What's new

Final Salute to F-6

F-6s at War
Filed Under China, PAF, Pakistan, Technology, US Policy

by Air Cdre M Kaiser Tufail (Retd)

The US embargo on military sales to Pakistan at the outbreak of 1965 Indo-Pak War was received with dismay and disbelief by the PAF, whose combat and training aircraft were totally of US origin. Already starting to get outclassed by more modern aircraft, the F-86Fs, F-104s and B-57s were now plagued by spares support problems that rendered them virtually worthless in the PAF. The C-in-C of the PAF, Air Marshal Nur Khan who had cannily led the force during the war, sensed the criticality of the situation and started an immediate search for suitable aircraft from new sources. Unfortunately for Pakistan, geopolitical realities restricted most available options. Pakistan’s CENTO and SEATO memberships hardly endeared her to the Soviets. The Indians had already made inroads to Moscow and the first shipment of six MiG-21s had made its operational debut during the 1965 War. The Soviets saw India not only as a socialist ideologue that could be helped militarily, but as its influential proxy and mouthpiece in the Non-Aligned Movement. The prospect of Soviets and Pakistanis developing any kind of patron-client linkage, thus, came to be a non-starter.

China, in the throes of the Cultural Revolution, had not shown much interest in developing newer aircraft technologies for the time being. Content with the copy of Soviet-supplied MiG-19s, China mass-produced this single-role fighter in thousands. When Pakistan approached China for military help in 1966, she was only too glad to offer the F-6 as a token of friendship, the initial batch of 60 being free of cost. Though limited in range, speed and weapons payload, PAF inducted the aircraft and assigned it the day interceptor role with a secondary close air support task, which it dutifully went on to perform over the next 36 years.

A Quirky Fighter

The MiG-19 (Mikoyan and Gurevich) was the first supersonic fighter of the Soviet-bloc, making its prototype debut in late 1953; it was contemporaneous with the North American F-100 Super Sabre, the first supersonic fighter of the West. The MiG-19 sported audaciously swept-back wings which, at 55 degrees, were considered the right answer to drag rise during high speed flight, but were also problematic at low speeds due to the lower lift-generating ability of such wings. Designers increased wing thickness to ensure enough lift at low speeds, but more lift meant more drag in another form. Two powerful afterburning RD-9B turbojet engines pushed the aircraft out of this jumble and gave it a respectable status of a transonic fighter which could race through to a top speed of Mach 1.3. A set of three hard-hitting 30-mm cannon and, in later versions, two first-generation K-13 heat-seeking missiles completed the weapons suite as the Soviet bloc’s frontline missile-armed interceptor.1 (PAF modified the aircraft to carry AIM-9B Sidewinder missiles.) The same set of cannon armed with armour-piercing bullets, along with two rocket pods, served a useful secondary close air support role. Pilots discovered that they could manoeuvre the aircraft with abandon as long as their speed was not below 500 kph and, they could effortlessly chase their prey if the speed was not above 1,000 kph. Outside these limits lay severe testing grounds requiring special nerves and lots of muscle.

Ready for War

PAF pilots did not take long to master the quirky complexities of the F-6 at the limits of its flight envelope. They often relished the no-holds-barred dogfights with Mirages and Starfighters which could easily be out-turned, if not out-run, in dissimilar air combat. F-6 pilots boasted of some of the best gunnery and rocketry scores in the PAF. Operationally, the pilots seemed pleased to get so much out of so less, as it were. Maintenance of the aircraft was, however marred by a very low time-between-failure of components, as well as a low time-between-overhaul of the aircraft and engine. This was something that the engineers and technicians were able to overcome only when the PAF set up its own F-6 Rebuild Factory at Kamra in 1980 and, rapid overhauls became possible. At the outbreak of the war, PAF had 90 F-6 on its inventory, but due to these maintenance issues, a mere 48 were available for operations.

The F-6s were distributed amongst Nos 11, 23 and 25 Squadrons, each with 16 aircraft. No 11 Squadron, based at Sargodha, was commanded by Wg Cdr Sikandar M Khan. No 23 Squadron, the first Unit to be equipped with the F-6 in early 1966, was commanded by Wg Cdr S M H Hashmi; it had moved from its parent base Sargodha to the forward base at Risalewala, which formed the first tier of air defence against intruders from the east. No 25 Squadron, commanded by Wg Cdr Sa’ad A Hatmi, was split into two detachments of eight aircraft each, based at Sargodha and Mianwali. At the latter base, the detachment had the somewhat unconvincing task of guarding the ‘back-up’ strike assets including 10 B-57 and 5-odd Mirage IIIE for the all-important phase of Army’s main offensive.

Defending the Skies

Air defence cover in West Pakistan was patchy at best, but at low level it had wide gaps and only 7% of the border had radar coverage. Raid reporting by the few rear-located low level radars was not expected to provide enough reaction time for a ground scramble. Similarly, reporting by mobile observers – which is based on visual or aural information – was likely to cause delays. An expedient solution was to mount combat air patrols over possible enemy ingress routes, round the clock, effort permitting. Wasteful though it was, it was decided to man several points in the air and all fighters were ordered up for this task. F-6 came to be the workhorse for day air defense in the northern region.

The morning of 4 December promised action as the IAF was expected to retaliate in response to PAF’s strikes against some of the Indian airfields the previous evening. The PAF was ready, with fighters continuously patrolling the skies since first light. No 23 Squadron pilots at Risalewala had been tidily scheduled for the day’s proceedings. Around 0930 hrs, as F-6s for the day’s sixth mission were taxiing out of their pens, an air raid warning was sounded. A mission abort was ordered and loudspeakers relayed instructions for everyone to take cover. Flt Lt Javed Latif who was on cockpit standby, started to unstrap from his F-6 for a quick egress. Momentarily glancing out of the pen opening to see what was going on, he was aghast to see a Su-7 diving down straight at his aircraft. “The scary sight of an intake pointing at me is still etched fresh in my memory,” recalls Latif. As he jumped out of his F-6 to take cover, a salvo of rockets landed smack on the pen.3 Still scampering towards a trench, Latif was rattled by cannon fire from the second Su-7 as the bullets landed a few yards away. Then the raid was over as suddenly as it had started, and the AAA died down too, as if heralding an all-clear. Dusting himself and recovering his composure, Latif rushed to his pen to help put out the fire caught by the hessian camouflage covering. Luckily, his F-6 was unharmed except for a few nicks from slivers of falling plaster. “I was seething with anger at having been violated thus, and hurried to strap up again to settle the score,” remembers Latif. Shortly thereafter, a scramble was ordered for the next pair but confusion reigned as the taxi way had been blocked by the F-6s of the previous aborted mission. This led to yet another abort at a critical time but the situation was salvaged when Latif, who was standing by for a later mission, took charge and hit the starter button on his own. Just as he was taxiing out, his crew chief came rushing towards the aircraft, signalling for a switch off as another air raid warning had been notified. “My mind was racing and I had already decided in a split of a second – I was going to take my chances flying and I was not going to repeat the fiasco of the last pair,” Latif recollects. Over-ruling the Air Traffic Control’s somewhat confused recall message, Latif checked if his No 2 was also taxiing out. Hearing no response, he decided to take-off alone. Changing over to the radar frequency, he heard an eager voice wanting to join up as his wingman. It was Flt Lt Riffat Munir on patrol from the fifth mission, whose leader had aborted due to a technical problem. The new partners were only too glad to find themselves as a viable combat entity again. It wasn’t long before the ground radar handed the pair over to ‘Killer Control,’ a cleverly-perched look-out tasked to visually guide the interceptors about the raiders’ position with the help of geographic landmarks. Flt Lt Ahmed Khattak’s confident voice called out that two Su-7s were pulling up for an attack from the north-westerly direction and pointed out their position over the main water tank. After jettisoning their drop tanks and charging their guns, Latif and Riffat confirmed visual contact with both Su-7s. As the attackers approached the airfield, Latif easily positioned behind one of them while Riffat cleared tails. Firing all three of his cannon, Latif waited for some fireworks. Noticing that the aircraft was still flying unharmed, he fired another long burst till all his ammunition was exhausted. Just as he was expecting his quarry to blow up, he felt a huge thud. Thinking that he had been hit by the other Su-7, he broke right and then reversed left but found no one in the rear quarters. Checking for damage, he found that the left missile was not there and the launcher was shattered. The AAA shells bursting in puffs all around the airfield confirmed his suspicion that he had taken a ‘friendly’ hit, but luckily the aircraft was fully under control. Pressing on, he started to look for the escaping Su-7s and within moments, was able to pick one of them trailing a streak of whitish smoke. Convinced that it was the same one he had hit earlier and, assuming it to be crippled, Latif decided to go for the other Su-7. He spotted it straight ahead, flying over the tree tops at a distance of two miles. Engaging afterburners, he closed in for a Sidewinder shot but could not get a lock-on tone. To his dismay, he realised that the missile tone was routed through the circuitry of the left missile which had been shot off. Getting below the Su-7, he fired without a tone nonetheless, half expecting it to connect, if at all it fired. Moments later, he heard Riffat’s excited voice on the radio, “Good shooting, leader, you got him!” Not sure if he had really hit him as he had not seen any explosion, Latif was soon relieved to see the Su-7 roll over inverted and hit the ground.4 Flt Lt Harvinder Singh of Halwara-based No 222 Squadron went down with his aircraft near Rurala Railway Station. Riffat’s chase of the second Su-7 (flown by the mission leader, Sqn Ldr B S Raje) had to be cut short as he was getting low on fuel and his leader was out of ammunition. No 23 Squadron had drawn first blood after an eventful morning that saw Latif doggedly in business after surviving rocket and AAA hits. For his heroics on the ground and in the air, Latif was awarded a Tamgha-i-Jur’at (Medal of Valour).


25 Sqn at Mianwali

Shortly before sunset on the same day, Sakesar radar reported a raid heading towards Mianwali. Sqn Ldr Ehsan and Flg Off Qazi Javed of No 25 Squadron, who were on ‘cockpit standby’ in the hessian-covered pens, started their F-6s and within minutes, were taxiing out for take-off. Just then, Javed reported seeing two Hunters pull up for an attack. Sensing that they had been caught on the ground at the wrong time, Ehsan decided on a hasty take-off and pushed up the throttles to execute a sharp turn on to the runway. Unfortunately, use of excessive power caused him to veer off into the ‘kutcha.’ Stuck in the mud, he became an unwitting spectator as the Hunters delivered their attacks. In the meantime, Javed decided to take-off without his leader. Just as he lined up, he saw the lead Hunter strafing way far to the left of the runway. With half his worries suddenly over, Javed started rolling but danger from the second Hunter remained, as it had all the time to aim carefully and take a hearty shot. Anxious, Javed craned his neck back only to see the Hunter’s cannon blazing at him. “I thought his dive was too shallow and, at the close distance he was, the bullets would overshoot,” Javed recalls his rather masterly prediction. Mercifully, the bullets did land 200 feet ahead and towards the left, so Javed continued his take-off. Once airborne, keeping the Hunter in sight was a problem in the fast-fading light. Speeding at 900 kph, Javed remembered that he had not jettisoned his drop tanks. When he did get rid of them at such a high speed, he induced a porpoise but was somehow able to ride it out. Charging in at 1,100 kph, he had closed in to about a mile and a half, which was just the right range for a Sidewinder shot. He fired his first missile and when he did not see it connect, fired the second one. That too went into the ground. “All this while the Hunter pilot seemed totally oblivious of what was going on and his leader was nowhere in sight, so I gleefully decided to press on for a gun attack,” says Javed. “Since things had been happening too fast, I had forgotten to charge my guns after take-off. Having done that, I first fired with my centre gun till all its ammunition was spent.5 With the Hunter still flying unharmed, I decided to continue firing with the side guns. After a few frustrating bursts, I closed in to about 1,000 ft and fired a real lengthy one. Luckily, the last few bullets of the volley struck the right wing as I noticed a flash. The aircraft pitched up and rolled over to the right. I only learnt of the pilot’s ejection later, as I had to break away to avoid overshooting the out-of-control Hunter.” The aircraft fell about 14 nautical miles north-east of Mianwali. Flg Off Vidyadhar Chati of the Pathankot-based No 27 Squadron, when interrogated about the circumstances of his shooting down, said he suspected he had been brought down by ground fire! Duck shoot it was, over the idyllic Khabbaki Lake, but Chati should have known better where the bullets really came from. Ironically, the pilots of No 27 Squadron who had been declared the ‘Top Guns’ of IAF’s Western Air Command during a gunnery meet prior to the war, had failed to shoot up the conspicuously exposed F-6s on the runway. For the rookie Javed, who was freshly out of operational training on the F-6, remaining cool under fire was a most worthy achievement and he deservedly won a Sitara-i-Jur’at (Star of Valour) for his daring deed. F-6s over Sakesar

The high-powered FPS-20 radar at Sakesar, had received considerable attention f the war. Shortly after mid-day on 5 December, aron was again able to sneak in and attack the rand cannon. Patrolling nearby, over the picturesque Salt Range, were two F-6s of No 25 Squadron flown by Wg Cdr Sa’ad Hatmi and Flt Lt Shahid Raza. They were immediately vectored by the radar towards the exiting Hunters but it was a while before Hatmi spotted the pair. As the Hunters sped away over the hilly terrain, Hatmi wisely decided not to waste his missiles in the unfavourable background clutter. Using his guns instead, he made short work of one of the Hunters which fell 15 miles east of Sakesar. The pilot, Flg Off Kishan Lal Malkani, was killed. Next, Flt Lt Shahid Raza, who had all along kept the second Hunter in sight, closed in and opened fire with his guns which found their mark. The pilot, Flt. Lt Gurdev Singh Rai, who was the leader of the mission had twice visited Sakesar on the previous day, ran out of luck this time. He met his end when his Hunter crashed near the small town of Katha Saghral at the foothills of Salt Range.

On the afternoon of 8 December, two patrolling F-6s of No 23 Squadron flown by Wg Cdr S M H Hashmi and Flt Lt Afzal Jamal Siddiqui were vectored on to two Su-7s, just as they were exiting after attacking Risalewala airfield. Hashmi caught up with one of the pair, about ten miles east of the airfield, and let off a Sidewinder. The missile homed on unmistakably and the Su-7 exploded above the tree-tops; the pilot was not seen to eject. The remains of Flt Lt Ramesh Gulabrao Kadam6 were later discovered around the wreckage near the small town of Khalsapur. Hashmi immediately started looking for the other Su-7 and, to be sure of his No 2’s safety, called out for his position. Afzal replied but the transmission was garbled, which Hashmi interpreted as his No 2 being visual with him and, assumed that he was somewhere in the rear quarters. Just then Hashmi picked contact with the second aircraft and did not think twice before launching a missile. If there was any difference between the similar-looking planforms of the Su-7 and F-6, this was surely one time to have had a closer look. His No 2 was nowhere in sight and his frantic unanswered calls to Afzal seemed to confirm Hashmi’s worst fear. Had he mixed up his quarry in the murky winter haze? Afzal, who was chasing the second Su-7 at high speed and had ended up ahead of his leader, was not able to clearly convey his position on a broken radio. Hashmi, an otherwise unflappable squadron commander, should have known better, for he had been too eager for the second kill which unfortunately ended up as a horrific fatality for his wingman.

On one occasion the F-6 was completely outwitted by a Su-7. Flt Lt S S Malhotra of No 32 Squadron, who was on a photo recce mission over Risalewala on 13 December, spotted a patrolling F-6 and took a pot shot before exiting. It was only later that Malhotra learnt of Flt Lt Ejazuddin’s ejection over his home Base.

F-6s flew a total of 674 day air defence sorties (including 42 sorties over the battle area) which was 40% of PAF’s day air defence effort. Five enemy aircraft were downed during the air defence missions, or a kill rate of 0.74% in the role of an air defence fighter. All interceptions took place after the raiders had released their weapons on their targets, which was a reflection of the inadequacy of the air defence system that had been unable to provide sufficient early warning. The saving grace was the ability of the powerful F-6 to accelerate fast and nab the escaping raiders.

Over the Battlefield

PAF’s concept of air support to the land forces was biased towards direct support (close air support, armed recce and battlefield interdiction), as it was seen to yield immediate results in the ongoing battle. Indirect support in the form of deep interdiction beyond the battlefield was considered an exercise wrought with uncertainties in a short war, as the severance of the supply chain was likely to take some time before it showed its effects on a well-stocked front. The F-6 fitted well into the scheme of direct support as its powerful 3×30-mm cannon were ideal for strafing of convoys and rolling stock during armed recce, while two pods holding 8×57-mm rockets8 each, offered the option of firing a salvo in the midst of an armour concentration.

F-6s found their calling in Shakargarh sector, where the Indians had launched a two-pronged offensive with two infantry divisions along with two armoured brigades, while a third division was deployed in a defensive role. Against this force was Pakistan Army’s beleaguered 8 Infantry Division trying to fight off the massive onslaught, while 8 Armoured Brigade, staunchly but unsuccessfully, tried to launch a belated counter-attack. This sector saw PAF intervening in great force, with the bulk of air support missions flown for 8 Division. F-6s flew all but 9 of their 141 close air support and armed recce sorties9 in this sector but, regrettably, the mission success was very low; almost half the sorties were wasted as no enemy activity was observed in the area of interest. Hazy winter conditions as well as abundance of natural camouflage and dense habitation contributed majorly to the problem. While it must have been very frustrating for the pilots not to find the ‘armor concentrations’ that the tasking orders promised, they more than made up whenever they stumbled upon them.

An exciting situation developed in one of the close air support missions on the morning of 7 December, when four F-6s of No 11 Squadron found themselves vying for airspace with four Su-7s, which also happened to be on a similar mission near akargarh salient. The moment the Su-7s sighted the F-6s pulling , they lit afterburners and started to exit eastwards. At that time the No 2 called that he had been hit by AAA so he was asked by the mission leader, Flt Lt Atiq Sufi, to pair up with No 4 and recover back. Atiq then smartly ordered a split, so that two F-6s were chasing a pair of Su-7s each. “I remember accelerating to 1,100 kph despite the rocket pods which were retained, as I could not afford to take my eyes off the prey to look inside for the selective jettison switches,” says Atiq. He barely managed to arrest his rate of closure and opened fire on his target with the centre gun. “I had expended the ammunition in the centre gun so I switched to the two side guns and continued firing. A well-aimed volley struck right behind the cockpit and the Su-7 rolled over its back,” remembers Atiq. It was later learnt that Sqn Ldr Jiwa Singh, the senior flight commander of Adampur-based No 26 Squadron had gone down with the aircraft, south-west of Samba just over the border. The F-6 deputy leader, Flt Lt Mus’haf Mir also fired at one of the fast-receding Su-7s but it was lucky to have accelerated away, apparently unscathed.

A brief scrap took place between ‘relatives’ of the MiG family on 14 December when three F-6s of No 11 Squadron, which were on an armed recce mission in Shakargarh area, sighted four patrolling MiG-21s. Flt Lt Aamer Sharief manouvred behind one of the trailing aircraft and fired a Sidewinder. The outcome of has remained moot as the engagement took place in enemy-controlled territory and, no further details of the wreckage or pilot status have emerged ever since. PAF lost two F-6s to ground fire during the tactical air support campaign. Flt Lt Wajid Ali Khan of No 11 Squadron was shot down by AAA near Marala Headworks on 7 December; he ejected but ended up as a POW after being picked up by Indian troops which were in the vicinity. The other casualty was Flt Lt Shahid Raza of No 25 Squadron who was shot down by AAA near Shakargarh on 17 December, the last day of the war; he was heard to be ejecting in enemy fate remained unclear. He was awarded a Tamgha-i-Jur’at for devotion to duty, as well as professionalism shown in his earlier Hunter kill.

141 sorties of close air support by the F-6 were a mere 20% of PAF’s daytime tactical air support effort, with the bulk flown by F-86E & F. Considering the eminent suitability of the F-6 for the task, a larger share could have been more advantageous. The F-6 detachment at Mianwali could not help, as it was too far removed from the battle scene; it belatedly flew into Sargodha for air support duties a day before the war ended. Nonetheless, a total of 33 tanks, 42 vehicles and 4 guns were claimed by F-6 pilots in the 80 sorties that were considered successful. It can be seen that this was a useful contribution by the F-6 squadrons to 8 Divisions’s efforts in stemming the offensive in Shakargarh salient.

Report Card

During the 14-day war, the F-6s flew a total of 823 sorties which was 28% of PAF’s overall war effort of 2,919 sorties. For a relatively new weapon system, the F-6 could have achieved an aircraft Utilisation Rate better than the 1.6 sorties per aircraft per day during the war. While it fell short of the planned 2.2 sorties daily, it reflected a cautious conduct of the war, whereby the PAF was held back army’s main offensive which, in the event, never came through.

Besides the individual gallantry awards won by F-6 pilots, Nos 23 and No 25 Squadron were awarded Squadron Colours for distinguished performance during the war. The battle honours are as much a tribute to the F-6 as its spirited pilots, who forged this spartan aircraft into one of PAF’s most robust and dependable war machines.

Bio of A/C Kaiser Tufail:

He has had the opportunity of flying several classic fighters including F-6 (MiG-19), F-7P (MiG-21 variant), F-7PG (MiG-21 double-delta variant), Mirage-5, Mirage F-1E and the venerable F-16 Fighting Falcon. He commanded a fighter squadron, a fighter wing and PAF’s largest fighter Base at Masroor. When out of the cockpit, he found time to pursue literary activities. ‘Great Air Battles of Pakistan Air Force‘, a book written by him, is a manifestation of his interest in aviation history. He also writes for various military journals and newspapers. He retired as an Air Commodore in 2005, after thirty memorable years of service.

Addendum:

by Imran H. Khan

F-6 provided PAF engineers with the first airborne platform that they could experiment with freely. They did so in both the mechanical and electronic areas. Adding the Gondola to increase the flight duration was one of the most visible modifications. Addition of sidewinder was another major weapons upgrade that was an unlikely marriage of US and Chinese technologies.

Chuck Yeager wrote the following about this in his book.

“One of my first jobs there was to help them put U.S. Sidewinders on their Chinese MiGs, which were 1.6 Mach twin-engine airplanes that carried three thirty-millimeter canons. Our government furnished them with the rails for Sidewinders. They bought the missiles and all the checkout equipment that went with them, and it was one helluva interesting experience watching their electricians wiring up American missiles on a Chinese MiG.”

In my brief tenure in the PAF I had the opportunity to install a piece of ECCM equipment on the F-6. What struck me was the lack of process in conducting such a modification on this type of plane, when compared with others. The plane that I modified was a flying breadboard with all sorts of modifications. PAF engineers performed some 140 modifications. Sometimes in our rightful glorification of the pilots who put their lives on the line, we forget the contributions of the technicians and NCOs in keeping these planes flying. I have in all my interactions been impressed by the dedication of the maintenance staff. These modifications led to F-6s playing an active role much later than in other air forces that flew it. PAF trained over 1,000 fighter pilots and flew over 400,000 sorties on this aircraft. It retired after thirty years of active service in 2002. Not bad for a plane that flew originally in 1954.
 
. . .
Mar
12
The Origins of Pakistan-China Military Friendship
Filed Under China, PAF, Pakistan, Technology, United States, US Policy

An informal off-the-record expose by Air Marshal (R) Inam H. Khan

Pakistan was the first Muslim country to recognize China in 1950 and the third non communist state. Pakistan then voted for a bill concerning the restoration of China’s legitimate rights in the UN. PIA became the first non-communist airline to fly into China in 1964.


All Eggs in One Basket

The real transformation came when USA cut off all spares and other support such as training courses etc. both to India and Pakistan on breakout of 1965 Indo-Pak War. It did not hurt India much as they were mostly dependent on USSR. It had a few US transport twin piston-engine C-118 Packets with a third jet engine specially positioned on top of fuselage. It was specially designed for operations from high altitude airfields such as Leh, after Indo-China War of 1962. (As a POW we flew in one from Calcutta to Nagpur on way to our camp at Jabbalpur. Aircraft was in a rickety dilapidated shape due to poor maintenance).This sudden cutting off of support effected Pakistan very adversely. PAF very significantly effected as it had all her eggs in one (US ) basket. After partition, PAF had acquired first 60 Sea Fury fighters in1950, then followed by 12 jet Attackers from UK. In addition, for transportation, PAF replaced 8 odd C-47 Dakotas with (110 yes 110 ) British Bristol Freighters. We needed at the most 12 transport aircraft, but our RAF CinC bought 110 of them. We got a raw deal from Britishers in Attacker and Freighter sales inter alia many others – thanks to RAF CinC and other senior seconded RAF officers. Pakistan could only afford these small numbers with its own honest money. After joining CENTO and SEATO PAF went whole hog for better US aircraft, acquiring 100 F-86s, 12 F-104s, approx 10 B-57s, 12 or so C-130s, and number of search and rescue helicopters and amphibians.


Mauripur Base in the 50s. Click on it to enlarge.

“These picture shows most of the newly acquired US planes. I was there with my newly raised 16 Squadron ( Motto as suggested by late Group Captain Mahmood (Edu) ‘ tendrust o tenumend o drusht zee”. As you would observe, the birds are clean without drops. Nur Khan led the fly-past of ninety six clean F86s, taking off from old short 040 runway, climbing to 35,000 feet. From there diving and streaking over city at high speed 1,500 feet high. Luckily no bird hit even though the area was infested with them. Some pilots had very few hours on F86s; No 16 Squadron had then Pilot Officers late Akhtar (Air Commodore, Comdt Staff College) and P/O Riaz (Heli pilot later) who had only 5 hours or so on the type. 96 aircrafts lined up for take off on short 04, at 98 % power crammed up together was not a joke. Recovery was even more remarkable as the runway was not only short but it had at the end a 2 feet high lip of main runway 27 under construction.“

US Embargo Dilemma

Faced with this dilemma due to US embargo, PAF frantically looked around for replacements, but nothing was available soon and within our means. Though most of our top brass including President Ayub Khan, under the influence and over-awed by the West, had to eat the crow and beg China to help. For example, Chinese PM Chou En Lai, with his far sightedness first offered the construction of Karakoram Highway in1962. Pakistan turned it down lest USA got annoyed. Air Marshal Asghar Khan was sent to Peking during the War for immediate procurement of the aircraft and for the Chinese double barreled, very effective, 12.5 mm Ack Ack guns. Chinese PM graciously and promptly agreed to meet our request with the proviso that FM Ayub Khan will have to personally make the request. This he did soon after the war towards end of September. He visited Peking meekishly and very secretly lest USA got peeved. On advice from our Foreign Office, dominated by Brown Sahibs, Air Marshal Asghar suggested to Chou En Lai that these aircraft may be crated and secretly shipped to Jakarta, and from there to Karachi. Thus giving the impression to West that, just like Indonesian Submarines, these aircraft too have been obtained from there. It was an immature, time consuming and childish proposal.



Premier Chou-En-Lai

“One of the worlds greatest person PM Chou En Lai having exclusive lunch with our Ambassador M Sultan Khan and his wife Abida in the Embassy (Embassy is where Ambassadors live , Chancery is their office which is mistakenly called Embassy ) Occasion being the visit of M Shahabuddin, brother of first Pakistani PM Nazimuddin,( ex Chief Minister of combined Bengal pre-partition. He was a very honest but simple man who left little assets. His wife was living in a small house in some remote Karachi Colony till 1980 when Gen Zia allotted her some decent house.) Shahabuddin then was probably Speaker of Parliament.”

Chou En Lai immediately shot it down and said that these will be made available at airbase like Hotian. It will be very easy to ferry them across to Pakistan from there. During this meeting Chinese PM enquired from AM as to how long it will take PAF pilots to achieve the necessary proficiency. Asghar Khan replied that our pilots are experienced aviators; they would not take more than 10 to 15 days. Remarkably PM disagreed and said that unlike your planes, these are equipped with metric systems, have configurations different from Western aircraft, and most of all there would be language problems. He thus opined it would require 6 to 8 weeks for transition. And it took that much. To highlight this, it took our pilots nearly one week to understand that switches on panels on right side of cockpit are in fact ‘circuit breakers’ and not switches as these appeared to be. China provided initially sixty F-6 aircraft along with tanks, arms and ordinance for 3 Army Divisons, large number of AA guns and ammunition etc..


Pakistani Air and Military Attaches with Chinese Military Leaders

And it was done almost free of cost and within days. One point always bothered the Chinese. China following policy of conservation, objected to our scales of ammunition. They said we follow American pattern of firing to frighten where as we should fire to kill. This reminds me, once in 1962 at PAF Naltar attending Ski Course we 5 or 6 Wing Commanders went for Chakor shikar. We fired about two dozen cartridges but could not kill a single bird. Next day one local bearer took 4 cartridges, in the evening he brought 3 chakors and returned one unused cartridge. When we inquired, he said they approach bird behind a colorful shield and fired only after reaching it close,

First batch of PAF pilots reached China in early Oct’65, where they were stationed sixty miles south of Tientsin Harbour. Base facilities were spartan but clean. Accommodation and food was prepared under Muslim requirements. They flew about 10 to 15 missions each on F-6, Chinese built Mig-19 aircraft. As stated earlier, China then made all efforts to conserve. F-6s. They were thus fully covered and protected from sun and dust. They were taken close to beginning of runway; covers were removed at the last moment and mission accomplished from thereon. Protective measures were undertaken immediately after landing. Not a single fault occurred during training of the two batches of six pilots each, except one malfunctioning of a gauge. This was remarkable achievement. Life style was simple. The airfield was about a mile away from the residential area. When one of our pilots had hairline crack of ankle, he was provided with a cycle, otherwise every one walked.

Air Marshal Nur Khan’s Visit

CinC PAF Air Marshal Nur Khan paid two visits to China during my tenure as Air Attache at Peking. The first one was in Nov’65 and second in Dec’67.


AM Nur Khan with Premier Chou En Lai

The above picture was taken during first visit , when he was accompanied by AVM Qadir, Air Cdre Z A Chaudhry, Air Cdre Khawaja Maint, my course mate Grp Capt S H Shah, Grp Capt Khawaja Supply and Group Capt Mustafa. Embassy is represented by Minister Durrani (in grey suit in front row) and First Secy Yunus next to me behind Minister Durrani. Normally PM Chou En Lai did not meet Military Chiefs, but he had liking for Nur Khan and thus graciously had dinner with him followed by this photograph.

The visit was to review the progress of procurement of aircraft, tanks and other equipment. It also included a visit to the air base where our pilots were undergoing. Aircraft unserviceability was zero, Base workshop produced most of the spare parts themselves despite the fact that their workshops were not as well equipped as ours, according to Air Cdre Khawaja, ACAS Maint. They were remarkably self sufficient in every thing including food, vegetables, etc.

F-6 Aircraft


Newly Minted F-6s arriving in Pakistan

F-6 had good power weight ratio of 86 %, giving it a lot of kick and maneuverability even at high altitude. But it was not a perfect aircraft. A serious problem faced in these aircraft was turbine buckets melting away or detaching and piercing through the other engine or pipes causing it afire. This was due to poor Russian metallurgy. Engines required change of the turbine buckets after every 100 hours. This was in contrast to an F104 engine requiring Inspection and Replacement if required (IRAN) after 1200 hours. PAF installed British Martin Baker ejection seats amongst many other changes. Maintenance wise F-6 was a labor intensive aircraft when compared to US aircraft. Latter having modular systems which are expensive but efficient. F-6 was not pilot friendly aircraft in an emergency and cost us many lives.

On the whole, however, the F-6 was a great acquisition considering that these were provided promptly at a crucial juncture; when we were against the wall and not being able to fill the requirement from any other source. To top it off these were almost free of cost, thanks to the Chinese government and in particular PM Chou En Lai. They have thus earned our gratitude, goodwill and trust, despite our leader’s penchant for the West.



Multi Faceted Relationship

The efforts put in to developing an exemplary relationship by people of both countries in those days, has paid dividends across the board. We now have collaboration in both civil and defense industries. The Karakoram Highway and Gwadar Port are two mega projects that have the potential to transform the social landscape. While there are many lessons to derive from the experience, there are some that truly stand out.

Lessons To Learn

The first lesson is never to put all our key assets at the mercy of any one country. Despite our experience after 1965 we still tried to buy US F-16s and even paid for many of them, only to see their delivery embargoed and money not returned. In contrast the collaboration on JF-17 and other projects with the Chinese have borne fruit. Becoming self sufficient in essential items is a lesson to learn from the Chinese.

The other important lesson is to lead a simple life style and live within ones means. China when it became independent was in much worse shape than Pakistan. Chinese have shown that by living simply and focusing on important things, with correct priorities, they can achieve wonders. We can better protect our interests and sovereignty if we avoid dependence on aid and learn to stand on our feet. Is it too much to ask?

The author was commissioned in 5th GD(P) Course in 1949 and has the unique honour of winning the coveted Sword of Honour, Best Pilot Trophy and Ground Subjects Trophy. He later raised and commanded No 16 Squadron (F-86F), two fighter Wings (No 32 Fighter Ground Attack Wing and No 33 Fighter Ground Attack Wing). Served as the first Air Attache in Peking China after 1965 war. He commanded two Bases, viz PAF Base Peshawar and PAF Base Dacca. At the latter Base, he was also AOC East Pakistan during 1971. He was appointed as ACAS (Ops) after repatriation as a POW. His last appointment within PAF was as first Air Officer Commanding, Air Defence Command. Following that, in 1976 he was appointed as the first DG JS in the newly established JCSC Headquarters. In 1979 he was inducted in th Federal Cabinet, from where he resigned and retired from PAFin 1982. He is the recipient of the second highest military award, Hilal-e-Juraat.





Editor’s Note: I am thankful to the author for sharing pictures from his personal collection with the public.
 
.
This is a general description of the Nanchang Q5 / A5. I'm searching for PAF specific articles in my archives.


Nanchang Q-5 (Fantan)

Ground Attack / Close-Air Support (CAS) Aircraft

The Nanchang Q-5 Fantan became a Chinese evolution of the Soviet Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-19 Farmer with some obvious physical changes - it is largely retired today.

Authored By: Staff Writer | Edited: 8/6/2019

nanchang-q5-fantan.jpg

1/1
Credit: Right side illustration profile view of the Nanchang Q5 Fantan strike aircraft
nanchang-q5-fantan.jpg



nanchang-q5-fantan.jpg


Specifications

Year: 1970
Status: Retired, Limited Service
Manufacturer(s): Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing Company - China
Production: 1,300
Capabilities: Close-Air Support (CAS); Electronic Warfare (EW); Training;

Crew: 1
Length: 51.35 ft (15.65 m)
Width: 31.76 ft (9.68 m)
Height: 14.21 ft (4.33 m)
Weight (Empty): 14,054 lb (6,375 kg)
Weight (MTOW): 26,081 lb (11,830 kg)

Power: 2 x Shenyang WP6 afterburning turbojet engines developing 7,165lb of thrust each.

Speed: 739 mph (1,190 kph; 643 kts)
Ceiling: 54,134 feet (16,500 m; 10.25 miles)
Range: 1,243 miles (2,000 km; 1,080 nm)
Rate-of-Climb: 20,275 ft/min (6,180 m/min)

Operators: Bangladesh; China; North Korea; Pakistan; Mayanmar





As a long time Soviet equipment user, the Chinese were already building the twin-engine Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-19 "Farmer" jet fighters in quantity locally as the Shenyang J-6. It was soon given thought that the F-6 should be modified for the strike role which gave birth to the Nanchang Q-5 "Fantan" series of aircraft. The basic MiG-19 form was retained in the Shenyang F-6 but, to revise the latter for the attack role, some modifications were naturally required. This included an all new nose to fit the attack radar as well as split air intakes along the fuselage sides for the MiG-19 design featured its intake in the nose. An internal bomb bay was also fitted. Overall, however, little of the aft fuselage and wings were to change in the new Chinese endeavor.

Shenyang designed a new strike aircraft version of the F-6 in March of 1958. However, their facilities were largely committed to modernization of existing MiG-15s and serial production of the MiG-17 and MiG-19. Chinese authorities directed development of the new aircraft to Nanchang with Shenyang still playing a major role. Up to this point, Nanchang had held some experience in the production of MiG-19 variants but was mostly tied to light-class transport aircraft and piston-powered trainer aircraft.

Development proceeded in August of 1958 to which a prototype - designated as the Qiangjiji-5 - was begun. The design brought together engineers from both the Shenyang and Nanchang concerns with the MiG-19 selected as the starting point. The basic MiG-19 fuselage was reworked to include two side-mounted intake openings to aspirate the twin engine design. The nose intake of the original jet would be covered over in a nose cone assembly that would take in an advanced attack radar and avionics. The fuselage was now area-ruled to reduce inherent drag at transonic and supersonic speeds. The nose gear was revised to fold sideways under the cockpit floor. The wings were revised with less sweep than on the MiG-19 design while anti-flutter attachments were added to the horizontal tailplanes. The single vertical tail fin had its area expanded for improved stability. The Soviet-era fighter design now evolved into a decidedly Chinese product with the completed mockup built and sent to Beijing for review in October of 1958. The prototype was finally completed in 1960 and wind tunnel testing revealed several drawbacks that necessitated reworking of the diagram designs.

In 1961, economic hardship found the burgeoning program and official work on the new strike aircraft was halted. The 300-strong design team was disbanded and the project canceled for the near future. Despite this measure, 15 of the original team proceeded to work on the project during this period and forged ahead in attempting to develop the aircraft. In 1963, the program was reinstated and development picked up once again. On June 4th, 1965, the aircraft went airborne for the first time and successfully completed it maiden test flight. Additional evaluations forced the reworking of several key systems and production of two more flyable prototypes. The completed design finally entered serial production at the end of 1969. She was formally accepted into service with the People's Liberation Army Air Force in 1970 with deliveries forthcoming. Production has since been ongoing with roughly 1,300 examples delivered including those serving in the foreign forces of Bangladesh, Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan and Sudan. Pakistan operated the type up until 2010. Export versions were designated as "A-5". The Q-5 received the NATO reporting name of "Fantan" once it was identified as a new Chinese offering.

While the Q-5's new nose cone assembly was intended to accept a new attack radar, the system was never fitted in main production models.

The base Q-5 was crewed by a single personnel. It retained much of the MiG-19s general shape with the exception of the new nose and relocated intakes and bared an uncanny resemblance to the American Republic F-105 Thunderchief. The fuselage was oblong when viewed in the forward profile and well-rounded along its edges. The cockpit sat aft of the nose assembly and featured thick framing under a two-piece canopy. Visibility was somewhat restricted due to the type's raised fuselage spine. The intakes straddled either side of the cockpit and aspirated the dual engine configuration fitted deep within the middle-to-aft fuselage. Wings were mid-mounted assemblies with high sweep along their leading and trailing edges and designed to hold much of the external weapons loads. Large boundary layer fencing along the wing top sides are consistent with Soviet-era jet designs. The empennage tapered off, fitting snuggly around the engine installation and capped by a large exhaust ring. The tail was characterized by its single large vertical tail fin as well as a pair of horizontal tail planes. Ventral strakes (shallower than on the MiG-19) were also noted along the aft-fuselage underside. The undercarriage was fully retractable and consisted of two main landing gear legs as well as a nose leg. All legs were single-wheeled with the main legs retracting into each wing underside toward the fuselage centerline while the nose leg retracted forwards under the cockpit floor. When at rest, the design held a pronounced "nose up" appearance. An ejection seat was afforded to the pilot and provided for safe ejection from the aircraft at any altitude and at any speed. Basic internal fuel stored consisted of three forward- and two rear-set fuel tanks, this augmented by external fuel tanks as well as the internal bomb bay converted for use as an internal fuel store.

Power for the Q-5 was supplied by way of a dual engine arrangement made up of 2 x Liming Wopen-6A (Wopen-6) afterburning turbojet installations. These engines were Chinese copies of the Soviet Mikulin RD-9BF turbojets rated at 5,732lbs of thrust, supplying the mount with a top speed of 752 miles per hour (Mach 1.12 at altitude) as well as an operational range equivalent to 1,200 miles - much less under a full combat load. Rate-of-climb was 20,300 feet per minute with a service ceiling of about 54,000 feet. Performance-wise, the Q-5 exhibited much of the low-level prowess of the MiG-19 before it, though - based on the fuselage edits and additions - suffered in high-altitude performance but this was to be expected. A brake parachute was initially installed at the tail fin to help with shorter landing sequences. This installation was eventually relocated to the tail fin base.

The Q-5 fitted a standard internal cannon arrangement made up of 2 x Norinco Type 23-2K cannon systems (replacing the MiG-19's original 30mm installations) with 100 rounds afforded to each gun, these buried at each leading edge wing roots. The original Q-5 production model sported six hardpoints as well as an internal weapons bay while later models saw up to ten hardpoints and the internal bomb bay given up for fuel. Two underwing positions were also plumbed for external fuel tanks and these became seemingly standard fixtures on all future Q-5 ordnance loads to help offset the aircraft's inherently short operational range when hauling a full combat payload. Beyond the standard cannon armament, the Q-5 could be outfitted with various air-to-air missiles (primarily for short-ranged self-defense), rocket pods (unguided types in various calibers) and drop bombs - initially these being only conventional types though, later, laser-guided versions were introduced. Naturally, the weapons delivery capabilities of the Q-5 evolved within time to accept more modern weapon types.

The initial production models were known simply as "Q-5" and fielded a total of six weapons hardpoints for the carrying of various munitions (including an internal bomb bay). The Q-5A model then followed in limited production quantities and brought about capabilities for a nuclear-tipped payload in a recessed fuselage fitting under the aircraft. In January of 1972, one such aircraft was used to drop a nuclear bomb during testing. A navalized version of the Q-5 was also developed and included a gun ranging radar system but, again, these saw only limited production.

In 1976, it was ever more apparent that the Q-5 suffered from extremely limited operating ranges under a full load. Thusly, the Q-5I was developed from the Q-5A production model and had its internal weapons bay deleted in favor of more internal fuel storage for much improved range. The landing gear were also revised and a Type 1 ejection seat was installed. The drag chute dispenser was relocated from the tail fin to the tail fin base while Wopen WP-6A series turbojet engines were introduced for better performance. The initial Q-5I prototype went airborne in the latter part of 1980.

Nanchang was not done with the Q-5 evolution. The Q-5I was furthered in the Q-5IA production model which brought about an improved navigational suite, an integrated laser rangefinder and a weapons sighting device that allowed for greater angles of attack. Electronic CounterMeasures were further improved as a 360-degree Radar Warning Receiver coverage system was brought online. In all, the Q-5 saw her operational ranges increased as well as her ordnance carrying capabilities broadened to produce a more potent strike aircraft while her runway requirements were significantly reduced. The Q-5I production model would go on to represent the main Chinese Air Force Q-5 service model and definitive Q-5 mark.


The Chinese Navy took interest in the Q-5 and received a navalized version as the Q-5II. She was completed with Radar Warning Receiver protection to alert the pilot of incoming enemy threats as well as a revised laser rangefinder and new sighting device for improved weapons delivery accuracy. The cockpit was raised for a better vantage point while the nose cone assembly was slanted further down to increase vision out over the nose. The Q-5II was cleared to field anti-ship torpedoes for its dedicated maritime strike role.

The Q-5IA was modernized to become the Q-5III, incorporating an inertial navigation system (of Chinese origin) as well as a Heads-Up Display system comparable to similar Western offerings. Weapons pylons were improved and avionics were brought to a new standard. The Q-5 was also now a modular weapons platform of sorts, able to accept both Chinese- and Western-based weapon systems. Nanchang received the official development contract in April of 1981 three prototypes were produced in response. The Q-5III was cleared for serial production and saw subsequent deliveries to the air forces of Bangladesh, Myanmar, North Korea and Pakistan in January of 1983. However, it is notable that the Q-5III production model was only reserved for export customers (under the designation of A-5C) and not formally accepted into the inventory of the PLAAF.

The Q-5IV (also known as the "Q-5D") was a vastly revised Q-5 form and upgraded the Radar Warning Receivers as well as digital processing. A new HUD and laser rangefinder were also introduced. The Q-5A increased external weapons carrying capabilities by introducing more pylons (now eight in number) which allowed the aircraft to defend itself with air-to-air missiles while also carrying a strike load. The Q-5D was an ELlectronic INTelligence (ELINT) conversion model not to be confused with the Q-5D attack model variant. The Q-5IV was further evolved into the Q-5E and given facilities to manage laser-guided munitions. A new GPS-based navigation system was also brought online as was self-designation of enemy ground targets - the aircraft no longer requiring the designation from another allied source. The Q-5J was a two-seat development intended for pilot training and Forward Air-Control (FAC) duties with an all new cockpit arrangement, canopy unit and communications transfer suite.

The Q-5M export model (A-5M), with a different nose design, was to feature Italian-based avionics but the endeavor was dropped after Tiananmen. This project was to partner Nanchang with Aeritalia and introduce a new avionics suite, an additional two underwing pylons, an integrated Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) system, ranging radar, modernized HUD and inertial navigation system. Two prototypes were completed though one was lost to accident. First flight was achieved on August 30th, 1988.


Similarly, the Q-5K "Kong Yun", which took existing Q-5II models and - with French assistance - attempted to modernized the Q-5 line. Thompson-CSF was to join Nanchang to the effort and fit new avionics, a nose-mounted laser range finder, new inertial navigation system and improved HUD. These would have been differentiated by their chisel-shaped noses. However, this initiative was shelved after the events of Tiananmen Square in 1989. Two prototypes were in fact produced but never furthered due to subsequent arms embargoes against China.

Both the Q-5M and Q-5K prototypes were tested against one another and data collected during these trials are thought to have been used in indigenous modernization efforts concerning newer Q-5 developments.

Regardless, the Q-5 was developed into export models by 2000, this effort producing the A-5 forms. These were delivered to North Korea. Myanmar took delivery of the A-5B, which was based on the Q-5II series, and fitted with a Western-capable weapons delivery suite. Bangladesh and Pakistan took on delivery of the A-5C which incorporated evermore Western functionality including weapons delivery, instrument panel and Martin-Baker Mk 10 "Zero-Zero" ejection seats.

Hongdu headed up development of a dedicated strike variant known under the designation of "Q-5D". This form brought about marked improvements in the laser rangefinder and targeting systems as well as improved cockpit functionality through a revised HUD, chaff/flare dispensers and TV/FLIR support. This version also utilized laser-guided bombs.

As of this writing, about 20 A-5C models remain in service with the Myanmar Air Force while less than 10 examples serve with the Bangladesh Air Force. It is unknown how many Fantans currently serve with the North Korean Air Force or Sudanese Air Force. Pakistan made widespread use of the A-5C production models from 1983 to 2010 across three squadrons (No. 7, No. 16 and No. 26), ultimately giving them up in favor of the more advanced JF-17 "Thunder" - a joint Chinese-Pakistani multi-role combat aircraft in the same vein as the Western Lockheed F-16 Fighting Falcon.

All told, the Nanchang Q-5/A-5 is regarded by some as an aged and outmoded strike aircraft when compared to the latest of 5th Generation mounts. However, to the discerning budget-conscious customer, the Q-5 retains robust battlefield qualities, low procurement and maintenance costs, high speed performance and good handling qualities at low levels. Her avionics and weapons delivery suites have been exceedingly upgraded to content with modern sortie requirements and her power in numbers still make her a notable addition to any fighting force. This does not preclude its owners from looking towards the near future for newer, more modern solutions when economics permit. While China has continued support of their Q-5 line with production ongoing and modernization programs in check, she is still developing more modern systems to make the Q-5's future limited at best.



Armament


STANDARD:
2 x 23mm NORINCO Type 23-2K cannons in wing roots.

OPTIONAL:
Up to 4,400lb of stores (external or internal depending on model) including nuclear-tipped, homing air-to-air missiles, guided and conventional drop bombs, rocket pods (unguided) and torpedoes (PLAN version).

automatic-cannon.jpg

air-to-air-missiles.jpg

air-to-air-missile-short.jpg

rocket-pods.jpg

aerial-torpedoes.jpg

nuclear-ordnance.jpg

conventional-drop-bomb.jpg


Variants / Models


• Qiangjiji-5 - Initial Project Designation under Shenyang.
• Q-5 - Initial Production Form; six weapon hardpoints; limited-production nuclear-capable and maritime strike versions also completed.
• Q-5I - Based on Q-5A production model; sans internal weapons bay in favor of internal fuel storage; improved operational ranges.
• Q-5IA - Revised weapons sight; revised navigation suite; laser rangefinder installed.
• Q-5II - PLA Navy Variant; Radar Warning Receiver installed; all new laser rangefinder; revised weapon sight device; redesigned nose section and raised cockpit; improved navigation.
• Q-5III - Upgraded Q-5II; Chinese-based inertial navigation system and HUD; export only model.
• Q-5IV - Modernized Q-5; twin digital computer processing; new RWR, HUD and laser rangefinder.
• Q-5A - Eight weapon hardpoints; air-to-air missile support.
• Q-5D (Q-5D) - Dedicated ELINT variant.
• Q-5E - Based on the Q-5IV model; laser-guided munitions capability.
• Q-5F - Based on the Q-5E; improved GPS navigation; self-designation of targets.
• Q-5J - Two-Seat Variant; for training or Forward Air Control.
• Q-5K "Kong Yun" - Proposed Chinese-French upgrade; cancelled.
• Q-5M - Proposed Chinese-Italian upgrade for export; cancelled.
• Q-5D (Hongdu) - Dedicated attack model headed up by Hongdu concern; improved targeting capabilities and cockpit functionality.
• A-5 - Export Models to North Korea
• A-5B - Export Models to Myanmar
• A-5C - Export Models to Bangladesh and Pakistan; fitting Western systems.
• A-5D - Abandoned Export Model
• A-5K - Abandoned Export Model; French (Thompson-CSF) avionics in redesigned chisel-shaped nose.
• A-5M - Abandoned Export Model; Italian (Aeritalia) avionics in redesigned nose.

A-5c1.jpg

A5-C, 'Fantan'
homebar.jpg


Introduction:

The A-5C is a single-seat, twin-engined, close air support and ground-attack strike fighter-bomber. The A-5Cs of the PAF have been employed exclusively in the ground attack role. Pakistan obtained 52 A-5Cs in 1983 which equip No. 16 and No. 26 Squadrons of the PAF.

Background:

Designed to meet a 1950s requirement for a supersonic attack aircraft, the Qianjiji-5 (Attack aircraft 5) first flew on 4 June 1965. The Q-5 (A-5 for export) is a derivative of the Shenyang F-6 (MiG-19) aircraft and was first designed in China in August 1958 at the Shenyang facility. Responsibility was later assigned to the Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing Corp. (NAMC) facility. The prototype programme was cancelled in 1961, but kept alive by small team of Chinese aeronautical engineers and defence personnel. It resumed officially in 1963. The first flight of the Q-5 took place on 4 June 1965. The preliminary design certificate was awarded
and the pre-production batch was authorized in late 1965. Development of the Q-5 led to the Q-5I. A major change involved deletion of the bomb bay in favour of more fuel, thus extending the aircraft's range. Strengthened landing gear and an extra pair of derfuselage hardpointswere fitted, and some Navy aircraft were fitted with Doppler radar compatible with their role as sea-skimming delivery platforms for the C-801 Anti-ship Missiles (AshMs) and underfuselage torpedoes. Further enhancement of the Q-5I's offensive capabilities, in the form of an extra pair of underwing hardpoints and a new gun/bomb-sighting system, led in the mid-1980s to
the Q-5IA; the addition of RWR resulted in the Q-5II.

The aircraft was further modified, leading to the flight testing of two further modified prototypes from October 1969. The series production-run was approved at end of 1969 and deliveries began to take place in 1970. The A5-C (Q-5C) is the improved Q5-I 1976 version of the aircraft. It was flight tested in late 1980 and certified for production on 20 October 1981.

The Q-5IA accounted for the type's first export success, namely 40 for North Korea. Keen to win further orders, Nanchang offered the Q-5IA for export as the A-5C (Q-5III). Incorporating 32 modifications of the Q-5 plus upgraded avionics and an added AIM-9 AAM capability, the A-5C was ordered by Pakistan (52 aircraft) and Bangladesh (20 aircraft). Development of the Q-5II in co-operation with Alenia of Italy subsequently produced the all-weather A-5M. Myanmar has ordered 24 such aircraft.

Mission:

The A-5C Fantan is deployed by the PAF as a close air support and ground attack aircraft. It also has the capability for air-to-air combat if need be. The A-5C has been modified to meet the PAF requirements in the special role of close air support as well as its primary role, ground-attack and deep penetration strike. The PAF A-5Cs have been modified to carry a single 5-20 kT nuclear bomb under the centreline along with two external wing mounted fuel drop tanks. In the event of nuclear attack, the PAF A-5Cs will be used primarily to deliver battlefield nuclear bombs over advancing enemy armoured columns. They will also be used for conventional as well as nuclear attack on enemy air bases, missile launch sites and strategic installations located within 1,000 km from the Pakistani border with air defence escort provided by PAF F-7MP fighter interceptors.

Features:

The A-5C is powered by two Shenyang WP6 turbojets, each rated at 25.50 kN dry and 31.87 kN with afterburning, mounted side by side in the rear of the fuselage. Armament includes one internal 23mm cannon with 100 rounds in each wingroot; ten attachment points normally for external stores; two pairs in tandem under centre of fuselage, and three under each wing; fuselage stations can each carry a 250 kg bomb; inboard wing stations can carry 6kg or 25 lb practice bombs; outboard wing stations can each be occupied by a 400 litre drop tank or by air-to-air missiles such as PL-2, Pl-2b, Pl-7, AIM-9 Sidewinder and R550 Magic. The A-5C is
an all-weather interceptor with provision for a search-tracking radar in the nose. There is now increased an inlet diameter and enlarged forward fuselage. Thus, more fuel can be carried in the proportionally waisted mid-fuselage. There are also space provisions for additional updated avionics.

Another improved version Q5-K had been tested with French avionics, the programme was cancelled in 1989. It is equipped with a ranging radar and can carry two torpedoes or two YJ-8 sea-skimming AshMs (C-801, range 10-50km at Mach 0.9) for anti-ship mission. The latest model in service with AF may be equipped with HUD, ballistic computer, ECM pod, ALR-1 laser range finder/designator (to deliver newly developed LGBs) and Russia is also offering its Phazotron Komar PD radar to upgrade the Q-5.

Basic Specifications:

Primary Function: Ground-attack strike aircraft.

Manufacturer: NAMC (China)

Power Plant: Two Shenyang Wopen-6 (WP6) turbojet engines with afterburners.

Thrust: 31.87 kn. (7,165 lb. st)

Length: 53 feet, 4 inches (16.25 meters)

Height: 14 feet, 10 inches (4.52 meters)

Wingspan: 31 feet, 10 inches (9.70 meters)

Maximum Takeoff Weight: 26,455 lbs. (12,000 kgs); Empty: 6,494 kg (14,317 lb)

Speed: 1,190 km/h (740 mph) or Mach 1.12 at 36,000 feet (11,000 metres)

Ceiling: 52,000 feet (15,850 meters); max rate of climb at 5000 m (16,400 ft) 4980-6180 m (16,340-20,275 ft)/min.

Range: 1,243 miles (2,000 km)

Armament: Two 23 mm internal cannons. Ten hardpoints points for carrying up to 2,000 kg (4,410 lb) of bombs (250 to 1000 kg bombs), Mk 82 or Snakeye, French Durandal, air-to-air missiles such as Chinese PL-2, PL-2B, PL-7, AIM-9 Sidewinder and Matra R.550, Magic, auxiliary fuel tanks. C-801 AshMs. Capable of carrying a single 5-20 kT nuclear bomb.

Crew: One

PAF Inventory: 51(current); 60 (original)

Note : Additional information available upon request.




HOME PICTURES OF A-5C AIRCRAFTS& ARMAMENTS


COPYRIGHT © 1999-2002 PAKISTAN AIRFORCE ONLINE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, WORLDWIDE.
Email: commentsnsuggestions@pakistan.airforce.net
 
.
Qiang-5 Ground Attack Aircraft

The Q-5 (Qiangji-5, or Qiang-5; export name: A-5; NATO reporting name: Fantan) is a twin-engine, single-seat, supersonic ground attack aircraft developed by Nanchang-based Hongdu Aircraft Industry Group. The main roles of the aircraft are air interdiction and close air support. Early variants of the Q-5 in service with the PLAAF and PLA Navy have now been replaced by the upgraded variants with improved navigation and precision strike capability. The PLA has been seeking a replacement to this forty-year-old design since the 1970s, but with no success. Instead, the aircraft has been steadily upgraded with new weapons and avionics to extend its service life.

The Q-5 was developed from the Shenyang J-6 (MiG-19 Farmer copy) fighter. The Q-5 inherited the wing and tail of the J-6, but has a redesigned fuselage featuring a solid nose with lateral air intakes. The increased airframe weight and modified profile have resulted in the Q-5 being less manoeuvrable. The Q-5 is 1,360kg heavier than the J-6 and its maximum speed is 0.23 Mach slower. The Q-5 is also inferior to the J-6 in maximum climb rate and service ceiling, and requires longer runway for take-off and landing. Additionally, in order to give room for additional avionics and armaments, the internal fuel capacity had to be reduced, resulting in a shorter combat radius.

The Q-5 has a downward-sloping profile nose that provides the pilot with better visibility. The wings are mid-mounted, sharply swept-back, and tapered. The tails are also swept-back and tapered. Early variants of the Q-5 has a fuselage weapon bay but this was removed on the later variant to accommodate more fuel in internal tanks. Two Wopen-6 turbojet engines are mounted side-by-side in rear of the fuselage with two hydraulically actuated nozzles. The semicircular lateral air intakes have small splitter plates. The cockpit and internal tanks have armour protections. The cockpit is fitted with a 3-piece windscreen and a rear-hinged canopy.

The Q-5 is equipped with the radio compass, radio altimeter, beacon receiver, and optical firing/bomb sight. The aircraft is equipped with a low-speed ejection seat identical to that of the J-6/MiG-19, which can operate at speeds between 250~850km/h. The aircraft is powered by two WP-6 turbojet engines, each rated at 25.5kN (2,600kg, 5,733lb) dry and 31.87kN (3250kg, 7,165lb) with afterburning. The aircraft can fly at near sonic speeds when carrying 1,000kg weapon load in its internal weapon bay without external payloads. When carrying a pair of 760 external fuel tanks, the aircraft can only fly at subsonic speeds. The Q-5 usually adopts a “lo-lo-lo” flight profile, which gives a maximum combat radius of 400km, or 600km when using a “lo-lo-hi” profile. The flight manual of the Q-5 also instructs that the flight speed should not exceed 0.98 Mach when flying at low altitudes.

Q-5A (Nuclear Bomber)


The Q-5A '11264' that dropped China's first operational thermal nuclear weapon (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5A is the nuclear weapon bomber variant, featuring a semi-recessed weapon bay to carry a single KuangBiao 1 air-dropped thermal nuclear (hydrogen) bomb. The internal fuel capacity was increased by 2,155 litre and the external fuel capacity was increased by 1,560 litre to achieve extended range. The aircraft was fitted with nuclear weapon check and control system, an nuclear weapon ejection mount produced by 124 Factory, and a special optical sight developed by 5714 Factory. Only a small number of the Q-5A was built and the PLAAF no longer operates this variant in active duty.

The Q-5A uses a method of loft bombing (also known as toss bombing), where the attacking aircraft pulls upwards and releases its bomb load. This method enables the aircraft evading enemy radar detection by flying at low altitudes when approaching the target. The bomb load is then released at an angle between 45~90 degrees above the horizontal, enabling it to gain some altitude to cover a larger blast killing zone in spite of its low release. The aircraft could even conduct ‘over-the-shoulder bombing’ release, where the bomb is released past the vertical so it is tossed back towards the target.

On 30 December 1970, a Q-5A ‘11264’ flown by PLAAF pilot YANG Guoxiang carried China’s first operational thermal nuclear (hydrogen) bomb to Lop Nor nuclear test site. However, the aircraft’s weapon mount failed to release the bomb over the target zone. Two subsequent attempts to release the bomb using emergency procedures also failed. YANG flew the aircraft with the bomb back to the base safely. On 7 January 1972, YANG flying the same Q-5A dropped the nuclear bomb at Lop Nor nuclear test site and the bomb detonated successfully, indicating that China’s thermal nuclear weapon was ready for operational use.

Q-5B (Torpedo Bomber)


Q-5B torpedo bomber for the PLA Navy in test flight (Chinese Internet)

Nanchang began to evaluate the concept of a naval variant Q-5 for the PLA Naval Air Force in 1965. Three basic variant Q-5s were converted into torpedo bombers for trial and evaluations. These aircraft were fitted with special weapon mounts under the wings to carry two torpedoes. Upon successful tests of these aircraft, the PLA Navy finally approved the Q-5B development programme in 1968.

The Q-5B had two special weapon mounts to carry two Yu-2 (Soviet 56-45 copy) torpedoes or 1,000~1,500kg free-fall bombs. The landing gears were enhanced to support the increased overall weight of the aircraft. The cockpit was raised and the conical nose was rounded. The wing area was also increased for better aerodynamic performance. The aircraft was powered by two more powerful WP-6A turbojets rated at 36.8kN (3,750kg) with afterburning. The fuselage weapon bay was removed to give more space for internal fuel. In addition, the aircraft was also to be fitted with four avionics improvements, including the Jia-13 radar, Doppler navigation radar, No.45 optical sight, and KJ-4 autopilot.

The Q-5B first flew on 29 September 1970, but the aircraft could not be commissioned due to the slow progress in the development of the avionics equipments. By 1979 the torpedo was deemed too obsolete and the Q-5B project was subsequently cancelled after only six examples delivered to the PLA Navy.

Q-5B (Anti-Ship Missile Bomber)

This variant was developed as an alternative to the original Q-5B in the late 1970s. The aircraft was designed to carry two YJ-81 anti-ship missiles under the wings. The aircraft has a Type 317A fire-control radar accommodated in the nose. The development project was later cancelled as the aircraft’s performance could not meet the requirements.

Q-5I/IA/II and A-5B


The improved Q-5I with longer-range and improved avionics (Chinese Internet)

Nanchang began to develop the first major improved variant of the Q-5 in 1977. The programme was intended to tackle the short range of the basic variant Q-5. The aircraft’s original internal weapon bay was removed to give space for additional fuel. The main internal tank was enlarged and was added with a soft fuel tank. The aircraft has four under-wing stores stations, each capable of carrying up to 250kg bomb. This variant was designated Q-5I by the PLAAF.

The Q-5I was powered by the improved WP-6AIII turbojet originally developed for the J-6III fighter. The engine is rated at 29.4kN (2,998kg, 6,609lb) dry and 36.8kN (3,752kg, 8,273lb) with afterburning. The land gears were enhanced to support extra weight. The break chute was relocated at base of rudder to improve the landing performance and shorten run. The aircraft was fitted with Type-I ejection seat and sea survival equipment. An 50W HF single sideband radio was added for extended range communications.

The Q-5I made its maiden flight in August 1979, with five examples were produced for testing by late 1980. The results of the flight tests showed a 26% increase in range and 35% increase in low-altitude combat radius over the basic variant Q-5. The aircraft’s take-off and landing distance are 130m shorter, and its climb rate and maximum speed were also increased. In December 1983, the Q-5I was officially certified for design finalisation.

In the second phase of the programme, the aircraft was added with improved equipments and avionics, including the tail radar warning receiver, chaff dispenser, new firing/bomb sight, and pressured fuelling system. The aircraft is also capable of carrying a range of free-fall bombs and unguided air-to-surface rocket launcher pods. The Q-5IA was design certified in 1985.

Later Nanchang added the Q-5IA with an all-aspect radar warning receiver and some other minor improvements, and gave the aircraft a new designation Q-5II. The aircraft was available in the export market under the designation A-5B. This variant may have been exported to North Korea.

Q-5III (A-5C)


A-5C carrying air-to-surface and air-to-air weapons on its external hardpoints (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5III was developed from the Q-5IA for the export market and has been given a westernised designation A-5C. The aircraft received its first order from the Pakistani Air Force (PAF) in April 1981. Three prototypes rolled out in 1982 and the first flight took place on 7 September 1982. The aircraft passed its trial review in January 1983 and the delivery of the first batch of the aircraft began in March 1983.

The A-5C in the PAF service featured 32 modifications to meet the requirements of the PAF, including Martin-Baker ejection seat, updated avionics (RWR, IFF, UHF radio), and hardpoints modified for Western weapons such as R550 Magic or AIM-9 Sidewinder. Over 100 examples were delivered to the PAF in the 1980s. The aircraft was also export to Bangladesh, Burma and Sudan.

Q-5M

In July 1986, Nanchang signed a contract with the Italian company Aeritalia (now Alenia) to co-develop an improved variant known as Q-5M. The aircraft was developed on the Q-5IA airframe, but upgraded with 17 items of avionics provided by Aeritalia. The upgrade package was based on the avionic suite of the Aermacchi/Alenia/EMBRAER AMX ground attack aircraft, featuring inertial navigation system (INS), head-up display, ranging radar, air data computer, and two central mission computers, all of which are connected by a MIL-STD-1553B data bus.

For surface attack missions, the Q-5M could carry eleven types of free-fall bombs and/or four types of unguided rockets. The avionics upgrade package enables the aircraft deliver these weapons accurately over long distance flight in all weather conditions. For self-defence, the Q-5M could also carry two PL-5, PL-7 or French R550 IR-guidance short-range air-to-air missiles.

To improve the aircraft’s survivability in the battlefield against enemy air defence weaponry, the Q-5M was equipped with an electronic countermeasures (ECM) suite, including the all-aspect radar warning receiver and chaff/flare dispenser. The warning receiver and the dispenser are correlated so that the aircraft could automatically launch the chaff and flares immediately when a threat is detected. If necessary, the launch of the chaffs and flares could also be manually controlled by the pilot.

Modification of a Q-5IA began in August 1986. The first prototype flew successfully on 30 August 1987 and the aircraft was displayed in the 1987 Paris Air Show and 1988 Farnborough Air Show. Although the project was later cancelled during the aftermath of the 1989 incident, its technologies are believed to have been used on the development of the Q-5D.

Q-5K


Q-5K jointly developed by PRC and France featuring a laser rangefinder in the nose (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5K is the version produced under the joint Sino-French agreement signed in 1987 to provide an alternative to the Q-5M, with prototype trials beginning in September 1991. The Q-5K features a Thomson-CSF VE-110 HUD and TMV-630 laser rangefinder, as well as other improvements. The project was cancelled in the 1990s due to political and economic reasons.

Q-5D

As the PLAAF failed to find a suitable successor to the ageing Q-5, Nanchang (Hongdu) began to develop a further improved variant Q-5D in the 1990s, possibly based on the technologies of the cancelled Q-5M programme. The aircraft was reported to first fly in the late 1990s, with a small number delivered to the PLAAF to replace the ageing Q-5I and Q-5IA. The Q-5D in service with the PLAAF can be identified by its deep green colour scheme in contrast to the light grey and alloy silver on early variants.

Inside the fuselage the aircraft is fitted with an instrument compartment located in front of the nose landing gear. The compartment may accommodate a new Doppler navigation radar or a TV camera. The aircraft is also fitted with improved avionics including HUD, GPS/INS navigation, RWR, TACAN, and chaff/flare launcher. The aircraft is also said to have a longer range and can carry more types of bombs, though the precision strike capability is still not fitted on this plane as standard.

Q-5 Precision Strike Variant


Q-5C precision strike variant with laser guided bombs and a conformal fuel tank (Chinese Internet)

The PLAAF has been seeking to add the Q-5 with precision strike capability for many years. This effort has led to the introduction of a new precision strike variant Q-5 in 2007. The variant features an under-chin laser target designator and carries two indigenous 500kg laser-guided bombs (comparable to the U.S. Paveway-I) under the wings. A conformal fuel tank is mounted under the fuselage to give the aircraft extended range. However, such modification may further increase the weight of the airframe and thus reduce the aircraft’s aerodynamic performance. The latest Internet-source photo confirmed that this variant is already operational with the PLAAF 5th Air Division.

Q-5J (Two-Seat Trainer)


Q-5J trainer prototype (Chinese Internet)

Hongdu developed the twin-seat trainer variant Q-5J to replace the obsolete JJ-6 fighter-trainer for Q-5 pilot training. The aircraft has a redesigned forward fuselage and enlarged tail fin to improve stability. The first flight took place on 28 February 2005. The project was funded by Hongdu with no support from the PLAAF. It is not known whether the PLAAF would eventually accept this design.

Weapons

Fixed weapons include two 23mm Type 23-2K cannon with 100 rounds per gun in the wing roots. The aircraft has 10 external stores stations to carry up to 2,000kg dispensable payload. There are two tandem pairs under the fuselage each rated at 250kg, and six under the wings each rated at 500kg.

Fuselage stations can each carry a 250kg bomb (Chinese 250-2 or 250-3, US Mk 82 or Snakeye, French Durandal, or similar). On Q-5E the station is used to carry a FLIR/LT (infrared and laser targeting) pod.Inboard wing stations can carry 6kg or 25 lb practice bombs, or a pod containing eleven Chinese 57-2 (57mm), seven 68mm, or seven Type 90-1 (90mm), or four 130-1 (130mm) rockets.Centre wing stations can carry a Chinese indigenous 500kg laser guided bomb, a BL755 600lb cluster bomb, a Chinese 250-2 or -3 bomb, US Mk 82 or Snakeye, French Durandal, Chinese indigenous 500kg LGBs, or similar. Normal bomb carrying capacity is 1,000kg (2,205 lb), maximum capacity 2,000kg (4,410 lb). Instead of bombs, centre wing stations can each carry a 760 litre drop tank or ECM.Outboard wing stations can each be occupied by a 400 litre drop tank (when the larger tank is not carried on the centre wing station) or by air-to-air missiles such as PL-2, PL-2B, PL-7, AIM-9 Sidewinder and R550 Magic.

Last update: 16 January 2009







dc20d594aba195e57f0975b3796413ed08ad7f04.jpg.jpeg
cd4bedf9dd656911b8809a3f3446137288470f44.jpg.jpeg
65d50a053b216ef9b074437c73e2017638643010.jpg.jpeg
731b67c61320adc417b5ba85db235f5f4c1dc492.jpg.jpeg
ea5cfbb9b3c5976e7eb863c0de4bc62b61d33916.jpg.jpeg
20c63a931918eba2cb32383e33f65de3321ed9dd.jpg.jpeg
6c624c7059f9811569b62900fbcc9c075d72129b.jpg.jpeg
312737fabde9c3c39fdd065d0d13b44da7c14724.jpg.jpeg
 
.
DEFENCE NOTES

F-86 F&E Sabres in Pakistan Air Force

Gp Capt SULTAN M HALI talks about the fighting warhorse of the PAF that gave us air superiority in the 60s.

Pakistan Air Force (PAF) received a total of 102 F-86Fs from the USA, following the conclusion of a mutual defence assistance pact in 1954. After the Pakistan-India war of 1965 and the resulting embargo on US Military aid, PAF purchased 90 ex-Luftwaffe Orenda-engined Sabre Mk-6s known in PAF as F-86Es. The Sabres were phased out after exhausting their airframe life in 1980. During its twenty four years stay with Pakistan Air Force, the Sabres and their pilots saw meritorious service. PAF pilots flew a total of 320,185 hours in the PAF out of which about 4,500 hours were flown during the war. Fifty PAF pilots were decorated with gallantry awards for their kills during the 1965 and 1971 Pakistan-India Wars. Some prominent landmarks are listed in the chart that follows.

IMPORTANT ACHIEVEMENTS BY SABRES OF PAF

S.NO DATE EVENT REMARKS

1.13 June 1956 F-86F Sabres enter PAF inventory.

2. 25 Feb 19577 Sabre Aerobatics Team The Falcons formed.
3. 23 Mar 1957 64 Sabres participate in the fly past on Pakistan Day Parade.
4. 02 Feb 1958 PAF stages first-in-the world 16 aircraft formation loop in an air display in honour of King Zahir Shah of Afghanistan.Details provided.
5. 10 Apr 1959 Flight Lieutenant M Yunis shoots down an Indian Air Force (IAF) Canberra, which intruded into Pakistani territory on Eid Day.Canberra crew Squadron Leader Sen Gupta and Flight LieutenantS M Rampal made POWs. Details provided.
6. 01 Sep 1965 Squadron Leader Sarfraz Rafiqui and Flight Lieutenant Imtiaz Bhatti shoot down 4 IAF Vampires. Details provided.
7. 06 Sep 1965 No 19 Squadron carries out devastating strike at IAF Base, Pathankot. Details provided.
8. 06 Sep 1965 No 5 Squadron attacks IAF at Halwara.Details provided.
9. 06 Sep 1965 Squadron Leader M M Alam shoots down Indian Hunter during a raid on IAF Base,Adampur.IAF pilot Flight Lieutenant Rawllay of No 7 Squadron was killed in action.
10. 07 Sep 1965 No 14 Squadron strikes IAF Base Kalaikunda.Details provided.
11. 07 Sep 1965 Squadron Leader M M Alam becomes an Ace during epic battle over PAF Sargodha. Details provided.
12. 07 Sep 1965 Flight Lieutenant Anwar-ul-Haq Malik shoots down an IAF Mystere over Sargodha.Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant B Guhe of No 1 Squadron killed in action.
13. 13 Sep 1965 Flight Lieutenant Yusuf Ali Khan shoots down IAF Gnat over Amritsar (India).Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant A N Kale of No 2 Squadron ejected safely.
14. 16 Sep 1965 Squadron Leader M M Alam down IAF Hunter over Amritsar (India).Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant F D Bunsha of No 7 Squadron killed in action.
15. 19 Sep 1965 Flight Lieutenant Saiful Azam shoots down an Indian Gnat over Sialkot.Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant Maya Dev of No 9 Squadron was made POW.
16. 20 Sep 1965 Squadron Leader Sharbat Ali Changezi shoots down an IAF Hunter over Lahore.Indian pilot Squadron Leader S K Sharma of No 7 Squadron ejected over own territory.
17. 20 Sep 1965 Flight Lieutenant S N A Jilani shoots down an IAF Hunter over Lahore.Indian pilot Squadron Leader D P Chatterjee of No 7 Squadron killed in action.
18. 1966 F-86Es enter PAF inventory.
19. 09 Mar 1967 Grand Fire Power demonstration held at Jamrud range in honour of Shah of Iran. F-86Fs & F-86Es participate actively.
20. 23 Nov 1970 F-86Es modified to carry bombs
21. 04 Dec 1971 Flight Lieutenant Mujahid Salik shoots down IAF Hunter over Duman.Indian pilot Flying Officer Sudhir Tyagi of No 27 Squadron killed in action.22. 04 Dec 1971 Flight Lieutenant Salim Baig shoots down IAF Hunter over Peshawar.Indian pilot, Flying P Muralidharan of No 20 Squadron killed in action.
23. 04 Dec 1971 Squadron Leader Javed Afzal shoots down an IAF MiG-21 and one Hunter. His No 2 Flight Lieutenant Saeed Afzal shoots down a Hunter over Dhaka (then East Pakistan). In the ensuing battle, Flight Lieutenant Saeed Afzal was shot down and is martyred in action.
24. 04 Dec 1971Flight Lieutenant Schms ul haq shoots down an IAF over Dhaka.Details of the Air Battle over Dhaka Hunter by the lone No 14 Squadron comprising Sabres against 10 IAF Squadrons is given in detail.
25. 04 Dec 1971Flight Lieutenant Shams-ul-Haq shoots down an IAF SU-7 and two Hunters while his No 2 Flying Officer Shamshad shoot down one Hunter over Dhaka.
26. 04 Dec 1971Squadron Leader Dilawar Hussain, shoots down an IAF over Narayanganj (then East Pakistan).Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant Kenneth Hunter Lemontree ejected safely and made POW.27. 10 Dec 1971Wing Commander Moin Rabb shoots down an IAF SU-7 while his No.2 Flight Lieutenant Taloot Mirza also shoots down an SU-7 over Jaurian, battlefront. Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant S.K. Chibber was killed inaction.
28. 10 Dec 1971 Squadron Leader Aslam Choudhry shoots down an IAF Hunter over Chamb battlefront. Indian pilot MK Jain was killed in action.
29. 11 Dec 1971Wing Commander Ali Imam Bukhari and his No 2 Squadron Leader Cecil Choudhry each shoot down an SU-7 over the battlefront at Shakargarh.Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant K K Mohan of No 26 Squadron was killed in action.
30. 14 Dec 1971 Squadron Salim Gohar shoots down an IAF Krishak over Shakargarh battlefront. Indian pilot Captain P K Gaur killed in action.
31. 14 Dec 1971Flight Lieutenant Salim Baig shoots down an IAF Gnat Details provided.
32. 17 Dec 1971Flight Lieutenant Maqsood Amir shoots down an IAF MiG-21FL over Pasrur (Pakistan).Indian pilot Flight Lieutenant Tejwant Singh of No 29 Squadron made POW.
 
.
This great aircraft should be turned into suicide drones for attacking airfields. It should lead any attack therefore exposing air defence sites and allowing the real fighters behind to do their jobs
 
.
The Chinese did convert F6 or J6 into drones but I think they were used for target practice
This great aircraft should be turned into suicide drones for attacking airfields. It should lead any attack therefore exposing air defence sites and allowing the real fighters behind to do their jobs
 
.
the A5C doesn't get much publicity as it was never used in anger unlike the F86 and the F6. the F16 went to war in the 80s v afghan / soviets in Afghanistan and recently the F16 / JF17 Hi-Lo tandem v the IAF in Op Retort.
 
.
Qiang-5 Ground Attack Aircraft

The Q-5 (Qiangji-5, or Qiang-5; export name: A-5; NATO reporting name: Fantan) is a twin-engine, single-seat, supersonic ground attack aircraft developed by Nanchang-based Hongdu Aircraft Industry Group. The main roles of the aircraft are air interdiction and close air support. Early variants of the Q-5 in service with the PLAAF and PLA Navy have now been replaced by the upgraded variants with improved navigation and precision strike capability. The PLA has been seeking a replacement to this forty-year-old design since the 1970s, but with no success. Instead, the aircraft has been steadily upgraded with new weapons and avionics to extend its service life.

The Q-5 was developed from the Shenyang J-6 (MiG-19 Farmer copy) fighter. The Q-5 inherited the wing and tail of the J-6, but has a redesigned fuselage featuring a solid nose with lateral air intakes. The increased airframe weight and modified profile have resulted in the Q-5 being less manoeuvrable. The Q-5 is 1,360kg heavier than the J-6 and its maximum speed is 0.23 Mach slower. The Q-5 is also inferior to the J-6 in maximum climb rate and service ceiling, and requires longer runway for take-off and landing. Additionally, in order to give room for additional avionics and armaments, the internal fuel capacity had to be reduced, resulting in a shorter combat radius.

The Q-5 has a downward-sloping profile nose that provides the pilot with better visibility. The wings are mid-mounted, sharply swept-back, and tapered. The tails are also swept-back and tapered. Early variants of the Q-5 has a fuselage weapon bay but this was removed on the later variant to accommodate more fuel in internal tanks. Two Wopen-6 turbojet engines are mounted side-by-side in rear of the fuselage with two hydraulically actuated nozzles. The semicircular lateral air intakes have small splitter plates. The cockpit and internal tanks have armour protections. The cockpit is fitted with a 3-piece windscreen and a rear-hinged canopy.

The Q-5 is equipped with the radio compass, radio altimeter, beacon receiver, and optical firing/bomb sight. The aircraft is equipped with a low-speed ejection seat identical to that of the J-6/MiG-19, which can operate at speeds between 250~850km/h. The aircraft is powered by two WP-6 turbojet engines, each rated at 25.5kN (2,600kg, 5,733lb) dry and 31.87kN (3250kg, 7,165lb) with afterburning. The aircraft can fly at near sonic speeds when carrying 1,000kg weapon load in its internal weapon bay without external payloads. When carrying a pair of 760 external fuel tanks, the aircraft can only fly at subsonic speeds. The Q-5 usually adopts a “lo-lo-lo” flight profile, which gives a maximum combat radius of 400km, or 600km when using a “lo-lo-hi” profile. The flight manual of the Q-5 also instructs that the flight speed should not exceed 0.98 Mach when flying at low altitudes.

Q-5A (Nuclear Bomber)


The Q-5A '11264' that dropped China's first operational thermal nuclear weapon (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5A is the nuclear weapon bomber variant, featuring a semi-recessed weapon bay to carry a single KuangBiao 1 air-dropped thermal nuclear (hydrogen) bomb. The internal fuel capacity was increased by 2,155 litre and the external fuel capacity was increased by 1,560 litre to achieve extended range. The aircraft was fitted with nuclear weapon check and control system, an nuclear weapon ejection mount produced by 124 Factory, and a special optical sight developed by 5714 Factory. Only a small number of the Q-5A was built and the PLAAF no longer operates this variant in active duty.

The Q-5A uses a method of loft bombing (also known as toss bombing), where the attacking aircraft pulls upwards and releases its bomb load. This method enables the aircraft evading enemy radar detection by flying at low altitudes when approaching the target. The bomb load is then released at an angle between 45~90 degrees above the horizontal, enabling it to gain some altitude to cover a larger blast killing zone in spite of its low release. The aircraft could even conduct ‘over-the-shoulder bombing’ release, where the bomb is released past the vertical so it is tossed back towards the target.

On 30 December 1970, a Q-5A ‘11264’ flown by PLAAF pilot YANG Guoxiang carried China’s first operational thermal nuclear (hydrogen) bomb to Lop Nor nuclear test site. However, the aircraft’s weapon mount failed to release the bomb over the target zone. Two subsequent attempts to release the bomb using emergency procedures also failed. YANG flew the aircraft with the bomb back to the base safely. On 7 January 1972, YANG flying the same Q-5A dropped the nuclear bomb at Lop Nor nuclear test site and the bomb detonated successfully, indicating that China’s thermal nuclear weapon was ready for operational use.

Q-5B (Torpedo Bomber)


Q-5B torpedo bomber for the PLA Navy in test flight (Chinese Internet)

Nanchang began to evaluate the concept of a naval variant Q-5 for the PLA Naval Air Force in 1965. Three basic variant Q-5s were converted into torpedo bombers for trial and evaluations. These aircraft were fitted with special weapon mounts under the wings to carry two torpedoes. Upon successful tests of these aircraft, the PLA Navy finally approved the Q-5B development programme in 1968.

The Q-5B had two special weapon mounts to carry two Yu-2 (Soviet 56-45 copy) torpedoes or 1,000~1,500kg free-fall bombs. The landing gears were enhanced to support the increased overall weight of the aircraft. The cockpit was raised and the conical nose was rounded. The wing area was also increased for better aerodynamic performance. The aircraft was powered by two more powerful WP-6A turbojets rated at 36.8kN (3,750kg) with afterburning. The fuselage weapon bay was removed to give more space for internal fuel. In addition, the aircraft was also to be fitted with four avionics improvements, including the Jia-13 radar, Doppler navigation radar, No.45 optical sight, and KJ-4 autopilot.

The Q-5B first flew on 29 September 1970, but the aircraft could not be commissioned due to the slow progress in the development of the avionics equipments. By 1979 the torpedo was deemed too obsolete and the Q-5B project was subsequently cancelled after only six examples delivered to the PLA Navy.

Q-5B (Anti-Ship Missile Bomber)

This variant was developed as an alternative to the original Q-5B in the late 1970s. The aircraft was designed to carry two YJ-81 anti-ship missiles under the wings. The aircraft has a Type 317A fire-control radar accommodated in the nose. The development project was later cancelled as the aircraft’s performance could not meet the requirements.

Q-5I/IA/II and A-5B


The improved Q-5I with longer-range and improved avionics (Chinese Internet)

Nanchang began to develop the first major improved variant of the Q-5 in 1977. The programme was intended to tackle the short range of the basic variant Q-5. The aircraft’s original internal weapon bay was removed to give space for additional fuel. The main internal tank was enlarged and was added with a soft fuel tank. The aircraft has four under-wing stores stations, each capable of carrying up to 250kg bomb. This variant was designated Q-5I by the PLAAF.

The Q-5I was powered by the improved WP-6AIII turbojet originally developed for the J-6III fighter. The engine is rated at 29.4kN (2,998kg, 6,609lb) dry and 36.8kN (3,752kg, 8,273lb) with afterburning. The land gears were enhanced to support extra weight. The break chute was relocated at base of rudder to improve the landing performance and shorten run. The aircraft was fitted with Type-I ejection seat and sea survival equipment. An 50W HF single sideband radio was added for extended range communications.

The Q-5I made its maiden flight in August 1979, with five examples were produced for testing by late 1980. The results of the flight tests showed a 26% increase in range and 35% increase in low-altitude combat radius over the basic variant Q-5. The aircraft’s take-off and landing distance are 130m shorter, and its climb rate and maximum speed were also increased. In December 1983, the Q-5I was officially certified for design finalisation.

In the second phase of the programme, the aircraft was added with improved equipments and avionics, including the tail radar warning receiver, chaff dispenser, new firing/bomb sight, and pressured fuelling system. The aircraft is also capable of carrying a range of free-fall bombs and unguided air-to-surface rocket launcher pods. The Q-5IA was design certified in 1985.

Later Nanchang added the Q-5IA with an all-aspect radar warning receiver and some other minor improvements, and gave the aircraft a new designation Q-5II. The aircraft was available in the export market under the designation A-5B. This variant may have been exported to North Korea.

Q-5III (A-5C)


A-5C carrying air-to-surface and air-to-air weapons on its external hardpoints (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5III was developed from the Q-5IA for the export market and has been given a westernised designation A-5C. The aircraft received its first order from the Pakistani Air Force (PAF) in April 1981. Three prototypes rolled out in 1982 and the first flight took place on 7 September 1982. The aircraft passed its trial review in January 1983 and the delivery of the first batch of the aircraft began in March 1983.

The A-5C in the PAF service featured 32 modifications to meet the requirements of the PAF, including Martin-Baker ejection seat, updated avionics (RWR, IFF, UHF radio), and hardpoints modified for Western weapons such as R550 Magic or AIM-9 Sidewinder. Over 100 examples were delivered to the PAF in the 1980s. The aircraft was also export to Bangladesh, Burma and Sudan.

Q-5M

In July 1986, Nanchang signed a contract with the Italian company Aeritalia (now Alenia) to co-develop an improved variant known as Q-5M. The aircraft was developed on the Q-5IA airframe, but upgraded with 17 items of avionics provided by Aeritalia. The upgrade package was based on the avionic suite of the Aermacchi/Alenia/EMBRAER AMX ground attack aircraft, featuring inertial navigation system (INS), head-up display, ranging radar, air data computer, and two central mission computers, all of which are connected by a MIL-STD-1553B data bus.

For surface attack missions, the Q-5M could carry eleven types of free-fall bombs and/or four types of unguided rockets. The avionics upgrade package enables the aircraft deliver these weapons accurately over long distance flight in all weather conditions. For self-defence, the Q-5M could also carry two PL-5, PL-7 or French R550 IR-guidance short-range air-to-air missiles.

To improve the aircraft’s survivability in the battlefield against enemy air defence weaponry, the Q-5M was equipped with an electronic countermeasures (ECM) suite, including the all-aspect radar warning receiver and chaff/flare dispenser. The warning receiver and the dispenser are correlated so that the aircraft could automatically launch the chaff and flares immediately when a threat is detected. If necessary, the launch of the chaffs and flares could also be manually controlled by the pilot.

Modification of a Q-5IA began in August 1986. The first prototype flew successfully on 30 August 1987 and the aircraft was displayed in the 1987 Paris Air Show and 1988 Farnborough Air Show. Although the project was later cancelled during the aftermath of the 1989 incident, its technologies are believed to have been used on the development of the Q-5D.

Q-5K


Q-5K jointly developed by PRC and France featuring a laser rangefinder in the nose (Chinese Internet)

The Q-5K is the version produced under the joint Sino-French agreement signed in 1987 to provide an alternative to the Q-5M, with prototype trials beginning in September 1991. The Q-5K features a Thomson-CSF VE-110 HUD and TMV-630 laser rangefinder, as well as other improvements. The project was cancelled in the 1990s due to political and economic reasons.

Q-5D

As the PLAAF failed to find a suitable successor to the ageing Q-5, Nanchang (Hongdu) began to develop a further improved variant Q-5D in the 1990s, possibly based on the technologies of the cancelled Q-5M programme. The aircraft was reported to first fly in the late 1990s, with a small number delivered to the PLAAF to replace the ageing Q-5I and Q-5IA. The Q-5D in service with the PLAAF can be identified by its deep green colour scheme in contrast to the light grey and alloy silver on early variants.

Inside the fuselage the aircraft is fitted with an instrument compartment located in front of the nose landing gear. The compartment may accommodate a new Doppler navigation radar or a TV camera. The aircraft is also fitted with improved avionics including HUD, GPS/INS navigation, RWR, TACAN, and chaff/flare launcher. The aircraft is also said to have a longer range and can carry more types of bombs, though the precision strike capability is still not fitted on this plane as standard.

Q-5 Precision Strike Variant


Q-5C precision strike variant with laser guided bombs and a conformal fuel tank (Chinese Internet)

The PLAAF has been seeking to add the Q-5 with precision strike capability for many years. This effort has led to the introduction of a new precision strike variant Q-5 in 2007. The variant features an under-chin laser target designator and carries two indigenous 500kg laser-guided bombs (comparable to the U.S. Paveway-I) under the wings. A conformal fuel tank is mounted under the fuselage to give the aircraft extended range. However, such modification may further increase the weight of the airframe and thus reduce the aircraft’s aerodynamic performance. The latest Internet-source photo confirmed that this variant is already operational with the PLAAF 5th Air Division.

Q-5J (Two-Seat Trainer)


Q-5J trainer prototype (Chinese Internet)

Hongdu developed the twin-seat trainer variant Q-5J to replace the obsolete JJ-6 fighter-trainer for Q-5 pilot training. The aircraft has a redesigned forward fuselage and enlarged tail fin to improve stability. The first flight took place on 28 February 2005. The project was funded by Hongdu with no support from the PLAAF. It is not known whether the PLAAF would eventually accept this design.

Weapons

Fixed weapons include two 23mm Type 23-2K cannon with 100 rounds per gun in the wing roots. The aircraft has 10 external stores stations to carry up to 2,000kg dispensable payload. There are two tandem pairs under the fuselage each rated at 250kg, and six under the wings each rated at 500kg.

Fuselage stations can each carry a 250kg bomb (Chinese 250-2 or 250-3, US Mk 82 or Snakeye, French Durandal, or similar). On Q-5E the station is used to carry a FLIR/LT (infrared and laser targeting) pod.Inboard wing stations can carry 6kg or 25 lb practice bombs, or a pod containing eleven Chinese 57-2 (57mm), seven 68mm, or seven Type 90-1 (90mm), or four 130-1 (130mm) rockets.Centre wing stations can carry a Chinese indigenous 500kg laser guided bomb, a BL755 600lb cluster bomb, a Chinese 250-2 or -3 bomb, US Mk 82 or Snakeye, French Durandal, Chinese indigenous 500kg LGBs, or similar. Normal bomb carrying capacity is 1,000kg (2,205 lb), maximum capacity 2,000kg (4,410 lb). Instead of bombs, centre wing stations can each carry a 760 litre drop tank or ECM.Outboard wing stations can each be occupied by a 400 litre drop tank (when the larger tank is not carried on the centre wing station) or by air-to-air missiles such as PL-2, PL-2B, PL-7, AIM-9 Sidewinder and R550 Magic.

Last update: 16 January 2009







View attachment 601849View attachment 601850View attachment 601851View attachment 601852View attachment 601853View attachment 601854View attachment 601855View attachment 601856

Like f-6 dual seaters came very towards the end of a5 and paf used ft-6 instead of buying dual seaters a5

When f-6 were retired all available ft-6 were kept /reassigned to a5 sqn
 
.
Written in the 80s.

F-6 Aircraft of Pakistan Air Force

Columnist Gp Capt SM HALI remembers the Chinese F-6 aircraft in the PAF.

The mach 1.4 F-6 Day Fighter is an export designation of the Chinese-built J-6 (Fighter aircraft 6) which was originally designed as MiG-19 in the USSR, its Soviet prototype having flown for the first time in September, 1953.

Immediately after the 1965 Indo-Pak War, USA placed an embargo on the supply of weapons to both countries. Pakistani defence planners selected the F-6 aircraft as an addition to the PAF inventory. Thus its induction commenced on 30 December, 1965. Initially 72 aircraft were procured with subsequent additions bringing the total to 253 aircraft. At its peak, the F-6 aircraft equipped ten Fighter Squadrons of Pakistan Air Force.

PAF pilots have now flown this aircraft for more than thirty-four years. They mastered this twin engined pack of roaring power in a considerably short time. On 09 March, 1968, PAF F-6s participated in an impressive Fire-Power display at the Jamrud Firing Range near Peshawar organised for the visiting Iranian monarch, Raza Shah Pahelvi. In 1969, PAF formed an aerobatics team named ‘Rattlers’. The team comprised four F-6 aircraft painted black. On 14 March, 1969, the team performed formation aerobatics in a thrilling display of speed control and co-ordination in an air display organized for the visiting Soviet Minister of Defence, Marshal Grechko.

While the PAF pilots gained expertise on this thrilling but difficult and demanding weapon system, PAF’s engineers and technicians carried out a number of indigenous modifications and improvements to make the F-6 more effective and enhance its roles of air superiority and ground attack. The major upgrading and innovative modifications include the provision of western avionics, Martin and Baker ejection seats, the AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile, French 68 mm rockets, additional under wing tanks and under-belly ‘Gondola’ fuel tanks and a special ground-power unit for instantly starting its twin engines to shorten ‘scramble’ time.

PAF’s expertise on the F-6 was fully tested during the 1971 Indo-Pak War. Its three F-6 squadrons, Nos 11, 23 and 25 gave an excellent account of themselves: flying 945 sorties comprising 735 hours and destroying numerous enemy tanks, armoured cars and field guns during the close support missions. In air combat, F-6 pilots shot down eight Indian Air Force fighter aircraft including a superior MiG-21 and damaged five.

On 04 December, Flight Lieutenant Javed Latif of No 23 Squadron shot down an SU-7 while it was attacking the PAF airfield at Risalewala. Its pilot Flight Lieutenant Harvinder Singh was killed in action. On 04 December, Flying Officer Qazi Javed of No 25 Squadron shot down an Indian Hunter when it came to attack PAF airfield at Mianwali. Its pilot Flight Lieutenant Vidya Dhar Shankar was also killed in action.

On 05 December, Wing Commander Saad A Hatmi, the Officer Commanding of No 25 Squadron and his Number two, Flight Lieutenant Shahid Raza chased two IAF Hunters and shot them down close to Sakesar. Their pilots Flight Lieutenants G.S. Rai and K.L. Malkani were both killed in action.

On 07 December, Flight Lieutenant Atiq Sufi of No 11 Squadron shot down an IAF SU-7 near the battle front at Samba. Its pilot Flight Lieutenant Jiwa Singh was killed in action.

On 08 December, Wing Commander S. M. Hashmi, Officer Commanding of No 23 Squadron shot down two IAF SU-7s which were attacking Risalewala airfield.

On 14 December, Flight Lieutenant Aamer A Sharif of No 11 Squadron engaged a superior IAF MiG-21 and after a classic battle, shot it down near Niankot.

All three squadrons received battle honours for the 1971 War, while three F-6 pilots were awarded gallantry medals.

Todate F-6 aircraft have flown more than 400,000 hours. The Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra’s F-6 Rebuild Factory, which was inaugurated in 1980, has played a major role in giving the F-6 aircraft a new lease of life by completely over-hauling it.

Today F-6 aircraft are in the twilight of their service in PAF but they still compete actively with the more modern weapons systems. PAF is presently maintaining two Squadrons: No 17 and 23 with F-6s which are active in guarding the aerial frontiers of PAF.
 
.
The F6 carried Pakistan through some really rough & tough times. Retire in peace loyal war bird. We will always remember you...
 
.
thats interesting . 226 huge number. our backbone fighters were always chinese jets if am not wrong sir

Not always. Sabers were American.

The F6 carried Pakistan through some really rough & tough times. Retire in peace loyal war bird. We will always remember you...

By far my most favorite fighter in the PAF. Difficult to master but in skillful hands, it was lethal. Was agile, had a fast climb rate and monstrous 30mm guns..
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom