What's new

Destroy Pakistan: The manual courtesy all of India

Status
Not open for further replies.
Take this professor into custody and dont give him food for a week....let this guy know what hunger feels like....your life slowly shutting down before your very eyes while you helplessly cringe in pain.....thats what he wants for millions of people on the other side of the border....i bet this guys never knows how cruel hunger is thats why he could write such a disgusting article.He should be ashamed to call himself as a human .
 
. .
Whoever says Taliban are our real enemy are crazy.

Pakistan's only real enemy is India (Hindustan Bharat....whatever you want to call it) that neighboring country of ours with over 1 billion people, more than 800 million Hindus are our real enemy.
can't expect much from you.
 
.
Prof R Vaidyanathan

This "professor" is really crazy. How could it possibly stop terrorism to destabilize Pakistan? It's insane. Unstable, "failed states" are the best environments for terrorists. They want a lawless area to dominate and control. It is amazing that he is not embarrassed in front of his academic colleagues to propose such a preposterous theory. It is so crazy that it must be ISI "disinformation". :azn:

I think the idea that he is trying to propagate revolves around an economically weak Pakistan and not a destabilized Pakistan.

Right now,I am unsure about which side to take,I am sceptical.

It is indeed true,that the terrorist attacks in Kashmir and elsewhere in India,the fake currency issues,all have gone down by great margin in India since the start of WoT by US-led forces in regions.There is now peace in the valley.I am glad that I dont find the news about grenade attack in Srinagar anymore.Now that is directly related to the shifting of focus and less funds,with ever increasing international pressure of course.

On the other other hand,it is just so wrong to punish the people of an entire nation for the wrong-doings of a handful.It is unethical and inhuman.

But then,when it comes to choosing,I will choose my home to be safe first,those who think I am being mean can respectfully go to hell.

There is a big problem down somewhere with the Pakistani leadership.Sometimes it becomes difficult to understand who is the puppet and who is the real power behind the throne.There has been so many ups and downs,military coups,not to mention massive level of influence of external powers in Pakistan,who otherwise have no business there,that each and every government in Pakistan have done nothing but add to the loss of credibility as a stable nation in International platform.
Add to that,the issue of "State sponsored terrorism",something present in theory from long time back and implemented in large scale by Zia-ul-Haq,and thats a big reasons for India to be upset with Pakistan.Common people like us,of course want peace with a neighbouring country.There is just one big question.Can we believe the leader from Pakistan who is sitting down to talk?? Let us even assume that he is truthful in hi endeavors,whats the guarantee that he will remain in power in Pakistan or his way of thinking will be carried forward by his successors ??It is just a classic case of mistrust.
We have examples of that as well.The Indian PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee was at Lahore for peace talks with the Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif.The talks go all positive,and when thew Indian PM comes back to India,he is presented with the Kargil insurgency.Now if this be the track record,then I am quite sure there will be very few people in their right mind to trust Pakistani leadership.
 
.
Take this professor into custody and dont give him food for a week....let this guy know what hunger feels like....your life slowly shutting down before your very eyes while you helplessly cringe in pain.....thats what he wants for millions of people on the other side of the border....i bet this guys never knows how cruel hunger is thats why he could write such a disgusting article.He should be ashamed to call himself as a human .

he is infact polluting minds of coming economists it would have been far better if he had some innovative ideas to overcome hunger in the region and stabilize it economically
 
.
the other day Rahul Gandhi just said,"ashamed of being Indian", here's the reason.
 
.
Twelve steps to shock-and-awe Pakistan’s economy
Prof R Vaidyanathan
Tuesday, December 09, 2008


Economic destabilisation of the Terror Central is imperative for rooting out terror.

I did not anticipate the huge response my inbox received for the article last week (December 2) slamming Pakistan. Many of those who wrote in have sought concrete steps to tackle the Terror Central. The terror attack on world citizens at Mumbai has created revulsion and outrage all over the world. It is imperative that India seize the opportunity provided to destabilise Pakistan.

A stable Pakistan is not in the interest of world peace, leave alone India. Army controls the country and owns its economy. A significant portion of its GDP is due to army-controlled entities (See Military Inc Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy by Ayesha Siddiqa; OUP; 2007). One can easily say that Pakistan Economy and its Army/ISI are synonymous.

Unless this elementary fact is internalised, we are not going anywhere. This implies we should stop talking of a stable Pakistan since a stable Pakistan means multiple attacks on many more cities of India by that rogue organisation ISI, which is the core of the Pakistan Army and the heart of Pakistan’s economy.

Let us not even assume that Zardari is in control. Poor man - he did not trust his own investigators to probe his wife’s assassination - he wanted Scotland Yard to do the job. Now he blabbers that if his investigators are satisfied, then he will initiate action against terrorists sitting inside Pakistan. Periodically, the Pakistan Army likes to present some useful idiots (as Lenin would have called them) as elected representatives and we swoon over such events.

India should take the following steps to destabilise the economy of Pakistan:
n Identify the major export items of Pakistan (like Basmati rice, carpets etc) and provide zero export tax or even subsidise them for export from India. Hurt Pakistan on the export front.


Identify the major countries providing arms to Pakistan and arm twist them. Tell Brazil and Germany (currently planning to supply massive defense items to Pakistan) that it will impact their ability to invest in India. Tell Germany that retail license to Metro will be off and other existing projects will be in jeopardy.

Incidentally, after the arrival of Coke and Pepsi in China, the human rights violations of China are not talked about much by US government organs. Think it is a coincidence? Unless we use our markets to arm-twist arms exporters to Pakistan, we will not achieve our objectives.

Tell American companies that for every 5% increase in FDI limit for them, their government needs to reduce equipping Pakistan by $5 billion. That is real politics, not whining. Let us remember that funds are in desperate search of emerging markets and not the other way about. Let us also remember that international economics is politics by another name.

Create assets to print/distribute their currency widely inside their country. To some extent, Telgi types can be used to outsource this activity. Or just drop their notes in remote areas.

Pressurise IMF to add additional conditionality to the loans given to them or at least do not vote for their loans.

Create assets within Pakistan to destabilise Karachi Stock market - it is already in shambles.

Cricket and Bollywood are the opium of the Indian middle classes. Both have been adequately manipulated/ controlled by the D-company since the eighties. Chase the D-company money in cricket/ Bollywood and punish by burning D-assets in India instead of trying to have them auctioned by the IT department when nobody comes to bid for it.
n Provide for capital punishment to those who fund terror and help in that. We have the division in the finance ministry to monitor money laundering, etc. It is important that terror financing is taken seriously and fully integrated into money laundering monitoring systems and this division is provided with much larger budget and human resources. And it should coordinate with RAW.

Encourage and allow scientists/ academicians/ elites of Pakistan to opt for Indian passport and widely publicise that fact since it will hurt their self-respect and dignity. There will be a long queue to get Indian passports — many will jump to get our passport — since they will not be stopped at international airports. It is rumoured that Adnan Sami wants one. Do not give passports to all — make it a prized possession. Let it hurt the army and ISI controlled country. This one step will destroy their identity and self-confidence.

Discourage companies from India from investing in Pakistan, particularly IT companies, till Pakistan stops exporting its own IT (international terrorism).

In all these, it is important that we do not bring in the domestic religious issues. The target is the terror central, namely Pakistan, and if there are elements helping them here then they also should be punished-irrespective of religious labels. If Pakistan is dismantled and the idea of Pakistan is gone, many of our domestic issues will also be sorted out.

Will the Indian elite go for the jugular or just light more candles and scream at the formless/ nameless political class before TV cameras? It is going to be a long haul and may be in a decade or so, we can find a solution to our existential crisis of being attacked by barbarians from the West. We need to combine strategy and patience and completely throw to the dustbin the ‘Gujral Doctrine’ by that mumbling Prime Minister about treating younger brothers with equanimity.

The doctrine essentially suggests that if we are slapped on both the cheeks we should feel bad that we do not have a third cheek to show. He, according to security experts, seems to have dismantled our human intelligent assets inside Pakistan, which has resulted in the gory death of thousands of Indian citizens in the last few years. Such is our strategic thinking in this complex world since our political class is not adequately briefed and the elite don’t think through issues. Better to be simple in our talks and vicious in our actions rather than the other way.

Hopefully, this November attack will create a new vibrant India capable of taking care of its own interests.

The writer is professor of finance and control, Indian Institute of Management - Bangalore,

QUOTE:
I feel helpless at the moment to comment on above theory especially when it is deliverd by not any ordinary, but by an honorable professor....:eek:, just thinking that such professors may the causes to boggle the minds and blowing the fires of hatterd by sowing the seed of negative approaches, in the minds of new generation...!!!:woot:
I am really surprised that he havnt think even for a while, for the aspects of the 'back fire' of such theories which may create big crunch for your own country, Big country - Big Problem !!!:azn::coffee:

Anyway, he must know "dreams never comes true" :smokin:

where did u find such a funny article? the author clearly has no idea how the world economy works.
 
.
he is infact polluting minds of coming economists it would have been far better if he had some innovative ideas to overcome hunger in the region and stabilize it economically
I just read one of the best debates (indian vs pakistani) from true pakis, Rafi, Arslanus, Vivek(indian), Vikas and Zain:

Pages onwards:

Courtesy Pakdef Forum:

Strategic Defence Review & the Emerging Threats

:pakistan::pakistan:
 
.
This article is some mentally sick bastard and we debate on it. Chuck this thread dudes. No one in India with good mental healthwhich is a majority) wishes to see hunger, starvation and misery accros the boder. After all we were brothers once who fought Brits together (arm in arm).
 
.
This article is some mentally sick bastard and we debate on it. Chuck this thread dudes. No one in India with good mental healthwhich is a majority) wishes to see hunger, starvation and misery accros the boder. After all we were brothers once who fought Brits together (arm in arm).

We fought the brits for Independence .. others fought for liberations from concept of secular democratic Nation.. big Difference... Please don't mix the two
 
.
article is 2008, we have had almost 3 years to decide what he said has actually happened?

I say to a certain extent, but mostly no.
 
.
We fought the brits for Independence .. others fought for liberations from concept of secular democratic Nation.. big Difference... Please don't mix the two

That not what they had in mind when the strugle for independance started. we were united in common cause, but they lost the essence when they found INC won the assembly with huge majority and JINHA thought his community will be left aside in politics and hence the move for partition which has not favoured their country since its birth. If JINHA had nothing in his mind we would have still been a single secular democratic country.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom