What's new

Forced Conversions of Hindu Girls

Islam is still used to unite Pakistan.
Without Islam how is Pakistan united?
What is Pakistani identity? How was it created?
Pakistani identity has Islamic unity at its core.
We can either choose to preserve our Islamic unity and Pakistani identity or secularists can take away Islam from our Pakistani identity and watch our Pakistani identity fall.
Pakistan wasn't falling during the times that Islam was kept as a tenet rather than a core state material (Jinnah's time, Ayub Khan's time)

But it was failing during the times of Zia Ul Haq, when Islamisation reforms occurred.

I don't think that you realise that a true state of Islam governs based on a more loose and liberal form of islamic governance, most of which is similar to the current laws and legislations of nations across the world, albeit differences in financial and social systems.

The stereotype for Islam being linked to heavy Sharia and "backwards practice" is a myth, Islam encourages us to innovate state machinery and systems of governance for the ease of the people and betterment of society, rather than a heavily conservative and undeveloped society.
 
Pakistan wasn't falling during the times that Islam was kept as a tenet rather than a core state material (Jinnah's time, Ayub Khan's time)

But it was failing during the times of Zia Ul Haq, when Islamisation reforms occurred.

I don't think that you realise that a true state of Islam governs based on a more loose and liberal form of islamic governance, most of which is similar to the current laws and legislations of nations across the world, albeit differences in financial and social systems.

The stereotype for Islam being linked to heavy Sharia and "backwards practice" is a myth, Islam encourages us to innovate state machinery and systems of governance for the ease of the people and betterment of society, rather than a heavily conservative and undeveloped society.
Sharia for Pakistan would be great.
 
Sharia for Pakistan would be great.
No, it would be terrible seeing that you see Sharia as hard-line islamic ruling, when rather it is encompassed of liberal interpretations of Quran and hadith to remain relevant in the modern day.

THAT is true Sharia.
 
Forced conversions happens right under so called leftist/secular Pee Pee Pee and their Bhutto overlords. Sindh is a shit hole, they still have slavery there. No one can do anything in Sindh without approval of Bhutto/Zardari clan and their feudal buddies.

This thread lk smelling like cow dung

Such a heartbreaking thread is being hijacked by Pajeets
Sad
That's the problem, we need a Pakistani only forum so we can discuss serious issues within Pakistan without pajeets polluting it with their cow dung.

No, it would be terrible seeing that you see Sharia as hard-line islamic ruling, when rather it is encompassed of liberal interpretations of Quran and hadith to remain relevant in the modern day.

THAT is true Sharia.

Yep according to sharia you can't force people to convert to Islam. Every non Muslim in Pakistan who follows the law is supposed to be a protected minority within Islamic sharia. What we have is a dangerous mix of feudalism and corrupt mullahs.
 
No, it would be terrible seeing that you see Sharia as hard-line islamic ruling,

You are just presuming.... Sharia.. the one that the people of Pakistan desire should be the rule of the land...

when rather it is encompassed of liberal interpretations of Quran and hadith to remain relevant in the modern day.

THAT is true Sharia.
sure...Would military coups be possible in such sharia?
 
Pakistan wasn't falling during the times that Islam was kept as a tenet rather than a core state material (Jinnah's time, Ayub Khan's time)
Pakistan literally broke into two during that type. Yahya and Bhutto were the same ideology. The same Ayub who slandered Fatima Bhutto in the worst way possible and his stupidness made 65 war be a stalemate.
Jinnah’s Pakistan died with Jinnah.
Jinnah and Iqbal’s Pakistan was a Pakistan with Islam as its core.
But it was failing during the times of Zia Ul Haq, when Islamisation reforms occurred.
Miners say otherwise. Zia took a country that was divided into 2 just a few years before he came into power. He managed to revive the economy and rebuild the military while engaging soviets in Afghanistan and keeping india from attacking us. Under Zia’s time Pakistan had the highest gdp growth in history and the military was rapidly building. Zia didn’t even Islamize Pakistan properly but even his half baked attempt yielded more good for Pakistan than his secular predecessors who broke the country.

I don't think that you realise that a true state of Islam governs based on a more loose and liberal form of islamic governance, most of which is similar to the current laws and legislations of nations across the world, albeit differences in financial and social systems.

The stereotype for Islam being linked to heavy Sharia and "backwards practice" is a myth, Islam encourages us to innovate state machinery and systems of governance for the ease of the people and betterment of society, rather than a heavily conservative and undeveloped society.
Nowhere have I said Islam is super strict and against progress. An Islamic system is different from the current Pakistani system in many ways. The current Pakistani system is a continuation of British colonial system. The American system is probably the closest to an Islamic system and with some changes can be made into an Islamic system. There is no heavy or light Shariah. There is only one Shariah and it must be implemented in full. Progress and innovation happened in Islam golden age while the states ruled with Shariah. So Islamic system does not stop progress or innovation.
I don’t know what you’re thinking about when I say Islamic system but extremism is not what I want either.
Theres many books from scholars on the topic of Islamic governance.
A whole separate thread can be made if you want to go in dept about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom