Yeti
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7,400
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Look, EFT was given several years and a fixed timeline to submit their 'cheapest' costs? If the price they gave was the cheapest then this new cheaper price is obviously after cutting corners. You don't wanna take a risk against a black box like that.
That is not the way tenders work trust me! I will give you a idea for example now say I wish to purchase some accounting software for my business and I have a set budget of £100,000. I request 3 companies to submit their quotes and out of that one is dismissed and the other 2 is selected.
Now having looked at both the quotes I go with party A, Now for the interesting part! Having worked with tenders for a number of years I noticed there is leakage! if for example the loosing party is not selected this does not necessary mean they have lost the 'contract' as the contract has not been signed on the dotted line.
If for some reason they have made me a counter offer which reflects in a lowering of price or say a better package overall than party A I would be mad not to consider it right?
Now I would also use this counter offer to obtain better terms with party A (my original choice) it is a bit like a game of poker in terms of who is bluffing.
So yes this is good news in my view as added competition would result in getting a better deal in the long run.
That's not real news, since the statement is just a show of last hope, but they know their chances are low now. More interesting would had been, if our government would had shown any sign that they consider a change in the tender for re-evaluation, because without that the Rafale will remain the only current choice, unless they mess it up at any point. However, since the reports about the new EF offer no hint of a change in mind in GoI was visible, which might mean that the offer simply was not interesting enough to re-consider. But I hoped for an improved offer too, but not about lower costs and that's where the EF partners might made the mistake.
Tenders will not be reissued for this deal but there is leakages and parties will try to obtain what the other one is offering and see if it can come out with a counter offer to try to get back in the deal.