Crashed Pakistani UAV was 'on experimental flight'

[PindiKaEngineer]

And thanks to our media any element of surprise is gone and cat is out of the bag ... wish someone teaches these journalists what to show and what not to show on national television ...

lol you say it as if enemy gathers intel by watching our tv channels

 

[tarrar]

The crash drone looks like Ch-4 or CH-5. May be Pakistan is testing them, if true then thats a great news.

 

[SOHEIL]

This is kind of funny !!!

People still talking about CH-4/5

 

[_NOBODY_]

Gentlemen which variant of Wing Loong series this drone is ?
@Quwa @SOHEIL

 

[Quwa]

Gentlemen which variant of Wing Loong series this drone is ?
@Quwa @SOHEIL

Pakistan rejected the Wing Loong I in 2010, I don't think it'd be anything less than Wing Loong II. It's worth keeping in mind that when it comes to drones, Pakistan seems to prefer designs from CASC (the maker of the CH-4 and CH-5). The Wing Loong is made by CAIG. I think Pakistan was evaluating its MALE UAV options, I imagine it'll select CH-4B over Wing Loong II.

 

[_NOBODY_]

Pakistan rejected the Wing Loong I in 2010, I don't think it'd be anything less than Wing Loong II. It's worth keeping in mind that when it comes to drones, Pakistan seems to prefer designs from CASC (the maker of the CH-4 and CH-5). The Wing Loong is made by CAIG. I think Pakistan was evaluating its MALE UAV options, I imagine it'll select CH-4B over Wing Loong II.

Why not CH-5 ?

 

[SOHEIL]

Really sad ... pakistan is not interested in Iranian drones !

 

[Quwa]

Why not CH-5 ?

Not yet cleared for export.

 

[HRK]

So which one is it bruda!

Wing loong

 

[Hell hound]

Pakistan rejected the Wing Loong I in 2010, I don't think it'd be anything less than Wing Loong II. It's worth keeping in mind that when it comes to drones, Pakistan seems to prefer designs from CASC (the maker of the CH-4 and CH-5). The Wing Loong is made by CAIG. I think Pakistan was evaluating its MALE UAV options, I imagine it'll select CH-4B over Wing Loong II.

few questions if you can answer them
1)why did we reject it?
2)why do you prefer ch 4 over wing loong
3)which one is more capable ch4 or wing loong and who has more payload carrying capability

Wing loong

is it ours or just was here for evaluation

 

[Quwa]

few questions if you can answer them
1)why did we reject it?
2)why do you prefer ch 4 over wing loong
3)which one is more capable ch4 or wing loong and who has more payload carrying capability


is it ours or just was here for evaluation

1. I don't know

2. I am stating the facts as they are: the PAF prefers working with CASC on drones as opposed to CAIG. This is why there is a higher chance of the PAF selecting the CH-4B over Wing Loong 2.

3. They're direct competitors, similar.

 

[Hell hound]

1. I don't know

2. I am stating the facts as they are: the PAF prefers working with CASC on drones as opposed to CAIG. This is why there is a higher chance of the PAF selecting the CH-4B over Wing Loong 2.

3. They're direct competitors, similar.

sir i was hoping for a bit technical answer to expand my knowledge given i know little about uavs thanks

 

[HRK]

is it ours or just was here for evaluation

not sure ... but media reported crash occurred during TARBIYATI PARWAZ (training flight) BTW I doubt this report ....

 

[HRK]

this was posted by one of our member last year

this crashed Wing Loong drone is indication for the trials of our MALE category UAV/UCAV program

 

[Quwa]

this was posted by one of our member last year

View attachment 311733

this crashed Wing Loong drone is indication for the trials of our MALE category UAV/UCAV program

Definitely.