You don't make any sense. You're saying you don't know if he was actually ever involved in war crimes but at the same time you're claiming the ICT proceeding does not suggest anything conclusive, it's all circumstantial hearsay and weak documents. Based on what you're claiming that?
The way you asked me for conclusive evidence and wanted to know how am I so sure, I thought you're a hotshot lawyer with conclusive evidence on this case and already debunked the ICT proceeding and all conspiracy against this "angel" but doesn't look like it. So WTF are you trying to say?
It would've been nice if you could highlight/mark the part of that PDF file you've problem with and show us which evidence/documents seem inconclusive. I don't have patient or interest to go through 120 pages of that file. And this is only tribunal's copy, there's also appellate division's copy. There's also review on this case after that.
Also, a verdict is given after witnesses statement, evidences, documents and both lawyers so how did judge's verdict become BAL's position on 71? What would be fair and unbiased trial? If this guy was proven innocent? What should be BAL's position on 71? Should they forgive traitors? Party position still won't change anything.
There was protest and activities against these war criminals by freedom fighters/victims family lead by Jahanara Imam and others for at least 20 years or more, even before the trial for war criminals. Probably when Jamat was brought back in BD. Saidi was even arrested in 74/75.
There were at least 20 charges against Saidi in tribunal, he was proven guilty in 8. He was sentenced to death for 2 but later got life sentence in appellate division. If the trial was bias then why not just hang this guy for more charges, why/how did he reduce his punishment? Also his witness got more time than govt's lawyer.
Even if this guy was guilty only for one case, he should've been executed by firing squad like dog. Anyway, here is a discussion on Saidi's case from an ACTUAL lawyer. Instead of wasting time on rajakar sympathizers, it's better if I just share it here and rest my case. If you're still interested then you better argue with an expert on this.
View attachment 953463
View attachment 953464
Yes you did!!
এইসব ইনিয়ে বিনিয়ে মিনমিন কইরা অমুক তমুক বইলা কোনওওও লাভ নাই। ব্যাপার না, আপনি নতুন না, আপনার মত বান্দা বহু আছে। জেনে-বুঝে হোক আর না হোক, তারা এখনও কুই কুই করছে ভবিষ্যতেও করবে। যেমনটা উপরে বললাম, এই বেটারে নিয়া গেঞ্জাম অনেক আগে থেকেই, লীগের রাজনীতি তো পরের কথা। কোকিলা বেহেন আই মিন কোকিল কন্ঠী কোরআনের পক্ষী হিসেবে "মাওলানার" যেই ইমেজ আছে ঐটাতেও ভেজাল।
Doesn't matter what a random guy on PDF thinks. No one cares except piggies and Golapis. Like I mentioned above you're not the only one and professional lawyers couldn't protect these guys. Only piggies and Golapis consider proven rajakars like Golam Azam, Nizami, Mollah, Saidi and Jamat as "political opponents". দেশে এনে যে মন্ত্রী বানাইছে এইজন্য যে এখনও বিচার ফেস করতে হচ্ছে না সেইটা শুকরিয়া করেন। আপনাদের কাজকর্ম খুবই হাস্যকর, একদিকে রাজাকারদের নিয়ে কান্নাকাটি করেন আবার ভারতের দালাল নিয়াও চিল্লাচিল্লি করেন। ভন্ডামির তো একটা লিমিট থাকে।
Is that so? We will also eat grass and posses nukes?
In that case we should try it. I have no problem if party like Jamat gets wiped out for that. Even Germany managed to rose from pile of ashes and prosper after Nazis got their *** kicked. Though this is another discussion.