CV-18 Fujian - Type 003 Aircraft Carrier News & Discussions

[samsara]

The ACP100 is an integral reactor.


View attachment 662701

CNNC's ACP100 SMR: Technique Features and Progress in China

Authored by XU Bin (xubilly@163.com) | Nuclear Power Institute of China

13th INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues in the Global Deployment of Small Modular Reactors
18-21 October 2016, IAEA Headquarters Vienna - Austria

CONTENTS

1. Background
2. ACP100 technique features
3. Progress of ACP100
4. ACP SMR Series Products
5. Governmental Support & International Cooperation
6. Our Team

1. Background

1.2 About ACP100

• An Integrative type SMR, 125MWe, is being developed by CNNC (China National Nuclear Corporation).
• Large LOCAs (loss-of-coolant accidents) are physically impossible.
• On utilization of existing PWR technology and verified passive systems to cope with the consequences of accident events.
• Flexibility for different purposed application.

...

2.2 Reactor type & Technique route

• Adopt integrative layout instead of the traditional distributed layout. Eliminate large LOCA accident by design.

• Eliminate the technique risk to the most extent, by utilizing existing PWR technique storage and industry
foundation, and verified new techniques.

(...)

Full PDF accessible:
https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/INPRO/df13/Presentations/011_CNNC's ACP100 SMR-Technique Features and Progress in China.pdf

* SMR: small modular reactor

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

CNNC's ACP100 SMR: Technique Features and Progress in China

Authored by XU Bin (xubilly@163.com) | Nuclear Power Institute of China

13th INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues in the Global Deployment of Small Modular Reactors
18-21 October 2016, IAEA Headquarters Vienna - Austria

CONTENTS

1. Background
2. ACP100 technique features
3. Progress of ACP100
4. ACP SMR Series Products
5. Governmental Support & International Cooperation
6. Our Team

1. Background

1.2 About ACP100

• An Integrative type SMR, 125MWe, is being developed by CNNC (China National Nuclear Corporation).
• Large LOCAs (loss-of-coolant accidents) are physically impossible.
• On utilization of existing PWR technology and verified passive systems to cope with the consequences of accident events.
• Flexibility for different purposed application.

View attachment 662742
...

2.2 Reactor type & Technique route

• Adopt integrative layout instead of the traditional distributed layout. Eliminate large LOCA accident by design.

• Eliminate the technique risk to the most extent, by utilizing existing PWR technique storage and industry
foundation, and verified new techniques.

View attachment 662741

(...)

Full PDF accessible:
https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/INPRO/df13/Presentations/011_CNNC's ACP100 SMR-Technique Features and Progress in China.pdf

* SMR: small modular reactor

Yep, CPC has only revealed the civilian one, but we all know that the military one has always been kept in secret.

 

[samsara]

Yep, CPC has only revealed the civilian one, but we all know that the military one has always been kept in secret.

@ChineseTiger1986, why you keep on using the term "CPC" to denote the nation? That's a common, ill-conceived practice by the Five-Eyes media nowadays to try to draw a line between the ruling party & its political system (CPC) vis-à-vis the nation of China and the Chinese people.

Those very skillful propagandists will lie to their teeth to say out aloud that they only detest the ruling party & political system of China today but not the nation itself moreover its people. But they hate seeing them united, prosperous, strong and being advanced... yet won't be vassal and taking orders!

I least expect to see such contemptible practice in this forum. Trust that you have no such bad intention so please drop such annoying usage.

 

[Figaro]

@ChineseTiger1986, why you keep on using the term "CPC" to denote the nation? That's a common, ill-conceived practice by the Five-Eyes media nowadays to try to draw a line between the ruling party & its political system (CPC) vis-à-vis the nation of China and the Chinese people.

Those very skillful propagandists will lie to their teeth to say out aloud that they only detest the ruling party & political system of China today but not the nation itself moreover its people. But they hate seeing them united, prosperous, strong and being advanced... yet won't be vassal and taking orders!

