Donald Trump slams Pakistan for lies and deceit

[Mugwop]

and same guy who wants to bang his own daughter, grab women by genitals , and supporter a Sexual abuser/Child Abuser like Roy Moore , Supports a Racist like Steve Banon , KKK and other White Supermists groups , and he is also the same guy who re-posted a non-verified Video posted by a British right wing racist and Islamophobe women .. that guy is a embarrassment for Americans.

Embarrassment for Americans but a Hero for indians

 

[Sankpal]

Happy new year will be when we cower to American demands. So far we have shown the middle finger so yeah a happy new year to the Americans as well LOL

Yes, I can see that
Hafiz Saeed’s JuD, banned outfits barred from collecting donations
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1598216/1-hafiz-saeeds-jud-others-barred-collecting-donations/

 

[LeGenD]

We can say that for quite a few countries: GB, India, Russia, China, France, etc "Without XXX the world would look different today."

Bro,

Some historians argued that Hitler lost WW-2 in Stalingrad but this is pure nonsense. Neither Russians and nor Europeans were achieving a breakthrough against Wehrmacht during the course of WW-2. But situation completely changed when US came into the picture.

US could project power into the heart of Germany itself via USAF; allied bombers began to bomb the shit out of German industries and cities in 1943 and on-wards. Objective was to disrupt the flow of supplies to Wehrmacht across the battlefield and these delays would force Wehrmacht to give ground to opponents consequently. On top, US-led armies opened two fronts against Wehrmacht in Italy (1943) and France (1944), and Wehrmacht began to fall apart.

Much of Europe and USSR could not stop Wehrmacht in several years but it collapsed in just 1 year after D-Day? Ponder. Some historians tend to be very selective in their observations; they look at setbacks in some battles and assume - OK, this was the game-changer. Bullshit.

Stalingrad was a symbolic victory for USSR and an insignificant at that; Soviets delivered a major blow to the Wehrmacht in the battle of Kursk actually. However, I tell you that Gregory Zhukov is overrated per Russian sources.

FYI: http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/battle-of-kursk

Battle of Kursk took place in 1943. Did you notice that US-led armies opened a front against Wehrmacht in Italy in the same year? Objective was to divert attention of Wehrmacht back to Europe and prevent its breakthrough in the battle of Kursk. Conversely, Allied bombing runs made sure that Wehrmacht would not be able to replenish its forces in the Eastern Front.

Reality is much different than selective projections of some Historians.

Wehrmacht was a vastly superior force than the Red army at the time. However, Soviets not only benefited from Allied Lend Lease program but also from US-led interventions in the WEST. Soviet efforts are commendable in their own right but let us not bury our head in the sand while praising them.

 

[Dalit]

Yes, I can see that
Hafiz Saeed’s JuD, banned outfits barred from collecting donations
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1598216/1-hafiz-saeeds-jud-others-barred-collecting-donations/

LOL stop copying and pasting news before Trump's tweet stupid Indian.

As for the news, this hardly fulfills US demands to do more in regards to Afghanistan. Stupid fvcker.

 

[Devil Soul]

Pakistan decides to review ties with Washington
By Aamir Khan
Published: January 2, 2018
24SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL

Only response to any ‘do more’ demands will be ‘no more’. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI: Pakistan has decided to review its relations with the United States and adopt a tough stance, in the wake of President Donald Trump’s recent statement, it is learnt.

Pakistan will highlight its sacrifices in the war against terrorism at the diplomatic front; and if the US reduces or suspends aid to Pakistan or places any sanctions, the country will completely revise its relations policy with the superpower, according to sources.

Pakistan, said the sources, would not accept any demands to do more, and could stop all kinds of cooperation with the US. The only response to any ‘do more’ demands will be ‘no more’. The future policy with the US would be limited to ‘cooperation for cooperation’ and relations based on equality. “This policy will be adopted gradually,” they added.













It is learnt that the foreign minister and other officials will contact friendly countries, including China, to take them into confidence. The high-ups are reviewing the recent statement by President Trump and the future relations with the US “which are turning from strained to tense”.

Pakistan summons US ambassador over Trump tweet, registers protest

It is decided that Pakistan will make its decisions keeping in view its national security, and the US defence secretary had been told during his visit to Islamabad that Pakistan would not accept any dictation from the US against its national security.

He was also told that Pakistan was playing a role of frontline state in the war against terror. “There any no safe havens for terrorists in Pakistan, nor is Pakistan supporting any terrorist group directly or indirectly; and if US has any proof, it should hand it over to Pakistan.”

The sources based in Islamabad said that the US had failed to provide any proof and was blaming Pakistan just to cover up its failures in Afghanistan. “The Trump administration is pressuring Pakistan, but Pakistan will not accept any pressure and face the situation.”

Delicate Pakistan-US relations

Pakistan, according to the sources, has also decided to reduce dependency on the US in different fields and look for alternatives. It will also speed up the process of implementing its strategy for increasing diplomatic, trade and other relations with China, Russia and other countries.

The sources said that the Trump administration was under pressure after the resolution in the United Nations General Assembly.

Pakistan had supported the resolution calling on the US to withdraw its recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Since then, the Trump administration has intensified pressure on Pakistan and is busy in levelling allegations which are meeting failure at the diplomatic level as well. Not a single important country is supporting the US stance. The US fears that if it moves any resolution against Pakistan in the UNGA, China or Russia may veto it.

According to the sources, since the US understands the importance of Pakistan; the Trump administration will think several times before taking any action against Pakistan. “Any anti-Pakistan step may deprive the superpower of valuable cooperation.”

They said that the federal government had also decided to take parliament into confidence on the current situation of the Pak-US relations, and the federal government would devise its future strategy on relations with the US in consultation with the military leadership.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Bro,

Some historians argued that Hitler lost WW-2 in Stalingrad but this is pure nonsense. Neither Russians and nor Europeans were achieving a breakthrough against Wehrmacht during the course of WW-2. But situation completely changed when US came into the picture.

US could project power into the heart of Germany itself via USAF; allied bombers began to bomb the shit out of German industries and cities in 1943 and on-wards. Objective was to disrupt the flow of supplies to Wehrmacht across the battlefield and these delays would force Wehrmacht to give ground to opponents consequently. On top, US-led armies opened two fronts against Wehrmacht in Italy (1943) and France (1944), and Wehrmacht began to fall apart.

Much of Europe and USSR could not stop Wehrmacht in several years but it collapsed in just 1 year after D-Day? Ponder. Some historians tend to be very selective in their observations; they look at setbacks in some battles and assume - OK, this was the game-changer. Bullshit.

Stalingrad was a symbolic victory for USSR and an insignificant at that; Soviets delivered a major blow to the Wehrmacht in the battle of Kursk actually. However, I tell you that Gregory Zhukov is overrated per Russian sources.

FYI: http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/battle-of-kursk

Battle of Kursk took place in 1943. Did you notice that US-led armies opened a front against Wehrmacht in Italy in the same year? Objective was to divert attention of Wehrmacht back to Europe and prevent its breakthrough in the battle of Kursk. Conversely, Allied bombing runs made sure that Wehrmacht would not be able to replenish its forces in the Eastern Front.

Reality is much different than selective projections of some Historians.

Wehrmacht was a vastly superior force than the Red army at the time. However, Soviets not only benefited from Allied Lend Lease program but also from US-led interventions in the WEST. Soviet efforts are commendable in their own right but let us not bury our head in the sand while praising them.

World war was fought with American weapons, Russian hands, and British Intelligence.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Bro,

Some historians argued that Hitler lost WW-2 in Stalingrad but this is pure nonsense. Neither Russians and nor Europeans were achieving a breakthrough against Wehrmacht during the course of WW-2. But situation completely changed when US came into the picture.

US could project power into the heart of Germany itself via USAF; allied bombers began to bomb the shit out of German industries and cities in 1943 and on-wards. Objective was to disrupt the flow of supplies to Wehrmacht across the battlefield and these delays would force Wehrmacht to give ground to opponents consequently. On top, US-led armies opened two fronts against Wehrmacht in Italy (1943) and France (1944), and Wehrmacht began to fall apart.

Much of Europe and USSR could not stop Wehrmacht in several years but it collapsed in just 1 year after D-Day? Ponder. Some historians tend to be very selective in their observations; they look at setbacks in some battles and assume - OK, this was the game-changer. Bullshit.

Stalingrad was a symbolic victory for USSR and an insignificant at that; Soviets delivered a major blow to the Wehrmacht in the battle of Kursk actually. However, I tell you that Gregory Zhukov is overrated per Russian sources.

FYI: http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/battle-of-kursk

Battle of Kursk took place in 1943. Did you notice that US-led armies opened a front against Wehrmacht in Italy in the same year? Objective was to divert attention of Wehrmacht back to Europe and prevent its breakthrough in the battle of Kursk. Conversely, Allied bombing runs made sure that Wehrmacht would not be able to replenish its forces in the Eastern Front.

Reality is much different than selective projections of some Historians.

Wehrmacht was a vastly superior force than the Red army at the time. However, Soviets not only benefited from Allied Lend Lease program but also from US-led interventions in the WEST. Soviet efforts are commendable in their own right but let us not bury our head in the sand while praising them.

Yep, the Kursk operation was aborted after the German victory at Prochorovka
(They were the masters of the battlefield, and could recover many of the ”lost” tanks)
as soon as the allies invaded Sicily.

 

[Maxpane]

just take a right stance we are with the govt

 

[egodoc222]

another knee jerk reaction?! when will pakistani diplomats learn to be proactive rather than reactive?

 

[SunilM]

and if the US reduces or suspends aid to Pakistan or places any sanctions, the country will completely revise its relations policy with the superpower, according to sources.

Shows you still want their AID even after how they treat you. Btw, They have already taken that decision.

Trump administration to continue to withhold military aid to Pakistan

http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/01/politics/white-house-pakistan-military-aid-cuts/index.html

Take my word for it, you will continue seeking Aid from them, especially due to the balance of payment crisis you are facing.

 

[Champs Trophy 2017]

We are with the Govt. Enough is enough put an end to it.
Pakistan Zindabad

 

[batmannow]

Taliban is just a boogeyman today.

ISIS-K is the real monster there.

Brustin ur bubble bro ! Do you ever think how come these ISIS dogs came to afghanistan ?
Specially airdropped ?
Oh cause dady sam wants to fight pakistan , & wants a equalizer to pro/pak Talibans ?
Opps !

Trump just said, Happy new year to pakistan.

Sure , & we said wellcome to indian troops in.afghanistan ?
Lets see how bigger balls you got ?lolzzx

 

[LeGenD]

World war was fought with American weapons, Russian hands, and British Intelligence.

My friend,

Yes, all of them played a role but I don't think that these kind of one-liners are accurate.

 

[IceCold]

Take my word for it, you will continue seeking Aid from them, especially due to the balance of payment crisis you are facing.

Believe me every Indian here wants every Pakistani to take their word for it but in the real world no body is bothered about what an Indian has to say specially about matters related to Pakistan.

 

[SunilM]

Believe me every Indian here wants every Pakistani to take their word for it but in the real world no body is bothered about what an Indian has to say specially about matters related to Pakistan.

Then why did you reply? Einstein we are clearly not!