T-SaGe
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
- Messages
- 721
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Turkey and Egypt, of course, should never be in open and conventional meaning war with each other. War means breaking historical bridges and lasting hostility. This legacy is more important than the daily political bickering.
SO, Let's clarify a point: Turkey did not fought with Egypt. When we look at the active forces on the field, Egypt was not even one of the main aim for TR that wanted to be prevented.
By destroying all lines of attack of a putschist structure in which a coalition mobilized all its means, Turkey's enabled the Libyan internal parties to return to the table of democracy again.
Despite billions of dollars of investment, lna could not enter Tripoli in 2 years. They then had to retreat for 200km-to-500km within 2 weeks.
Then, Wagners and Janjavids occupied Sirte and formed a line of defense. Egypt was a spokerman so that this would not turn into a counter-operation. However, at that time, the talks were already continuing by the Russian and Turkish delegations. Later, after the bilateral talks between the Turkish and Russian delegations, the military operations came to a halt.
A transitional government has now been established. It consists entirely of the names that Turkey wished. Moreover, the government received a vote of confidence from both side parliaments.
Democratic elections will be held across the country at the end of the year. The putschists lost the war. Meanwhile, Haftar's massacring commanders began to die mysteriously, one by one. (which are wanted by the international criminal court)
I think you should ask yourself the following question:
1. What was the situation of Tripoli before Turkey involved in? It was a besieged city that was expected to collapse within weeks.
2. What is the current position of Turkey, in Libya? It is one of the main actors shaping current Libyan politics and future.
So you have to ask the basic questions of reasoning logic. Who started at what point, who won what?
Everything else is populist discussions that entertain the amateurs.
SO, Let's clarify a point: Turkey did not fought with Egypt. When we look at the active forces on the field, Egypt was not even one of the main aim for TR that wanted to be prevented.
By destroying all lines of attack of a putschist structure in which a coalition mobilized all its means, Turkey's enabled the Libyan internal parties to return to the table of democracy again.
Despite billions of dollars of investment, lna could not enter Tripoli in 2 years. They then had to retreat for 200km-to-500km within 2 weeks.
Then, Wagners and Janjavids occupied Sirte and formed a line of defense. Egypt was a spokerman so that this would not turn into a counter-operation. However, at that time, the talks were already continuing by the Russian and Turkish delegations. Later, after the bilateral talks between the Turkish and Russian delegations, the military operations came to a halt.
A transitional government has now been established. It consists entirely of the names that Turkey wished. Moreover, the government received a vote of confidence from both side parliaments.
Democratic elections will be held across the country at the end of the year. The putschists lost the war. Meanwhile, Haftar's massacring commanders began to die mysteriously, one by one. (which are wanted by the international criminal court)
I think you should ask yourself the following question:
1. What was the situation of Tripoli before Turkey involved in? It was a besieged city that was expected to collapse within weeks.
2. What is the current position of Turkey, in Libya? It is one of the main actors shaping current Libyan politics and future.
So you have to ask the basic questions of reasoning logic. Who started at what point, who won what?
Everything else is populist discussions that entertain the amateurs.
Last edited:
