Aaron was related to Moses(peace be upon him). But no Apostle will come after me."
(Bukhari and Muslim, Kitab Fada'il as-Sahaba)
Difference With Tribe of Israel
The Holy Prophet(SAW) observed:

"The tribe of Israel was guided by prophets. When a prophet passed away, another prophet succeeded him. But no prophet will come after me; only caliphs will succeed me."
(Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib).
Thirty Liars in the Ummah
It is related by Hazrat Thauban(RA) that our Prophet(SAW) said:

"In my Ummah there shall be born thirty liars (dajjals) each of them will claim that he is a prophet but I am the last of the Prophets; there shall be no prophet after me".
(Abu Dawood and Tirmizi)
No Prophet or Messenger After Me
The Prophet of Allah(SAW) affirmed:

"The chain of Messengers and Prophets has come to an end. There shall be no Messenger nor Prophet after me."
(Tirmidhi, Kitab-ur-Rouya Babu Zahab-un- Nubuwwa, Musnad Ahmad, Marwiyat-Anas bin Malik)
Last Prophet: Last Ummah
Abu Hurairah(RA) said, I heard the Prophet(SAW) saying:

"We are the last (ummah) but will precede all on the Day of Resurrection except that the Book was given to them before us".
(Bukhari and Muslim)
If There Were To Be A Prophet It Would Have Been Umar(RA)

The Holy Prophet(SAW) said:

"If an Apostle were to succeed me, it would have been 'Umar bin Khattab." (Tirmidhi,Kitab-ul- Manaqib)
I Am Hashir, I am Aaqib, I am Muqaffi
The Holy Prophet(SAW) observed:

"I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am the effacer and infidelity shall be erased through me; I am the assembler. People shall be assembled on Doomsday after my time. (In other words Doom is my only successor.) And I am the last in the sense that no prophet shall succeed me."
(Bukhari and Muslim, Kitab-ul-Fada'il, Bab: Asmaun-Nabi; Tirmidhi, Kitab-ul- Adab, Bab: Asma-un-Nabi; Muatta', Kitab-u-Asma in-Nabi, Al- Mustadrak Hakim, Kitab-ut-Tarikh, Bab: Asma-un-Nabi.)
To Conclude
It stands proved in the above written lines that (1) the Holy Quran, (2) unbroken chain of "Mutawatir" Ahadith, and (3) Consensus of the Muslim Ummah vouch that the holy Prophet Muhammad(SAW) was the terminator of the entire chain of venerable prophets with no exception (peace be upon them). Therefore no person after him(SAW) can be called a prophet in any meaning or sense and nobody can fix for himself a prophetic stance by his guile or guise. Consequently, he who does so or tries to do so or if anybody believes in the prophethood of that claimant, then such a person is a cast off from the fold of Islam.

And this finality of the holy Prophet(SAW) is a status which is most dignified, an honor most distinguished and an esteem most high. It is therefore a grave insult to the holy Prophet(SAW), if somebody is so insolent as to lay a claim to the line of prophethood.

Moreover, even if one stretches ones human imagination to the farthest end and presumes there is some prophet who has come in the world, he should seek for a proof to substantiate his hypothesis, i.e. whether or not this new-comer-of-the prophet has been indoctrinated with some fresh disciplines. If it is said that no new learnings were given to the new prophet; rather the same learnings were again revealed to him as had already been revealed to the holy Prophet Muhammad(SAW) that would be an inexplicable repetition. With the existing Prophetic learnings and the indiminishing Quranic reservoir of knowledge, such repetition by the "new prophet" should turn into a divine exercise in futility, whereas Allah the exalted is absolutely above anything futile. And if the plea is that this later claimant to prophethood was specifically bestowed with such learnings as were not conferred upon the holy Prophet(SAW) then this is (Allah forbid) tantamount to (1) belittling doctrinal learnings sent by Allah through Muhammad(SAW), (2) insinuating that the Quran lacks completeness and (3) hinting at the imperfection of the Islamic faith, thereby disbelieving in the Quranic verse (Holy Quran, 5:3), "This day I have perfected your Religion". Such thoughts and actions heap worst indignity upon the holy Prophet(SAW), the Quran and the religion of Islam.

Moreover, if just for the sake of argument, it is supposed that there is a prophet after our holy Prophet(SAW), then as a natural corollary it will become incumbent upon all to express allegiance to him and believe in whatever he says or does; and conversely disbelief in him will be deemed infidelity and Kufr! Otherwise, what else could prophethood signify? Such supposition in effect amounts to insulting the holy Prophet(SAW) and finding fault with him to the extent that one who believes in him and his entire religion is deemed an unbeliever (Kaffir) deserving hell for ever. It would mean that even belief in the holy Prophet Muhammad(SAW) would (Allah forbid) not be adequate to protect him from disbelief (Kufr) and the Hell.

May Allah the exalted grant all the Muslims his graciousness to remain attached to the cloak of the holy Prophet Muhammad(SAW).

by Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi​

Molvi Zarvan sahib, all you do is copy and paste your point of view. You totally ignore what someone else writes, I doubt you even read what you copy and paste yourself. I see you did not directly reply to my replies about your "excerpts". Am I right in assuming that you have either not bothered to read or that you cannot answer them? For its all good and dandy that you keep copy pasting stuff and I keep replying, but that is hardly fair since I actually read every thing you post while you hardly read the first line and go on google to copy paste more stuff.

Well okay, since we are going to continue copy paste football match, here goes:

A Misunderstanding Removed - Ahmadis Do Believe in the Holy Prophet (saw) As Khataman Nabiyeen
It is alleged that Ahmadies do not believe in the Holy Prophet Muhammadsaw to be Khataman Nabiyyeen. This is based on a gross misrepresentation of the Ahmadiyya views and I would like to present the following to remove this misunderstanding.
At the very outset I would like to state categorically that Ahmadies believe the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be upon him) to be Khataman Nabiyyeen - Seal of the Prophets, as has been stated in the Holy Quran and it is an awful fabrication against the Ahmadies that they do not believe in the doctrine of Khatm-i-Nabuwwat. The difference is only in interpretation of the title and not in the title itself.
The Promised Messiah and Mahdi, the Holy Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam (peace be upon him) says: "I swear by the glory of God and His Majesty that I am of the faithful, a Muslim and I believe in Allah, the High, in His Books, and in His Messengers and in His Angels and in Life after death. And I believe that our Prophet Muhammad the Elect of God (peace of Allah be on him and His blessings) is the most eminent of the prophets and the Seal of Apostles." (Hamamatul Bushra, page 6) He again says: "The charge made against me and my Community that we do not believe the Messenger of Allah (peace be on him and His blessings) to be the Seal of Prophets is a big falsehood. The faith, the conviction, certitude and the utterness that characterize our belief in the Holy Prophet as the Seal of Prophets, are markedly absent in the belief of these people (those who level this charge at us)." (Al-Hakam, March 19, 1905) Many Muslims believe that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) is the last prophet and that no prophet can come after him. I shall first state and examine the arguments that are given in support of this belief, then show that this is true only in a certain sense.
The Holy Quran says: "Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Apostle of Allah and Khataman Nabiyyeen--The Seal of the Prophets." (33:41)
The real meaning of Khatam is a seal (see Tajul Aroos, Lisanul Arab, and Qamoos), and the phrase should be interpreted in the light of this meaning. Ibn Khaldun says it is wrong to interpret the word Khatam in this verse to mean the last or the end (see Muqaddama Vol. II, p. 54, Paris). He holds that the word Khatam denotes the consummation and completion of a thing, which he further explains by the words, authenticity, perfection and validity. When a seal is put to a letter it becomes authentic and complete. The seal may be put in the end or in the beginning. According to him, therefore, Khataman Nabiyyeen would mean the truest and the most perfect of prophets and not the last in point of time. It refers to his status and place among the prophets and not to the time of his advent.
USE OF THE WORD KHATAM:
In one of his sayings the Holy ProphetSAW calls his uncle, Hadhrat Abbasra, Khatamul Muhajireen (see Kanzul Ommal, Vol. VI, p. 178). But it does not mean that Abbas was the last Muhajir (refugee) of the whole Muslim world.
Similarly, Hadhrat Alira is called Khatamul Auliya (see Tafsir Safi under the Quranic verse 33:41). Ibn Khaldun says this phrase is understood to mean that Ali was a perfect saint and not the last (see Muqaddama, Vol. II pp. 165-167).
An Arab poet, Hasan bin Wahab, called Abu Tamam (the compiler of Himasa) Khatamush-Shu'ara (see Wafiyatul A'ayan Li Ibn Khallikan, Vol. I, p. 123, Cairo). Obviously Abu Tamam was not the last poet. The word Khatam, therefore, used in such phrases means the best and not the last.
The context of a verse is a most important factor in determining its true meaning. If we look into the context of the words we are further assured of the same meaning.
The verse runs as follows: "Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of God and Khataman Nabiyyeen." God is obviously refuting an objection, viz., Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) has no male issue. Elsewhere we read in the Quran: "Surely it is thy enemy and not thou who shall be childless and without posterity." (108:4)
These words are said to have been revealed when Al-Aas Ibn Wayel called the Holy ProphetSAW Abtar (having no children or posterity) on the death of his son Al-Qasim (see Jalaluddin's Commentary under verse 108:4). As an answer to this taunt of the enemies, God declared in the verse under discussion that the line of his physical male descendants is no doubt cut off by the death of his sons but as Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) is a Messenger of God, he possesses devoted followers who shall form a continuous and long line of spiritual descendants to keep his memory and name and teachings alive for ever and ever.
The followers of a prophet are often described as his spiritual children. The meaning of the word Khataman Nabiyyeen must fit with this context. To say that Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) is the last of the prophets and there shall be no prophet after him does no credit to him. His enemies could at once add an insult by saying that Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on be him) failed to produce a progeny in the spiritual sense of the word also and thus proved himself (God forbid) barren and abtar in every respect. According to the context, therefore, the Seal of the Prophets must mean that the spiritual descendants of Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on be him) would be of no mean order. They would, God says, attain to great spiritual distinctions so must so that by following in his footsteps some of them would even become prophets.
The Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on be him) is called here the Lord Privy Seal or the Lord Keeper of the great Divine Seal of Prophethood, which not only ratifies and authenticates the office of the previous prophets but also awards the distinctive mark of prophethood to those who make themselves worthy of it. (Haqeeqatul Wahy by Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, p. 56) We read in the Bible: "The Lord will make thee the head and not the tail; thou shalt be above only and thou not be beneath." (Deuteronomy 28:13)
To be the tail of a line, therefore, is no credit or distinction. Even if we take the phrase Khataman Nabiyyeen to mean the last of the prophets; we must interpret it as meaning that he is the last in the sense that he has attained a degree of perfection beyond which it is impossible for anyone to go. He has exhausted all the degrees of perfection and none can ever excel or supersede him. He is the Head of the prophets and not the tail.
NO NEW CODE:
He is the greatest not because he appeared last of all but because he has brought a law which is absolutely final and can never be replaced or excelled. Ibn Khaldun also mentions this meaning in his Muqaddama (Vol. II, p. 165, Paris). Ali Bin Muhammad Sultan Al-Qari (Mulla Ali Qari) interprets this phrase in the same sense. He says that it means that there will not come a prophet after Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on be him) who could cancel his law and who is not a follower of his (Mauzooat Kabeer, p.69).
Sheikh Mohyud Din Ibn Arabi says that the prophethood which brings law is finished with the advent of Muhammad, peace and blessings of God be on be him. (Fosoosul Hikam, p. 140)
Shah Waliullah Muhaddas of Delhi writes that Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on be him) was the last of the prophets in the sense that there will appear no one after him to promulgate a new law for the people. (Tafheemate Ilahiya, 53)
Syed Abdul Kadir Jeelani says: "The prophetic law is finished and completed with the Holy Prophet and he was called Khataman Nabiyyeen. (Al-Insanul Kamil, Ch. 36)
Maulana Abdul Haye of Lukhnow says: "It is not impossible that a new prophet may appear during or after the age of Muhammad but bringing of a new code of religion is an absolute impossibility." (Dafi-ul-Wasawis fee asr ibn Abbas, p. 12)
THE TRADITIONS:
I shall now deal with Hadith (Traditions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) on this subject. The Holy ProphetSAW said to Ali Ibn Abi Talibra: "You are to me as Aaron was to Moses, except that *Laa Nabiyya Ba'adi".
(Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi, Mishkat) The last words are translated as: there is no prophet after me. On the basis of these words it is contended that if it were really possible for anyone to become a prophet, no one could have been more deserving than Hadhrat Alira, who was not only a near relation of but succeeded the Holy ProphetSAW as the 4th Khalifa. The words were uttered when the Holy ProphetSAW was going to Tabook and appointed Hadhrat Alira as the Ameer at Medina after him. Hadhrat Alira was desirous of participating in the battle and did not wish to stay behind. The Holy ProphetSAW, therefore, reminded Hadhrat Alira of the importance of his work by referring to Hadhrat Aaronas who was appointed Ameer of the Israelites when Mosesas went to Mount Sinai. Hadhrat Aaronas was the brother of Hadhrat Mosesas and a prophet of God. Hadhrat Alira was a cousin but not a prophet. The Holy ProphetSAW could not be blunt but he must not be misunderstood in such matters. Therefore, he added that he was not leaving a prophet behind him. The word Ba'ad means behind. (see Lane's Lexicon Book I, p. 225)
The context shows that the idea was to tell Alira that he was being left behind like Hadhrat Aaronas but he was not a prophet. The words cannot refer to any remote future. They were used and meant for that particular occasion. The word Ba'ad is often used in this sense. In verse 7:149 of the Quran this word is translated by Pickhall as `after I had left you'. The word Ba'ad is also used in the sense of Ma'a, i.e., with. (Lane's Lexicon Book I, p. 225) In this sense the sentence La Nabiyya Ba'adee would mean that there was no prophet with him.
It is curious to note that in the Shia traditions the words used are Laisa Ma'ee Nabiyyun, i.e., there is no prophet with me (Amalee). In other traditions the words reported are quite clear. The Holy ProphetSAW added "except that thou art not a prophet". (Tabaqati Kabeer, Vol. V., p. 15) There is another tradition which is very clear: "Dost thou not desire to be what Aaron was to Moses except that thou art not a prophet". (Biharul Anwar, Kitabul Manaqib, Vol. 9, Iran) Taking the word Ba'ad to mean after, we can interpret the sentence in another way. If we go into the idiom of language we find that the words are not to be taken in their literal sense. There is another tradition where the Holy ProphetSAW says: "When Chosroe dies there will be no Chosroe after him, and when Kaiser dies there will be no Kaiser after him." (Bukhari, Vol. IV, p. 91, Egypt) This is explained in Faithful Bari, Vol. VI as follows: "No Chosroe will administer the affairs of State as well as this Chosroe has done." Obviously it cannot mean that there will be no king after the Chosroe or Kaiser.
Muhyuddin Ibn Arabi interprets La Nabiyya Ba'adi by saying that there shall be no prophet who will cancel or go against the Islamic law of Hadhrat Muhammad SAW. (Fotoohati Makkiya Vol. I, p. 569; Vol. II, pp. 3, 64, 417)
Imam Muhammad Tahir Gujrati also says the same thing. (Takmala Majmaul Bihar, p. 85) Imam Sha'arani also interprets these words in the same way. (Al-Yawaqeet Wal Jawahir, Vol. II, p. 22)
Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan states the same. (Iqtarabus Sa'a, p. 162)
Hazrat Ayeshara, whose position is well known, says: "Say he is the Seal of the Prophets but do not say that there is no prophet after him". (Takmala Majmaul Bihar, p. 88) Imam Soyooti writes that Mogheera also expressed the same opinion. (Durri Mansoor) The other Hadith brought forward is:

Lau Kaana Ba'adi Nabiyyeen Lakaana Umaro.

"If there were a prophet after me, it would have been Umar." The word Ba'ad as stated earlier also means `with', and there is nothing here which should confine its meaning to `after'. Therefore, the tradition should be translated as: "If there were a prophet with me it would have been Umar." In another tradition, the Holy ProphetSAW says: "If I were not raised it would have been you, O Umar." (Mirqat, Vol. V, p. 539) Another saying is: "If I was not raised, Umar would have been raised among you." (, p. 103) These traditions would only show that Umarra had an aptitude for a prophet, like Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) who brought the Islamic law. Therefore, the Hadith in question would mean that if a prophet were to bring a new law, it could have been Umarra. It cannot mean that there can be no prophet after Hadhrat Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him). In another tradition, the Holy ProphetSAW clearly implies the opposite. He says: "If Ibrahim (his son) had lived, he would have been a Prophet." (Ibn Maja, Vol. I, p. 237)
He could not say this if it were absolutely impossible for anyone to become a prophet. This shows clearly that the Holy Prophet was clear in mind as to the continuity of prophethood after him. Another tradition points to the same effect when he says: "Abu Bakr is best of men after me except a prophet should appear." (Kanzul Ummal)
The next Hadith that is brought forward is: "I am Aqib and he is one after whom there is no prophet." (Tirmidhi) The authenticity of this Hadith is very much questioned. Mulla Ali Qari, who is a recognized critic of Hadith, definitely declares that the last portion of this Hadith is spurious. He says it appears to be the interpretation put upon the word Aqib by some reporter. (Mirqat, Vol. V, p. 367)
The next Hadith in support of this belief is: "I am the last of the Prophets and you are the last of peoples." (Muslim) The meaning of this is explained by another Hadith which runs as follows: "and my mosque is the last mosque." (Muslim, Kitabul Haj Fazlis Salat, p. 531) It is clear that the Holy Prophet did not mean that there was to be no prophet after him, otherwise we shall have to conclude that he did not want the Muslims to build any other mosques. Obviously, what he means is that the religion brought by him is perfect and no one can cancel or modify it after him.
The use of the word Akhir (last) in this sense is quite common in the Arabic language. Imam Soyooti calls Ibn Taimiyya as the last of Mujtahideen (original thinkers and Jurists). (Al-Intibah Wan Nazir, Vol. III, p. 310, Hyderbad) An Arab poet uses the word Akhir (last) in the sense of perfect and unique, in Himasa, Babul Adab.
It is clear from the foregoing that it is not Ahmadies alone who are interpreting the expression Khataman Nabiyyeen (Seal of Prophets) in a manner allowing the appearance of a prophet after the Holy ProphetSAW, who does not bring any new Shariah (Law) and does not attain prophethood independently but through complete obedience to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him). Even recognized Muslim saints of different countries, ages, and clines, and even the Holy Prophet himself, have understood the expression in the like manner.
The Ahmadiyya belief, beyond any shadow of doubt, is par excellence that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) is Khataman Nabiyyeen, i.e., the Seal of the Prophets. In him the excellences of prophethood have reached their perfection and therefore, the door to receiving prophethood independently is closed since his appointment to this office. Henceforth, every kind of Grace is attainable only through serving him.
His advent, thus has not closed the stream of Divine Grace but its course has been channelized through his person which is now, so to say, the new Headwork. A prophet, henceforth, shall appear only through allegiance to him, by receiving light from his light and as his shadow and reflection, and not otherwise. Hence, "all prophethood except Muhammadan prophethood has ended. No law-giving prophet shall ever come, and a prophet without law may, but only such as is primarily a follower of the Holy Prophet (Allah bless him). I am both a follower and a Prophet." (Tajalliyate Ilahiyya by Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, pp. 24-25)







Covenant of the Prophets
And remember the time when Allah took a covenant from the people through the Prophets, saying, ‘Whatever I give you of the Book and Wisdom and then there comes to you a Messenger, fulfilling that which is with you, you shall believe in him and help him.’ And He said, ‘Do you agree, and do you accept the responsibility which I lay upon you in this matter?’ They said, ‘We agree.’ He said, ‘Then bear witness and I am with you among the witnesses.’ (Surah Ale-Imran 3:82)

In this verse, Allah has mentioned the covenant, which He took from all the prophets and through them from their followers also, regarding acceptance and help of any such prophet who testifies the teachings they already have. Testifying here does not mean mere declaration of truthfulness of the teachings which every believer does, but to fulfill the prophecies mentioned therein. Non-Ahmadi Muslim scholars argue that Hadhrat Muhammad sa is not included in this covenant. Though there is no such indication whatsoever that the Holy Prophet sa is excluded from the term ‘Prophets’ mentioned in this verse, this misconception is cleared by the following verse wherein Allah has specifically mentioned the Holy Prophet sa by addressing him.

And call to mind when We took from the Prophets their covenant, and from thee, and from Noah and Abraham, and Moses and Jesus, son of Mary, and We indeed, took from them a solemn covenant; (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:8)

This verse explains that this covenant was not only taken from the previous prophets but also from the Holy Prophet Muhammad sa. According to this covenant, the Muslim Ummah has been made responsible that whenever a prophet comes to them who testify Islam and believe in the Holy Prophet sa, they have to accept him and support him.

Allah has reminded this “covenant” in the following verse exhorting people to fulfill their promise and believe in the prophet who hasn’t brought a new religion but calling them towards their own God they already believe in.

Why is it that you believe not in Allah, while the Messenger calls you to believe in your Lord, and He has already taken a covenant from you, if indeed you are believers? (Surah Al-Hadid 57:9)

The repercussions and consequences of breaking this covenant have been mentioned in the following verse:

And those who break the covenant of Allah, after having established it and cut asunder what Allah has commanded to be joined, and act corruptly in the earth, on them is the curse of Allah and they shall have a grievous abode. (Surah Ar-Ra'd 13:26)

Founder of Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama`at, Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as of Qadian (1835-1908), who claimed to be that Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi whose advent has been foretold by the Holy Quran and the Holy Prophet sa, not only testified the truthfulness of Islam, the Holy Prophet sa and the Holy Quran but also the prophecies of the Holy Qur`ān and Hadīth, related to his personality and time are fulfilled.

These prophecies include solar and lunar eclipse in Ramadan; spread of plagues and epidemics; world wars, invention of modern transport system; and linking of oceans etc.

In the light of these exhortations and the injunctions of the Holy Qur`ān, it is our responsibility, being Muslims, that we fulfill the covenant Allāh took from us through the Prophets and not only accept the Promised Messiah as but also help him in spreading the message of Islam world over.


These are the opinions of some great muslim scholars, I'm sure you've heard of them.
Hazrat Sheikh Ahmad Farooqi:

'The rising of prophets after the Khatamar Rasul Hazrat Muhammad, the Chosen One, peace and blessings be upon him, from among his own followers and as a heritage, does not in any way run counter to his status as the Khatamar rasul. Therefore, O reader, do not be among those who doubt.' Maktubat Imam Rabbani, Hazrat Mujaddid Alf Thani



Hazrat Imam Mohiyyiud Din ibni Arabi:

'From the study and contemplation of the Darud we have arrived at the definite conclusion that there shall, from among the Muslims, certainly be persons whose status, in the matter of prophethood, shall advance to the level of prophets, if Allah pleases. But they shall not be given any book of law.' Fatuhati Makiyyah: Vol 1. pg 545


Hazrat Imam Abu Ja'far Sadiq:

'Hazrat Abu Ja'far, while discussing the Quranic verse: "For verily We granted the Book to the children of Abraham...," said that God vouchsafed to the children of Abraham, Messengers, Prophets and Imams. But what is ironical is that people believe in what God blessed the children of Abraham with and yet they deny this blessing for the progeny of Muhammad.' Al-Saafi Sharah Asool Al-Kaafi, Part 3, Pg. 119

Hazrat Imam Abdul Wahhab She'raani :

...prophethood has not been abolished and it is only law-bearing prophethood that is abolished. (Al Yawaaqeetu Wal Jawaahir: Vol. 3 pg. 35)

Allama Qummi:

Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah

The Muhaddith of Dehli, Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah subscribed to this opinion and stated: 'The meaning of the Holy Prophet being the Khataman Nabiyeen is that there shall not now appear a person whom God may appoint with a new Law for mankind, that is to say, there shall be no prophet who shall come with a new Law.' (Tafheemati Ilahiyyah pg. 53)

The Hakim ul Millat in fact gave credence to the opinion that prophets within the Ummah may arise when he stated: 'There cannot be an independent prophet after the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who is not his follower and his adherent.' (Al Khairul Katheer: pg 111)

This is a short note on a common narration relied upon by Aḥmadī and non-Aḥmadī Muslims within their ‘’Finality of Prophethood’’ discourses. ‘Ā’ishah (radī Allāhu ‘anhā), the ‘’Mother of the Faithful,’’ is reported to have said: “Say of the Messenger of Allāh [that he is] the Seal of the Prophets and do not say [that there will be] no Prophet after him’’ (qūlu li-rasūl Allāh, Sall Allāh ‘alayhī wa sallam, khātam al-anbiyā’ wa la taqūlu lā nabī ba‘dah).’’ (i) This is an early report which is found in Ibn Qutayba’s (d. 885) book ”ta’wīl mukhtalif al-ḥadith” wherein it is used by the author to reconcile the conflicting Islamic principles that the Prophet (ṣall Allāhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) was khātim al-nabīyīn (i.e., last Prophet) and that Jesus (‘alayhi al-salām) would return as the Messiah after the passing of the Prophet (ṣall Allāhu ‘alayhi wa sallam). (ii) A similar version of the narration is found the earlier ‘’Muṣnaf’’ of Ibn Abī Shaybah (d.849). (iii)


Imām al-Ṣuyūtī (d. 1505) also includes the above narration in his much later Commentary of the Qur’ān ‘’Durr al-manthūr’’ and adds the following narration:

‘A man once said in the presence of al-Mughīra b. Shu’ba: God bless Muḥammad the Seal of the Prophets; after him there will be no Prophet. Mughīrah replied: Be content with saying Seal of the Prophets, for we have been told that Jesus will appear and should he appear he would have been before him and after him (i.e. the Prophet) (fa-in huwa khārij fa kāna qablahu wa ba‘dahu).’ (iv)

The issues which usually arise are twofold, namely:

1) Non-Aḥmadīs often argue that the Ḥaḍrat ‘Ā’ishah (radī Allāhu ‘anhā) narration is only found in the works of Imām al-Ṣuyūṭī; and

2) Even if one is to accept this narration, it cannot be understood as a proof of the permissibility of ‘’ẓillī’’ / ‘’burūzī nabuwwah.

As you will have already observed, the narration is not singularly found in the works of Imām al-Ṣuyūṭī, as is often argued, but is also present in the much earlier works of Ibn Abī Shaybah and Ibn Qutaybah.

Regarding the second point, non-Aḥmadīs will often argue that the report is only intended to reconcile the fact that Ḥaḍrat Jesus (‘alayhi al-salām) would again return after the Prophet (ṣall Allāhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) with his Prophethood intact. It is unfortunate, yet so often the case, that this view is held to the exclusion of the Aḥmadī interpretation. I believe that Ḥaḍrat Mirza Ghulām Aḥmad (‘alayhi al-salām) claimed to be a ‘’ẓillī’’ / ‘’burūzī’’ Nabī and the Promised Messiah / second manifestation of Ḥaḍrat Jesus (‘alayhi al-salām). The above mentioned ‘Ā’ishah (radī Allāhu ‘anhā) narration, coupled with the Ḥaḍrat Mughīrah (raḍī Allahu ‘anhu) narration that usually accompanies it, are completely in line with the above claims of Ḥaḍrat Mirza Ghulām Aḥmad (‘alayhi al-salām). Feel free to hold that these narrations only refer to the second coming of Ḥaḍrat Jesus (‘alayhi al-salam), but do not rubbish the alternative interpretation which is quite reasonable and in context. To do so would be rather dishonest.

On a final note, it is also often said that Aḥmadīs are deceptive as they quote the Imām al-Ṣuyūṭī narration and fail to quote the Ḥaḍrat al-Mughīrah narration that follows it. This is completely untrue and with little foundation. The primary contemporary Āḥmadī text which quotes this narration, from ‘’Durr al-Manthūr,’’ is the book ‘’Beacon’s of Truth” (see here). You will notice that the original Arabic containing all of the narrations is scanned in for the wholw world to see (hardly hidden or indicative of a deception).

Footnotes

(1) Ibn Qutaybah, Ta’wīl mukhtalif al-ḥadīth, 271-271. In his commentary of 33:40, al-Qurtubī includes the following narration attributed to the Prophet: ‘’[there is] no Prophethood after me unless Allah so wills it (lā nabuwwah ba’di illa mā shā’ Allāh).’’ Qurtubi, al-Jām’i aḥkām al-Qur’ān, pg.166.

(2) The Prophet is narrated as having referred to the Promised Messiah as a Prophet (nabī Allah) four times in a single narration. Al-Naysābūrī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, 4:2254.

(3) Ibn Abī Shaybah, Muṣnaf, (kitāb al-adab, man karah an yaqūl la nabī ba’d al-nabī ṣall Allahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) 13:566.

(4)Jalāl al-Dīn al-Ṣuyūtī, Durr al-Manthūr, 5:368; the wording of the narration in Dur al-Manthūr is slightly different: ‘’qulū khātam al-nabīyyīn wa lā taqūlu lā nabī ba’di.’’ These are the same words reported by Ibn Abī Shaybah who also mentions the statement of Mughīrah.​

 

[Zarvan]

@Pakistani Exile the kind of PROPHET you believe Mirza is HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW Have cleared no kind of PROPHET would come after him Mr Mirza is nothing but a liar and a Kazab

A False prophet a liar?

Lie #7: Mirza made many false declarations. He claims also that he is a prophet. Mirza writes " I am a messenger as well as a prophet and receiver of the news from God". (Tazkarah p. 352,492,Daaf-e.Albla, means Remedy of a mistake, Roohani Khazain , vol.8, page 231). He refutes his statement and writes "Our prophet is the seal of the prophets and there cannot come another prophet after him."(Shahadatal Quran p. 27,28, Roohani Khazain volume 6 page 323, 324, Azala Auhaam p31).
The fake Jesus Christ (Mirza) degrades the real Jesus Christ !

Lie #8: Mirza Qadiyani blames Hazratv Isa (a.s) "Isa (Jesus) A.S (peace be upon him). used to abuse and used bad language. He also used to lie". (Addendum Anjaam Atham p.5)
It is an insult to Hazrat Isa A.S. and a filth of lie which can at once be seen.Inspite of this Mirza says"I have never insulted Masih ibne Mariam"(Kashti-e-Nooh p.16, Roohani Khazain volume 19, p.18).He furher writes "God forbid that he (Masih,christ) was destitute of moral values". (Zarooratal Imam p.7, Roohani Khazain volume 13, p478).
Mirza blames Hazrat Isa (Jesus) a.s to be a drinker

Lie#9: Mirza blames Hazrat Isa ( Jesus a.s) to be a drinker and responsible for all the damages caused by alcohol in the whole Europe.(Kishti Noah margin page 70, Roohani khazain vol.19, page 72)

Lie #40: Jesus, on account of epilepsy had gone mad.(Margin Sat Bachan p170, Roohani Khazain volume 10, p. 294).This is an insult to Jesus because mad caanot perform as prophet.

Lie#41: As we all know Isa Masih(a.s) had no father but Mirza writes that "Hazrat Masih bin Mariam worked for 22 years as a carpenter with his father Yusuf.(Azala auham p. 303 margin).

Liars have short memories.

Lie #10 :Mirza Qadyani writes "Jesus`s family is not pious and holy. Three of his paternal and maternal grandmothers were adulteresses and his blood is polluted with theirs.(addendum Anjaam Atham, margin p7).Mirza refutes his own lie and writes "the families of the prophets are always pious."(Ijaaz-e-Ahmadi p.17,)
Lie #43: It is proved by the Quran and Bible that the jews had rejected Hazrat Isa A.S. (Jesus Christ) and he was on the lowest ladder amongst the prophets.(Nusratul Haque, p.38, Roohani Khazainvol.12, p48). It is only to degrade Isa(Jesus) A.S. otherwise there is no mention in the Quran.
Lie #11: "It is clearly mentioned in Surah Tehreem that some persons,in this UMMAH has been named Mariam(Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya, part. 5 p189 Roohani Khazain volume 21, p361)
Lie # 45: Quran witnesses the piety of Hazrat Mariam (Mary) but Mirza blames "but God did not leave him (Hazrat Isa , Jesus, A.S) alone and gave his mother (Mariam) many brothers and sisters(MarginBraheen Ahmadiyya part 5p.100 Roohani Khazain volume 21, p262). There is no mention in the Quran.
Lie #12:"It is true that he(Isa A.S) did not perform any miracle.(Addendum Anjaam Atham p26 margin)
Later he refutes his own statement "We do not deny Hazrat Isa (Jesus) A.S.`s miracles. No doubt there did appear some miracles.(shahadaatul Quran mrgin p72, Roohai khazain vol. 6 p. 373)
Liars have shortmemories.Lie #:13 "It is surprising that Hazrat Isa(Jesus) A.S. did not act on educating self-morality. He was a liar.(Addendum Anjam Aatham page 5).
Was Isa (Jesus) en eunuch ?

Lie #14: Manliness and virility are man`s laudible virtues. Hazrat Isa A.S. could not produce a practical sample of his marital relation with his wives due to the absence of this virtue. (Maktoobaat Ahmadiyya vol.3, p28). This is a shamless and wretched concoction about Hazrat Isa A.S. as he is a complete man. Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. says "Hazrat Isa A.S. shall land on the earth then marry and shall have off-spring."(MISHKAAT SHARIF, chapter Nazool-e-Isa p.480). If God forbid, Isa A.S. was an eunuch, how would he have offspring.
Fact of the matter is Isa A.S. was complete man. It was Mirza Qadyani who himself was impotent ! (Tariaqul Quloob p75,Roohani khazain vol.15 page 203.Tazkarah p. 124)
.That is why the Christians wrote angerly :
we shall beat Mirza so bitterly
that he will forget his revelations
his prophethood will be destroyed
and his angels will never return

Lie#15: Mirza says "I have never insulted Masih ibne Mariam(Kashti-e-Nooh p.16, Roohani Khazain volume 19, p.18). He insults Hazrat Isa a.s again and again. Liars have short memories
Lie#119: Satan put his words into Jesus`s heart. (Zarooratul Imam p17, Roohani Khazain vo. l3.,p487)
Is Mirza Qadiyani Isa a.s ibn Maryam (Jesus son of Mary) ?

Lie #16: Mirza claims that he is Masih ibn Mariam; "I was named Isa bin Mariam(Jesus son of Mary) "(Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya p.189, Roohani khazain vol.21 .p361). Mirza says again "God says Inna Ja`alakal Masih ibne Mariam or no doubt we made you MASIH ibn Mariam." (Aa�`na Kamalat Islam p551, Roohani khazain vol.5, p551 Arba`een p33).Then he writes: "I have not claimed that I am Masih ibn Mariam. He who blames me, is a great liar. (Azaala Auham Roohani Khazainvol.3, p194). Now listen to Mirza`s another claim: "after several months (not more than 10 months) I was made Isa (Jesus) from Mariam (Mary), hence Isa ibn Mariam.(Kashtie Nooh p52Roohani Khazain volume page19, p50). So, be sure that I am ibn Mariam. A lie is a lie !

Lie #17: It is a matter of great surprise that at the end of the fourteenth century, people except myselfclaimed to be MEHDI (the interpreters of the Islamic Law) e.g. Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan of Bhopal and Maulvi Abdul Haye Lukhnavi, died early in the century.(Appendix Haqiqat-ul-Wahimargin p30.Roohani Khazain volume 22 page 462) . This is Mirza`s big lie as these people never made such a claim.
Lie #18: It is mentioned in Tafseer-e-Sanai that Abu Huraira`s understanding about Quran was defective and the Mohaddeseen object to it.(Braheen Ahmadiyya vol5.p234, Roohani Khazain volume21 page 410).You will be surprised the statement does not exist in the Tafseer.
Where are the "four tombs" of alive Hazrat Isa(Jesus) a.s ?

Lie#19: Miza Qadiyani claims that Hazrat Isa (Jesus) a.s is alive and when he will come back then the way of Islam shall spread all over. (Braheen Ahmadiyya v. 1, p. 499, 505 margin, Roohani Khazain volume 1 page 593,601 margin). He refutes it and kills Hazrat Isa to claim himself to be Isa(Jesus) and builds four graves of a single man in the different parts of the world !
Mirza`s lie about Isa's grave

Isa's grave is in Al-Quds (Jerusalem)
Lie# 20: Mirza writes: "It is true that Masih died in his native town" . (Azaala Auham pt.2, p253,Roohani Khazain v.3, p353).He is born in Bait-ul-Laham. It is 3 kilometer from Jerusalem,Al-Quds or Bait-ul-Maqdas. (Itmam-al- Hujjati margin, p. Old edition 21, new edition p. 27, Roohani Khazainvol.8, p. 299). His grave is in Galil. He died there. (Azala Auham p.97, Roohani khazain v. 3, p. 353).
He confirms it again:"Isa died on the same land (Jerusalem) 50 years after crucifiction"(Kishti Noah p.15, Roohani khazain, v, 19 p. 103 )
"And Hazrat Isa`s (Jesus) grave is in" Al-Quds, Jerusalem" (the City of Pious) and a church has been built on it and the church is bigger than the other churches and in this church exists the grave of ISA a.s and in the church exists the grave of Hazrat Mariam and both are separate. (Itmam-al- Hujjati margin, p. Old edition 21, new edition p. 27, Roohani Khazain vol.8, p. 299).

Lie# 21: about Isa's grave: Hazrat Isa's (Jesus) grave is in Trablis i.e. Tripoli, Syria
In the above mentioned book he refutes and says that Hazrat Isa's (Jesus) grave is in Trablis i.e. Tripoli, Syria. The witness is Syed Maulvi Muhammad Al-Saeedi Trablisi. It is situated in his area.If you say grave is fake, it should be proved.(Itmam-ul-Hujjati p.old edition p.19, new edition p. 24,Roohani Khazain volume 8 page 296).
Please accept Mirza Qadiyani's challenge andcompare the page 296 and 299 in the same book, Itmam-ul-Hujjatiin "Roohani Khazain" volume no. 8 (or in the book Itmam-ul-Hujjati p. 24 and 27) again and again and confirm that Mirza Qadiyani is a great liar !

Lie # 22: Mirza`s third lie about Isa's grave: No one knows where the tomb of Hazrat isa,Jesus is in Syria

Lie # 23: Now let us face a new lie ! Mirza Qadiyani discloses: "No one knows where the tomb of Hazrat isa ibn Mariam is in Syria and it is said that it is also not available like that of Jesus.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi margin p101, Roohani Khazain Vol.22, p104, margin).

Lie # 24: Isa's grave is in Srinagar, Kashmir .
His grave is in Srinagar, Kashmir. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi margin p101, Roohani Khazain Vol.22, p104, margin). "His grave is in Sri Nagar(Kashmir), Mohallah Khanyar".(Kashti Noah, Taqviat-ul-Iman p.54, Roohani khazain, v. 19, p. 58).
Let us come to the coclusion after reading Mirza Qadiyani's different writings:
1: Isa (Jesus) is alive and he will come back.(Braheen Ahmadiyya v.1, p.499,505 margin,Roohani Khazain volume1p. 593,601 margin)
2: He isnot alive. He died. (Kishti Noah p.15, Roohani khazain, v, 19 p. 103, Azaala Auham part.2, p253, Roohani Khazain v.3, p353)
3: His grave is in Jerusalem. (Itmam-al- Hujjati margin, p. Old edition 21, new edition p. 27,Roohani Khazain vol.8, p. 299,Kishti Noah p.15, Roohani khazain, v, 19 p. 103 ).
4: His grave is in Galil. He died there. .(Azala Auham part 2, p.473, Roohani khazain v. 3, p. 353).

