False Flag Chemical Attack In Syria? And Syria: Not a Revolution

[Anaoshak]

We all know after the Mainstream media fiasco of the coverage on the last month before Aleppo fell that they are outright lying. Their sources on the ground were making claims of Genocide, Mass executions, Rape and Chemical attacks in Aleppo, That half a million people were stuck there as well during the last month before the Syrian Army took the city, none of those claims were true, There was no Genocide, There were no Mass Executions or Mass Rape and also the number of people stuck in the pocket in Aleppo was ALOT lower than what they claimed and the civilians there actually were happy when the rebels left. And the people that lied and claimed all of those things which weren't true are the exact same people in Idlib right now, as they were evacuated from Aleppo to Idlib under the agreement between the SAA and Rebels, so that ordinary Aleppo citizens could return to their normal lives.
These are the exact same sources that are being used again by MSM, right now for this supposed Chemical attack "Done by Assad". Even though the not so moderate Rebels are the only ones benefiting from it.
It's a good thing that internet and globalisation as evolved so much that people can look into things themselves and see what's going on. Instead of being yet another sheep following the herd blindly.

This guy makes a pretty good analysis about the recent false flag attack in the video below.
I found his channel earlier this month and it's really good. So i suggest checking it out for some proper coverage of events happening in Syria, He is a Political Researcher / Writer / Analyst as well as a Syrian Refugee in Europe.

Also check out his video "Syria: NOT a Revolition",

 

[DJ_Viper]

We all know after the Mainstream media fiasco of the coverage on the last month before Aleppo fell that they are outright lying. Their sources on the ground were making claims of Genocide, Mass executions, Rape and Chemical attacks in Aleppo, That half a million people were stuck there as well during the last month before the Syrian Army took the city, none of those claims were true, There was no Genocide, There were no Mass Executions or Mass Rape and also the number of people stuck in the pocket in Aleppo was ALOT lower than what they claimed and the civilians there actually were happy when the rebels left. And the people that lied and claimed all of those things which weren't true are the exact same people in Idlib right now, as they were evacuated from Aleppo to Idlib under the agreement between the SAA and Rebels, so that ordinary Aleppo citizens could return to their normal lives.
These are the exact same sources that are being used again by MSM, right now for this supposed Chemical attack "Done by Assad". Even though the not so moderate Rebels are the only ones benefiting from it.
It's a good thing that internet and globalisation as evolved so much that people can look into things themselves and see what's going on. Instead of being yet another sheep following the herd blindly.

This guy makes a pretty good analysis about the recent false flag attack in the video below.
I found his channel earlier this month and it's really good. So i suggest checking it out for some proper coverage of events happening in Syria, He is a Political Researcher / Writer / Analyst as well as a Syrian Refugee in Europe.

So just yesterday so many children were killed by the Syrian forces run by this inhumane as$hole Assad. So you don't think he's killed them? There were parents who lost their little children in that attack, pleading to the UN and the US to come save the remainder of these innocent civilians on tv, social media and on various Arab and non-Arab news channels. Some recorded the Syrian military's jets dropping these bombs.

So many children couldn't even get to an age to go to school. Instead, they perished due to a dictator's wish!! What part of the world do you live on where humanity doesn't exist?? And here you are telling people how "everything is cool"!

 

[Anaoshak]

So just yesterday so many children were killed by the Syrian forces run by this inhumane as$hole Assad. So you don't think he's killed them? There were parents who lost their little children in that attack, pleading to the UN and the US to come save the remainder of these innocent civilians on tv, social media and on various Arab and non-Arab news channels. Some recorded the Syrian military's jets dropping these bombs.

So many children couldn't even get to an age to go to school. Instead, they perished due to a dictator's wish!! What part of the world do you live on where humanity doesn't exist?? And here you are telling people how "everything is cool"!

I'm guessing you didn't bother to watch the video, hence why you as a sheep follow the herd.

Kids were killed by a chemical attack yesterday, but i don't believe it was done by Assad.
And as stated in my post , last time media and social media did the exact same thing in regards to Aleppo, where a supposed genocide, and mass executions and rapes were going on and done by Assads forces during the last month before the city was liberated. It turned out not to be true. I'm more worried about whether or not these kids were actually part of the kidnapped group last week and used by the rebels as a way to influence people like you. As well as the Islamists and Extremists having chemical weapons. Which they do according to the reports.

Do you know who Dr. Shajul Islam is? It's the guy that most of the media has been quoting lately in regards to the recent Chemical attack, and prior to this attack in other articles he was according to media, this quote from the daily mail "A British doctor struck off by the NHS who was accused of kidnapping Western journalists has fled to Syria and is treating bomb victims, including jihadis."
You think that's a reliable source?

If you are talking about the whole war itself, that's another story. If you read my thread, it's about the recent chemical attack. And no "everything is not cool", had extremists not been supported by the west as well as some states in the Area, this war would have never reached this point.

EDIT: Fixed spelling.

 

[takeitwithyou]

7 years of Iraq-Iran war a false flag, Iraq never used any chemical weapons on Iran.

See how easy that was?

 

[Talwar e Pakistan]

So just yesterday so many children were killed by the Syrian forces run by this inhumane as$hole Assad. So you don't think he's killed them? There were parents who lost their little children in that attack, pleading to the UN and the US to come save the remainder of these innocent civilians on tv, social media and on various Arab and non-Arab news channels. Some recorded the Syrian military's jets dropping these bombs.

So many children couldn't even get to an age to go to school. Instead, they perished due to a dictator's wish!! What part of the world do you live on where humanity doesn't exist?? And here you are telling people how "everything is cool"!

Bro you have to wait for investigations. Last time we pointed fingers on Assad for the chemical attacks earlier and it seemed that was not true.

 

[Anaoshak]

7 years of Iraq-Iran war a false flag, Iraq never used any chemical weapons on Iran.

See how easily that was?

If your gonna troll then no need to reply to the thread. Difference is that there actually was an investigation done into the chemical attacks during the Iran-Iraq war which showed that Iraq was using them and on top of that there were so much more evidence, for example the CIA declassified files that stated the U.S administration at the time was giving intelligence and targets for Iraq to attack because the Iraqis were losing the war and they did so knowing that Saddam would use chemical weapons. All investigated and fact, unlike the current event in Syria.

@waz

No investigation has been done into the chemical attack that happened in Syria recently and the previous attack in 2013 showed that it was not Assad that launched the Attack. As you see in the Video, the UN investigator actually said that evidence showed the "Rebels" were using chemical attacks and the investigative reporter as well reporting that the "Rebels" have access to Chemical weapons.

 

[DJ_Viper]

Kids were killed by a chemical attack yesterday, but i don't believe it was done by Assad.

Of course not. All the videos available showing Syrian jets dropping bombs and then the destruction of people getting killed like flies was all a Hollywood show right? Those were Syrians who shot those scenes of horrific violence committed against humans.

Small, tiny little children and so many of them perished when they didn't have to, if this bas*tard wasn't in the power. Poor crying fathers were sobbing and appealing the UN and the US (some videos directly showed people holding dead children asking Trump to send forces in to take Assad out). So you people would suggest that was all staged right?

I would never suggest the US forces to ever go into this mess in Syria. And Trump had similar policy viewpoints too. Now, he is almost forced to do that IMO. That is if he feels like being a responsible leader of the world.

Bro you have to wait for investigations. Last time we pointed fingers on Assad for the chemical attacks earlier and it seemed that was not true.

Ok, which is why nothing happened, meaning the US forces didn't go in and take Assad out. But yesterday's attack by the Syrian jets was recorded by many Syrians. Some actually lost their children to this attack while they filmed it from a distance. So now what is the excuse? The French or the Israelis somehow flew the Syrian air force jets to do that? Common man, you guys gotta start to look beyond the conspiracy theories about the US or "other's" involvement.

Precious and tiny, young human lives were lost, many children and women. Watching those videos makes one cry no matter what religion, country or culture you are from. Denying that, even makes it worst.

 

[takeitwithyou]

Bro you have to wait for investigations. Last time we pointed fingers on Assad for the chemical attacks earlier and it seemed that was not true.

what did you say- Seemed it was not true- Where do you get your news from? lol

I tell you guy's legendary propensity to believe conspiracies. If the earlier attack was not true then why did Assad agree to get rid of his chemical weapons? who agrees to remove chemical weapons if they don't have any?

 

[Anaoshak]

Of course not. All the videos available showing Syrian jets dropping bombs and then the destruction of people getting killed like flies was all a Hollywood show right? Those were Syrians who shot those scenes of horrific violence committed against humans.

Small, tiny little children and so many of them perished when they didn't have to, if this bas*tard wasn't in the power. Poor crying fathers were sobbing and appealing the UN and the US (some videos directly showed people holding dead children asking Trump to send forces in to take Assad out). So you people would suggest that was all staged right?

I would never suggest the US forces to ever go into this mess in Syria. And Trump had similar policy viewpoints too. Now, he is almost forced to do that IMO. That is if he feels like being a responsible leader of the world.

Am i speaking in a different language here?
What are you talking about? The chemical attack or the Syrian War?
Those are 2 separate issues.
As previously stated by @Talwar e Pakistan , you need to wait for investigations to be done before you point fingers at Assad. Last time it wasn't true.

Is Assad a good guy? Nope, and i actually would have supported the moderate opposition, some of which did exist in the beginning of the war, but it wasn't long until extremists and Salafi islamists took over the opposition because they were the bulk of those in the protests. And those moderate opposition figures were swept aside, and or killed as you can see in the video about the Syrian revolution, and also fled from the country. I suggest you look at the second video in my first post in this thread instead of jumping to conclusions based on MSM.
Assad is not a good guy, but he is definitely the lesser evil in the conflict. Either him or the Kurds. Which is why they have been working together a lot and against the groups which the west considers to be "Moderate rebels".
Do you think it's a coincidence that the U.S stopped supporting and training the groups they were supporting and instead went to the Kurds? No, there isn't. The reason they did that is because there is no moderate opposition. And whenever they gave weapons and or training to the groups they had supported previously, it always benefited Al-Qaeda and Isis.

 

[takeitwithyou]

Ok, which is why nothing happened..

What do you mean nothing happened. Assad/Russia agreed to remove his chemical weapons. why would he agree to have weapons if he did not have any?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-chemicalweapons-idUSKBN0EY18T20140623

 

[DJ_Viper]

What do you mean nothing happened. Assad/Russia agreed to remove his chemical weapons. why would he agree to have weapons if he did not have any?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-chemicalweapons-idUSKBN0EY18T20140623

Read up the whole sentence....and yes, I know they promised to remove the weapons. But a crazy bas*tard who doesn't shy away from using these bad weapons on his own children, can easily lie to the entire world. Which is what he did.

 

[Anaoshak]

what did you say- Seemed it was not true- Where do you get your news from? lol

I tell you guy's legendary propensity to believe conspiracies. If the earlier attack was not true then why did Assad agree to get rid of his chemical weapons? who agrees to remove chemical weapons if they don't have any?

Is it a conspiracy when the LEAD UN investigator said that Assad wasn't responsible?

Syria has had Chemical weapons for a long time, which has been known so i don't know where you got the assumption that Assad or his government has said they don't have chemical weapons other than right after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, when the media reported that they said they don't when in fact they said that they weren't conducting tests of chemical weapons after Rumsfeld had accused them of doing so. There is a difference between having chemical weapons and using them.

I'll give you a quote, "At the outbreak of civil war concerns were raised about both the security of Syria's chemical weapons sites and about the potential use of chemical weapons. In July 2012, Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi stated that "No chemical or biological weapons will ever be used... All of these types of weapons are in storage and under security and the direct supervision of the Syrian armed forces and will never be used unless Syria is exposed to external aggression.". https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/23/syria-chemical-weapons-own-goal
That was in 2012, before the 2013 attack and it was in 2013 the weapons were removed, so your entire argument is void.

As i said, sheep following the herd.

Do some research of your own instead of listening to everything that you are told on MSM and social media.

 

[takeitwithyou]

Is it a conspiracy when the LEAD UN investigator said that Assad wasn't responsible?

Syria has had Chemical weapons for a long time, which has been known so i don't know where you got the assumption that Assad or his government has said they don't have chemical weapons other than right after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, when the media reported that they said they don't when in fact they said that they weren't conducting tests of chemical weapons after Rumsfeld had accused them of doing so. There is a difference between having chemical weapons and using them.

I'll give you a quote, "At the outbreak of civil war concerns were raised about both the security of Syria's chemical weapons sites and about the potential use of chemical weapons. In July 2012, Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi stated that "No chemical or biological weapons will ever be used... All of these types of weapons are in storage and under security and the direct supervision of the Syrian armed forces and will never be used unless Syria is exposed to external aggression.". https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/23/syria-chemical-weapons-own-goal
That was in 2012, before the 2013 attack and it was in 2013 the weapons were removed, so your entire argument is void.

As i said, sheep following the herd.

Do some research of your own instead of listening to everything that you are told on MSM and social media.

UN proves Assad regime dropped chemical bombs on civilians


As I said Iraq never used any chemical weapons on Iran. Iranians have lied about then and now are making excuses for Assad now. and no lead UN investigator said Assad did not do it. The link above shows UN proved it too.

None of your baloney above proves anything other than the Syria is the only one who had access to chemical weapons and used it against his own people.

Chemical weapons are banned and you seem to say not only was it okay for Syria to have it, but because some Syrian fella said they would not use meant they would not use it. LOL. Personally, I could care less of you guys gassing each other- should not be our concern and we(U.S.) should stay out of it.

Read up the whole sentence....and yes, I know they promised to remove the weapons. But a crazy bas*tard who doesn't shy away from using these bad weapons on his own children, can easily lie to the entire world. Which is what he did.

UN proves Assad regime dropped chemical bombs on civilians

 

[Anaoshak]

As I said Iraq never used any chemical weapons on Iran. Iranians have lied about then and now are making excuses for Assad now.

None of your baloney above proves anything other than the Syria is the only one who had access to chemical weapons and used it against his own people.

Chemical weapons are banned and you seem to say not only was it okay for Syria to have it, but because some Syrian fella said they would not use meant they would not use it. LOL. Personally, I could care less of Muslims killing and gassing each other- should not be our concern and we( U.S.) should stay out of it.

Ok, now we just know that you are a troll. It's a fact that they were used. Why would i say that they were used then? Because not only were there concrete evidence, but an extensive investigation was launched and pointed the blame at Saddam and his allies, like the U.S.

You just wrote earlier that Syria had said they don't have chemical weapons. Proved you were wrong.

You're right, chemical weapons are banned. But not everyone has signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention, Including the U.S. It wasn't long ago that you used chemical weapons yourselves. Whether it be white phosphorus(it is a toxic chemical substance, even though it isn't listed in the convention) or agent orange.

The blood on the U.S's hands during the last 50 years are more than anyone one else's in the world. Don't forget that.

 

[Imad.Khan]

This picture sums up what i think about anything that the US or the official western media says

Also do you remember this testimony of the Kuwati girl that was later found to be fake.

And then the famous Colin Powell speech that also later turned out to be a lie

We also know how the US "accidentally" dropped weapons to ISIS.

This is also not the first time that the US and British media has faked Chemical attack in Syria. Just google it and you will find loads of articles and videos.

Also why would Asad drop chemical bombs on its own civilian population? what would he achieve by doing that? Who would benefit from a chemical attack on civilians in Syria?

Think logically and you will understand what is happening and who is behind all this.