I agree, an off-putting comment .. but was it directed towards you personally like you did with your response ? .. that too all the while talking about how there must be more to the story, how she must have a mental disorder to have thoughts of chopping up his legs and following through ... and lemme just say this is not the first time I've seen you talking about chopping men's privates so ..
Lastly there is a HUGE difference between a feminist and a femanazi .. a feminist can be the likes of Christina Hoff Sommers or Camille Paglia .. women, who stay neutral to both genders while making arguments .. Femanazis on the other hand are the likes of Andrea Dworkin who say that "men especially love murder" ..
Okay you say that we shouldn't give benefit of the doubt to women, yet you immediately follow it up by "indeed there must be something else to this story" ... how many times have we heard that for men who commit heinous crimes against women ... ?? Not alot ... it usually goes like ... he committed such a crime!! ... condemn him and make an example out of him ... that is the reaction an accused man gets where we don't know anything at all ...
Indeed men are waking up. However whats in fact really amusing is how the same principle of equality can be used to pretty much bust the implicit bias that third wave feminists have of women and equality ... that they are nothing but goodie two shoes and even in cases of them committing heinous crimes, there must be "more to the story" .. implying they might be the victims .. even though they clearly are the perpetrators ..
Point this out and you have the equality seeking feminists running away from the concept of equality faster then the flash ...
...