Bukhari.syed
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Respect to the sisters in arms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
Tell that to the USAF, RAF , RAAF and every other modern society... and now the PAF.I don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
Shut up, fool.
Tell that to the USAF, RAF , RAAF and every other modern society... and now the PAF.
Sadly some nations are still stuck in that archaic thought process from medieval ages so therefore have excuses on women's inability.
k, dont keep them in the Indian forces then k?I don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
I don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
Tell that to the USAF, RAF , RAAF and every other modern society... and now the PAF.
Sadly some nations are still stuck in that archaic thought process from medieval ages so therefore have excuses on women's inability.
...you may not remember...but when I joined this forum...you gave me a lot of information on US and UK school, where I am trying to get in...hence I would not use the same language...I ask you to ignore me and not quote me again.
This is not equality...it is in the name of equality bringing down the standards of the whole combat effectiveness. You took the example of USAF, RAF , RAAF....in spite of allowing the women two years ago..there are no women in US marine or seals ...and there is still debate going in US on the effect of a female on team cohesion.
As far I know...I have talked with lot of army personal...their response is the same as mine.
Female attention maybe in indian army but in PA army female soldiers are given respect of a sister or mother.I don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
no, its notcool, but isn't this haram ?
...you may not remember...but when I joined this forum...you gave me a lot of information on US and UK school, where I am trying to get in...hence I would not use the same language...I ask you to ignore me and not quote me again.
Most of these women are in non combat roles like medical,communications and logisticsI don't think women are good for combat role, neither is their presence good for the team cohesion. It is will reduce the whole brotherhood enjoyed in a combat team and will lead to competition among male members for the female attention.
Female attention maybe in indian army but in PA army female soldiers are given respect of a sister or mother.
It isn't but you are.cool, but isn't this haram ?