What's new

Forgotten Hero of Islam: Alp Arslan

Luffy 500

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
5,562
Reaction score
2
Forgotten Hero of Islam: Alp Arslan



http://www.islam21c.com/islamic-thought/forgotten-hero-of-islam-alp-arslan/

seljuk.jpg


“How often a small group overcame a mighty host by Allāh’s Leave?”[1]

Many years before Salāh al-Dīn’s magnanimity towards the defeated barbaric crusaders, another Muslim leader had shown the world how a Muslim ruler behaves with mercy and restraint in this very month of August.

Soon after the advent of Islām, the Roman Empire faced an energetic new challenger in the Umayyad Caliphate. The Umayyads made two serious attempts to conquer the Roman Empire, laying siege to Constantinople in 674-8 CE and again in 717 CE. Fortunately for Byzantium, the Umayyad Caliphate was overthrown in 750 CE by the Abbasids, who gave up such ambitious plans, opting instead for regular military campaigns that sometimes penetrated right into the heart of Byzantine Anatolia. These raids culminated in Caliph Mu’tasim’s (833-842 CE) destruction of Amorium in central western Anatolia in 838 CE.[2]

By the end of the eighth century however, Byzantium’s situation began to improve whereas the Abbasid economy was in decline and the government was paralysed by religious and political factionalism – this was the height of heresy with philosophers, mu’tazilites and bātinites. The Byzantines exploited Abbasid disunity to take the offensive and over the course of two centuries recovered their lost provinces of Illyricum, Greece, Bulgaria, Northern Syria, Cilicia, and Armenia. At this same time that the Byzantines were celebrating their revival, a new player in international affairs arrived on the scene – the Seljuk Turks who were a family of nomadic Oghuz Turks who had converted to Islām around the end of the tenth century.

The Seljuk Turks

The Abbasid Caliphate was in disarray and there was no effective force to stop the migration of Central Asian nomads. In 1040 CE, the first Seljuk horsemen under their first major leader, Tughril Beg penetrated the Caliphate’s eastern border and, without encountering any effective Abbasid opposition, began plundering their way across Iran and Iraq. They soon crossed into Armenia and drove deep into Anatolia, reaching the Byzantine port city of Trebizond on the Black Sea coast in 1054 CE. The following year, the Abbasids bowed to the inevitable and conceded political and military authority to Tughrul Beg of the Seljuks. Tughrul Beg (1056-1067 CE) was granted the title of Sultan and took Baghdad as his capital. Suddenly the Seljuks were elevated from nomadic raiders to masters of a vast and sophisticated empire.

The rise of the Seljuks caused disunity amongst the Byzantines. In 1064 CE the Seljuk’s captured and sacked Ani. Ani was critical to the Byzantine’s eastern defence strategy.

Constantine X died in 1067 CE leaving the administration in the hands of his wife Eudocia who married Romanus who then became the Emperor of Byzantine Rome.

Alp Arslan and events leading to the Battle

In 1063 CE (454 AH), Tughril’s nephew, Alp Arslan became Sultan of Persia and Iraq. His actual name was Muḥammad ibn Dāwūd and came to be known as Alp Arslan which means ‘heroic lion’ or ‘courageous lion’. His vizier (Chief Administrator), Nizam al-Mulk (Abu Ali Hasan ibn Ali Tusi), who was also a scholar came to be known as one of the greatest viziers and would go on to establish the esteemed Nizamiyah Madrasa – Imām Ghazzāli was to be one of its rectors.

Sultan Alp Arslan was a merciful and generous leader, even against his enemies which proved to be a key feature during his rule. In the year 1066 (459AH), the ruler in the area of Kirman called Qara Arslan, rebelled against Alp Arslan. After marching towards Kirman and one of his detachment forces being defeated by Alp Arslan, Qara sought forgiveness from Alp, who received him graciously. The Sultan restored him to his kingdom and changed nothing in his position [3].

In 1069 CE (462 AH), the envoy of the ruler of Makkah, Muhammad ibn Abu Hashim visited Sultan Alp Arslan to inform him of the introduction of the khutbah (sermon) at Makkah in the name of the Caliph, al-Qa’im bi-Amr Allah and the Sultan and the dropping of the khutbah for the Fatimid ruler of Egypt and that they had abandoned the call to prayer with the Fatimid formula of “Hayya a’la khayril ‘amal” (‘Hasten towards the best of action’). The Sultan gave him 30,000 dinars and robes of honour and arranged an annual pension [3].

Sultan Alp Arslan regarded the Fatimid Caliphate of Egypt as his main enemy; he had no desire to engage the neighbouring Byzantines in unnecessary hostilities and as such, in the same year of 1069, he entered into a treaty where he had committed to preventing Seljuk raiding on Byzantine territory

In 1071 CE (436AH), Sultan Alp Arslan made his way to Edessa in Syria where it was reported to him that although the khutbah there went out in the name of the Caliph, they continued to pronounce the adhan of the Fatimid and as such, Sultan Alp Arslan marched towards them. The leader there, Mahmud ibn Salih sought Sultan Alp Arslan’s forgiveness with his mother in attendance. Sultan Alp Arslan received them both with kindness, gave robes of honour to Mahmud and restored him to his town.[3]

In the meantime, Romanus needed a decisive victory not only to protect Armenia but also his throne and, in the summer of 1071 CE, Romanus decided to gamble everything on a massive eastern campaign that would draw the Seljuk’s into a engagement with Byzantine. In February 1071 CE, Romanus sent an embassy to Alp Arslan to renew the treaty of 1069 CE. Romanus’ envoys reached the Sultan outside Edessa, which he was besieging at the time. Keen to secure his northern flank against Byzantine attack, Alp Arslan happily agreed to the terms, abandoned the siege and immediately led his army south to attack Aleppo in Fatimid Syria. Aleppo was subdued and introduced the khutbahs in the name of Caliph al-Qā’im bi-amr Allāh and Sultan Alp Arslan. It has been recorded that the commoners in the city took away the rugs in the Mosque saying “These are Ali ibn Abi Tālib’s rugs, let Abū Bakr bring rugs for his followers to pray on”.

The offer to renew the peace treaty by Romanus was a key element of Romanus’ plan, distracting the Sultan long enough to allow Romanus to lead an army into Armenia and recover the lost fortresses before the Seljuks had time to respond. Romanus’ offer to renew the treaty while at the same time preparing for a war was deceitful, but the use of deceit in warfare was a skill the Byzantines prized very highly. Byzantine tactical manuals regularly recommended using ploys, deceit and negotiation and to either avoid battle or gain advantage.[4]

The Battle of Manzikert

Romanus marched with 200,000 men, Greeks, Franks, Russians, Georgians, Armenians and many others. Many historians such as Matthew of Edessa claim the Byzantine army exceeded one million men [5] – Gibbons claims it was the largest army ever fielded by the Roman Empire, East or West. They came with much equipment and in great pomp and to attack the lands of Islām arriving in Malazgrid, also known as Manzikert.

News reached Sultan Alp Arslan when he was laying siege in Azerbaijan. Sultan Alp Arslan knew that he would not be able to raise his army who were far away and whilst the enemy was close. He gathered the men he had with him which numbered around 15,000. They then marched on and when they drew near the enemy, they encountered an advance guard of the Byzantines of around 10,000. After a brief engagement, the advance guard fled. When Sultan Alp Arslan drew nearer, he sent a message to Emperor Romanus for a truce but this was emphatically refused by Romanus.

It is said that before battle, Romanus sent an envoy to Sultan Alp Arslan as one last warning saying: “I have come to you with forces you cannot resist so become subservient to me willingly”. This angered Sultan Alp Arslan and the glory of Islām filled his breast and he responded:


“Tell your master it is not you who have brought me out but it is God, to Whom be praise, who has brought you and your troops to me to make you food for the Muslims” [6]


Sultan Alp Arslan was then advised by the Imām and Scholar of the army, Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Abdul Malik as follows:


“You are fighting for a religion which Allāh promised to support and to make it prevail over all others. I trust that Allāh will have put this victory down to your name. Confront them on Friday in the afternoon, at the hour when the preachers will be in the pulpits. They will be praying for victory for the warriors of jihād – and prayer is linked to a favourable response.”[3]


Accordingly, just as the hour came on Friday 20 Dhu’l-Qa’da 463 AH, corresponding to 19 August 1071 CE, Sultan Alp Arslan led all his men in prayer following which he wept much beseeching Allāh and they too wept with him. He then addressed his men and said:


“We are with a depleted force. Either I will achieve the goal or I will go as a martyr to Paradise. If I die, then know that my son, Malikshah is to be my heir. Whosoever wishes to depart, let him depart, for there is no Sultan to command and forbid today for I too am a ghazi (warrior) with you.”[7]


Encouraged by the fact that no one departed; he threw down his bow and arrows, picked up his sword and mace and tied the tail of his horse. He put on a white coloured clothing, anointed his body and said “If I am killed, then this is my winding sheet”. He then moved closer to the enemy and then dismounted his horse, rubbed his face in the dust of the plains of battle and wept and prayed to Allāh for a considerable amount of time for he understood the words of the Messenger of Allāh (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) who was reported to have said:


“Two du’ās are never rejected, or rarely rejected: the du’a during the call for prayer, and the du’a during the calamity when the two armies attack each other”[8]


The Byzantines set up like the number five on a dice with Romanus in the Centre whilst the army of Islām set up in a crescent formation hiding their small number. Voices reciting the Qur‘ān and the sounds of drums from the Sultan’s troops, and the ringing of bells from the Byzantines, filled the air. Sultan Alp Arslan then mounted his horse and charged towards the enemy lines with cries of “Allāhu Akbar” in unison with his army such that the mountains trembled. The charge was so ferocious that the dust which emerged from beneath provided them with much cover as they smashed into the centre of the Byzantine army. Allāh’s help descended and many of the enemy’s army were sent to their hereafter whilst the others fled in retreat with the soldiers of the Sultan reciting the verse I have set out at the outset of this article.[9] But it was to get better. The Muslims had managed to capture the Emperor of the Byzantines, Romanus himself.

When Romanus was taken to Sultan Alp Arslan, the Sultan beat him three times with his whip and the following conversation is said to have then taken place:


Alp Arslan: “What would you do if I was brought before you as a prisoner?”


Romanus: “Perhaps I’d kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople.


Alp Arslan:
“My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free”.[10]

Arslan negotiated a peace with Romanus before permitting him to depart. This saw the transfer of Antioch, Edessa, Hierapolis, and Manzikert to the Seljuks as well as the initial payment of 1.5 million gold pieces and 360,000 gold pieces annually as ransom for Romanus. Romanus remained captive with Sultan Alp Arslan for approximately a week during which time he treated him with great kindness and generosity. He escorted him a long distance back to Constantinople and sent with him a number of his men for safe passage with a banner above his head bearing the words ‘There is nothing worthy of worship but Allāh’ [7].

For Romanus, when he returned he found that he had been dethroned, was blinded and sent into exile by another powerful dynasty, the house of Ducas. As for Sultan Alp Arslan, just under a year after the momentous battle, the Sultan set out for Mawarannahr (Transoxiana) and subdued its tyrant ruler, Yusuf al-Khwarezmi. Yusuf was being tied up and insulted the Sultan who asked for him to be released and took aim at him with his trusted bow except, for the first time, he missed his target and Yusuf, who had two knives hidden in his garment, stabbed the Sultan before he himself was killed.[3] The wound which the Sultan received eventually led to his death and with that, came the end of one of the most courageous sons of Islām.

Points to Note:

There are many points we can take from the life and times of Sultan Alp Arslan but to list all of them would mean that this article would become endless.

Firstly, in a time when Muslims are negatively portrayed as barbaric because of the wrongful acts of a few in how they treat their prisoners, here we see a leader who dealt with his foes mercifully. Imagine, the head of the enemy who was the aggressor in attacking you, who killed many of your people and caused many injuries and much devastation and now you have him in your grasp – to pardon him indeed takes great character. This example in dealing with your enemies is one that you will not find anywhere outside the house of Islām where you will also find many other examples such as how the Messenger of Allāh (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) dealt with the Quraish at the Conquest of Makkah and how Salāh al-Dīn would deal with the barbaric crusaders almost a century after Sultan Alp Arslan.

Regarding the crusaders, it should not be forgotten that this battle was so devastating, that it set in motion a number of events – one of these was that, within a decade, Pope Urban would make a call to unite Western and Eastern Christendom to avenge the consequences of the defeat at Manzikert in what was the first Crusades. Another event that was set in motion was that the victory opened up the area of Anatolia to the Muslims which marked the beginning of the end of the Byzantine Empire’s tenure as a dominant world power, and marked not only the beginning of the end of their civilization, but also sparked the birth and rise of a powerful Muslim presence that would last until its dissolution almost nine hundred years later, the Ottoman Empire, and thus, the battle of Manzikert is one of the most defining battles in history.

We learn that the outward display of pomp and splendour of Romanus and the Byzantines were of no avail to them and that victory is indeed in the hands of Allāh.

We also see the power of Friday, the day of Jumuʿah in the conscious of the Muslims and how they linked the power of duʿā with victory and how certain they were in their knowledge that on this day, the Muslims everywhere would raise their hands in duʿā for those fighting for them whereas today, you will find many Imāms and Muslims afraid to do so openly for fear of being criminalised.

So, now you know who Sultan Alp Arslan is, I hope you will make him a household name and ensure that his noble legacy lives on. May Allāh make his grave spacious and may Allāh have mercy on him as he had mercy on those he ruled. May Allāh send to this ummah men like him.

Source: www.islam21c.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@Akheilos @Zarvan @Apprentice @Aslan @Malik Abdullah @tesla @bsruzm @azzo @Mrc @Umair Nawaz @Horus @Saiful Islam @Al-zakir @kobiraaz
 
.
"Seljuk Sultan Alp Arslan’s tomb about to be found in Merv, say experts

1428249106302.jpg


Crucial developments came to light regarding excavation efforts carried out by the sponsorship of Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TİKA) to find the tomb of the second Sultan of the Seljuk Empire, Alp Arslan, in Turkmenistan's historic city of Merv, also known as Mary.

Prof Dr. Osman Eravşar, one of the cochairs of finding Sultan Alp Arslan's tomb project and a professor in the Department of Literature in Turkey's Selçuk University, told the Anadolu Agency that a protocol was signed by Turkish President Abdullah Gül and his Turkmen counterpart Gurbanguli Berdimuhamedov to find Sultan Alparslan's tomb and initiate a tomb reconstruction project in March 30, 2013.

A workshop was organized by TİKA's initiative in Turkey before geophysical researches were made in the province of Merv. "We have found some tiles and architectural pieces. We think that they belong to Seljuk architecture. An epitaph found among those pieces is what excites us most. No matter how ruined it is, we could find out where the tomb is on condition that we find missing parts of the epitaph," Eravşar said.

Eravşar also emphasized that the project has been carried out following a comprehensive examination of resources which belong to the Middle Ages by numerous scientists. As a result of those examinations, the first scientific council was appointed to search for the exact place of the tomb. In this respect, mapping analyses were carried out. "For us, the previous committee has identified five different points about the possible place of the tomb. We read studies carried out before us to try to understand what has been done until now. Finding both resources, 'Where could this tomb be?' we asked, we had discussions about it. In fact, the medieval sources clearly say that Sultan Alparslan was buried into a Cuma (Friday) Mosque. Sources of the era show that Sultan Alp Arslan's funeral was brought to Merv and buried into the Cuma Mosque. With this in mind, we asked again 'Which Cuma Mosque could the Sultan be buried in?' Because there are three Cuma Mosques in Merv. One of them is Ben-i Mahan Cuma Mosque, the other one Mescid-i Atik and the last one is Macan Cuma Mosque."

Two other co-chairs, Professor Halit Çal from Gazi University and Professor Haşim Karpuz from Selçuk University were assigned for the project as well. Professor Çal also gave some technical information about the excavations, saying that, "15 scientists and 70 workers were appointed for the project as well as five scientists from Turkmenistan." Authorities from the Ministry of Culture of Turkmenistan are also a part of the excavations.

Stating that English and Russian scientists had also carried out some excavations to find the tomb, Eravşar said that what they found so far are small clues and highlighted that, "If we combine our information in the future with what we found now, we can say that we are very close to finding Sultan Alparslan's tomb. It is hard to say so for now, but we think that we are in the right place since we started excavating. We believe that we are looking for the tomb in the right place."

One another co-chair of the project, Professor Karpuz, also emphasized that they have already excavated 47 meters, adding, "Excavations will be carried out in two different periods this year, the first one will start in May. " He stated that after some regular excavations, they made huge progress within a year, while it normally takes fifteen years." Daily Sabah

_____
- Alp Arslan: “What would you do if I was brought before you as a prisoner?”

- Romanus: “Perhaps I’d kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople.

- Alp Arslan:
“My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free”

alparslan-520x245.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Romanus marched with 200,000 men, Greeks, Franks, Russians, Georgians, Armenians and many others. Many historians such as Matthew of Edessa claim the Byzantine army exceeded one million men [5] – Gibbons claims it was the largest army ever fielded by the Roman Empire, East or West. They came with much equipment and in great pomp and to attack the lands of Islām arriving in Malazgrid, also known as Manzikert.

Absolutely impossible for the Byzantines to ever field such an army,this is ridiculous ,and the Emperor wasn't attacking "muslim lands" but only defended his and his forefathers lands,lands wich were Byzantine for hundreds of years before Islam ever existed, against savage invaders.I guess we shouldn't be very surprised at the jihadist,agressive attitude of many muslims today when history is butchered in such a shameless way to portray every islamic agression as "innocent defensive wars".
 
.
Absolutely impossible for the Byzantines to ever field such an army,this is ridiculous
Your post shows me how much you know about history and Islam. If you do not know what you are talking about, then its best to keep your mouth shut.

The sources on the numbers of Byzantine Army are provided by Byzantine officials and historians themselves. It indeed and no doubt was one of the largest army the Byzantines have ever fielded.

he Emperor wasn't attacking "muslim lands" but only defended his and his forefathers lands
against savage invaders.I guess we shouldn't be very surprised at the jihadist,agressive attitude of many muslims today when history is butchered in such a shameless way to portray every islamic agression as "innocent defensive wars".

Do you even know how the Byzantine-Islamic war started?
The Caliphate always kept close relations with the Byzantines and heavily respected them as 'people of the book'; they saw them as future allies against the 'heretical Persians' who behaved very aggressively towards Islam. This relation was highlighted with letters and gifts exchanged between the Byzantine Emperor and Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

Relations soured when the Byzantines refused to punish several tribes responsible for pillaging and raids into Muslim territory. The degradation in relations hit climax when Ghassanids perpetrated a massacre of Muslim emissaries and their families. This prompted an expedition into Ghassanid territory. The Byzantines unexpectedly attacked the expedition on Mu'tah and routed the Muslims. This led to panic within the Caliphate; the Muslims neither expected to fight nor win against the Byzantine Empire; which was superior in any way. Another Byzantine army was sent into Muslim territory but was defeated at Dathin.

Muslims miraculously began to began to gain victories despite being numerically, economically and technologically inferior; giving the Muslims a sense of invincibility.

but only defended his and his forefathers lands,lands wich were Byzantine hundreds of years before Islam ever existed, against savage invaders
Their forefathers came from Rome and they were seen as invaders and occupiers by the local populations. People of other faiths were persecuted, non-Greeks/Romans were seen as inferior and they forced their beliefs upon others.

Here is a historic account when Jews and Christians both united to defeat the Byzantines and remain under Muslim control with free-will.

"When Heraclius massed his troops against the Muslims, and the Muslims heard that they were coming to meet them, they refunded the inhabitants of Hims the tribute they had taken from themm saying : "We are too busy to support and protect you. Take care of yourselves." But the people of Hims replied: "We like your rule and justice far better than the state of opression and tyranny in which we were. The army of Heraclius shall indeed, with your help, repulse from the city." The Jews rose and said: "We swear by the Torah, no governor of Heraclius shall enter the city of Hims unless we are first vanquished and exhausted." Saying this, they closed the gates of the city and guarded them. The inhabitants of other cities - Christians and Jews - that had capitulated did the same. When the Muslims won, they opened the gates of their cities, went out with singers and players of music, and paid the tribute. (Ezzati, 144)"

-----

You need to lay off your bias and learn real history.
 
.
the Emperor wasn't attacking "muslim lands" but only defended his and his forefathers lands,lands wich were Byzantine for hundreds of years before Islam ever existed, against savage invaders.I guess we shouldn't be very surprised at the jihadist,agressive attitude of many muslims today when history is butchered in such a shameless way to portray every islamic agression as "innocent defensive wars".

"The Armenians of Byzantium have welcomed the Seljuk conquest with lengthy celebrations in the streets and thanksgiving to God for having rescued them from long years of Byzantine oppression. Seljuk Turks gave protection to the Armenian Church, which the Byzantines had been trying to destroy. They abolished the oppressive taxes which the Byzantines had imposed on the Armenian Churches, monasteries and priests, and in fact exempted such religious institutions from all taxes. The Armenian community was left free to conduct its internal affairs in its own way, including religious activities and education, and there never was any time at which Armenians or other non-Muslims were compelled to convert to Islam. The Armenian spiritual leaders in fact went to the Seljuk Sultan Melikshah to thank him for his protection." Stephanos Taronetsi, Armenian historian, who recorded his impressions on the arrival of Seljuk Turks to Anatolia around 1071


"How well the Seljuk Turks treated the
Armenians is shown by the fact that some Armenian noble families like the Tashrik family accepted Islam on their own free will and joined the Turks in fighting Byzantium." Mathias of Edessa, Armenian historian, in his Chronicles, Nr. 129
 
.
Your post shows me how much you know about history and Islam. If you do not know what you are talking about, then its best to keep your mouth shut.

The sources on the numbers of Byzantine Army are provided by Byzantine officials and historians themselves. It indeed and no doubt was one of the largest army the Byzantines have ever fielded.




Do you even know how the Byzantine-Islamic war started?
The Caliphate always kept close relations with the Byzantines and heavily respected them as 'people of the book'; they saw them as future allies against the 'heretical Persians' who behaved very aggressively towards Islam. This relation was highlighted with letters and gifts exchanged between the Byzantine Emperor and Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

Relations soured when the Byzantines refused to punish several tribes responsible for pillaging and raids into Muslim territory. The degradation in relations hit climax when Ghassanids perpetrated a massacre of Muslim emissaries and their families. This prompted an expedition into Ghassanid territory. The Byzantines unexpectedly attacked the expedition on Mu'tah and routed the Muslims. This led to panic within the Caliphate; the Muslims neither expected to fight nor win against the Byzantine Empire; which was superior in any way. Another Byzantine army was sent into Muslim territory but was defeated at Dathin.

Muslims miraculously began to began to gain victories despite being numerically, economically and technologically inferior; giving the Muslims a sense of invincibility.


Their forefathers came from Rome and they were seen as invaders and occupiers by the local populations. People of other faiths were persecuted, non-Greeks/Romans were seen as inferior and they forced their beliefs upon others.

Here is a historic account when Jews and Christians both united to defeat the Byzantines and remain under Muslim control with free-will.

"When Heraclius massed his troops against the Muslims, and the Muslims heard that they were coming to meet them, they refunded the inhabitants of Hims the tribute they had taken from themm saying : "We are too busy to support and protect you. Take care of yourselves." But the people of Hims replied: "We like your rule and justice far better than the state of opression and tyranny in which we were. The army of Heraclius shall indeed, with your help, repulse from the city." The Jews rose and said: "We swear by the Torah, no governor of Heraclius shall enter the city of Hims unless we are first vanquished and exhausted." Saying this, they closed the gates of the city and guarded them. The inhabitants of other cities - Christians and Jews - that had capitulated did the same. When the Muslims won, they opened the gates of their cities, went out with singers and players of music, and paid the tribute. (Ezzati, 144)"

-----

You need to lay off your bias and learn real history.

Don't you even try this pseudo history BS with me.It all started with the offensive letter Muhammad sent Heraclius asking him to convert to Islam.After this,muslims started to raid Byzantine lands in 634 which lead to the Byzantine response and the subsequent disaster at Yarmouk.No serious historian ever doubted that muslim started the agression against the Byzantine empire but it's futile discussing with people brainwashed to believe that Islamic expansion by the sword was just defensive and muslims "did nuffin' wrong".

"The Armenians of Byzantium have welcomed the Seljuk conquest with lengthy celebrations in the streets and thanksgiving to God for having rescued them from long years of Byzantine oppression. Seljuk Turks gave protection to the Armenian Church, which the Byzantines had been trying to destroy. They abolished the oppressive taxes which the Byzantines had imposed on the Armenian Churches, monasteries and priests, and in fact exempted such religious institutions from all taxes. The Armenian community was left free to conduct its internal affairs in its own way, including religious activities and education, and there never was any time at which Armenians or other non-Muslims were compelled to convert to Islam. The Armenian spiritual leaders in fact went to the Seljuk Sultan Melikshah to thank him for his protection." Stephanos Taronetsi, Armenian historian, who recorded his impressions on the arrival of Seljuk Turks to Anatolia around 1071


"How well the Seljuk Turks treated the
Armenians is shown by the fact that some Armenian noble families like the Tashrik family accepted Islam on their own free will and joined the Turks in fighting Byzantium." Mathias of Edessa, Armenian historian, in his Chronicles, Nr. 129


Pretty sure they've "enjoyed" the genocide inflicted by the Turks later.Sure dude,everyone was happy whenconquered by muslims.Heck,we saw in the Fetih Turkish movie,the Byzantine civilians greated the sultan and there was no widespread looting in the city.......Jeez,the amount of propaganda fed to you....

Btw,Christianity only took an agressive posture after seeing Islam using the sword for conversions,in a way they adapted to the new trend,fighting fire with fire.
 
.
True gentleman this Arp Arslan was, he could have executed the Byzantium king but chose to let him go.
 
. .
Pretty sure they've "enjoyed" the genocide inflicted by the Turks later.Sure dude,everyone was happy whenconquered by muslims.Heck,we saw in the Fetih Turkish movie,the Byzantine civilians greated the sultan and there was no widespread looting in the city.......Jeez,the amount of propaganda fed to you....
How is it exactly that you and your Balkan friends, our former provinces for several centuries, managed to live under our tutelage and kept your faith? Maggot country with maggot mentality. You only payed Jizye and you were under our protection for centuries up till the 19th century. I understand why a certain bodypart of yours hurt so much

13221751_593450224156119_7990274801104828232_n.jpg

Know your place
 
.
How is it exactly that you and your Balkan friends, our former provinces for several centuries, managed to live under our tutelage and kept your faith? Maggot country with maggot mentality. You only payed Jizye and you were under our protection for centuries up till the 19th century. I understand why a certain bodypart of yours hurt so much


Because imposing Islam by force would have meant widespread rebellion throughout the Balkans,it was easier that way-this wasn't some kindness granted.We kept our faith under miserable conditions and due to our bravery.

Pls,try to use words like maggot when adressing your family members only,it's for the best. and more appropriate for the contextTnx
 
.
Forgotten Hero of Islam: Alp Arslan



http://www.islam21c.com/islamic-thought/forgotten-hero-of-islam-alp-arslan/

seljuk.jpg


“How often a small group overcame a mighty host by Allāh’s Leave?”[1]

Many years before Salāh al-Dīn’s magnanimity towards the defeated barbaric crusaders, another Muslim leader had shown the world how a Muslim ruler behaves with mercy and restraint in this very month of August.

Soon after the advent of Islām, the Roman Empire faced an energetic new challenger in the Umayyad Caliphate. The Umayyads made two serious attempts to conquer the Roman Empire, laying siege to Constantinople in 674-8 CE and again in 717 CE. Fortunately for Byzantium, the Umayyad Caliphate was overthrown in 750 CE by the Abbasids, who gave up such ambitious plans, opting instead for regular military campaigns that sometimes penetrated right into the heart of Byzantine Anatolia. These raids culminated in Caliph Mu’tasim’s (833-842 CE) destruction of Amorium in central western Anatolia in 838 CE.[2]

By the end of the eighth century however, Byzantium’s situation began to improve whereas the Abbasid economy was in decline and the government was paralysed by religious and political factionalism – this was the height of heresy with philosophers, mu’tazilites and bātinites. The Byzantines exploited Abbasid disunity to take the offensive and over the course of two centuries recovered their lost provinces of Illyricum, Greece, Bulgaria, Northern Syria, Cilicia, and Armenia. At this same time that the Byzantines were celebrating their revival, a new player in international affairs arrived on the scene – the Seljuk Turks who were a family of nomadic Oghuz Turks who had converted to Islām around the end of the tenth century.

