Desi G3OM Makes BrahMos Smarter

[acetophenol]

Has India developed Anti GPS jammers? If so that makes sense what he is saying, if not than he is not making any sense
.

BrahMos,like its contemporaries has multiple ways of guidance,so what he said does make sense,right?Even if the seeker fails,it can use an alternate mode of guidance to reach the target.

Nasr Missile test video. hitting pole with bulls eye.

Where's the video bro?
By the way here's BrahMos in different forms:

I'm saying, the supposition that a missile can be solely relied upon sat navigation is misleading.

If I am not wrong,no one ever made the supposition that a missile can be solely relied on sat navigation in the first place.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Can you support what you said with sources or vid.

Sure, except that Nasr doesn't hit within 3.1 meters of the target, but it's the target which
is painted within 3.1 meters of Nasr hit location and then fed to all the great drone-stricken
peoples to provide with mental masturbation material for a few months.

But then again, BrahMos has like 300 km range while Nasr is just 60km.



.

You are wrong Naswar is 0 mtrs. Dont underestimate.

thank to @farhan_9909, the great and unsinkable.

 

[Bratva]

BrahMos,like its contemporaries has multiple ways of guidance,so what he said does make sense,right?Even if the seeker fails,it can use an alternate mode of guidance to reach the target.



Where's the video bro?
By the way here's BrahMos in different forms:

If I am not wrong,no one ever made the supposition that a missile can be solely relied on sat navigation in the first place.

Pakistani missile hitting target 0:16-0:20

 

[Gessler]

Additionally, the good thing about G3OM is, due to it's small size & weighing only few grams, it can be easily
equipped with a wide variety of weapons & support systems, ranging from artillery shells to small dumb bombs
to make them 'smart'.

thank to @farhan_9909, the great and unsinkable.

Not that impressive over a distance of 60km, is it? And Nasr is no cruise missile, even dumb artillery shells can
fall within few meters of target over distance of 40-50km. Tell Nasr to fly through a target horizontally within few meters like
BrahMos, tell Nasr to reach Mach 3 and then do a supersonic steep dive into valleys between mountains like BrahMos,
tell Nasr to see targets with SAR seeker and selectively attack set of targets like BrahMos, tell Nasr to so S-curve maneuver
and evade ship defences like BrahMos, until then it's just a dumb missile.

Impressive means hitting within 10-25 meters from 5,000km range, reaching speeds of Mach 24 outside
atmosphere i.e. Agni-5.

 

[hkdas]

Additionally, the good thing about G3OM is, due to it's small size & weighing only few grams, it can be easily
equipped with a wide variety of weapons & support systems, ranging from artillery shells to small dumb bombs
to make them 'smart'.


Not that impressive over a distance of 60km, is it? And Nasr is no cruise missile, even dumb artillery shells can
fall within few meters of target over distance of 40-50km. Tell Nasr to fly through a target horizontally within few meters like
BrahMos, tell Nasr to reach Mach 3 and then do a supersonic steep dive into valleys between mountains like BrahMos,
tell Nasr to see targets with SAR seeker and selectively attack set of targets like BrahMos, tell Nasr to so S-curve maneuver
and evade ship defences like BrahMos, until then it's just a dumb missile.

Impressive means hitting within 10-25 meters from 5,000km range, reaching speeds of Mach 24 outside
atmosphere i.e. Agni-5.

bro,
accuracy of agni 5 is less than 10 m

 

[Gessler]

bro,
accuracy of agni 5 is less than 10 m

It hit within 10 meters in one test, but the CEP is said to be 25 meters. Which means it could hit anywhere
within 25 meters, it may even hit directly on the target, but the CEP still remains 25 meters.

 

[hkdas]

It hit within 10 meters in one test, but the CEP is said to be 25 meters. Which means it could hit anywhere
within 25 meters, it may even hit directly on the target, but the CEP still remains 25 meters.

any way it doesn't matter if it is 10 or 25 meters when the warhead is nuclear

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Additionally, the good thing about G3OM is, due to it's small size & weighing only few grams, it can be easily
equipped with a wide variety of weapons & support systems, ranging from artillery shells to small dumb bombs
to make them 'smart'.


