Again -
47: Pakistan invaded a small independent kingdom of Kashmir, and then got pushed back from the best parts when thhey invited the Indian armed forces to do so.
65: Pakistan started the war in the hopes of capturing Kashmir, and now console themselves that they didn't lose Lahore. Brilliant!
71: We cut you into two. And two your remain.
99: Every Pakistani infiltrator was sent back in body bags, and your country even refused to acknowledge that you fought. In fact, the Indian army had to offer funeral services to your dead soldiers.
Sure, try to invade India. What is stopping you? Cowardice? Pragmatism?
47-49: Tribal lashkars pushed into Kashmir on behalf of the muslim population that was being systematically genocided by the brutal regime of Hari Singh. The lashkars managed to reach Srinagar which is when the Indian army pushed in (after Hari Singh singed the instrument of accession, later retconned by the UN telling both sides that a plebiscite needs to be held (neither side complied yet)). The indian army pushed the Lashkars back to the border managing to retake the whole Kashmir, up until the Pakistan army (regulars) counter attacked the Indian Army, pushed them back and retook over 40% of Kashmir. A ceasefire was declared and singed by both combatants.
65: following India's unprovoked assault in the Rann of Kutch (which ended in a complete failure), Pakistan launched its own operation Gibraltar in Kashmir which ended in a failure. This led to India declaring war on Pakistan, hence pushing past the IB and into Pakistan. What followed next was a category of failures and success on both sides, and the ultimate failure of the Indian army to capture Lahore and gain the upper hand (see CIA report on the 65 war). In the mean time the Indian military suffered heavier casualties than the Pakistan military, in terms of manpower and equipment. Land gained by the Indian army was made negligible (despite capturing more land than Pakistan) by the Pakistan armys gains, as per the CIA stating 'the land captured was unimportant and held no strategic value). Despite this, ceasefire was declared and all land was returned.
71: contrary to your claims of the Pak army not fighting 2700km away from Pakistan, and that they were still in Pakistan (read up on the creation of Pakistan and how East Pakistan was never meant to be a part of Pakistan), the Pakistan Army in the East was cutoff from receiving supplies and reinforcements. Hence they were heavily outnumbered and outgunned, but still gave a hell of fight. East Pakistan was doomed to fall.
34,000 troops can only hold out for so long against a coalition of 350,000+. Esepcially with limited supplies.
In the west however, India just like 65, faced a plethora of failures. Land gained again was of little strategic value, despite fielding the much more advanced equipment now, the Indian military still continued to sustain heavy losses and make unimportant gains against the Pakistan military. All in all, at the end of the war, the only gain India got was Kargil, where as Pakistan gained the Chamb. East Pakistan became Bangladesh.
99: Pakistan still holds 4/8 peaks today incl the most important peak. During the initial conflict, India was only able to take back 2/8 peaks. India still hasnt taken back the remaining 4 peaks today, thus operation vijay is a failure (operation vijat was to take back all peaks occupied by Pakistan and to expel Pakistani presence from the AO). That too whilst again, taking heavier losses.
........read it again. It says NOTHING of Pakistan invading, rather it mentions Tribesmen FROM Pakistan coming to fight the indian army...........
