Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heck the F/A 22 is only 166 million,Now I can say for sure that you dont have much grasp on the issue. The Aussie planes cost them 72 million FYI
See, we came up first with just replacing numbers, therefore the whole single engine thingie,
Then we wanted a fighter to suit our Doctrine, thus the twin engined, Strike platform concept
ARM missiles can be fulfilled by Meteor.Europe and Israel uses American Munitions. Do you even understand the value of JSOM, JDAM, HARM missiles in terms of First Strike Capability.
FLAWED concept, it is "Swing Role". not strike platform.
ARM missiles can be fulfilled by Meteor.
Yes we dont have JDAM, but are you sure US has offered us JDAM?
We can always manufacture a JDAM with Russia, all you need is proper GPS system...
dude honey is not what matters MOST but the GLASS IN WHICH IT COMES.understand the feasibility/geopolitics first.
I'm for Mig 35 and Rafale/Typhoon.
Note that their approach to "Program Cost per Unit" (PCU) used in their chart is to divide the total cost of each program, as stated in the Pentagon's latest Selected Acquisition Reports, by the number of units to be produced. This means that each PCU includes research and development costs, and even some support costs. Actual acquisition prices tend to be lower, and PCU can be moved significantly up or down if the number of aircraft bought rises or falls. Small-numbers programs are particularly vulnerable to this effect, and will also show up as especially expensive because very few aircraft absorb the entire R&D cost.
Note that all production numbers represent US purchases only.
Would it be a single purchase or splited in multiple orders, over a period of time?Ps: we are buying 126 to 200.