Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
WW2 was very different, straight after the war people were angry, and so they convicted many people fairly quickly, straight away. Others who were convicted of similar crimes and trialed long after the war were let off relatively easy in comparison (Jail sentences), as the allied nations were satisfied with the events of Nuremberg trials.
Bangladesh has been sitting on this for a long time, the anger is gone and a more humane solution should be put forward.
Human rights organizations like Amnesty international, and Human Rights Watch also pointed out that the trail was severely flawed, and that insufficient evidence was provided among other things. So tell me, how is this justice? How can a death sentence be handed out when a fair trial has not even been conducted?
I am just saying there is precedence for hanging old people accused of war crimes internationally (well past 70 or even 80 years of age)
Eichmann wasn't exactly a spring chicken when he was hanged either.
No the anger is not gone. Is there more jubilation or sorrow about these hangings in general BD public? Its mostly the former.
Last edited: