desiman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 3,957
- Reaction score
- 0
pakistan has four all rounders, india has none(unless ofcourse u start counting yuvi and tendulker, bhaji and pathan as allrounders), pakistan has good bowling attack, good pace attack and good spin attack, it contributes very much to its success, pakistan has better batting attack, it oes down to number 9, where as india has batsmen upto number 7, with proper bowling attack, indian team has a very weak batting attack, example: proteas...
Pakistani all rounders, hmmm Afridi is a bowler who can hit sixes sometimes, most of the time wont cross 10 with the bat no matter what the situation is. Abdul Razzak shines maybe once every 20 matches, he is good but not among the best. Im not even sure who else you are including in the all rounder list. Pakistan has a good bowling attack for sure, but its batting just doesnt cut it, the spin attack is average. Doesnt matter if you bat till 9 if none of the batsmen are consistent. India's batting does not need to go till 9, even when its star batsmen dont perform, we still hit 260-270 odd easily. India has a weak batting line up, are you joking ? India was smoking the South African attack and only the lower order did not stand up. Dude Pakistan is a good team but dont put them better than India, you have ICC rankings to look at as well.