bigmoneymaker
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 434
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi,
First of all, there is no such thing as true democracy---democarcy is earned not lent.
Secondly---even though S 2 and I---as we look through the prism---we see a different picture---but sometimes when there is a convergence of light at one point---then we are not too far apart on how it should be handled.
This is my e-mail to ISPR through their web-site---
Dear general,
These terrorists have come and stuck a dagger in your heart, right in the middle of your house---and you the leader of my army,have been caught sleeping at the job, unprepared and ill-equipped to handle 10 terrorists.
Isn't that a shame and a disgrace for you---after all this talk of how great the pak army is and how prepared we are to face the enemy---you kow towed to 10 terrorists---who broke through your frontline barriers with a minimal of effort---.
Even though you killed them, that doesnot take the shame of loss from your uniform. Truthfully, you people are absolutely not mentally prepared to fight the TTP. Seems like you are really clueless to what you want to do.
Maybe you need to learn a lesson from your enemy---see how dedicated they are to their jobs---if you are half as dedicated and committed to yours as they are to theirs, you would not have been found lying on your knees with the gun of the enemy pointed at your head. MK . END
The problem with pak millitary is that it is not following its very own procedures---that of basics and fundamentals of security 101. The stance and the posture of pak millitary is extremely casual and callous.
Historically, pak millitary has taken all previous conflicts very casually and in a non-chalant manner. Like the 65 and 71 war---they have traditionally missed all the oppurtunities to take take down the enemy in the shortest possible time span---.
Examples are 62 india china war---pak didnot go for kashmir---71 war---pak generals chickened out on the western front---.
A simple analysis may show that the right officers are not being promoted---it may just be an inherent fault in the selection system---through no fault of there own---more procastinators / thinkers are being elected to a job that should have gone to doers---men of action---.
The analytical wing of the pak millitary may be way behind the eight ball---historical prcedence exists---.
Young pakistanis have no clue and understanding to what happened at the GHQ when the birgadier asked the gunmen--'what is happening' and got shot in result.
This incidence in itself show the callous and casual attitude of the brig in question---when no armed soldier was allowed in the GHQ then the brig should have asked the question to himself---what is this soldier doing over here---there is a gun figfht going outside and this soldier is here by himself---.
I mean to say---an attack outside and the insurgents getting in, inside that building would have been instantaneous--- otherwise the brig. would have had the time to peek outside or call someone to find out what was happening---.
Any standard operating procedure for security would have been---once you heard gunfire---every office should have been locked down from inside and not opened unless proper security clearance was given. Any armed soldier, who has no business to be inside the building in the first place should have been considered as a hostile.
I am a firm believer of the fact that once you get anrgy---your learing abilities disappear---once anger takes over thinking, the resulting reaction is more of self destruction.
The swat operation proves that the taliban cannot stand in front of the might of the millitary----any millitary---with a 30,000 strong force assaulting with all the fire power---even if there were a 100 thousand taliban troops, they would have been slaughtered---the millitary has big guns---they have armour and tanks---they have air support---they can pound the living day-lights out of the taliban as they did in swat at their discretion.
Swat showed what pak millitary can do---but the biggest thing that came out of the swat action was that---why did the pak millitary not do that before hand----did the pak millitary had a different agenda than the rest of the pakistan---.
It is not for the regular joe to understand the threat level of the enemy insurgency---it is the job of the millitary to analyze and assess the threat and convey their reservations to the the govt to take the appropriate action.
Very emotional video
Very sad , and very very sad - shows the ugly face of war when
innocent people go in war, they come out as tortured souls
When you go in , you are told something stories and vision by your commanders and when you go at ground level and see realities you get shocked and , you have only to choices either you die or you make it alive
Looks like this solider made it back alive but he lost his innocence , and soul in process
But at least he can see difference between right and wrong , and loss of civilian life -
if only more ppl were like this person the cilian life lost would be less ....
Rest I am speechless - war is always pain and sad
Hopefully he will find peace and goodness
Why doesn't China get off its a$$ and help Pakistan with the military assistance it needs RIGHT NOW to fight the TTP? Is China helping and I am just ignorant? Please enlighten me. What is China doing to help Pakistan fight internal terrorists??
who created taliban and call it terrorists at first??? usa
who abandoned taliban and snubbed its very religious existence so they become desperate and extreme to keep on surviving after they are no longer used to confront with ussr?? usa
who become jingoistic aroused to attack taliban instead of negotiating with sane islamic world to get a concensus on solutioN
to deal with extremist taliban??? usa
who now become powerless to curb taliban and try to get pak economy commiting suicide by attacking retaliatory taliban??? usa
who now blame pak and china for not participating in its DIRTY game of obliterating ITS FORMER SUBORDINATE taliban??? usa
Who then will claim the credit of winning the wot and protecting the world with the HEAVY sacrifice of pak army and citizen IF PAK PUT ALL HER EFFORT TO JOIN WAR INITIATED BY USA???? usa
CONCLUSION: this is all usa GEOPOLITIC SEEKING(INTERESTS GAINED BY USA INCLUDES CONTAINING RUSSIA AND PARTICULARLY CHINA)game of wot, usa should pay THE PRICE to curb the terrorist taliban so that the world will be in peace by your brutal rule of force, and small weak countries like pak and developing china should keep away from WESTERN INVENTED brutal game rules otherwise they will be smashed to pieces...
MAYBE USA should THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE RAPING THE OTHER COUNTRIES WHICH USA CANNOT AFFORD, AND THEN USA NEED TO SPEAK HARSHLY TO THE COUNTRIES TO GAIN SUPPORT FOR ITS GAME FOR WORLD PEACE (ACTUALLY WESTERN CHRISTIAN AGGRESSIVE CIVILIZATION SAFETY) BY SPREADING MORE BLOODY HATRED, IS THAT MORALLY UPRIGHT FOR YOU TO DRAG OTHERS INTO MARSH OF HATRED-SPREADING, CIVILIANS-INVOLVED PROLONGED BLOODY PEACE FIGHTING?????...ANSWER THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!!!