Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
Lol, it seems i am alone
'I will go it alone' then.
I already TOLD you adux, that MiG 35 in its production form is inferior to teh Typhhon, however i challenge that after it has been modified.
JAPAN HAS NOT BOUGHT THE TYPHOON, get that first.
Then, Typhoon has PATHETIC ground attack, somethign MiG 35 is FAR FAR better in. Next Typhoon has been made with a CLEAR a2a bias in mind, however MiG 35 is able to challenge that because of its TVC.
I repeat dont continue on RCS. The Russians have reduced its RCS by quite a lot, its in teh same league as the Typhoon.
What a2a package are u talking about, new Russian a2a packages are comming. It seems you just like western stuff. All MiG 35 needs is a bit of TIME to make it better. With the new russian missiles comming, the a2a package is better than the one Typhoon has.
Supercruise is under development in Typhoon. If you take that as well along with composites, these are the only two things i cannot argue against. But are these two things the determining factor. I dont think so. Supercruise and composites alone dont make a winner.
If you wanna compare the two properly, im all for it. I say MiG 35 when modded, will be BETTER than Typhoon. You have to first understand the MiG 35 before commenting that it is inferior. Its not the same 80's design. Its been redesigned extensively using three basic models before the designation MiG 35.
So please, im not being jingoistic, cuz we dont have the plane yet. But i think its a great plane, and far better than Shornet. And i am willing to challenge every one here for it.
Incidentally, what is the percentage of composites used in Typhoon, adux?
'I will go it alone' then.
I already TOLD you adux, that MiG 35 in its production form is inferior to teh Typhhon, however i challenge that after it has been modified.
JAPAN HAS NOT BOUGHT THE TYPHOON, get that first.
Then, Typhoon has PATHETIC ground attack, somethign MiG 35 is FAR FAR better in. Next Typhoon has been made with a CLEAR a2a bias in mind, however MiG 35 is able to challenge that because of its TVC.
I repeat dont continue on RCS. The Russians have reduced its RCS by quite a lot, its in teh same league as the Typhoon.
What a2a package are u talking about, new Russian a2a packages are comming. It seems you just like western stuff. All MiG 35 needs is a bit of TIME to make it better. With the new russian missiles comming, the a2a package is better than the one Typhoon has.
Supercruise is under development in Typhoon. If you take that as well along with composites, these are the only two things i cannot argue against. But are these two things the determining factor. I dont think so. Supercruise and composites alone dont make a winner.
If you wanna compare the two properly, im all for it. I say MiG 35 when modded, will be BETTER than Typhoon. You have to first understand the MiG 35 before commenting that it is inferior. Its not the same 80's design. Its been redesigned extensively using three basic models before the designation MiG 35.
So please, im not being jingoistic, cuz we dont have the plane yet. But i think its a great plane, and far better than Shornet. And i am willing to challenge every one here for it.
Incidentally, what is the percentage of composites used in Typhoon, adux?