What's new

DARPA's Anti-Ship Missile Still Less Deadly Than Chinese ‘Carrier Killer’

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
DARPA's Anti-Ship Missile Still Less Deadly Than Chinese ‘Carrier Killer’ / Sputnik International

While DARPA has developed a long-awaited anti-ship missile for the United States Navy, the new weapon will be no match for one of the threats it was designed to counter, China’s so-called “carrier killer” missile.

At 15 tons and 35 feet tall, China’s DF-21D Dong Feng missile is rumored to be able to travel at speeds as fast as Mach 10 and has an effective range of up to 1,200 miles. In the event of a conflict, the weapon would pose a major threat to US aircraft carriers off the coast of Taiwan.

In response to the Navy’s call for a similarly sophisticated weapon system, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency spent years developing its own Long Range Anti-Ship Missile. According to DARPA, LRASM aims "to provide a leap ahead in US surface warfare capability."

The missile can operate in antiaccess/area denial or A2/AD environments with robust anti-missile defense and fierce electronic warfare with the ability for "jamming" guidance systems. LRASM can also operate independently and under remote guidance and survive GPS jamming.

The missile, designed by defense contractor Lockheed Martin, can guide itself to targets using "autonomous guidance algorithms" even in the absence of remote control or GPS by pinpointing strike targets independently.

LRASM has completed three successful flight tests, according to DARPA, and is targeted for a deployment date sometime in 2018.

As another countermeasure to China’s “carrier killer,” the Pentagon paid Raytheon millions of dollars to develop a RIM-162 ESSM "Evolved SeaSparrow" antimissile missile. The hope is that such a defensive weapon will be able to shoot down DF-21D, despite its high speed and high trajectory.

In a keynote address on American Society of Naval Engineers’ Day on March 4, Sean Stackley, the Navy’s acquisition chief, stressed the importance of modernizing ships in the fleet.

To help reach that goal, the Navy has embarked on a 30-year research and development plan to ensure that it remains not only the largest such force in the world, but also the most powerful.


Read more: DARPA's Anti-Ship Missile Still Less Deadly Than Chinese ‘Carrier Killer’ / Sputnik International
 
.
DARPA's Anti-Ship Missile Still Less Deadly Than Chinese ‘Carrier Killer’ / Sputnik International

While DARPA has developed a long-awaited anti-ship missile for the United States Navy, the new weapon will be no match for one of the threats it was designed to counter, China’s so-called “carrier killer” missile.

At 15 tons and 35 feet tall, China’s DF-21D Dong Feng missile is rumored to be able to travel at speeds as fast as Mach 10 and has an effective range of up to 1,200 miles. In the event of a conflict, the weapon would pose a major threat to US aircraft carriers off the coast of Taiwan.

In response to the Navy’s call for a similarly sophisticated weapon system, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency spent years developing its own Long Range Anti-Ship Missile. According to DARPA, LRASM aims "to provide a leap ahead in US surface warfare capability."

The missile can operate in antiaccess/area denial or A2/AD environments with robust anti-missile defense and fierce electronic warfare with the ability for "jamming" guidance systems. LRASM can also operate independently and under remote guidance and survive GPS jamming.

The missile, designed by defense contractor Lockheed Martin, can guide itself to targets using "autonomous guidance algorithms" even in the absence of remote control or GPS by pinpointing strike targets independently.

LRASM has completed three successful flight tests, according to DARPA, and is targeted for a deployment date sometime in 2018.

As another countermeasure to China’s “carrier killer,” the Pentagon paid Raytheon millions of dollars to develop a RIM-162 ESSM "Evolved SeaSparrow" antimissile missile. The hope is that such a defensive weapon will be able to shoot down DF-21D, despite its high speed and high trajectory.

In a keynote address on American Society of Naval Engineers’ Day on March 4, Sean Stackley, the Navy’s acquisition chief, stressed the importance of modernizing ships in the fleet.

To help reach that goal, the Navy has embarked on a 30-year research and development plan to ensure that it remains not only the largest such force in the world, but also the most powerful.


Read more: DARPA's Anti-Ship Missile Still Less Deadly Than Chinese ‘Carrier Killer’ / Sputnik International
Well this is good thing and we have that Chinese Carrier killer thanks to our Friend China
 
.
A carrier killer BM is a laughable concept, but the Pentagon sure knows how to con American citizens to make sure that the discourse on defence budget cuts is always in their favour.
 
.
A carrier killer BM is a laughable concept, but the Pentagon sure knows how to con American citizens to make sure that the discourse on defence budget cuts is always in their favour.

Why is killer BM laughable?
 
.
Why is killer BM laughable?

Because unless China plans to put a nuke in it, there is no way they are going to hit a tiny moving carrier in a vast ocean. I am not gonna try to explain anymore as it will turn into a shit storm.

You either already know or you never will. But hey you are still majority by a long distance. Less than 0.001% of human beings understand even basic ballistics, forget rocketry.
 
.
Because unless China plans to put a nuke in it, there is no way they are going to hit a tiny moving carrier in a vast ocean. I am not gonna try to explain anymore as it will turn into a shit storm.

did u even read the post? "In the event of a conflict, the weapon would pose a major threat to US aircraft carriers off the coast of Taiwan."

You either already know or you never will. But hey you are still majority by a long distance. Less than 0.001% of human beings understand even basic ballistics said:
please don't compare your beloved Brahmos to the DF-21D.
 
.
comparing a BM with a Cruise Missile???LOL...
 
.
Indeed, might as well compare a ballistic missile to a JDAM kit. How much less deadly the LRASM is? That is the question. Because the article is stating all its potential and deadly capabilities and no faults.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom