This woman is good at producing BS mixed with facts..and extremely good at using her over-confident tone to sell it.
In all that talk of hers regardless she claimed there was no F-16 shot ,regardless she called the videos fake she comfortably pronounced Pakistan was hiding a terrorist camp in the end. This sort of speech would make illiterates in our country believe her on everything including that last part. And notice also how she declared the DoD reporter for the count as naive..and that DoD didnt pass any comment over it declaring thee report meaningless to draw any conclusion.
She perhaps doesnt know, how much time it takes to circumvent around all the bases hosting F-16 in Pakistan but she still challenged it..Because she doesnt have the empirical data she just challenged it..Well we are not going to give her the data nor we need to believe her.
She has faced a lot of sexism in India, probably some street gropers as well, she gets filled with rage upon anything sounding authoritative like how she reacted to that jerk sikh guy from the audience, though he was right that there is little punjabi spoken around that Naushehra area , he just lost his say because of his authoritative question.
She was in India at the invitation of the organizers, all expenses paid and at least a five-figure check in her purse hence she had to give some lip service to her hosts whose main purpose for inviting her must have been her anti-Pakistan stance. However, one has to admire her for being so candid in her observation and narrative. Few of here points certainly need to be mentioned again.
1: The Indian claim of their Spice missile effects were certainly laid bare, while Indians claimed that these missiles imploded inside the buildings thus no destruction was visible outside, Lol
As Christine Fair pointed out that such effects can only happen when a strengthen structure is attacked like Pentagon or a reinforced concrete bunker. The buildings in Balakot are nothing more than sheds with brick or wooden walls and a tin roof. Even if you drop a bag of cement from 100 feet on those buildings, they will most likely collapse let alone withstanding an explosion. Another point i made on these pages was, did the Indians use eco-friendly bombs, even if one is to believe the Indian version, if those bombs exploded, they should have caused fires but not a trickle of smoke was seen rising out of the complex. If nothing, the Red Indians can advise the Black Indians, how the smoke from even a small campfire is visible from miles around.....something not seen in Balakot.
2: She settled the argument on the IAF claims of shooting down an F-16 as nothing more than a ploy to de-escalate the situation. Basically the Indians were lying and fooling their public that what if PAF shot down an IAF MiG-21, the IAF has done better by shooting down an F-16.
She also reminded the Indians that the upgraded Bison was technically superior than F-16 and if the Indians really think that their MiG-21 can take care of F-16 than what's the need for something like Rafale....since you also have much more capable SU-30s, Mirage-2000s and MiG-29s........it's another thing that the host or the anchor didn't bring up the SU-30 kill.....we all know why. !!!
3: The former IAF Airchief, B S Dhanoa, has lost any credibility if he ever had any left.
To lend weight to his argument, he went searching back to 1965, 1971 and Kargil.....yet while standing before an audience in 2019, he was lying through his teeth on events which happened a few months earlier. While on one side he was claiming the F-16 kill, in the same breath he was cursing those who delayed the Rafale procurement, suggesting what could have been the results if Abhinandan was flying the Rafale on 27th Feb.
Alas, Mr Danoa, you have again shot yourself in the foot through this indirect admission, that PAF whacked the IAF on that day and your MKIs and Mirages couldn't do jack all.