5: Hazrat Isa's (Jesus) grave is in Trablis i.e. Tripoli, Syria. The witness is Syed Maulvi Muhammad Al-Saeedi Trablisi. It is situated in his area. If you say grave is fake, it should be proved.(Itmam-ul-Hujjati p.old edition p.19, new edition p. 24, Roohani Khazain volume 8 page 296).).
6: No one knows where the tomb of Hazrat isa ibn Mariam is in Syria and it is said that it is also not available like that of Jesus .(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi margin p101, Roohani Khazain Vol.22, p104, margin).
7: His grave is in Srinagar, Kashmir. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi margin p101, Roohani Khazain Vol.22, p104, margin). "His grave is in Sri Nagar(Kashmir), Mohallah Khanyar". (Kashti Noah, Taqviat-ul-Iman p.54, Roohani khazain, v. 19, p. 58).
These are Mirza`s self-spun lies.
Ahmadis/qadiyanis are requested to ask themselv :
Hazrat Isa (Jesus) is alive or dead ? Where is his grave ? In Jerusale, Galil,Trablis or inSrinagarKashmir ? What is true in all these statements? Was he not a lier ? Speak the truth please !
Can you dare my dear ?
Was Isa (Jesus) hanged ? Did God protect Jesus ?
Lie #25: Mirza writes: Had Isa A.S.(Jesus) been hanged, his prophethood would have been questioned and he would have not righteous. Therefore God protected him and was not hanged. (Ayyamus Sulah p. 123,Roohani khazain vol.14, p. 349). Now watch Mirza`s lie: "Hazrat Masih was a human whohanged himself for the welfare of the people and rode the cross as if he was riding a horse."(Tariaqul Quloob p. 370, Roohani khazain vol.15, p 498, 299). Where is the truth ?
ho was Mirza Qadiani?
Was Mirza Qadiani Krishan (The King of Aryans)?

Lie #26: God has revealed on me many a time that "Krishan" who was to appear in the last
age, you are the King of Aryans.(Tazkarah 380, 381 Haqiqat-ul-Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol. 22, p521)
Was Dawood (a.s) Krishan ?

Lie #27:This is quite true that Dawood was Krishan or Krishan was Dawood.(Braheen Ahmaiyya part 5, page 90, Roohani Khazain volume 21 page 117). It is Mirza`s self-spun Lie.
First think and then speak !
Mirza Qadiyani's false claim to be chinese !

Lie #28: Mirza writes about the prediction in the book "Nasoosul Hakam" of a great soofi Shaikh ibn Arabi that "there, in the humankind, shall be a last boy after whom the human`s progeny shall finish.The boy shall be in China and his language shall be Chinese and he shall invite the people towards God and no one shall come. Mirza claims with great fervour I am that boy. Leave aside a shamless, no oneelse shall have the guts not to accede to my claim which is like that of the Prophet.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi margin p201, Roohani Khazain volume 22 page 209). Mirza was born in Qadiyan,(India) and he did not speak Chinese. Hence Mirza`s false claim.
Was Mirza Qadiyani persian, Arab or mughal?

Lie #29: Mirza claims that "from his paternal side I am mughal. (Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya pt.5,Roohani Khazainvol.22, p81 margin). He refutes it and says that he is not moghal but a persian(Tazkarah p. 634)
Then he denies and says that I am neither Persian nor Mughal. I do not know how it became renowned as mughal. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi Roohani Khazain vol. 22, p81 margin).God`s revelation has opposed to be a Moghal.(Tariaqul Quloob p. 145, Roohani Khazainvol.15, p273 margin).Then he says "most of our mothers and grandmothers belong to mughal families, natives of China.( Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p. 210, , Roohani Khazain vol.22 p. 209 margin ,p.208 margin).He says further: "I have written many times about my family that they are a royal family who are mixture of Bani Faras and Bani Fatma". (Tariaqul Quloob p. 158 , Roohani Khazain vol.15, p286). "My first cousin Mirza Imamuddin renowns himself to be called from tribe "Lal Baigian" (Malfoozaat vol.6, p44)"
Qadiyani's desperate disease, All is well that ends well.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani died of cholera on the 26th of May 1908. His father-in-law Mir Nasir Nawab tells that "when I reached him and saw his condition, he (Mirza) said that I am suffering from cholera epidemic and he did not say a word afterwards until after ten days he died.(Hyat-e-Nasir page 14).
Died but not burried in Lahore !

Lie#30: Hazrat Muhammad Sal -lallaho-Alaihe wasallam(peace be upon him) said "No prophet has been burried in another place but the place where he died.(Mota Imam Malik, chapter burial). Had he been a prophet he would have been buried in Lahore where he died but Allah Ta`ala in order to reveal the truth wanted to prove him a liar. His father-in-law states: "Fearing from truth-loving youth of Lahore, his dead body was carried from Lahore to Qadyan in the company of the English Police Escort and then buried there. (Hyat-e-Nasir page 14).__________________
Truth is immortal; error is mortal
His followers are celebrating his 100 years. No doubt his lies are numerous but in accordance with the situation; we quote only a hundred plus. The followers are open to check its validity and accept the truth after due checking. Truth is an universal axiom and no one owns it.The bat cannot see the sun. Does this mean that the sunshine is at fault- no, it is the bat itself that does not see.We request the followers of Mirza Qadyani to embrace Islam after checking his falsehoods and come .
IS A SHINING SUN. It is upto him who comes under its light and to abstain from remaining in the dark. In every country the sun shines.

Sacrifice a cock on the head !
(Mirza`s funny treatment for high fever)
Lie #32:Information for doctors. Mirza`s funny treatment for high fever : "They may sacrifice a cock on the patient, Mirza Nizamuddin`s head".(Seerat-ul- Mehdi 3rd,
p27).
Mirza Qadiani was Jack of all trades and master of none. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Eat people pearl worm?
Lie #33: Mirza tells a lie:People eat pearl worm. ( Chashma M�ahrfat p327, Roohani Khazain volume 23 page 342).

Pregnant again and again and again, and...
Mirza`s Lie #34:"half doctor is dangerous for life". Mirza Qadyani was himself a hallf doctor, he writes: "Pregnant woman having been divorced should abstain from marrying another man because if she does, it is possible that she is pregnant again which may harm the earlier pregnancy. (Ariah Dharm page 21, Roohani Khazain volume 10 page 21). According to medical science, the woman`s egg enjoins the man`s egg at the time of intercourse and the combination thus enters the womb of the woman which does not accept any further sperm or eggs. Mirza Qadyani spins this lie that a woman can be pregnant again.
In European or western countries, the family system is in shatters. Man or woman keep on changing partners. If, according to Mirza Qadyani, a woman has intercourse with another man after having been pregnant from the previous one, she shall be pregnant again. I am sure that the doctor-followers of Mirza Qadyani and obstericians shall ask for ALLAH TA`ALA`s Forgiveness and come out of Mirza`s false observations.

Are the quails cause of plague?
Lie #35: According to Mirza Qadyani the quails are the cause of plague. (seerat al-mehdi part 2, page 132). As a matter of fact it spreads from rats and rats are not cousins with quails ! Think over my dear doctors who are the followers of Mirza Qadyani !

Are ten million people born andten million die every day?
Lie #36: Mirza "reveals" that every day ten million people die every hour and ten million are born by the order of Allah. (Kashti-e-Nooh, p37, Roohani Khazain volum 19 page 41)
This is Mirza's self-spun LIE as if ten million are born every hour, the dotors and nurses will ever be busy and if ten millionpeople die every hour, the people who render funeral services and dig graves will be busy burrying their coffins whole the time and the world shall soon finish.
Impossible! quite impossible!
Lie #37: If you see my Risala Tohfa Golarvia and Tohfa Ghaznavia - you can read in two hourswith resolve and consideration. (Arba`een #2, p23). This is Mirza`s worst lie. Tohfa Golarvia has 238 pages and each page has 23 lines. Not even this book alone can be read with resolve and consideration and what to speak of Tohfa Ghaznavia in addition. We challenge the lot of Mirza`s followers to read these books in 2 hours or otherwise curse the liar and join us muslims.
Lie# 38: It is muslim faith that in the last age, thousands of so-called muslims will turn into Jewish activities. This prediction is available in many a places in Quran (Kashti-e-Nooh p42-43, Roohani Khazain volume 19 page 46).
Neither is it Muslim faith nor is there any mention in the Quran.

A lie begets a lie
Now and again, a liar like Mirza Qadiyan is born.
Lie #39: In 1897 AD Mirza claimed that this Jama`at (Jama`at Ahmadiya) shall not be more than 4-5 thousand(Anjaam Atham p14). And in the same year and same book he lies again. Now there aremore than 8 thousand spirited people in the cause (Addendum Anjaam Atham p26) and again in the same book and same year (God) spread our Jama`at`s acceptance to thousand. (Addendum Anjaam Atham p51). After two years in 1899 AD, there will be more than ten thousand people in my Jama`at. (margin addendum #3 - Tariaqul Quloob p393) In1902 this Jama`at has reached a hundred thousand in British India.After four years, in 1906, today by the Grace of God, there are more than 3 lacs (p.120 ) In 1907 the number who have submitted is about 4 lacs. Again the lie was repeated andMirza two days before his death "revealed that remember our Jama`at is not less than 4 lacs"(Paigham Sulah p. 26,Roohani Khazain volume 23 page 455).

5 or 50 ? Once cheater always cheater
Lie #40: Mirza asked for donations from his followers for the publication of 50 volumes of " Braheen Ahmadiyya ". When he wrote only five, the followers protested strongly and he explained he originally wanted to write 50 but if we take off the "0" of 50, remains there only 5 thus the object has been achieved. (Braheen Ahmadiyya part.5, page 9, Roohani khazain vol. 23 page 342 ).

Mirza Qadiani loves to spin "LI"ES"
Mirza says "to lie is like eating shit". (Haiqat-ul-wahi p. 206, Roohani khazain vol. 22, p. 215)
Lie #41: Mirza writes that according to Hadith people of Masaia`s time will be worse than those living on earth. (Ijaz -e- Ahmadi p.13, Roohani Khazain volume 19 page 120) There is no mention of this type of Hadith. Mirza likes to spin "LIES" and calls it hadith.

Is Safar the fourth month of the Islamic Calender?
Lie #42: Mirza writes about the birth of his son Mubarak Ahmad and he was the fourth boy. As such, in the Islamic Calender, it was the fourth month "SAFAR" and fourh day of the week and fourth hour of the afternoon. (Taryaaqul Quloob p. 90, , Roohani Khazain vol.15, p218,).It is as clear as crystal. Even an illiterate person knows that "SAFAR" is the second month in the Islamic Calender.

Knowledge is power
Lie #43: Mirza writes " The Arabic words "LAM YALID"mean that "Allah is not anybody`s son". (Sat Bachan p140,Roohani Khazain vol.10, p26). This is the proof of Mirza`s illiteracy. It is as easy as A.B.C. because even an ordinary person knows its meaning i.e. "God has no son".
Lie#44Mirza writes that Alexanderia Roomi, the great, is Roman.(Shahadat-ul-Quran p. 12, Roohani khazain vol. 6 p. 309) His name was Alexander (not Alexandria Roomi) and he was Greek from Macdoniah (He was not Roman).

The rail between Makkah & Madinah?
Lie #45 Mirza Qadiani claimed to be a prophet. In his support, he uses different statements e.g. "rail is being run between Madinah and Meccah". (Kashti-e-Nooh P14,Roohani Khazain vol.19, p9). Not even today there is any rail in Saudi Arabia. This lie is also available on page 78 of Ayyamul Sulah.

Some are wise and some are otherwise
It is a case of great distress that even in these times of advancement in knowledge, the followers read and follow without understanding the books written by him. You cannot stop a person who is bent upon committing suicide. Nonetheless it is incumbent on the society to watch him, to make him understand the truth and to abstain from committing such a heinous crime that may save his life.Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is used to spin lies to such an extent as if you cannot stop sneezing or convulsive sobbing.He is all in all in the "Ahmadiyya Movement".

Are Ahmadis / Qadiyanies / Marzaiesnot Kafir (infidels) ?
Lie #31: The followers of Mirza claim that they are muslims they say that any muslim who believes in "Kalimah" should not be called "kafir". (infidels, nonbelieverss)That is totally wrong according to their own laws and regulations. WhenAllama Muhammad Iqbal`s father Shaikh Noor Muhammad did not take active part with the youth because of his old age, Mirza Qadiyani wrote that "he is not only separated from the Jama`but he is also out of Islam." (Seerat-ul- Mehdi part 3, page 249).Similarly when Doctor Abdul Hakim of Patiala who was a follower of Mirza, left him,he was called "Murtudd or the apostate". ( Seerat-ul- Mehdi vol.1, p165, Tazkarah page 607).

Everyone Muslim is a Kafir (infidel)
"God has disclosed to me that anyone who got my message and didn't accept me is not muslim", (Tazkarah p. 607). All the muslims do not accept Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani, so they are kafir (apostate, non-believer, infidel) according to Mirza Qadiyani.
__________________
A prophet or a poet?
Lie #46: Allah Ta`ala`s verdict according to Surah Yasin, verse 69: prophets do not know the art of poetry. On the contrary Mirza wrote Qaseeda Ijaaz. His work was published under the title of "Dur-re-thameen". It proves that he was not a prophet.
A slave or a prophet ?
Lie:47: Mirza Qadiyani was a slave of the British, born slave and died slave.A prophet can never be a slave !Crow deems to be better than the nightingalealthough claimant of prophethood was slave
Patriot or a traitor ?
It is...traitor
"I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country" (NATHAN HALE Last Words, 1776).
It is called patriotism. Unfortunately Mirza Qadiyani was not a patriot. He along with his forefathers was traitors. When the muslims of India were struggling for freedom, Mirza was working as a traitor against his people in order that the British rule should not end.
Lie#48: "Most of my life has gone by in favour and in the subservience of the British Empire. I have written so many books and brochures against this struggle that fifty cupboards could be filled with them. (Tariaqul Quloob old 15new p27, Roohani Khazain volume 15 page 155).

Is there any thing that is called Conscience? This is the prophethood of Mirza. His followers claim that Mirza has written about eighty books and 261 Ishtaharaat.(Paigham-e-Sulah p172 - August 1922), Roohani Khazain volume page. Then how could 50 cupboards be filled with eighty books and 261 Ishtaharaat.
Fight or migrate!
Lie #49: Prophet delivers his people from bondage otherwise migrates while Mirza declares that "Jehad(struggle) against the British is haraam (fobidden)". He emphasizes;Enemy to God is he who declares JehadRefutes the prophet he who believes it so.
(Addendum Touhfa Golrivia p. 27, Roohani khazain vol. 17 p. 78 Durre Sameen p. 59)
The cause of freedom is the cause of God.The Muslims hate slavery . They want to live as free as air. Therefore the Indian muslims fought before and behind against the British Empire and the British left India in 1947 bag and baggage.
Mirza (opportunist) flatters the British Government
Lie #50: Opportunists never hesitate to worship the rising sun.Mirza flattered the British Government and worked against those who fought against it. Against the war of freedom of 1857AD, he writes:"The MOST GRACIOUS ANDMUNIFICENT says in Quran that MY REVELATION shall be raised upto the heavens in 1857AD, that is why the muslims had similar deeds.(Azala Auhaam p.728, margin Roohani Khazain vol.3, p.490)".
A proof of Mirza`s false prophethood

Lie #51 : I have written about 40 books and in support of my claim,I have published 6o thousand posters.(Addendum Tohfa Golarvia p128, Arba`een no.3, p.35). This is a lie as the number of these posters is 261. Isn`t it a proof of Mirza`s false prophethood. Mirza says "to lie is like eating shit".
Great talkers are great liars
Lie #52: Watch Mirza`s another lie.In his book(Tazkirah Ash-Shahadatain p43). He writes; I am the man who showed hundreds of sign.He leaves two empty lines and says "these hundreds of signs are more than two lacs.Then again in the same book on page 43 and 63, he changes these two lacs into ten lacs. Liars have short memories.
Lie #53: In 1897 AD Mirza claimed this this Jama`at (Jama`at Ahmadiya) shall not be more than 4-5 thousand (Anjaam Atham p14) And in the same year and same book he lies again. Now there aremore than 8 thousand spirited people in the cause (Addendum Anjaam Atham p26))and again in the same book and same year .God spread our Jama`at`s acceptance to thousand. (Addendum Anjaam Atham p51 ). After two years in 1899 AD, there will be more than ten thousand people in my Jama`at.(margin addendum #3 - Tariaqul Quloob p393). In1902 this Jama`at has reached a hundred thousandin British India. After four years, in 1906, today by the Grace of God, there aremore than 3 lacs(Haqeeqat Wahi p120 ). In 1907 the number who have submitted is about 4 lacs. Again the lie was repeated and Mirza two days before his death "revealed that remember our Jama`at is not less than 4 lacs" (Paigham-e- Sulah p12)
The falsestatements
Lie # 54: Mirza Qadyani writes "But it was essential that the predictions of the Quran and Hadith prove to be correct which stated the ( promised christ) Masih Mauood (The promised Christ) shall appear and he will lift all the tribulations from the hands of muslim scholars and they shall proclaim him non-believer and FATWAS for his murder shall be issued.(Arba`een #3, p20,21). This is his false statement. There does not exist such VERSE or HADITH.
Qadian in Quran ?
Lie#55:Mirza Qadiyani boasts: ”ïnna anzalnahoo qareeban minal Qadian...The names of the three cities are written in the Quran with a great honour Makkah, Madinah and Qadiyan" (Tazkrah p. 75).There does not exist such VERSE or Qadiyanï's name in the Holy Quran!
Mirza Qadiyani claims: "I say that the name of Qadiyan is written in the Holy Quran". (Tazkarah p. 764, 765).This is Mirza`s worst lie as there is no mention whatsoever of Qadiyan in Quran. Where is the name of Qadiyan in Quran ?Kan any Qadiyani show the name of Qadiyan in the Holy Quran?
Cotradictions

Lie #56: Mirza claims that "Hazrat (Jesus) Masaih`s sparrows" are proved in the Quran. (Ai`eena Kamalaat Islam p68, Roohani Khazain volume 5 page 68). He himself denounced his statement: "and this too should be remembered that not only their flying but also their movement is not proved in Quran (Azaala auham margin vol.1, p307, 128). It appears that Mirza is a mad man. (Sat Bachan 312) It was God`s Will to humiliate Mirza because his books are replete with such contradictory statements.
Teacher or not ?

Lie #57: "God teaches the prophets himself without any teacher".(Braheen Ahmadiyya part one, preface, p.16, Roohani khazain part one vol.1 page 16)."One teacher has taught Torah to Hazrat Isa"(Jesus). Ayyam-ul-Sulh p. 47, Roohani khazain v. 14 p. 394.)
Teacher or servant ?

Lie#58: When I was six seven years old, a persian teacher was employed for me as a servant who taught me Quran and some Persian books. His name was Fazal Elahi.When I was ten years old, an Arabic tutor was employed for me whose name was Fazal Ahmad and I studied grammar. I studied for a few years.The name of this Maulvi was Gul Ali Shah. (Kitab Albarriyya 161,162,163 margin, Roohani khazain vol.13, p. 179,180, 181, 192 margin).Mirza clearly denying all these teachers and their teachings says "No one can prove that I learnt Quran, Hadith and Tafseer from any person." (Ayyam As-Sulah p147, 168)
It is Greek to me

Lie #59: Mirza writes that "the two books The Bible and The Torah are not changed."(Chashma M'ahrfat p75, Roohani khazain vol. 23, p. 83). This is another proof of his knowledge about the Quran. Mirza further in the same book denies that the books (The Bible, The Torah and Zaboor) were discarded by the times of Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. and many a lies were mingled in them. Both the books are changed. (Chashma Mï'ahrfat p.255, Roohani Khazain volume 23 page vol. p266).
Lie#60: A day before the death of my brother Ghulam Qadir, I was revealed "a funeral". The other day my brother died.(Nazoolul Masih p227, Roohani Khzain vol.18, p603).Another lie: The day my brother died in the evening I was revealed about his funeral in the morning. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi,Roohani Khazain volume 22 pagevol p20). A day before or same day ?
The true person or a Believer person do not curse,but Mirza curses

Lie #61: Mirza claims that " the true person or a Believer person do not curse"(Azala Second p 356,Roohani Khazain vol.3,p452).And then he himself proves to be a liar non-believer by writing the word "curse" a thousand times, e.g. curse no.1, curse no.2, curse no.3...untill curse no. 1000(Noorul Haque p.118,119,120,121,122, Roohani khazine vol. 8p. 158, 159,160,161,162 Tohfatul Nadvah pp 158-162)
Lie #62: "Similitude and analogy must conform".(Sat Bachan margin pp164 B, Roohani Khazainvol.10, p302, Tableegh-e-Risalat vol.4, p18) and then he refutes his own statement by saying "resemblance or similit ude do not need conformity e.g. a man is a lion but it does not necessirly need "paws and skin and tail and roar like a lion."(Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.5, p187 margin,Roohani Khazain volume 21 pagemargin 359 ,Tohfa Golarvia p101 margin)
One lie leads to another

Lie #63: Mirza states that "upto now a hundred thousand humans have repented on my hand".(Review p340 of Sept.1902 AD). After three and a half years, another lie "on my hand four lachumans have apologised from their sins and repented from polytheism."(Tajalliaat-e-Ilahiya p5 marqooma 15-3-1906, Roohani khazain v. 20, p. 397 ). If we account for these three and a half lacs repentances from 6 O`clock in the morning to 6 O`clock in the evening and every repentence takes three minutes, how much time it will take. Is it possible. If it is not then the followers must recall his saying "to lie is like eating shit."
Reason rules all thing

Lie# 64: Mirza writes "Our prophet is the seal of the prophets and there cannot come another prophet after him."(Shahadatal Quran p28, Roohani Khazain volume 6 page 324, Azala Auhaam p31).Mirza again starts spinning lies "True is God who sent his messenger in Qadiyan"(Da`afe-al-bala`p11, Roohani Khazain vol.18, p231).
Lie# 65: "Oh you who like to be called progeny or descendents of muslims, be not enemies of Quran and do not continue the phase of revelations of prophet after "The Seal of the Prophets and feel ashamed before God before whom you will be presented(Aasmani Faislah p25, Roohani Khazain vol.4, p335).And Mirza at once turns the table and says that these are God`s verses which have been revealed on me.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p211 Roohani Khazain volume 22, p.220).
A little pot is soon hot

Lie #66: Mirza says "It is beyond my nature that I use bitter language" (Aasmani Faislah p10,Roohani Khazain volume 4 page 320). Then he says " I have not used a word that could be termed as abuse. (Azala Auhaam, vol.1,p6, Roohani Khazain volume page). It is a fact that Mirza has abused his opponents. His books are as bitter as gall. We quote Mirza`s confession "we promised in the presence of Deputy Commissoner that we shall not begin with harsh words"(Ishtahar 30.12.1897 Kitaab Albarriyya P.15, Roohani Khazain volume 13, p.15).
Lie #67: Mirza claims that "it will not be found in any Hadith that his(Jesus) appearance will befrom the skies. (Hamamatul Bushra p77). Mirza refutes his statement and claims "according to Sahih Muslim Hadith, when Hazrat Masih will come down from the sky, his dress will be yellow".(Azala Kalan vol.p34).
The Revelations in different languages 

Lie#68: Mirza claims that "It is absurd a human should receive revelation in another languagethan his own."(Chashma M�ahrfat p201, Roohani Khazain Vol.23, p218).Mirza was born in Qadiyan Punjab (India) and his mother tongue was Punjabi but he received revelations in other languages e.g. in English "Life of Pain" (Braheen Ahmadiyya part 1, p556, Tazkarah 116,117), in Hebrew (Braheen Ahmadiyya Vol.1, p612), in Arabic (Braheen Ahmadiyya no. 1, p45 84,Tazkarah p. 117), in Sanskrit (Tazkirah 420). Besides he received revelationsin other languages which he did neither know nor understand them.(Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.2, p516, Tazkarah, 114, 116).
"Polluted stuff comes out of polluted heart" 

Lie #69: Mirza writes"Polluted stuff comes out of polluted heart". (Tohfa Ghaznavia p11, Roohani Khazain
Vol.15, p544).
Now comes Mirza Qadiyani’s nasty talk: "Although she is his wife and he himself is alive. Justbefore his eyes, others share his wife`s bed and inspite of his presence and in his house he (other person) has intercourse with his wife. And he (husband) listening to their talk in action, enjoys because it is all happening before his eyes”.(Naseem Da`wat page 78, 79, Roohani Khazain , p. 438,439).And someone has intercourse with his wife and he enjoys the act.(Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya part 5, p. 37, Roohani Khazain volume 21 page 192, 193).
Mirza Qadiyani’s books are filled with such dirt and Mirza Qadiyani writes "Polluted stuff comes out of polluted heart".It indicates his polluted heart!
Mirza himself refutes his own statement
Who is mad and hypocrite ?

Lie # 70: What is �Dabatul Ard ? Mirza writes that "according to Quran Dabatul Ard means bacteria and to change the meaning of Quran is deviation from the right path. (lecture of Sialkot p48,Roohani Khazain Vol.20, p240).This is a lie as well. No interpreter of Quran has ever taken the meaning as bacteria of plague.Mirza himself refutes his own statement and says:"it means that the group of the speakers who will attack all the false religions".(Azaala Auham pt.2, p.370,Roohani Khazain volume 3 page 370). ”It means the misguided scholars who are guiding people on the wrong direction”. (Hamamat-ul-Bushra Roohani khazain v.7 P.308) ,
Mirza`s word has so many flaws.He himself says "mad, hypocrite and flaterers`word is always contradictory and full of flaw". (Sat Bachan p30, Roohani Khazain vol.10, p142).
God educated prophets but Moses & Jesus a.s wereeducated in schools !

Lie#71: Mirza claims that "All the prophets were guided and educated without any tutor."(Braheen Ahmadiyya part 5 page 7 ,Roohani Khazain vol. 1p16) and then refutes himself and claims with great fervour that Musa and Isa were educated in schools and Hazrat Isa learnt Torah from a Jew teacher.(Ayyamul Sulah p.47, Roohani Khazain vol.14, p294).
Mirza Qadiyani’s countless contradictions prove that; Liars have short memories. 
Mirza Qadiyani lies on the Holy Quran :
Quran`s mistakes ?

Lie#72: Mirza claims that "Quran is God`s book and word of my mouth".(Haqiqat-ul-Wahip211,Roohani Khazain vol.23, p22o, Tazkarah p. 642). Mirza deserves to be cursed on uttering such absurdities.
Lie 73: Isa Will come to Ludhiana (Qadiyan) and pick Quran`s mistakes. (Azaala Auham p382,Roohani Khazain volume 3 page182). This is a lie.
Lie # 74: A person from this UMMAH shall be made Mariam and then in her shall be blown the spirit of ISA , Jesus. (Kashti-e-Nooh p45, Roohani khazain, v.19, p. 48). This is his false statement.
Were Adam and Eve made as twins

Lie #75: "According to Quran and Tauraat Adam was made as twin. "( Haqiqt-al -wahi p. 201, Roohani khazain vol. 22 p. 259, Addendum Tariaqul Quloob p.160,). It is the worst accusation on Quran. It was Adam who was first created and then Eve. They were not created twins.