I least expect to see such contemptible practice in this forum. Trust that you have no such bad intention so please drop such annoying usage.

Drawing a line between the party and the country does not work; on the contrary, it usually backfires and makes citizens more supportive of the party due to this perceived foreign intrusion. Such efforts did not work in the Cold War, where the West also tried to draw a wedge between the Soviet people and the ruling CPSU and it definitely will not work against China because it is much more homogenous than the USSR. Basically, this is a failed tactic.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

@ChineseTiger1986, why you keep on using the term "CPC" to denote the nation? That's a common, ill-conceived practice by the Five-Eyes media nowadays to try to draw a line between the ruling party & its political system (CPC) vis-à-vis the nation of China and the Chinese people.

Those very skillful propagandists will lie to their teeth to say out aloud that they only detest the ruling party & political system of China today but not the nation itself moreover its people. But they hate seeing them united, prosperous, strong and being advanced... yet won't be vassal and taking orders!

I least expect to see such contemptible practice in this forum. Trust that you have no such bad intention so please drop such annoying usage.

Take easy buddy, the term 'CPC' is the English term for 'TG' that we usually refer our ruling party in the Chinese military forums.

However, the term 'CCP' is a negative connotation most referred by those hateful anti-China lunatics.

 

[obj 705A]

I compared the measurements of the modules 2, 3 & 4 in the two previous pics, module #3 is actually not missing, it is already in the drydock in the bow section, the missing modules are #1 & #4.

the big module of the bow section in the drydock is composed of modules #2 & #3.

so if we take fzgfzy's measurements (I'm taking his measurements because they are the most pessimistic) and consider the length of the current modules to be 271m, then module #4 is about 17m. how long is module #1 well that is anybody's guess, if it is 5 meters in length minus the bulbous bow which may already be attached to it then this will make the ship as long as the Ford.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I compared the measurements of the modules 2, 3 & 4 in the two previous pics, module #3 is actually not missing, it is already in the drydock in the bow section, the missing modules are #1 & #4.

the big module of the bow section in the drydock is composed of modules #2 & #3.

so if we take fzgfzy's measurements (I'm taking his measurements because they are the most pessimistic) and consider the length of the current modules to be 271m, then module #4 is about 17m. how long is module #1 well that is anybody's guess, if it is 5 meters in length minus the bulbous bow which may already be attached to it then this will make the ship as long as the Ford.

fzgfzy now claims this ship is 83,000 tonnes conventional, a 10,000 tonnes increase from his previous assertion.

Next stop, he is going to claim that this ship is 93,000 tonnes conventional, basically a Nimitz class powered by 16 boilers.

That guy is stubborn as hell, and never admit that he could be wrong.

 

[Figaro]

fzgfzy now claims this ship is 83,000 tonnes conventional, a 10,000 tonnes increase from his previous assertion.

Next stop, he is going to claim that this ship is 93,000 tonnes conventional, basically a Nimitz class powered by 16 boilers.

That guy is stubborn as hell, and never admit that he could be wrong.

The Big Shrimps have completely underestimated the 003 from day one

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The Big Shrimps have completely underestimated the 003 from day one

Those big shrimps are now a lost cause.

It is ok to be conservative in prediction, but keep in denial even distorting the truth won't help them to regain their saving grace.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The stern section of the Type 003, and it does look exactly like this mockup.

 

[Figaro]

The stern section of the Type 003, and it does look exactly like this mockup.


View attachment 663425


View attachment 663427

I will be extremely satisfied if the 003 turns to have the superstructure of the mockup

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

003 is likely conventionally powered considering China needs 10 carriers by 2025 including LHD.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The shafts that will connect the steam turbines of the Type 003.

 

[LKJ86]

Via @彩云香江 from Weibo

 

[Deino]

View attachment 663540View attachment 663541
Via @彩云香江 from Weibo

At least it seems as if no additional modules are stored under these large white movable shelters in the background of dry dock no. 4.