Not that impressive over a distance of 60km, is it? And Nasr is no cruise missile, even dumb artillery shells can
fall within few meters of target over distance of 40-50km. Tell Nasr to fly through a target horizontally within few meters like
BrahMos, tell Nasr to reach Mach 3 and then do a supersonic steep dive into valleys between mountains like BrahMos,
tell Nasr to see targets with SAR seeker and selectively attack set of targets like BrahMos, tell Nasr to so S-curve maneuver
and evade ship defences like BrahMos, until then it's just a dumb missile.

Impressive means hitting within 10-25 meters from 5,000km range, reaching speeds of Mach 24 outside
atmosphere i.e. Agni-5.

well as by this video being fired in its SALVO MOD with precision of less then 3.1 atleast, for just a quasi ballistic missile is marvelous. Its still better then less then 5 meters of BrahMos. Now comparing this with Babur LACM whose precision details are kept highly secret by army, we can just imagine how accurate it would be. And also Nasr is also guided missile maybe not at the high mark of a cruise missile but for just a quasi ballistic tactical missile its awesome. This exact video shows it hitting within 0.16-0.20 meters. My careful estimate is atleast less then 3.1 meters but thats just mine not official.

BTW Nasr is also supersonic in its terminal flight.

 

[Gessler]

well as by this video being fired in its SALVO MOD with precision of less then 3.1 atleast, for just a quasi ballistic missile is marvelous. Its still better then less then 5 meters of BrahMos. Now comparing this with Babur LACM whose precision details are kept highly secret by army, we can just imagine how accurate it would be. And also Nasr is also guided missile maybe not at the high mark of a cruise missile but for just a quasi ballistic tactical missile its awesome. This exact video shows it hitting within 0.16-0.20 meters. My careful estimate is atleast less then 3.1 meters but thats just mine not official.

BTW Nasr is also supersonic in its terminal flight.

We have quasi-ballistic missiles going out to 750 km at cruise speeds of Mach 7.5

Heard about Shaurya? The fact that we got a 5,000-km range missile like Agni-5 achieving 25 meters CEP
shows how accurate this stuff is. As I said, even an artillery shell can hit within few meters of target at 40-50km. Nothing special about Nasr.

BTW, even if Nasr hit within 3.1 meters, what's the guarantee that the missile's CEP itself
is 3.1 meters? A missile with a CEP of 10 meters can hit anywhere from 9.99 meters to
directly on top of the target! That's completely random and often relies on elements outside
the control of the launcher or the missile.

Nasr hit within 3.1 meters doesn't mean 3.1 meters is the CEP of Nasr! A pity you can't
understand such simple basic knowledge & reasoning. And you got the nerve to write
shit about intelligence level of Indians? Fool's paradise, I say! Fool's paradise!

 

[hkdas]

well as by this video being fired in its SALVO MOD with precision of less then 3.1 atleast, for just a quasi ballistic missile is marvelous. Its still better then less then 5 meters of BrahMos. Now comparing this with Babur LACM whose precision details are kept highly secret by army, we can just imagine how accurate it would be. And also Nasr is also guided missile maybe not at the high mark of a cruise missile but for just a quasi ballistic tactical missile its awesome. This exact video shows it hitting within 0.16-0.20 meters. My careful estimate is atleast less then 3.1 meters but thats just mine not official.

BTW Nasr is also supersonic in its terminal flight.

i will consider it as the joke of the day. Babur LACM is a copy of Tomahawk missile...even Tomahawk don't have as much accuracy of bramos.. and now you are saying Babur is more accurate than bramos?? and i know about pakistan's secrets on missile... during 1999 pakistani commanders were afraid to use their highly accurate missile because the missile may fall on their own territory instead of its original target... even your president got surprised when his commanders told him about the accuracy of missiles.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

i will consider it as the joke of the day. Babur LACM is a copy of Tomahawk missile...even Tomahawk don't have as much accuracy of bramos.. and now you are saying Babur is more accurate than bramos?? and i know about pakistan's secrets on missile... during 1999 pakistani commanders were afraid to use their highly accurate missile because the missile may fall on their own territory instead of its original target... even your president got surprised when his commanders told him about the accuracy of missiles.

LOL u wish......... BTW Babur is not an exact copy of Tomahawk we had stared working on the project since 1995! and the tomahawks that fall within pakistan was in 1998!!! and Babur was tested for the first time in 2005 or 2006!!!

Basically u are a moron!

We have quasi-ballistic missiles going out to 750 km at cruise speeds of Mach 7.5

Heard about Shaurya? The fact that we got a 5,000-km range missile like Agni-5 achieving 25 meters CEP
shows how accurate this stuff is. As I said, even an artillery shell can hit within few meters of target at 40-50km. Nothing special about Nasr.

BTW, even if Nasr hit within 3.1 meters, what's the guarantee that the missile's CEP itself
is 3.1 meters? A missile with a CEP of 10 meters can hit anywhere from 9.99 meters to
directly on top of the target! That's completely random and often relies on elements outside
the control of the launcher or the missile.

Nasr hit within 3.1 meters doesn't mean 3.1 meters is the CEP of Nasr! A pity you can't
understand such simple basic knowledge & reasoning. And you got the nerve to write
shit about intelligence level of Indians? Fool's paradise, I say! Fool's paradise!

LOL stupid have u even watched the video or even read my post completely? and yr talking abt whose being a clown here LOL!

3.1 meters for Nasr is my careful estimate NOT official CEP! the video it showed u can see it firing 4 savo missile at a time and all of them giving accuracy of 0.16-0.20!!!!!! This 3.1 meters is my estimate and remember i said its actually less then 3.1 meters!!! which means it can even be less then one on regular basic and safely can be said it has a CEP of less then 1 meter! This less then 3.1 m was my general estimate!!! Understood now duffer!

Now my point was that this Nasr is afterall a short range rather battlefied range Quasi Ballistic Missile of Tactical class who has 4x salvo and with all of them firing at a time it can still maintain accuracy rate of 0.16-0.20 like clearly can be seen in the video! I dont care abt what yr Shuria or Agni (whose real range is 8000km but yr gov was too scared to release its real figures and just maintained with 5000km simply because u were afraid of the west LOL) thingy all i care is that just a quasi missile who is also supersonic can have a CEP of LESS then 3.1 m then what would be the of our dedicate Cruise Missile whose figures are still highly classified. After all this is a Military project!

 

[Indischer]

That knowledge needs to be updated.
The Chinese have been peddling a GPS/GLONASS/Beidou system for a few years now in the low key markets.

They're actually right. No Nation other than India has tested a G3OM system so far. China's seeker is a G2BOM.

 

[HariPrasad]

India has exclusive military level access to GLONASS signals , Chinese have only civilian level access to both GPS and Glonass.....


well if you have information , it able to meet requirement of May/june/july heat condition unto 2/3 Kms instead of 4. Improvement is underway to meet 4 km .

In last test it could lock on to a target 3.2 KM away before launch in very hot condition. In cold condition there is absolutely no problem for a target 4 KM +.

I was replying to post of Hari who was saying seeker is useless when missile can solely be guided with Sat Nav. Only INS based navigation would degrade accuracy significantly

I only said that missile can hit the target without even seeker. It doesn't mean at all that seekers are useless. In fact seeker will be very necessary for moving targets like ships. You can save the seeker if target is fixed and triple redundancy is in place to guide missile accurately to target.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

Which is why they have Beidou, all the access they want. India having military level access has little effect or rather.. who cares ..as far as the Chinese are concerned.

Well India has World Wide Military Level coverage , which Beidou don't have.

How do you think Iranian landed American drone who were using GPS encoded with M-code?

Threat to Satellite Signals Fuels Demand for Anti-Jam Products

Their is Difference between breaking communication Signal and GPS signal. Iranian break communication signals. Once the Signals was broke any drone can brought down using radar n visual connects.

 

[gslv mk3]

Which is why they have Beidou, all the access they want.

And this is why IRNSS is getting ready.