Lie #76: "According to Quran relgious war is haraam (forbidden)". (Margin Kashti-e-Nooh p.69, Roohani khazain, v.19, p. 75). This is a lie.It is not found anywhere in Quran.
Lie #77: Plague and rail are mentioned in the Quran(Tazkirahtul Shahadatain p3, 22. Roohani Khazain v. 20 p20/25). This is a lie. This is his false statement.There is no mention in the Quran.
Lie #78: It is mentioned in Allah`s Books that plague will spread and Hajj shall be stopped in the time of Masih.(Ijaaz Ahmadi p2, Roohani Khazain v. 19, p. 108, Kashti Noah p. 5, Roohani khazain v.19, p. 5). It is a white lie.Lie #79: Mirza used to write wrong the Verses of Quran, e.g.
Chapter 24, verses 41-42 versus Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.4 margin, p461-462
Surah Anbia, Verse 22 versus Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.4 margin, p518
Chapter 4, 1st Ruku`, Verse 8 versus Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.4, p655
Mirza`s lies could be detected by doing so.
Mirza lies on Ahadith
Is Qaiser mentioned on the first page of BUKHARI"?

Lie #80:"The Qaiser to whom our prophet Muhammad S.A.W. wrote a letter is mentioned on the first page of BUKHARI". (Anjaam Atham p40 margin).This is an open LIE.There is no such letter.There is no mention of Qaiser in Sahih Bukhari as announced by Mirza(Anjaam Atham p40 margin).
Lie #81: The prophets Hadith says repeatedly that Masih (Christ) shall appear after thethirteenthcentury. (A`eena Kamalaat Islam p340, Roohani khazine v. 5 p. 340). It is a white lie.
The word "tawaffi" does not always mean”death”

Lie #82: "Wherever in the Quran, from beginning to the end, the word "tawaffi" appears, it is taken in the meaning of "death".(Azala Kalan vol.1, p102 margin).This is Mirza`s worst lie.Please read the following verses in the Holy Quran to catch Mirza Qadiyani’s white lie :
Surah Al-anaam verse no. 60, Al-zamar: 42, Aal-i-Imran: 185, Al Baqrah:281
Lie #83: "It is mentioned in another Hadith that in the time of "MEHDI", they (moon and solar eclipse) shall happen twice. (Chashma-e- Ma’ahrfat pp314, Roohani khazain v. 23, p.329). This is a lie apparnt.
Hazrat Muhammad S.A.W. shall also appear

Lie #84: "It is apparent from the Hadith that Hazrat Muhammad S.A.W. shall also appear in the last age(Nazoolul Masih margin p66). This is a lie apparnt.
Lie #85: "The same is mentioned in the Hadith that MEHDI shall hail fom such a town which shall be "Kada`" or "Kadia". Every person who has sense shall understand that the word Kada` is the abreviation of Kadiyaan".(Kitaab Albarriyyah margin p. 243, Roohani khazain, v.13, p. 261).This is a lie apparnt.According to Hadith this word is "Kara`" and not "Kada`".
Lie #86: Mirza again spins a lie and says "it is mentiond in the Hadith that Masih Mauood will come at the beginning of the century and he wil be the Revivalist". (Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.5, p188, Roohani Khazain vol.21, p359).
Mirza Qadiyani’s white lie #87: And according to constant narrations in Hadith, our ProphetS.A.W.said that Masih shall have age of 125 years (Masih Hindustan mein p153), hundred years (Tohfa Golarvia p195).
There will be a black person ”Kahna” in India

Lie#88: Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w said: ”Kaana fil Hind Nabian aswad-al-lon ismahu Kahna” i.e. There will be a black person ”Kahna” in India.(Adden. Chashma-e-Marfat p. 10, Roohani khazain, v.23, p. 10)This is his false statement. Muhammad S.A.W. never said that. There does not exist such HADITH.
Has our Prophet S.A.W been called as God ?

Lie #89: In some Hadiths our Prophet S.A.W. has been called as God.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi P 63, Roohani Khazain vol.22, p66). Mirza has earned hell by accusing Prophet S.A.W. with such lies.
Lie#90: Hazrat Muhammad S.A.W. said whenever there should come epidemic disease, the citizens should leave that city otherwise they will be at war with Allahta`ala.(Ishtahaar for the followers 24-8-1907). Muhammad S.A.W. never said that.
Lie #91: "This (BUKHARI) is the same book in which it is clearly stated that Hazrat Isa(Jesus) A.S. had died. (Kashti-e-Nooh p87, Roohani Khazain Vol.19, p65). This is a lie apparnt.
Lie #92: Mirza Qadiyani’s white lie: ”It was the publication of Deen through blowing of the trumpet from the sky” .(Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya part 5, p. 188, Roohani Khazain Vol.21, p359).
Ignorance !
Where is Qadiyan ? Mirza Qadiyani is ignorant
Lie #93: According to the map Qadiyaan is situated in the north / east of Lahore. Mirza`s knowledge states: "it is in the corner of west / south.(Ishtihaar Chandah Minaratul Masih pH).
Self praise is no recommendation.

Lie #94: Mirza boasts "Quran witnesses, the prophet witnesses and the sky witnesses". (Tohfatul Nadvah p4, Roohani Khazain Vol.19, p. 96) This is a lie apparnt..It is self praise! Self praise is no recommendation.
Mirza Qadiyani lies and lies and lies...

Lie #95: Mirza Qadiyani writes: Do not lie as the lie is also a part of polytheism. (Kashti-e-Nooh p.26) . Mirza carries on cheating.
Mirza himself and his angel (Tichi, Tichi) is a liar

Lie 96: "I asked his (angels) name.He said no name (angel lied) I said, there must be a name. He said my name is taichi taichi.(Tazkirah p329).Mirza himself and his angel is a liar.
Angel`s name Mithan Lal (Hindue) and Khiraiti
"Three angels appeared from the sky: one of them was "khiraiti" (Tazkirah p29) - angel`s name Mithan Lal(Tazkirah p561).
Mirza Qadiyani explains his birth
first came out my sister then I

Lie #97: "God produced Adam and Eve`s couple. I was also produced as a couple with a girl whose name was Jannat.First she came out and then I came out....His (Mirza`S) head was touching her feet - first head and then feet would come out. (Tariaqul Quloob p. 351, Roohani Khazain Vol.15, p479-483).What a woderful birth it was ! Lovely description ! It is an open lie. Adam and Eve were nor produced couple. First Adam was made and then Eve was produced from him.
Lie #98: Mirza writes "It is decided in the Heavens that his (Yunus) people will be cursed for 40 days but there did not come any curse despite the fact that there was no condition."(Tatimma Haqiqat-ul-Wahi133,Roohani Khazain vol. 22, p571).There is no mention of such decision or cancellation thereof in any Heavenly Book.
Another proof of Mirza`s illiteracy

Lie #99: "Shubhaatul Khatab fee Tehqeequl Mehdi which is Collection of Maulvi Rashid Ahmad Gangohvi`s absurdities". (Addendum Braheen Ahmadiyya vol.5, p199, Roohani Khazain vol. 21, p371).This is another proof of Mirza`s illiteracy and endless chain of lies. The book mentioned does not belong to him but it is written by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi. This name still appears on the title.
God jerked the pen before signing

Lie #100: Mirza says that "I put a paper before God for His signatures. God jerked the pen before signing. By so doing,drops of the ink fell on my shirt and cap and Abdullah kept the shirt as a blessed souvenir.(Tazkarah 127, Haqeeqatul Wahi p255, Anjaam Atham p63, Roohani Khazainvol.11/2, p50 #3 Nishane Aasmani or Shahadul Muslimeen p37, Roohani Khazain volume 4 pagep397).
"My son twice talked from his mother`s womb”

Lie #101: "My son twice talked from his mother`s womb.(Tariaqul Quloob p45).It is again a lie as he did not say what he talked about.
Lie #102: All the scholars of divine inspiration except Sahih Tafseer, Quran Sharif and Hadith agree that Masih Mauood shall appear in the fourteenth century.Thousands of God-lovers tend to believe in it. (Tohfa Golarvia p158, Roohani Khazain vol.17, p. 244 ). Mirza dares so much to lie about Quran, Hadith and the Scholars. The fifteenth century has begun as such Mirza`s lie has been proven.
Lie # 103: The "revelations of earlier prophets have sealed that Masih Mauood Shall be born at the end of fourteenth century and it shall be in the Punjab.(Arba`een 2 p23, Roohani Khazainvol.7,p371).First of all, word "prophets" appeared in "Arba`een" but Mirza`s "UMMAH" corrected their "prophets" mistake and amended to read "AULIA". This is also a lie because it is not said by any Aulia(Saints).
Mirza’s white lie about Muhammad(S.A.W)Had our prophet (Muhammad S.A.W)11 sons and 12daughters ?

Lie #104: See our prophet had 12 daughters.(Malfoozat Mirza vol. 6, p.57).
Lie#105:Especially the Caliph whose mention is in BUKHARI. Allah`s Caliph Al-Mehdi(Shahadat Al-Quran 41 Roohani Khazain vol.6, p337). There is no such Hadith in BUKHARI SHARIF. All the followers are challenged to prove.

Lie #106: "Historians know that the prophet had eleven sons and they all died".(Chashma-e-Ma`arfat vol.2, p286, Roohani Khazain vol.23, p299).This is another lie. Prophet Muhammsd S.A.W. had not eleven sons.
Lie #107:"See history that the Prophet S.A.W. was the same orphan child whose father died a few days after his birth and the mother died leavng behind a few months old child. (Paighaam-e-Sulah p465, Roohani Khazain vol.23, p465). This is Mirza`s another lie
Lie#108: Especially the Caliph whose mention is in BUKHARI. Allah`s Caliph Al-Mehdi(Shahadat Al-Quran 41 Roohani Khazain vol.6, p337). There is no such Hadith in BUKHARI SHARIF.All the followers are challenged to prove.
Was Muhammad s.a.w God ?

Lie #109: In some Hadiths our Prophet S.A.W. has been called as God.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahip p.63,Roohani Khazain vol.22, p66). This is an open lie.Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w. is a prophet and not God !
Isa a.s in Muhammad’s Ummah ?

Lie #110: "It should be clear now that there are predictions from the prophet that there shall be a man in the Prophet`s Umma who shall be called Isa A.S. son of Mariam.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p. 406)." Not even one prediction exists in the Quran or Hadith that is against the scholars of Masiha. This is Mirza`s white lie.
Lie# 111: The three prophets "Muhammad S.A.W., Masih a.s and Yunus a.s entered their graves live,remained there live and came out live (Sat bachan p. 310, 164, margin, ). This is a serious lie.
Lie #112: "When the prophet S.A.W.was asked as to when Qayamat shall come, he replied "after a hundred years from today, it will appear on every human being" .(Azala Auhaam Kalan p104). Hazrat Muhammad S.A.W. will never give such a statement nor is this found in any Hadith. It is a pure lie
Lie #113: Migration for every prophet is customary (Tohfa-e-Golarvia margin p20 Roohani Khazainvol.17,p106,).It is a pure lie
Lie #114: Mirza writes that "the prophets mistake in interpretation of Islamic law, in fact, is the mistake of WAHIbecause the prophet is never out of the state of WAHI. (A`eena Kamalat Islam p353.Roohani Khazain volume 5 page 352). It is a lie evident.
Lie #115: It is like that a mischief-monger may not mention about the thirty thousand miracles that happened to our Prophet Muhammad S.A.W.and mention repeatedly about the prediction of Hudaiybia which did not come true at the predicted time. (Tohfa Golarvia p67, Roohani Khazain vol.17,p. 153).It is a false accusation as all the predictions made by Prophet S.A.W. came true.
Mirza has earned hell by accusing Prophet S.A.W. with such lies.

Mirza’s absurdities

Lie #116: "God says as"asma ya waladi or listen o my son"(Al-bushra vol.1, p49).God has no son !
Was Hazrat Musa a.s (Moses) a killer ?

Lie #117: Hazrat Musa killed hundreds of thousands of innocent children. (Noorul Quran vol.1, p24, Roohani Khazain vol.9, p253). It is a lie evident.
Mirza can give life and death

Lie#118: Allah Ta`ala says in Quran that "I give life and death". On the contrary Mirza writes that "I (Mirza) got the virtue of giving death and life from Allah Ta `ala.(Khutbatul Ahmadiya p55-56).This is Mirza`s another lie.If he had such a virtue, he would have given death to his enemiesMirza Sultan Ahmad, Abdullah Atham, Doctor Abdul Hakim and Maulana Sanaullah.
.
Mirza deserves to be cursed on uttering such absurdities
Another lie

Lie #120: Maulvi Ismail Aligarhi said "whoever of us a liar, shall die first". He died ten years ago.(Nazoolul Masih p31, Roohani Khazain vol.18, p409).This is another lie because he never said that.
An open challange!

Lie #121: It may be remembered that the news is available in Quran as well as in Tauraat scriptures that at the time of Masih Mauood`s appearance, there will be plague.Isa A.S. has also confirmed this in Bibel.(Kashtie Noah p. 5, Roohani Khazain Vol.19, p. 5). There is no such news in these books.Mirza spins these lies himself.
Lie #122: Mirza writes: Plague is mentioned in the following : Zakariyya 12/14, Gospel Mathew 8/24, Revelation 8/22.It is a pure lie ! ask any Chrisatian. It is an open challange!
Much boast, little roast!

Lie#123: Mirza boasts that "Those who had religious debate with us, all met death. (Chashma Ma`arfat p.333, Roohani Khazain vol.24, p.332). It is a pure lie. Mirza died himself having had debate with Doctor Abdul Hakim, Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari etc.All his geese are swans
Lie# 124: Mirza called his fourth son "Musleh Mauood as having long age "(as if God has come to earth)".The child died in his childhood. When Mirza was criticised seriously, he gave another good tiding of another son. (Al-bushra vol.2, p134). He will have an auspiscious body.(Al-bushra vol.2, p136) and named him Yahya. But there was no son afterwards. Mirza spun lies one after the other in order to avoid humiliation.
Lie # 125: Mirza has written books which contain only absurdities, abuses and contradictions.Prophets do not write books. Prophets do not obtain donations fom his followers to write books.
Health is wealth
Mirza Qadiany was suffering badly !

Lie #126: Mirza claims "God promised to me that I shall save you from all the satanic diseases"(Addendum Tohfa-e-Golarvia p8, Roohani Khazain Arba`een no. 3 p. 77 Roohani Khazain vol.17,p419 Ghair 4, p37).Satanic diseases mean those diseases which always pester like the satan and that accompanies him to the grave Mirza had so many diseases. As a matter of fact he was like a storage of diseases e.g. Heart Convulstion(Addendum Arba`een #43, p4), tuberculosis (Hayat Ahmad vol.2, p79), unconsciousness (Seeratul Mehdi vol.1, p13) ulcer of lungs, Hysteria,convulsion,nerves(Seeratul Mehdi vol.1, p, 13, 42, 55), laziness, impotence (Tariaqul Quloob p75, Roohani Khazain vol.5,p203), diabetes (Nazoolul Masih p209 margin), urinating hundred times a day(Addendum Arba`een no.4, page 4) . His dieases announce that his God’s promise is a lie evident.
A lie begets lie

Lie #128: Mirza claims that "Maulvi Mohammad Hassan Bheemwala has predicted about me(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p228 Roohani khazainvol.22, p239)as I mentioned in my book Mawahibur Rahman. This is an open lie.Maulvi Mohammad Hassan has not made such prediction in Mawahibur Rahman.Lie # 129: Mirza`s biggest lie is that "had I been a prophet, he would have not repented in the British court and he himself and six companions would have never promised to invite for the religious debate.(Anjaam Atham p30 margin, Roohani Khazain vol.11,p. 40).
Masiha shall have two horns

Lie #130: The forth-coming Masiha shall have two horns (centuries). (Braheen Ahmadiyya part 5 p.91, Roohani khazain Braheen Ahmadiyyah vol. 21, p. 118). Mirza is telling a lie.
"I am not introvert to any muslim believer in Islam."
Lie #131: Mirza claims that "I am not introvert to any muslim believer in Islam."(Da`afe-al-Waswaas p31, Roohani Khazain volume 5 page 31, preface). It is a lie evident. The muslims of the world have collectively denounced him to be a believer because his faith in "Khatme Nabuwwat, "Death" of Masih and all other laws of Sharia are contradictory to basics of Islam.Lie #132: It is proved in Quran that "after death Isa`s spirit was lifted towards the skies". (Azaala Auham 1st p133,Roohani khazain.3 p233).There is no such Verse in Quran. It is a lie evident.__________________
Mirza`s untrue predictions
Lie #136: Mirza writes "I firmly claim thousands of my predictions came true and hundreds of thousands of people witnessed.(Kashti-e-Noah p11, Roohani Khazain vol.19.p6).This is another of his lies as he on the same page of the book, he writes "....and thousands of people witnessed its fulfillment. (Kashtie-e-Noah p11/12, Roohani Khazain vol.19, p100).Is there any difference between hudreds and thousands ?
Plague in full swing in Qadiyan
Lie #137: Mirza announced with great stress that "the plague will not be cured until they recognise the "Deputy and the Messenger". (Dha�fae`Al-bala p5, Roohani Khazain volume page)and then he says "plague shall remain for 70 years but Qadiyan was protected from it because God`s messenger was in Qadiyan and it is his "throne-place".(Dhafae`al-bala p10). He revealed on me that HE will save everyone within the walls of this house.(Kashtie Noah p. 2, Roohani Khazain volume 19 page p. 4). On the contrary, circumstancial evidence proves Mirza`s "revelation" wrong as not only Qadiyan was not safe from plague but his house fell victim to it. On 10th April 1904 Mirza writes to Nawab Muhammad Ali Khan that "Big one Ghausaan is suffering from fever and he was ousted from the house. Master Din Muhammad suffered also from fever and tumour and he too was ousted. Sometimes I was so sick, it appeared to be dangerous and life expectancy was only 2-3 minutes. (Maktubaat Ahmadiya vol.4, p115). Mirza admits "when plague was in full swing in Qadiyan, my son, Sharif Ahmad was affected. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p. 253, Roohani Khazain volume 22 page 87, 265). The Editor of "Al-Badar" admitted about the cases of plague in Qadiyan. (Al-badar 24-4-1906). Mirza claimed that "I prayed for the spreading of plague thus my prayer was accepted and the plague spread in the country. (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p. 224 Roohani Khazain v.22, p235)But when plague hit Qadiyan, Mirza said, "it is a time for thanking the great British Government who, with compassion to its subjects, have suggested an injection to protect them from plague. (Kashtie Nooh p1).
"The death of some of our companions is like the martyrdom of the Prophet`s (SAW)
When Mirza`s companions started dying of plague, I said "the death of some of our companions is like the martyrdom of the Prophet`s (SAW)companions in the war.If a person from our Jama`at dies, a hundred or more enter in our Jama`at.(Tatimma Haqiqat-ul-Wahi p.131,Roohani Khazain v.22, p 568).That is how Mirza reacts after such humiliation.
Will Qadiyan be like Lahore ? never! never!

Lie #138: On every page of "Al-Fazal" (the Qadiyani newspaper) appear the words ”Daar-ul-Amaan” Qadiyan or the house of safety Qadiyan.Mirza Bashir Ahmad son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani, in his book Seeratul Mehdi, had the same words on its every page.It was according to Mirza`s claim of 19-4-1904 in which he announced his "revelation": "Mun Dakhala kaana Amina” or whoever enters, comes in a place of safety(Tazikarah p. 510). Mirza says "I had this revelation in reply to my prayer for Qadiyan.(Tazkirah p509 Jadeed p512). Mirza`s claim was humiliated when in 1947 this"house of safety became the place of disturbance". The Sikhs ousted everyone from their houses and the "Bahishtie Maqbarah" was also humiliated.Mirza Bashir Ahmed Qadiyani who was the leader (Khalifah) of Jama`at Ahmadiyya ran away from Qadiyan with his companions sayingwhat a house of safety is it where we could not get shelter and they came to Pakistan. There is no peace and tranquility in Qadiyan.Mirza Qadiyani was spinning lies.
Lie#139: Mirza`s God said "I shall give Qadiyan so much expansion that it will be like Lahore".(Tazkirah p795 Jadeed 815). Lahore is always Lahore.Mirza Bashir Ahmad, after denouncing his father`s revelations, came to Lahore then shifted to a village called "Dhiggiyan" which was re-named "Rabwah". Rabwah`s name was changed again and it became ”Chanab Nagar”.Mirza Tahir (caliph) fled therefrom as well and came in the "shelter" of his masters "The British".
My word is true, he who lives shall see
Lie #140: Mirza Qadiyani had an opponent crony Maulana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.In 1897 AD Mirza sarcastically predicted that he will believe in him like Pharoahs or the righteous ones.(Istisqa p22, Roohani Khazain volume12 page 130). Then again in 1903 he predicted that "we are not disappointed by his faith as he will believe in me. This is how the "revelation" of God means: "Mirza, Allah Ta`ala will show your friend `s destiny. Auspicious is it and God will not forget him and it will be revived by God`s own hands. God is all-powers and time of guidance shall come and sin shall be forgiven. He shall be given water of piety and cleanliness and mornng breeze shall bringfragrance. My word is true, he who lives shall see.(Ijaaz Ahmadi p50, Roohani Khazain v.19, p162). This prediction did not come true and Maulana did not believe in him.
Mirza was *****en hearted

Lie #141: "There is a prediction about my murder etc. in Brian Ahmadiya that I shall be saved from such plans.(Haqiqat-ul-Wahi, Roohani Khazain Vol.22, p234). Now watch Mirza Qadiyani`s another face: "... I had to go to Lahore - Maulvis are giving sermons with great fervour that this man is liable to be killed. How is it possible to go to Lahore without any protective measures - (people say) Mirza ran away and did not come - this man has hidden himself in the corner of a house (Majmooa` Ishtaharat vol.3, p350, 369, 370). Mirza was frightened despite Allah said "my messengers do not fear from any enemy". ( Haqiqat-ul-Wahi Roohani khazain vol.22, p75). He was as timid as a hare.
Boy or girl?

Lie #142: When Mirza Qadyani`s wife Nusrat Jehan Begum became pregnant he, with his usual pomp and show, invented the "revelation" that God is going to bless you with a pious and handsome son and he (son) with his curing power and true spirit shall free many from diseases and he will be the House of Allah (Tableegh-Risalat vol.1 p58) .But Allah Ta`la proved his "revelation like the others" wrong and she gave birth to a girl instead of a boy. Mirza did not admit and wryly said,next time it will be a boy". Nusrat Jehan became pregnant again in December 1886 and she gave birth to a son on 7th August (Tableegh-e-Risalat vol. 1. p99). Mirza gave him the name "Bashir Ahmad" but the boy, according to his "prophecies" did not cure the diseases but he himself died at the age of sixteen months.(Maktoobat Ahmadiya vol.5, p. 2).
Lie#143: Mirza Qadyani "reveals" that Manzoor Ahmad shall have a son and his name is Bashirud Daullah. After eleven days, he had another revelation that there shall be four names. And then another revelation, there will be nine (Tazkarah p.598, 626, 632). But Mirza`s "revelation" once again was false. Peer Manzoor Ahmad had a girl instead of a son on 17th July 1904. (Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi p100 margin (Roohani khazain vol.22, p. 103). Mirza strongly defended that there is some delay. Thebirth is not cancelled.This "revelation" proved to be a LIE because the woman Muhammadi Begum died(Al-Bushra vol.2, p116).
MIRZA’S LORD IS VERY FUNNY
GIVES BOY INSTEAD OF GIRL !
Tit for tat
Deputy Atham did not die according to Mirza Qadiani’s prediction!
Lie#144: Mirza challenged the Christian-convert Deputy Abdullah Atham. There was a great flux and reflux and having been irritated during the debate he had with him Mirza writes: I declare "if this prediction does not come true, he who according to God, is false and shall not fall into "Haavia or hell" within fifteen months from this date, I shall be prepared to take any punishment; I may be humiliated, a rope may be put around my neck.(Jang Muqaddas Roohani page 293, Khazain Vol.6, p210 - 5-9-1893).Mirza thus denounces his claim "when the prediction`s validity of 15 months i.e. 5-6-1893 to 5-9-1894) ended and the debater Abdullah Atham did not die, the Christians of Amritsar rallied(Anjaam Atham Roohani Khazain vol.11,preface).They shouted very loudly again and again. There shouts reached the sky ;
May the cunning net
be spread elsewhere
your prayers
have proven false
Love is blind

Lie #145: Muhammadi Begum was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani`s maternal cousin Mirza Ahmad Baig`s young daughter. In a case of a sale deed Mirza`s signatures were needed by Mirza Ahmad Baig.Mirza Qadiyani, availing the opportunity asked for his daughter`s hand to marry him.She was a teenager and Mirza was in his fifties. (Tazkirah p. 158, Ai`eena Kamalaat Islam p574,Roohani Khazain volume 5 page325, 572, 573).Father rejected his request .
Marriages are made in heaven

Lie1#46: When Muhammadi Begum’s father rejected Mirza Qadiyani’s request Mirza told him:” My wedding with your daughter has been settled in the skies. Do not wed your daughter with another, he will die.(Tazkarah p. 222). Father did not agree. Mirza tried all the fair and fowl means.Finally the father Mirza Ahmad Baig married his daughter with a soldier Mirza Sultan Ahmad.Having been disappointed Mirza Qadiyani invented revelations that her husband shall die within two and a half years and she shall come in his wedlock.(Tazkirah p.158, A`eena Kamalaat Islam, Roohani Khazain vol.5, p325, 572,573)But Mirza died having this craving in the mind. Muhammadi Begum`s husband who was to die within two and a half years. lived for forty years after Mirza`s death. Muhammadi Begum throughout her life condemned Mirza and died in Lahore as a muslim on 9-11-1966).May God bless her soul. This couple was successful in this life as well as in the hereafter.Mirza claimed that ”My wedding with your daughter has been settled in the skies. Do not wed your daughter with another, he will die” .Mirza Qadiyani was only cheating and blackmailing. (Tazkarah p. 222).His God had been settled his marriage in the skies with Muhammadi Beigum, buton the earth Mirza Sultan has snatched his ”bride”, by marrying with her in the village of ”Patti” . (Tazkarah p. 280, 286).Was Miza Sultan stronger than Mirza Qadiyani’s God, Yalash?
What a wedlock in the skies is
That the vanehope
shall accompany til Resurrection
One virgin and one widow ? Poor Mirza !

Lie #147: Mirza claims that "God has planned to bring two women in my wedlock: one virgin and the other a widow". First revelation has been fulfilled, the virgin has given birth to four children;the other (widow) is awaited. (Tazkirah p. 29, 39, 140, Tariaqul Quloob p24, addendum Anjaam Atham p14). In 1886 Mirza married a virgin Nusrat Jehan Begum but he died without marrying a widow. Had God planned to bring two wives in Mirza Qadiyani’s wedlock ? Why did it fail ? Who is liar ?
Dreaming about the ”blessed women”

Lie# 148: Mirza Qadiyani predicts 20 Feb. 1886: ”God has planned to bring some blessed women in my wedlock and I shall also have off-spring”.(Ishtihar Sadaqat Anwar, Surmah Chashm-e-Ariah page 259,Roohani khazain v.2, p. 309, Majmooa-e-Ishtharat v. 2, page 318).
Mirza died without having them! His God’s plan failed again.Who was liar ? Mirza or his God ?
In fact Mirza Qadiani loves to spin ”LIES”.
An empty vessel makes much noise

Lie #149: On 16-5-1893 Mirza had a debate with renowned religious scholar Maulana Abdul Haque Ghaznavi in Eidgah, Amritsar anddeclared with great fervour on 12-10-1907 that "he who is not right between the two debators, shall die in the life of the right" (Malfoozaat vol.9, p440). Since Mirza was a liar, he died on 26-5-1908 before the death of Maulana Abdul Haque Ghaznavi.
Curt cows have short horns
Lie #150: Dr. Abdul Hakim was Mirza`s follower for 20 years and then he refuted him and they were poles apart. Dr. Abdul Hakim wrote two books "Kana” (one-eyed) Masih (Christ) and Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal" against him.They exchanged hot words. Then he (doctor) declared that within three years from today (12-7-1906) Mirza shall die. In reply Mirza also replied with a poster. Then doctor Abdul Hakim again replied that I have been revealed on 1-7-1907 that Mirza shall die and shall be put in "Haavia" within the next fourteen months.Mirza again replied that my God has revealed that the liar shall die within the life of the true." (Chashma Ma’a-e-hrfat part.2, p.321-322,Roohani Khazain vol.23, p337). Mirza was a liar therefore he died of cholera on 26-5-1908 and doctor Abdul Hakim lived for many years after him.Mirza`s revelations were all false.Please read ”Chashma-e- Ma’arfat” page 321 again and again !Surely you wil get the right way.
Mirza died in Lahore, buried in Qadiyan(not in Makkah or Madinah)

Lie #151: Mirza claims that "I shall die in Mecca or Madinah".(Tazkirah p. 591, Al-bushra vol.2, p105).Mirza died in Ahmadiya (now Muhammadiyya) building on Branderath Road, Lahore. But he was not burried there and his dead body was brought to Qadiyan. ( ”To die”does not mean ”to conquer” in any language, as one of his followers has written.).Mirza Qadiyani was a liar again!
Mirza carries water in sieve

Lie #152: Mirza writes:” My birth took place in 1839/1840 during last days of the Sikh Reign”(Kitaab -al-bariyya p. 159 , Roohani Khazain volume13 page 177). Mirza Qadiyani reveals that his God has told him that you will live for 80 or more years. (Muaahibur Rahman p21, Tohfa Golarvia p29, Roohani Khazain volume page).His God`s promise was wrong. He died at the age of 68.Ahmadi group should count it again and again ! We are at loss to understand how the Qadiyani group believes on such a liar !

Zeal without prudence is frenzy
Pride will have a fall!

Fear that man who fears not God.
Lie #153: Mirza`s tongue and pen both were polluted with filth.He challenged Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari that "the liar shall die of plague and cholera within the life of the true".(Ishtahaar 5-4-1907 Majmu`a Ishtaharaat vol.3, p578, Tableegh-e-Risalat vol.10, p120). Since Mirza was a liar,he died of cholera within the life of the true (Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari) andMaulana Sanaullah Amritsari lived for 40 years after the death of Mirza. He died on 15-3-1948 in Sargodha. Mirza died on 26-5-1908 at the age of 68/69 while his "God" had falsely revealed his age 80 years. (Tazkarah p. 7, A�arbaeen no. 3 p. 29-30, Muwahib-ur-Rehman p. 21, Roohani khazain vol. 19 p. 239, Taufah Golvriah 29 new, addend. Tauhfa Golvriah p. 19 old). Who is a liar ? Mirza Qadiyani or his God, ”Yalash”! (Tazkarah p. 379)
Open confession is good for the soul !
Oh, friends: the followers of Mirza ! we do not hate you. That is why we have given you more than hundred and fifty lies of your leader, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani.We hope that you will be struck at heart and conscience.

Can a liar be a gentleman ? Can a liar be a prophet ?

The christians wrote about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani ;
What a Gabriel and revelation of your God Humiliated are all those whom you say
False and degenerate are all your claims Nothing came true Oh Mirza Qadiyan !
Death keeps no calendar. We all are subject to die. Death is the grand leveller. Mirza Qadiyani is not going to help you there. Ahmadiyya Movement is humpty dumpty these days. Everyone knows all the ins and outs of it now. The simple muslims came to know that
So called Ahmadies / Qadiyanies / Marzaies are goody-goody. They will have a face to face talk. They are not to be cowed down by Qadiyanies fee-faw-fum.
Look to the end please !

The Muslim’s faith is as clear as crystal. The muslims don’t see eye to eye with Miza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyanibecause he lies and lies. He is quixotic and dogmatic. He seems to be blase Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani says: "Do not leave the filth of lie; it is the way of the dogs nor the humans.(Anjaam Atham, Roohani Khazain vol. 11 p. 43). He writes:” To lie is nothing less than becoming Lan "apostate".(Arba`een #3, p24). He explains strongly:"Those who are the sons of prostitutes and are the products of adultery - even they feel ashamed when they lie.(Shahna Haq p.60, Roohani khazain,vol.2, p386). Mirza Qadiyani says "to lie is like eating shit" .(Haiqat-ul-wahi page 206, Roohani khazain vol. 22, p. 215)
Keep repeating Mirza Qadiyani`s quotations when you read his lies. A lie has no legs to stand upon .His actions are not fair and squre. You have conscience. We hope it will help you. There is no pillow so soft as a clear conscience. Thought is free and the best is behind.It is never too late to mend.Ahmadi / Qadiyani group is driving a lonely furrow.The unexpected always happens.We hope that in the end things will mend and Ahmadies / Marzaies will again become the part of our Muslim community. Pick and choose your religion before it is too late.We are your well wishers.
Let us not forget that Religion is nothing else but love to God and man (mankind) !

 

[Zarvan]

Rebuttal of Qadyaniat


Mirza Qadyani claims he is alike (maseel) to Hazrat Isa (as), and alike to all other prophets(as) including our Nabi (saw). This concept of likeness describes that a person capable of cultivating qualities /characteristics of some other person becomes alike (maseel) spiritually to that other person; this alike person (maseel) can claim all the attributes specifically associated with the original person. Such likeness is spiritual only not physical one. It means though alike person (maseel) and the original person have different physical entities, but in terms of spiritual attainments they are similar. If the original person is a prophet, his “maseel” may also be a prophet. In line with this concept, Mirza Ghulam Qadyani claims to have attained all spiritual achievements attributed to Muhammad (saw) including prophethood which is alike (maseel) to prophethood of Muhammad (saw). [Refrences: Rohani khazain (by Mirza Qadyani) vol.22, p-521. vol.18, p-212. vol.16, p- 258,259,270. Malfozaat Hazrat Masih Maood (by Mirza Qadyani) vol.3, p-270. Kalmatul fasl (by Mirza Bashir) p-113, p-105].
This concept of likeness is completely unscientific, totally mythical, and logically baseless.
With advancements in Genetics, scientists are increasingly advocating that human personality/ traits are based on genetic set-up. Two persons can’t have similar genetic set-up (unless they are cloned); it means two persons can’t have similar personality traits; in other words, two persons can’t have completely similar worldly/ spiritual achievements. Not to speak of complete similarity, two persons can’t have any one spiritual quality to the same degree, because the trait/genes composition relating to that quality can’t be the same in two persons. According to science of Psychology, human personality is shaped, to much extent, on the basis of environment he/she is subjected to. Two persons subjected to different environments can’t cultivate completely similar personality. Mirza’s claim to be alike (maseel) to Muhammad (saw) in terms of spiritual attainments is un-scientific.

Logically too, the concept of likeness is not tenable. The whole mankind has been directed in Quran to follow Muhammad (saw); this direction is forever and compulsory for every human to achieve Allah’s love. It was also compulsory for Mirza Qadyani to follow Muhammad (saw) if he wanted Allah’s love. Now the moment the follower and to be followed are elevated to the same spiritual level, the person to be followed no longer remains a person to be followed. But Muhammad (saw) is the person to be followed forever by whole mankind. It means no one can be a “maseel” to Muhammad (saw) in spiritual attainments. Secondly, Muhammad (saw) has been declared as “universal rehmat” forever; it means primary/basic source of Allah’s “rehmat” among the creations is Muhammad (saw). There can’t be another primary/basic source of Allah’s “universal rehmat” after Muhammad (saw); there can’t be two primary/basic sources of Allah’s universal rehmat. If two entities are taken as basic sources, it would mean no one is basic source. It means no one can be a “maseel” to Muhammad (saw) in spiritual attainments. Thirdly, all attributes of Muhammad (saw) are not cultivable; they can’t be developed through effort and deeds. Prophethood is also “wahbi”- it is bestowed upon whoever is chosen by Allah ( of course, it was bestowed upon the person who is the best among the people in terms of his deeds); but nobody can make a claim for Prophethood on the basis of his deeds. Similarly out of attributes of Muhammad (saw), which are described through his names, many are “wahbi” and can’t be attained through effort. A few such “wahbi” attributes are: Rasul; Nabi; Muhammad; Ahmad; Mehmood; Aqib; Yasin; Taha; Ha-mim; Tasin; Mujtaba; Mustafa; Qasim; Mansur; Khatam-al-anbiya; Awwal; Akhir; Zahir; Batin; Rasheed; Munji; Mahdi; Fatih; Mutahhar; Hasib; Habib; Murtaza; Sahib; Shafi; Shaheed; and Muhrrim. All these attributes should not be understood with only the literal meanings of these words, because only literal meanings of these words fall short of explaining true nature of these attributes; acctually specific meanings, based on literal meanings, are associated with all these names. For example, Nabi literally means a person telling about unseen; but as per specific meanings-based on literal meanings- “Nabuwwat” is a designation bestowed by Allah upon a chosen person for the guidance of mankind. No one can attain all these “wahbi” attributes through effort and pious deeds. In other words, no one can be “maseel” to Muhammad (saw).

Mirza Qadyani’s claim of likeliness to our Nabi (saw) is marred with so many contradictions. For instance, at one place he says “all spiritual attainments of Muhammad (saw) have been bestowed upon him”. [Ref.Malfuzaat Hazrat Masih Maood (by Mirza Qadyani) vol.3, p-270]. But at other place he says “spiritual quality pertaining to name of “Muhammad” (which is “jalali” in its nature) is not to be manifested; now the spiritual quality pertaining to name of “Ahmad” (which is cool like Moon) has manifested itself in his form. [Ref.Rohani Khazain (by Mirza Qadyani) vol.17, p-445/446]. This way he admits that all spiritual qualities of Muhammad (saw) have not been bestowed on him. It means he himself contradicts his claim of likeliness to Muhammad (saw).
The futility of Mirza’s claim for “Nabuwwat” is even more exposed, when his claim is judged on the basis of his actions/ performance. Islam is based on Quran and Sunnah. The linchpin of Mirza’s argumentation was the argument that Muslims did not understand Quran and Sunnah in the proper context and in the correct manner. But it is amazing to know that he did not write any “tafseer” of Quran so that the “ignorant” Muslims might rectify their understanding of Quran ( he did make interpretation of some verses). He also did not do any work of sifting huge collection of “ahadith” so that the Muslims might know what hadith was correct and what was not (he did make his views about some ahadith). Is it not strange and unbelievable that a person was receiving “Wahi” but he was not separating the right from the wrong out of sources of Islam? The answer is very simple; the sifting of huge collection of ahadith and writing “tafseer” of Quran required lot of knowledge which Mirza Qadyani was lacking in. One may argue that Muhammad (saw) also did not give detailed account of what was right and what was wrong in the previous divine Books. Therefore it is not objectionable if Mirza did not give such detailed account about interpretation of Quran and Books of Hadith. Such a argument would not be valid. Muhammad (saw) did not need to give such detailed account about the previous divine Books, because after coming of Muhammad (saw), Muslims were required to establish “Deen/ Shariah” on the basis of Quran and Sunnah, not on the basis of previous divine Books that is why Muslims were not required to have correct version of previous divine Books. But Qadyanis still require a valid account of ahadith and valid interpretation of Quran.
We can conclude that concept of likeness is completely unscientific, totally mythical, and logically baseless.

 

[SQ8]

Mr because those dumbos like you never bother to know the detail of ayat for what it came for you are such dumb people

Perhaps you are being a bigger dumbo for now bothering to explain it to him ONCE at least. If Once fails you can have your opinion.

@Azlan Haider The Ayat implies Prophet Issa as the preceding and following Ayat all mention him. Just as a continuation of conversation. After all, if I am talking about you for the past five sentences I will not expect you to think that he means anything other than Azlan Haider.

Thread going wayward.

Closed.