Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is now building 3rd reportly and we believe will see it in the near futureChina is now preparing to start construction on the 3rd aircraft carrier (type 002).
China is now preparing to start construction on the 3rd aircraft carrier (type 002).
Really. China uses the pyramid method of construction and if it is true then we will soon see some images on the internet soon. This one is supposed to be designed with an EMAL catapult system.
Should be an interesting years for all the military enthusiasts like me.
The type 002 will be a conventional flattop with 70,000 tons with 4 steam catapults.
Type 003 will be nuclear powered with 110,000 tons with 4 EMALS. Type 003 hasn't started construction yet.
I believe China will skip the steam catapult system altogether and jump straight into EMAL catapult system.
I have yet to see a version of steam catapult system by the Chinese in the net.
As for the powerplant for type 001 I read somewhere that they will be using the indigenous R0110 gas turbines.
The R0110 gas turbine
Will the Type 001A still put limitations on the J-15 ? PLA should get rid of the conservative mindset into more risk and reward one would be more beneficial having the focus on the Type 002. @ChineseTiger1986 ?
That take our time. is the best way to get this done. We dont need to rush to the goal which is much more risky when we already reach 90%.Exactly.
Wasting all that time building an outdated carrier (type 001A) with severe limitations. China should start with Type 002 which is a flattop conventional carrier with steam catapults.
Until that conservative mindset is changed, I don't foresee China ever surpassing the US technologically.
It basically comes down to country A being risk takers vs country B being risk averse. Country A will always win despite a few hiccups along the way.
Just look how slow and risk averse China's space program is. How many manned missions have there been altogether?
There is always a trade off between cost and benefit. I think it makes sense to have some cheap platforms to facilitate training. Hardware isn't the only consideration.Exactly.
Wasting all that time building an outdated carrier (type 001A) with severe limitations. China should start with Type 002 which is a flattop conventional carrier with steam catapults.
Until that conservative mindset is changed, I don't foresee China ever surpassing the US technologically.
It basically comes down to country A being risk takers vs country B being risk averse. Country A will always win despite a few hiccups along the way.
Just look how slow and risk averse China's space program is. How many manned missions have there been altogether?
It is not about risk averse, it is about taking steps and learning from the experience. If you skip a conventional carrier, you would not understand the pro & cons of operating such ship. There is always option to build nuclear carrier later on and make comparison with conventional carrier battle formation and doing such simulation is appropriate.Exactly.
Wasting all that time building an outdated carrier (type 001A) with severe limitations. China should start with Type 002 which is a flattop conventional carrier with steam catapults.
Until that conservative mindset is changed, I don't foresee China ever surpassing the US technologically.
It basically comes down to country A being risk takers vs country B being risk averse. Country A will always win despite a few hiccups along the way.
Just look how slow and risk averse China's space program is. How many manned missions have there been altogether?