Ali.009
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- -6
Bharati Foreign Minister changes his mind on an hourly basis. He first wanted surgical strikes against Pakistan. It then dicovered that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons prevented Bharat from ever attacking Pakistan. It then wanted the UN to declare Islamabad a rogue state. No such luck, the UN passed an impotent resolution egged on by the Pakistani government to provide a fig leaf to Indian failures. The Bharati establishment then wanted tough world sanctions against Pakistan. The world said no and both Brack Omaba and Vice President Obama supported tripling aid to Pakistan. Bharat then went back to huffing and puffing and strikes against Paksitan. It got a yawn from the world. Then Bharat wanted the criminal extradited. Pakistan and the world informed Bharat “What part of No don’t you understand”. It then pointed the finger at the ISI and the Pakistanis government. Pakistan and the world informed Delhi “Take a hike” and did not pay any attention to Bhraat. The dossier was laughed at by the entire world.
India has a few blind spots. It does not know about the blind spots. There is no one to show her the blind spots. India, a youthful country overrun by youngsters eking out a subsistence living in the mirage of Bollywood is unable to look at itself with any semblance of realism. A star struck destitute and impecunious populace is proud of evanescent and unattainable trophies, venerating educational institutions it can only brag about (never get admitted to), Billionaires it can worship on statistic charts and luxuries that it can dream about.
Inebriated by blindness towards a the goal of superpower status this populace is unable to see the deep cavities within its boundaries. Young xenophobic India votes for those that are hegemonistic and autochthonous. Its leadership impervious of the needs of the penurious is focused on expansionism and destabilizing its neighbors. It behaves like crack-addicts overwhelmed by blind hatred for Buddhists (the real ones who are not Hindu), Dalits, Christians and Muslims–this leadership doesn’t have a clue of what the white world thinks of Indians– unavoidable supplicators at best and disposable computer coolies at worst!
While Sonia Gandhi’s puppet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was playing good cop the septuagenarian Foreign Minister was playing bad cop.
The world is still making fun of Mr. Pranab Mukherjee. Pakistanis are calling him Mr. No (denial) after the fact that he call the Pakistani president adn threatened war and then denied it.
Mukherjee: Pranab’s last name
Mukkar ji: One who does what he says at the drop of the hat
Makkar ji: One who is deceitful
The seduction of the New East India Company overwhelms the senses of those who begin thinking of themselves as a new USA. Has the “East India Company” ever allowed any nation to compete with it and thus eliminate it? The Chinese are smart. Unfettered by the trappings of “democracy” they only allow limited access to the “East India Company”. The Indian nation tipsy by a shrinking $41 Billion call center industry (mislabeled and embellished as the IT industry) does not have the wisdom or the sagacity to see through the game. Too busy cajoling the USA, it has not only forgotten its roots, it is moving towards self-destruction. Like the 18th century India is ready to be pillaged and raped.
This leads us to believe who is in charge in Delhi–is it the hawks of the RSS, or the doves of Communist party?
By escalating a minor terror incident, the Bharatis have equated Bombay to Beirut and Baghdad. All, including President Obama now think of Kashmir as the root cause of the problems in South Asia and all seek a holistic “regional” approach
Either way the world is still trying to figure out what Delhi wants. In this confusion the UK and the US have pretty much ignored the cacophony of voices emanating from the various mouths in Bharat.
NEW DELHI: British Foreign Secretary David Miliband’s visit to India has been a ‘diplomatic disaster’ that weakened India’s stance in the wake of the Mumbai attacks, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) General Secretary Arun Jaitley told reporters on Friday. Jaitley criticised the Indian government for allowing Pakistan, the target of investigation, to become the investigator and conceding to the trial of the culprits by its judiciary that had a history of following the government diktats. Jaitley said the government and the ruling Congress had not been able to realise their biggest diplomatic disaster in letting Miliband completely negate India’s 52- day stance on the Mumbai attacks. Daily Times.
The Pranab Muhkerjee flip flops have confused the world about Bharat’s intentions and destroyed the credibility of the dossier which has in essence been rejected not only by Pakistan but the international community as well.
Saturday, January 17, 2009: It doesn’t happen often that one is forced to write and then re-write an editorial several times in the space of a few hours. But that is precisely what one is being forced to do courtesy Indian External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s penchant for saying one thing one day and then completely another the next, only to revert yet again to what he had said the first time around. On Jan 17, a day after telling an Indian TV channel that the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks could be tried in Pakistan, the Indian foreign minister made a clarification to the media saying that there was ‘no dilution’ of India’s stand that the culprits must be handed over by Pakistan to face ‘Indian justice’.
The clarification also contained within it yet another piece of advice to Islamabad – to undertake a ‘full’ and thorough investigation into the attacks. “We have never given up the demand that perpetrators of the terror acts should be handed over to India. There is no question of that we have given up that demand or we have climbed down,” he said in the clarification.The fact of the matter is that Jan 16’s statement in the TV interview was indeed a rare moment of sanity as far as the ongoing crisis is concerned because it recognised the logic behind Islamabad’s reasoning that any Pakistani involved in the attacks and found in Pakistan must be tried under Pakistani law and by a Pakistani court. The Jan 16 remark was indeed welcome, not least because it seemed to indicate hope that India’s belligerent foreign minister had after all conceded on a most sensitive matter, which was proving to be a major cause of strain between already tense Pakistan-India relations. The international support Islamabad received, most notably from China and the UK, had obviously played a part in bringing about the change in the Indian tone – which regrettably lasted not even for 24 hours. It seems domestic pressures must have forced Shri Mukherjee to revert to his hawkish and war-mongering stance.
So while New Delhi has gone about confusing and obfuscating what is a straightforward matter – that both countries try and get to the bottom of the matter and punish without fear or favour those involved in the attacks according to their respective laws – Islamabad has at least taken one significant step. In a massive operation against the Jamaat-ud-Daawa and the Lashkar-e-Taiba – believed by investigators to be involved in the attacks – 124 of their members have been detained, training camps in Punjab and Azad Kashmir closed and their websites and publications banned. This should help allay criticism that Pakistan has failed to act. In this context, Mukherjee’s remarks that Pakistan should convey decisions to India through diplomatic channels rather than over the media seems to be nothing more than a case of peevish whining. He was responding to the press conference by Pakistan’s adviser on interior, Rehman Malik, who gave details of the action against the groups.
Surely, New Delhi must realise what is most important is that action should be taken rather than the question of how news of this is made public. But this having been said, we must hope Pakistan follows up its action against the LeT and other groups affiliated with it with measures to ensure that the ban is meaningful. Since 2002, we have seen situations in which banned groups have been able to begin operations again either under new names or simply while remaining underground. This process has indeed led to the creation of a bewildering number of splinter groups, in many ways complicating the task of keeping tabs on them or even determining how they are structured.
India is like a millstone on South Asia. It has kept all of South Asia in poverty. Now it is beset with humongous problems–the harvest of sowing seeds of destruction in her neighbors. When the tide rises all boats float up. When the tide sinks all boats go down. India is a dead weight on South Asia. In the process all of South Asia is doomed to another century of penury and poverty.
About 370 BC, Plato wrote: “A democracy is a state in which the poor, gaining the upper hand, kill some and banish others, and then divide the offices among the remaining citizens equally.”
India is behaving a like a pumped up balloon Michelin mascot; pumped by the Americans who need crutches to needle China; pumped up by the British who cannot fight the good war in Afghanistan and expect India to clean up the mess that they have made.
The world is strapped with an unimpressive Indian Prime Minister who delivers written speeches without passion and without any moral convictions. A henpecked Indian Prime Minister has pointed to a “foreign hand” a pointed finger at “Pakistan and or Bangladesh” which itself is a euphemism for Muslims and Islam.
Nehru with all his faults and infatuation with Socialism at least had the ability to make a speech. Indira Gandhi for all her frailties could handle herself and present a positive image of India. Dr. Manmohan Singh makes the imbecilic Pakistani President look like a giant. Pranab Mukherjee makes the low IQ Gilani look like Einstein. What is wrong with a “democracy” that cannot produce leaders?