Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
Exactly this! The most unfathomable part about all this drama is the seeming de-linking of the 36 off the shelf purchase and the follow-on 90 jets to be made in India. I mean the most logical (yes yes I hear you now- this is India, logic be damned) thing would be to have a single type for about 15 billion different reasons (commonality of training, spares, procedures and simplifcation of almost everything) just being a part of this.I don't think that's to be feared from Trappier's words at the 2015 results question and answers.
Dassault and the rest of the Rafale GIE want both linked so that finally, costly choices can be spread,
a sticking point in one term being balanced by an easy one in the second or vice versa.
Example : IAF wants a non-desi part integrated, say Israeli. This is a one-off cost to Dassault. You pay.
But if you buy 126-200+ Rafales under MII, it is spread over all units and becomes a small percentage.
If the deals are entirely segregated, that cost may block things by tipping the tab over Indian maximum.
Fast and fluid is the spring torrent that brings life to the immemorial immobile dry plain? *
Don't be a dam?
Good day all, Tay.
* The Yank in me would translate that poem thus : - Let's be adaptable, creative and get the job done!
I mean, no one in the media seems to be questioning why exactly, it is being percieved, that this defence minister (who has zero cabinet experience and zero defence exposure) is going for two different types of fighter, they are just mindly parroting each other (who planted that intial seed is an interesting point to ponder).
If 1 Rafale is bought then you might as well buy 126, there is no point in half measures- all or nothing.
But alas, I have lost all faith in Parrikar to do the sensible thing, Modi is the guy for that I hope he calls his DM out on this needless circus whilst we are still young.