But Russia and China, the two major communist powers at that time, were not povertous in terms of natural resources.
Here is the essence of communism: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.
If I cut ten cords of wood and you cut only five, do you feel that it is right for you to have access to the fruits of my labor? It does not matter the method of access, be it you ask for a share or instructions from God to me to give you a share, do you feel that just because you have less, you should have a right to someone else's labor?
So even if communist countries have less natural resources than other countries, the fact that their governments forced everyone to live only within their physical needs mean that comparing wealth to other countries should be irrelevant. As long as the people is happy that no one has a bigger apartment than he lives in, have only a bicycle, eat only the cheapest cuts of meat once a week, and daily extol the virtues of communism, we should be looking at "Worker's Paradise" everywhere.
Did I just describe North Korea?
it doesn't work that way because you take a very simplistic view of the world just to promote your point.
the theory of communism is about equal opportunities. The fruits of everyone's labour are balanced out over time. And if i have access to enough goods then I am fine.
taking the average joe as an example, one has the right to be employed and be useful to the society, right to education, to better ones self, and access to health care.
I don't see why the above have to be subject to extreme competition, classism and division.
Capitalism, or quite simply the fact that your local super market chain needs to maintain lettuce at a competitive price that makes it throw out millions of tonnes of lettuce every month, enough to feed most starving african nations. Your idea of capitalism dictates that 12 year olds in china should work for a buck to make your Nikes so you only have to pay for them the acceptable $80 per pair or whatever, if they were actually been made in the US you'd probably couldn't afford them. that's how it is you say? well the only problem is that the world is running out of 3rd world countries to do that for you .. so the inevitable point where you won't be able to afford things just like the guy you see on TV in some 3rd world place is nearer than you think.
what is this world economic crisis you think? some guy screwing up some money transfer?
it is actually an expression of hyper capitalism, where money is demanded due where money does not exist.. not in monetary sense, not in material goods not in anything.
I tell you again, if there are only ten of us living in a village, and we all have 1 coin each, we cannot possibly expect to make more than 1 coin per year or if we have plans to be rich, 10 coins a year... and then noone will have any left.
well capitalism assumes you'll be making 10 coins a year ..every year.. .even if those 10 coins DO NOT EXIST! ... hence debt.. hence .. crisis...hence .. capitalism doesn't work.
does communism work ? i don't know, but in theory it isn't as crap as capitalism...