The Seljuk Turks

The Abbasid Caliphate was in disarray and there was no effective force to stop the migration of Central Asian nomads. In 1040 CE, the first Seljuk horsemen under their first major leader, Tughril Beg penetrated the Caliphate’s eastern border and, without encountering any effective Abbasid opposition, began plundering their way across Iran and Iraq. They soon crossed into Armenia and drove deep into Anatolia, reaching the Byzantine port city of Trebizond on the Black Sea coast in 1054 CE. The following year, the Abbasids bowed to the inevitable and conceded political and military authority to Tughrul Beg of the Seljuks. Tughrul Beg (1056-1067 CE) was granted the title of Sultan and took Baghdad as his capital. Suddenly the Seljuks were elevated from nomadic raiders to masters of a vast and sophisticated empire.

The rise of the Seljuks caused disunity amongst the Byzantines. In 1064 CE the Seljuk’s captured and sacked Ani. Ani was critical to the Byzantine’s eastern defence strategy.

Constantine X died in 1067 CE leaving the administration in the hands of his wife Eudocia who married Romanus who then became the Emperor of Byzantine Rome.

Alp Arslan and events leading to the Battle

In 1063 CE (454 AH), Tughril’s nephew, Alp Arslan became Sultan of Persia and Iraq. His actual name was Muḥammad ibn Dāwūd and came to be known as Alp Arslan which means ‘heroic lion’ or ‘courageous lion’. His vizier (Chief Administrator), Nizam al-Mulk (Abu Ali Hasan ibn Ali Tusi), who was also a scholar came to be known as one of the greatest viziers and would go on to establish the esteemed Nizamiyah Madrasa – Imām Ghazzāli was to be one of its rectors.

Sultan Alp Arslan was a merciful and generous leader, even against his enemies which proved to be a key feature during his rule. In the year 1066 (459AH), the ruler in the area of Kirman called Qara Arslan, rebelled against Alp Arslan. After marching towards Kirman and one of his detachment forces being defeated by Alp Arslan, Qara sought forgiveness from Alp, who received him graciously. The Sultan restored him to his kingdom and changed nothing in his position [3].

In 1069 CE (462 AH), the envoy of the ruler of Makkah, Muhammad ibn Abu Hashim visited Sultan Alp Arslan to inform him of the introduction of the khutbah (sermon) at Makkah in the name of the Caliph, al-Qa’im bi-Amr Allah and the Sultan and the dropping of the khutbah for the Fatimid ruler of Egypt and that they had abandoned the call to prayer with the Fatimid formula of “Hayya a’la khayril ‘amal” (‘Hasten towards the best of action’). The Sultan gave him 30,000 dinars and robes of honour and arranged an annual pension [3].

Sultan Alp Arslan regarded the Fatimid Caliphate of Egypt as his main enemy; he had no desire to engage the neighbouring Byzantines in unnecessary hostilities and as such, in the same year of 1069, he entered into a treaty where he had committed to preventing Seljuk raiding on Byzantine territory

In 1071 CE (436AH), Sultan Alp Arslan made his way to Edessa in Syria where it was reported to him that although the khutbah there went out in the name of the Caliph, they continued to pronounce the adhan of the Fatimid and as such, Sultan Alp Arslan marched towards them. The leader there, Mahmud ibn Salih sought Sultan Alp Arslan’s forgiveness with his mother in attendance. Sultan Alp Arslan received them both with kindness, gave robes of honour to Mahmud and restored him to his town.[3]

In the meantime, Romanus needed a decisive victory not only to protect Armenia but also his throne and, in the summer of 1071 CE, Romanus decided to gamble everything on a massive eastern campaign that would draw the Seljuk’s into a engagement with Byzantine. In February 1071 CE, Romanus sent an embassy to Alp Arslan to renew the treaty of 1069 CE. Romanus’ envoys reached the Sultan outside Edessa, which he was besieging at the time. Keen to secure his northern flank against Byzantine attack, Alp Arslan happily agreed to the terms, abandoned the siege and immediately led his army south to attack Aleppo in Fatimid Syria. Aleppo was subdued and introduced the khutbahs in the name of Caliph al-Qā’im bi-amr Allāh and Sultan Alp Arslan. It has been recorded that the commoners in the city took away the rugs in the Mosque saying “These are Ali ibn Abi Tālib’s rugs, let Abū Bakr bring rugs for his followers to pray on”.

The offer to renew the peace treaty by Romanus was a key element of Romanus’ plan, distracting the Sultan long enough to allow Romanus to lead an army into Armenia and recover the lost fortresses before the Seljuks had time to respond. Romanus’ offer to renew the treaty while at the same time preparing for a war was deceitful, but the use of deceit in warfare was a skill the Byzantines prized very highly. Byzantine tactical manuals regularly recommended using ploys, deceit and negotiation and to either avoid battle or gain advantage.[4]

The Battle of Manzikert

Romanus marched with 200,000 men, Greeks, Franks, Russians, Georgians, Armenians and many others. Many historians such as Matthew of Edessa claim the Byzantine army exceeded one million men [5] – Gibbons claims it was the largest army ever fielded by the Roman Empire, East or West. They came with much equipment and in great pomp and to attack the lands of Islām arriving in Malazgrid, also known as Manzikert.

News reached Sultan Alp Arslan when he was laying siege in Azerbaijan. Sultan Alp Arslan knew that he would not be able to raise his army who were far away and whilst the enemy was close. He gathered the men he had with him which numbered around 15,000. They then marched on and when they drew near the enemy, they encountered an advance guard of the Byzantines of around 10,000. After a brief engagement, the advance guard fled. When Sultan Alp Arslan drew nearer, he sent a message to Emperor Romanus for a truce but this was emphatically refused by Romanus.

It is said that before battle, Romanus sent an envoy to Sultan Alp Arslan as one last warning saying: “I have come to you with forces you cannot resist so become subservient to me willingly”. This angered Sultan Alp Arslan and the glory of Islām filled his breast and he responded:


“Tell your master it is not you who have brought me out but it is God, to Whom be praise, who has brought you and your troops to me to make you food for the Muslims” [6]


Sultan Alp Arslan was then advised by the Imām and Scholar of the army, Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Abdul Malik as follows:


“You are fighting for a religion which Allāh promised to support and to make it prevail over all others. I trust that Allāh will have put this victory down to your name. Confront them on Friday in the afternoon, at the hour when the preachers will be in the pulpits. They will be praying for victory for the warriors of jihād – and prayer is linked to a favourable response.”[3]


Accordingly, just as the hour came on Friday 20 Dhu’l-Qa’da 463 AH, corresponding to 19 August 1071 CE, Sultan Alp Arslan led all his men in prayer following which he wept much beseeching Allāh and they too wept with him. He then addressed his men and said:


“We are with a depleted force. Either I will achieve the goal or I will go as a martyr to Paradise. If I die, then know that my son, Malikshah is to be my heir. Whosoever wishes to depart, let him depart, for there is no Sultan to command and forbid today for I too am a ghazi (warrior) with you.”[7]


Encouraged by the fact that no one departed; he threw down his bow and arrows, picked up his sword and mace and tied the tail of his horse. He put on a white coloured clothing, anointed his body and said “If I am killed, then this is my winding sheet”. He then moved closer to the enemy and then dismounted his horse, rubbed his face in the dust of the plains of battle and wept and prayed to Allāh for a considerable amount of time for he understood the words of the Messenger of Allāh (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) who was reported to have said:


“Two du’ās are never rejected, or rarely rejected: the du’a during the call for prayer, and the du’a during the calamity when the two armies attack each other”[8]


The Byzantines set up like the number five on a dice with Romanus in the Centre whilst the army of Islām set up in a crescent formation hiding their small number. Voices reciting the Qur‘ān and the sounds of drums from the Sultan’s troops, and the ringing of bells from the Byzantines, filled the air. Sultan Alp Arslan then mounted his horse and charged towards the enemy lines with cries of “Allāhu Akbar” in unison with his army such that the mountains trembled. The charge was so ferocious that the dust which emerged from beneath provided them with much cover as they smashed into the centre of the Byzantine army. Allāh’s help descended and many of the enemy’s army were sent to their hereafter whilst the others fled in retreat with the soldiers of the Sultan reciting the verse I have set out at the outset of this article.[9] But it was to get better. The Muslims had managed to capture the Emperor of the Byzantines, Romanus himself.

When Romanus was taken to Sultan Alp Arslan, the Sultan beat him three times with his whip and the following conversation is said to have then taken place:


Alp Arslan: “What would you do if I was brought before you as a prisoner?”


Romanus: “Perhaps I’d kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople.


Alp Arslan:
“My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free”.[10]

Arslan negotiated a peace with Romanus before permitting him to depart. This saw the transfer of Antioch, Edessa, Hierapolis, and Manzikert to the Seljuks as well as the initial payment of 1.5 million gold pieces and 360,000 gold pieces annually as ransom for Romanus. Romanus remained captive with Sultan Alp Arslan for approximately a week during which time he treated him with great kindness and generosity. He escorted him a long distance back to Constantinople and sent with him a number of his men for safe passage with a banner above his head bearing the words ‘There is nothing worthy of worship but Allāh’ [7].

For Romanus, when he returned he found that he had been dethroned, was blinded and sent into exile by another powerful dynasty, the house of Ducas. As for Sultan Alp Arslan, just under a year after the momentous battle, the Sultan set out for Mawarannahr (Transoxiana) and subdued its tyrant ruler, Yusuf al-Khwarezmi. Yusuf was being tied up and insulted the Sultan who asked for him to be released and took aim at him with his trusted bow except, for the first time, he missed his target and Yusuf, who had two knives hidden in his garment, stabbed the Sultan before he himself was killed.[3] The wound which the Sultan received eventually led to his death and with that, came the end of one of the most courageous sons of Islām.

Points to Note:

There are many points we can take from the life and times of Sultan Alp Arslan but to list all of them would mean that this article would become endless.

Firstly, in a time when Muslims are negatively portrayed as barbaric because of the wrongful acts of a few in how they treat their prisoners, here we see a leader who dealt with his foes mercifully. Imagine, the head of the enemy who was the aggressor in attacking you, who killed many of your people and caused many injuries and much devastation and now you have him in your grasp – to pardon him indeed takes great character. This example in dealing with your enemies is one that you will not find anywhere outside the house of Islām where you will also find many other examples such as how the Messenger of Allāh (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) dealt with the Quraish at the Conquest of Makkah and how Salāh al-Dīn would deal with the barbaric crusaders almost a century after Sultan Alp Arslan.

Regarding the crusaders, it should not be forgotten that this battle was so devastating, that it set in motion a number of events – one of these was that, within a decade, Pope Urban would make a call to unite Western and Eastern Christendom to avenge the consequences of the defeat at Manzikert in what was the first Crusades. Another event that was set in motion was that the victory opened up the area of Anatolia to the Muslims which marked the beginning of the end of the Byzantine Empire’s tenure as a dominant world power, and marked not only the beginning of the end of their civilization, but also sparked the birth and rise of a powerful Muslim presence that would last until its dissolution almost nine hundred years later, the Ottoman Empire, and thus, the battle of Manzikert is one of the most defining battles in history.

We learn that the outward display of pomp and splendour of Romanus and the Byzantines were of no avail to them and that victory is indeed in the hands of Allāh.

We also see the power of Friday, the day of Jumuʿah in the conscious of the Muslims and how they linked the power of duʿā with victory and how certain they were in their knowledge that on this day, the Muslims everywhere would raise their hands in duʿā for those fighting for them whereas today, you will find many Imāms and Muslims afraid to do so openly for fear of being criminalised.

So, now you know who Sultan Alp Arslan is, I hope you will make him a household name and ensure that his noble legacy lives on. May Allāh make his grave spacious and may Allāh have mercy on him as he had mercy on those he ruled. May Allāh send to this ummah men like him.

Source: www.islam21c.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@Akheilos @Zarvan @Apprentice @Aslan @Malik Abdullah @tesla @bsruzm @azzo @Mrc @Umair Nawaz @Horus @Saiful Islam @Al-zakir @kobiraaz


Thanks you bring the topic i read about the Arp Arsalan in the books ''amra sei se jati by abul asad during by boyhood.
amra-3.png
 
.
This was the Ottoman empire,and this was how we kept our faith.......with pain and sacrifice....


Death and sanctification in eastern orthodoxy[edit]
The circumstances and facts of Constantin's death are history, his santification recognized in all The Eastern Orthodox Church.

Dragoș Ungureanu, a specialist at The National Patrimony Institute makes "a clear distinction between the holiness status of Prince Brâncoveanu and the same quality of some European monarchs who haven’t suffered a martyr's death. Brâncoveanu was canonized for his and his son’s martyrdom, just like the Christians martyrdom in ancient Rome, killed for their faith in Christ. And just like other Christian martyrs, Brâncoveanu had to choose between his and his son’s death and the denial of Christ, (in their case, by converting to Islam). His character, the nature of his relations with the others, the unexpected events of life brought, against his will, in this strange, even shocking situation for the year 1714"[1]

On 15 august 1714, Saint Mary Feast, when also Constantin Brâncoveanu celebrated 60 years he and his four sons among with counselor Ianache were brought in front of Sultan Ahmed The Third of Turkey. Diplomatical representatives of Austria, Russia, France and England were also present. Here is what history remembers: After all of his fortunes were taken, in change of the life of his family he was asked to renounce at the orthodox-christian fate. He reportedly said: ″Behold, all my fortunes and all I had, I have lost! Let us not lose our souls. Be brave and manly, my beloved! Ignore death. Look at Christ, our Savior, how much has endured for us and with what shamefull death has died. Strongly believe in this and do not move, nor do you leave your faith for this life and this world.″ After this, his four sons, Constantin, Ștefan, Radu and Matei and counselor Ianache were beheaded in front of their father. [2]

History records also that the smallest child, Matei (12 years old) he was so scared after seeing all the bloodbath and heads of his three brothers that he started crying asking his father to let him renounce christianity and convert to islam as sultan Ahmed The Third asked in front of all the great powers represented there. At this moment, Constantin Brâncoveanu said: "From our kind nobody lost his faith. It is better to dye a thousand times than to leave your ancient faith just to live few more years on earth." Matei listened and offered his head. After Brâncoveanu was also decapitated, her heads were stabbed with a javelin and shown in a procession. Their bodies were left in the front of the gate and later on thrown in the waters of Bosfor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantin_Brâncoveanu#Death_and_sanctification_in_eastern_orthodoxy



@Vauban @vostok .......just a reminder as in another thread I've mentioned how others sold their faith in the Balkans


 
Last edited:
.
Because imposing Islam by force would have meant widespread rebellion throughout the Balkans,it was easier that way-this wasn't some kindness granted.We kept our faith under miserable conditions and due to our bravery.

Pls,try to use words like maggot when adressing your family members only,it's for the best. and more appropriate for the contextTnx
Yes, very brave folks, living under "poor" conditions for centuries, while at the same time agreeing to be ruled by Istanbul. That may make sense in that head of yours, but reality works differently. You either overthrow your government, or you tacitly accept it. If those grievances you speak of existed, centuries wouldnt have passed before you managed to throw us out. You either must accept your extreme weakness both mentally and spiritually, or you must come to terms with the fact that Ottoman might actually have brought positives, instead of presenting everything in that head of yours in whites and blacks. It's either completely bad, or completely good. Nope, there are numerous variable at play simoultanously, only the fool would simplify, what's markedly interrelated.

There is a reason why Magnificient Suleyman in Turkey is called Kanuni Sultan Suleyman. Suleyman of Kanun/Laws. Because justice/law was his biggest weapon. A corrupt empire can't last for centuries during an age of rapid change.
 
.
Yes, very brave folks, living under "poor" conditions for centuries, while at the same time agreeing to be ruled by Istanbul. That may make sense in that head of yours, but reality works differently. You either overthrow your government, or you tacitly accept it. If those grievances you speak of existed, centuries wouldnt have passed before you managed to throw us out. You either must accept your extreme weakness both mentally and spiritually, or you must come to terms with the fact that Ottoman might actually have brought positives, instead of presenting everything in that head of yours in whites and blacks. It's either completely bad, or completely good. Nope, there are numerous variable at play simoultanously, only the fool would simplify, what's markedly interrelated


I gave you a link above.Even the 12 year old child after witnessing his brothers massacred for refusing to convert to Islam,refused to denounce Christ for his life.Ottomans brought nothing,unlike other conquerors ,like Western Europeans who brought modernisation.Ottomans only took ,they pillaged and raped,they were locusts .
 
.
.Ottomans only took ,they pillaged and raped,they were locusts
You are an uneducated fool. Change your point of vantage and attitude, you might become wiser, if you don't insistently remain ignorant

estern Europeans who brought modernisation
Is that why Jews fled to our Empire during their persecution? Your knowledge of history is laughable at best, which im sorry to say.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom