What's new

'Death to Pakistan’; Nangarhar residents protest Pak artillery shelling

You comment makes sense and don't get me wrong I'm not against the surgical strikes but I just want we use more intelligence and precision weapons to take out terrorist hideout but we should not cause damage to the people but as you said there has been no killing so that's a good thing and if then they are protesting, then it is no problem...we give an option of Afghan govt either hand us over those 76 terrorists or we continue strikes until the objective have been achieved. But try to minimise the disturbance to the civilians

Yes agreed...

We shud minimize civilain damage.... and any non combatant killed shud b offered diyyat as per islamic law.....

Ottomans went to an extent that they offered free education to childern of people killed in wars against them...

This is where our govt shud show vision... and current govt has none
 
.
Bbc literally stated India entered 2km into Pakistan, supported it with police , civilian confession.

But its humorous to see you compare Pakistan on the same level as Afghanistan.

You're not that bright. BBC literally said "by a few kms" and you magically expanded it to 2km. Then small arms fire/mortars resulting in the death of a soldier is evidence of the grand "surgical strikes" That's how a lie works. Such cross-loc ops happen all the time, check the numerous times indians have accused Pak of staging such "surgical strikes". Also by the same BBC and same " civilian confessions":

"Despite the use of the term "surgical strikes", the Indians definitely did not airdrop commandos to hit "launching pads of militants" inside Pakistani-held territory, or conduct ground assaults deep into the Pakistan-administered side...The Pakistani army described the exchanges as nothing more than cross-border firing...There is no conclusive evidence to prove either side's claims...The Pakistani fire sent them scurrying back to their bunkers"

So the drama remains a claim. Pakistan's response on the other hand is being live tweeted and corroborated by the Afghans themselves.
 
. .
Anyone bringing the India Pakistan border incident will have a bad day


Next

I would add a bit of exaggeration to any news coming out of Afghan sourced papers
 
. .
so you collect kinky pictures - what's new. No wonder you guys made Pakistan top google searches on a certain variety.

Change the search type to month by month and you will find that you guys come on top in that particular google search variety.
 
.
That's unfortunate...Pakistan army should be more discrete and use smarter weapons and clean/surgical strikes against the terrorists to avoid any collateral damage...no innocent Afghan should be harmed..I totally denounce the use of massive weapons that can harm innocent people. Our targets are the terrorists and not Afghan people.
I support you point, Pakistan should shell only with pun pint accuracy if it's going to do it. Standoff attacks increases the risk of civilian deaths, loss of property. Thus creating chain of action of which output is more radically militants.
 
. .
1.) There are, of course, more precise options than artillery barrages

2.) This protest could be real, staged or because of fear of ISIS/TTP repercussions --- or a combination

3.) They should be protesting against their own government for harboring these terrorists for the past several years

Keep protesting --- it isn't going to change much.

The Afghan govt has been brainwashing its people against Pakistan to hide its own miserable failures anyway. Moving along...
 
.
As I said earlier in other threads, it will be Afghans themselves who will verify our strikes and they did. Pakistan should keep up the ante and strike where it is required. There won't be any cooperation from Afghan forces and if US doesn't act against TTP than we are on our own and have to do what is best for our country when it comes to security. Did US considered Pakistani civilians deaths in their drone strikes ? No.

Operation Zarb-eAzb has pushed them into afghan sides where they have regrouped. We need to maintain a buffer zone at border which should be expanded slightly deep inside Afghanistan side..anything suspicious in the zone should be targeted at advance.
 
. . .
Bbc literally stated India entered 2km into Pakistan, supported it with police , civilian confession.

But its humorous to see you compare Pakistan on the same level as Afghanistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-37702790

Quoting

"
they did cross the Line of Control (LoC), in some cases by more than a kilometre, to hit nearby Pakistani border posts.

Police officials on the Pakistani side privately concede that such a ground assault did occur in the Madarpur-Titrinot region of Poonch sector, west of Srinagar, where a Pakistani post was destroyed and one soldier killed.

"



I know , i literally went through over a dozen Afghan sites before i posted this. One weird website , still runs on HTML said dozen . Therefore i said its 10pisa media

I Love How You Indians Selectively Quote Media.That Crosing Of LoC Is Something That Happens Frequently and If Anyone Has Been To The LoC He or She Knows That Crossing The LoC Does Not Mean You Automatically Land In The Other's Territory

Despite the use of the term "surgical strikes", the Indians definitely did not airdrop commandos to hit "launching pads of militants" inside Pakistani-held territory, or conduct ground assaults deep into the Pakistan-administered side. But they did cross the Line of Control (LoC), in some cases by more than a kilometre, to hit nearby Pakistani border posts

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37702790



Pakistan should immediately stop cross border terrorism on all its sides. When they know damned well the terrorists are safely sheltered inside their own country, some even openly fund raising, when their own ministerial meeting condemned their own military and ISI to stop supporting terrorists....they go and fire into Afghanistan. Just to create one more false belief among its brainwashed masses.

Awwww Your Pet Dogs Getting Killed Hurting You So Much:disagree::disagree::disagree:
 
.
That's unfortunate...Pakistan army should be more discrete and use smarter weapons and clean/surgical strikes against the terrorists to avoid any collateral damage...no innocent Afghan should be harmed..I totally denounce the use of massive weapons that can harm innocent people. Our targets are the terrorists and not Afghan people.

I totally agree with you. for god's sake, they are Muslims. We cannot even kill an innocent non-Muslim, no matter what. otherwise its same as setting off a bomb in the market full of women and children.
 
.
Please don't bring Sunni/Shia here, this issue has got nothing to do with sectarianism. I have meet many Afghan Hazaras and Tajiks in Australia that have lived in Pakistan and love it as much as i and you do. I have also meet many Pukhtuns from Afghanistan that hate Pakistan, so its a mixed bag.
Yep, u r right, my bad...
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom