EU Plans To Sell Eurofighter (Typhoon) To Pakistan Through Turkey

[zavis2003]

PAF is not formidable by any standard. Nabil.

It would struggle to contain a Massive on slaught by a LARGE well equipped enemy

They lack serious twin engined heavey fighter.
Poor Sam capability
And too many obselete fighter which have been upgraded to Death.
18 F16/52 IS THE STATE OF THE ART MR fighter.

What Formidable means to be is

Saudi Air force 200 Typhoons/F15
Israel 400 f15 & f16
Taiwan 200 F16/IRAGE2000
Eygpt 200 f16

Compare Wat you call Formidable

62 F16 & 16 Thunder (only 18 block 52)

why u ppl are neglecting that we have nukes

60 F16s with nuke on there wings are more dangerous than 500 F16s +800 F15s

so we need not to worry and you too

we know what is essential for out
and 18 JF thunders with nukes are really a great threat

 

[zavis2003]

and if our fighters with nukes on there wings enter into any country space and that hostile country if have more than 1000 state of the art fighters and pilots than still they will get there heart fail when hear our invasion before doing anything

 

[Manticore]

PAF is not formidable by any standard. Nabil.

It would struggle to contain a Massive on slaught by a LARGE well equipped enemy

They lack serious twin engined heavey fighter.
Poor Sam capability
And too many obselete fighter which have been upgraded to Death.
18 F16/52 IS THE STATE OF THE ART MR fighter.

What Formidable means to be is

Saudi Air force 200 Typhoons/F15
Israel 400 f15 & f16
Taiwan 200 F16/IRAGE2000
Eygpt 200 f16

Compare Wat you call Formidable

62 F16 & 16 Thunder (only 18 block 52)

if money is tight , i would go for an MR squadron rather than sams.
Constant large scale/ foreign excercises alongwith bvr and nuke missiles integration under the umbrella of awacs and refuellers make paf a Formidable Force

 

[TaimiKhan]

PAF is not formidable by any standard. Nabil.

It would struggle to contain a Massive on slaught by a LARGE well equipped enemy

They lack serious twin engined heavey fighter.
Poor Sam capability
And too many obselete fighter which have been upgraded to Death.
18 F16/52 IS THE STATE OF THE ART MR fighter.

What Formidable means to be is

Saudi Air force 200 Typhoons/F15
Israel 400 f15 & f16
Taiwan 200 F16/IRAGE2000
Eygpt 200 f16

Compare Wat you call Formidable

62 F16 & 16 Thunder (only 18 block 52)

I have no idea what the problem is with you, anyway.

PAF is formidable in its own way, in the region it operates, the enemy it faces, plus the 62 F-16s are not the only things we have, there is some other stuff too which are old, but what is in them is what matters, not the outer shell.

Anyway, useless to argue and make you understand as its your trait to talk rubbish.

 

[Iqbal_Brar]

and if our fighters with nukes on there wings enter into any country space and that hostile country if have more than 1000 state of the art fighters and pilots than still they will get there heart fail when hear our invasion before doing anything

but when that enemy can put up 270+ Su-30MKI with nukes on there wings and over 50 Mirage 2000 with nukes and 140 Jaguars carrying nukes on their wings.. its actually opposite difference... if pakistan wants to make difference.. it should be other way around... pak should have more airplanes since it needs to carry more nukes into enemy country since that country is bigger...

 

[MZUBAIR]

but when that enemy can put up 270+ Su-30MKI with nukes on there wings and over 50 Mirage 2000 with nukes and 140 Jaguars carrying nukes on their wings.. its actually opposite difference... if pakistan wants to make difference.. it should be other way around... pak should have more airplanes since it needs to carry more nukes into enemy country since that country is bigger...

Lolz funny

1) First PAK have more Nukes then India. Its not a tennis ball that u can make in hundereds in days. Its a NUKE man and even with a single mistake it can be harmfull for ur own country.

2) Second all Nukes will not be taken through Aircrafts. there are few more other ways to launch nukes and Pakistan is expert in that.

---------- Post added at 06:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:10 AM ----------

PAF dont need EU or other western AC. Its a useless thread.

 

[Iqbal_Brar]

Lolz funny

1) First PAK have more Nukes then India. Its not a tennis ball that u can make in hundereds in days. Its a NUKE man and even with a single mistake it can be harmfull for ur own country.

2) Second all Nukes will not be taken through Aircrafts. there are few more other ways to launch nukes and Pakistan is expert in that.

Pak may have more nukes than india but look at size of pak and size of india.. india doesn't need any more nukes.. pak has way less major cities than india...

 

[cross1993]

250 FC-1 and 75 F-16 and 36 J-10B
I think it can meet PAF.
Pakistan can to spend money to improve the power crises that will give the power for the industry.
If Pakistan can solve the energy and security issues, I think that it may change Pakistan's economy in 10 years. Then Pakistan can buy any fighter. For example, J-20 and F35...

Be careful of the India undermine Pakistan's economy through the arms race.

 

[SQ8]

but when that enemy can put up 270+ Su-30MKI with nukes on there wings and over 50 Mirage 2000 with nukes and 140 Jaguars carrying nukes on their wings.. its actually opposite difference... if pakistan wants to make difference.. it should be other way around... pak should have more airplanes since it needs to carry more nukes into enemy country since that country is bigger...

Ballistic Missiles?
Cruise Missiles?
Jets are actually easier to shoot down.

 

[tvsram1992]

Some Pakistani official reportedly said PAF had a requirement to procure 25 to 30 fighters in the class of Rafale and Eurofighter; however such a procurement will not take place before 2019. Currently there are no plans to procure heavy twin engine fighters.

For pakistan rafale/eft is a heavy fighter
For india it is medium fighter!!!
Then JF-17 thunder would be very very light aircraft that can fly
and J-10 would be very heavy aircraft.

 

[tvsram1992]

i think pakistan should invest in this programme with this pakistan airforce can give answer to any fighter jet india buys till 2050 i hope they should look in to it atleast 50 of those willl do good for paf and paf should not buy J 1o what paf has to do get 2 billion dollars for next five years at once what ever do just buy it if our government willing to buy these i dont seee any reason why we cant buy it 38 million a piece guranteed air superirirty for 40 years is a cheap deal for me and for a country like pakistan who has bigger enemy of its size

If pakistan can threaten any other country with 20-50 aircrafts till 2050 then what about india if it buys 126-200 aircraft of the same type???

 

[tvsram1992]

Lolz funny

1) First PAK have more Nukes then India. Its not a tennis ball that u can make in hundereds in days. Its a NUKE man and even with a single mistake it can be harmfull for ur own country.

2) Second all Nukes will not be taken through Aircrafts. there are few more other ways to launch nukes and Pakistan is expert in that.

---------- Post added at 06:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:10 AM ----------

PAF dont need EU or other western AC. Its a useless thread.

One ac can bomb as many times as possible if it is not shot.
Missiles lack accuracy and can be used only once remember 1000km range missile heading toward the target missed the target at 1km though its accuracy is 99.9% target is not hit!
pitiable condition.
If aircraft misses target it can return to kill the target.

 

[tvsram1992]

and if our fighters with nukes on there wings enter into any country space and that hostile country if have more than 1000 state of the art fighters and pilots than still they will get there heart fail when hear our invasion before doing anything

Cant we do the same?
U ve to carry nukes to threaten others with 250 ac's.
Conventional weapons are enough for us to scare pilots of others.

 

[Major Shaitan Singh]

why u ppl are neglecting that we have nukes

60 F16s with nuke on there wings are more dangerous than 500 F16s +800 F15s

so we need not to worry and you too

we know what is essential for out
and 18 JF thunders with nukes are really a great threat

What if all 60 F16 intecepted and short down before crossing the border.....

All you nuke dreams will burnt out with you.

You need to understand enemy power and capability to shoot down.
F16 will not be going to Iraq or Afghan or chez air-defence.... one aircraft with 20 SAM batteries with multiple layers.

 

[tvsram1992]

Lolz funny

1) First PAK have more Nukes then India. Its not a tennis ball that u can make in hundereds in days. Its a NUKE man and even with a single mistake it can be harmfull for ur own country.

No problem we ll import from our big bro russia which has more than 5000 active powerful nukes which yields mega tons along with su35 and mig 35, Brahmos and IRBM's.
Then dont u think the same. Ur nukes are harmful to u. Missiles are not accurate so it is dangerous for u it may blast in ur place or it may get dismantled due to collission when it falls on our place due to wrong timing. Our ac's are accurate there is no chance of wrong timing. No problem brother.

---------- Post added at 06:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:10 AM ----------

[/COLOR]PAF dont need EU or other western AC. Its a useless thread.

Thats why u bought f-16's???

One ac can bomb as many times as possible if it is not shot.
Missiles lack accuracy and can be used only once remember 1000km range missile heading toward the target missed the target at 1km though its accuracy is 99.9% target is not hit!
pitiable condition.
If aircraft misses target it can return to kill the target.