What's new

Delhi varsity considers removing Allama Iqbal from syllabus

That is a very intelligent point, but the counter to that lies within your knowledge of Indian politics, beyond a doubt.

If you care to consider, it has always been that the BJP has acted as a political grouping of RSS people, the RSS considering the thrust and cut of electoral politics to be an undignified occupation not appropriate for cultured and educated people who prided themselves on their standing aloof from positions where corruption was a constant temptation. If you stop to consider the BJP leadership, you are indeed right to consider the eclectic leadership that they have received. If you turn to the RSS, however, the picture is radically different. And therein lies the key to your puzzle.

There was, in fact, India from 1858 onwards, constituted as a state. Please don't waste everybody's time flaunting your ignorance. Go and read up first.


That was the Dominion of Pakistan, and it was born on the 15th of August, 1947, the date granted by the legislation governing the act in the British Parliament, irrespective of the date on which it was celebrated.


He was born Indian, in 1877, and died Indian, in 1938.

You are a quintessential delusional pathological lying Indian.

Next what? Jinnah was an Indian & Mughals were Indian?

Pakistan was formed the day you Hindus created Hindi.

1685901592710.png
 
. . . .
Stupid, bigoted, ethnically hostile thing to say.

You Hindus should look into the mirror.

Urdu existed much before Hindi.

You bigoted Hindus could not accept Urdu and created a fake language called Hindi by borrowing words from Sanskrit.

South Asian Muslims are descendants of Arabs, Turks and Persians.

We have nothing to do with your nonsensical languages like Sanskrit and Hindi.

Allama Iqbal wrote all his literature and poems in Persian and Udru ONLY and you have the gal to appropriate him as an Indian.​


Take your nonsence somewhere else where the sun does not shine.
 
.
You Hindus should look into the mirror.

Urdu existed much before Hindi.

You bigoted Hindus could not accept Urdu and created a fake language called Hindi by borrowing words from Sanskrit.

South Asian Muslims are descendants of Arabs, Turks and Persians.

We have nothing to do with your nonsensical languages like Sanskrit and Hindi.

Allama Iqbal wrote all his literature and poems in Persian and Udru ONLY and you have the gal to appropriate him as an Indian.​


Take your nonsence somewhere else where the sun does not shine.
Yeah, right.

Even the grammar of Urdu follows Indo-Aryan grammatical principles. Genetically, there is little connection between South Asian Muslims and any of the external immigrants you have mentioned, and what there is, is divided into classes. The differences between different classes of Muslims - the equivalent of a caste system - has been recorded widely.

Where do they dig out ignorant specimens like you?

If you submit your DNA sample for analysis, you may get a rude shock.
 
Last edited:
.
They can remove Allama Iqbal from the syllabus.

Why should the world care. Their country, their choice. lol.
 
.
Yeah, right.

Even the grammar of Urdu follows Indo-Aryan grammatical principles. Genetically, there is little connection between South Asian Muslims and any of the external immigrants you have mentioned, and what there is, is divided into classes. The differences between different classes of Muslims - the equivalent of a caste system - has been recorded widely.

Where do they dig out ignorant specimens like you?

If you submit your DNA sample for analysis, you may get a rude shock.

Some Muslims may have Hindu DNA because your Hindu women could not resist the manliness of the Muslim males. That does not mean South Asian Muslims have the same DNA as the Hindus.

1685911494315.png
 
.
Yeah, right.

Even the grammar of Urdu follows Indo-Aryan grammatical principles. Genetically, there is little connection between South Asian Muslims and any of the external immigrants you have mentioned, and what there is, is divided into classes. The differences between different classes of Muslims - the equivalent of a caste system - has been recorded widely.

Where do they dig out ignorant specimens like you?

If you submit your DNA sample for analysis, you may get a rude shock.

Exact same convo you have had with "Halfmoon" and his other spam accounts .... because its the exact same twit.
 
.
They can remove Allama Iqbal from the syllabus.

Why should the world care. Their country, their choice. lol.
This whole issue is blown out of proportion.

There is a legitimate reason to drop Iqbal's political position from the political science syllabus, and there is also a built-in objection.

The legitimate reason is that Iqbal's political thinking is specific to the Two Nation Theory, and to the creation of a Pakistan. Nothing wrong with that, but once independence came, and Pakistan was created, that thinking, used to justify a separate state for Muslims, became irrelevant for study in India.

Apparently.

That justification is itself the embedded objection.

If we are to understand the distinct nature of the political philosophy that constituted India, there is an urgent need to understand what it was NOT. That brings us back to Iqbal. To understand the politics of newly constituted India, it is necessary to understand what was opposed to it, and the outstanding features of such an opposed system.

By removing the political philosophy of Iqbal, the examination board has missed an opportunity for students to compare the two ideologies and learn the differences.

Exact same convo you have had with "Halfmoon" and his other spam accounts .... because its the exact same twit.
That's why the stupidity sounds so familiar.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom