What's new

Conversion of the Mongols

waraich66

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
4,641
Reaction score
-2
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
THE POWER OF TABLEEGH
Conversion of the Mongols
by Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi, Rector of Nadwatul Ulama, Lucknow, India

ISLAM was about to be submerged in the whirl-pool of the Mongol ardour of slaughter and destruction, as several Muslim writers had then expressed the fear, wiping it out of existence, but Islam suddenly began to capture the hearts of the savage Tartars. The preachers of Islam thus accomplished a task which the swordarm of the faith had failed to perform, by carrying the message of Islam to the barbaric hordes of heathen Mongols.

Conversion of the Mongols to Islam was indeed one of the few unpredictable events of history. The Tartaric wave of conquest which had swept away the entire Islamic east within a short period of one year was, in truth, not so astounding as the Mongol's acceptance of Islam during the zenith of their glory; for, the Muslims had by the beginning of the seventh century of Muslim era imbibed all those vices which are a natural outcome of the opulence, luxury and fast living. The Mongols were, on the other hand, a wild and ferocious, yet vigorous and sturdy race who could have hardly been expected to submit to the spiritual and cultural superiority of a people so completely subdued by them, and who were also looked down and despised by them. The author of the Preaching of Islam, T.W. Arnold, has also expressed his amazement over the achievement of this unbelieveable feat.

"But Islam was to rise again from the ashes of its former grandeur and through its preachers win over these savage conquerors to the acceptance of the faith. This was a task for the missionary energies of Islam that was rendered more difficult from the fact that there were two powerful competitors in the field. The spectacle of Buddhism, Christianity and Islam emulously striving to win the allegiance of the fierce conquerors that had set their feet on the necks of adherents of these great missionary religions, is one that is without parallel in the history of the world

"For Islam to enter into competition with such powerful rivals as Buddhism and Christianity were at the outset of the period of Mongol rule, must have appeared a wellnigh hopeless undertaking. For the Muslims had suffered more from the storm of the Mongol invasions than the others. Those cities that had hitherto been the rallying points of spiritual organization and learning for Islam in Asia, had been for the most part laid in ashes: the theologians and pious doctors of the faith, either slain or carried away into captivity. Among the Mongol rulers — usually so tolerant towards all religions — there were some who exhibited varying degrees of hatred towards the Muslim faith. Chingiz Khan ordered all those who killed animals in the Muhammadan fashion to be put to death, and this ordinance was revived by Qubilay, who by offering rewards to informers set on foot a sharp persecution that lasted for seven years, as many poor persons took advantage of this ready means of gaining wealth, and slaves accused their masters in order to gain their freedom. During the reign of Kuyuk (1246-1248) who left the conduct of affairs entirely to his two Christian ministers and whose court was filled with Christian monks, the Muhammadans were made .to suffer great severities

"Arghun (1284-1291) the fourth Ilkhan persecuted the Musalmans and took away from them all posts in the departments of justice and finance, and forbade them to appear at his court.

"In spite of all difficulties, however, the Mongols and the savage tribes that followed in their wake were at length brought to submit to the faith of those Muslim peoples whom they had crushed beneath their feet."

Unbelievable and of far-reaching significance, although the conversion of the Mongols to Islam had been, it is also not less surprising that extremely few and scanty records of this glorious achievement are to be found in the annals of the time. The names of only a few dedicated saviours of Islam who won proselytes from the savage hordes are known to the world, but their venture was no less daring nor their achievement less significant than the accomplishment of the warriors of the faith. Their memory shall always be enriched by the gratitude of Muslims for they had, in reality, performed a great service to the humanity in general and to the Muslims in particular, by diffusing the knowledge of faith among those barbarians, winning them over to the service of one God and making them the standard-bearers of the Apostle of Peace.

After the death of Chenghiz Khan the great heritage of that Mongol conqueror was divided into four dominions headed by the offsprings of his sons. The message of Islam had begun to spread among all these four sections of the Mongols who were rapidly converted to the faith. In regard to the conversion of the ruling princes in the lineage of Batu, the son of Chenghiz Khan's first born Juji, who ruled the western portion as Khan of the Golden Horde, writes Arnold:

"The first Mongol ruling prince who professed Islam was Baraka Khan, who was chief of the Golden Horde from 1256 to 1267. According to Abu'l-Ghazi he was converted after he had come to the throne. He is said one day to have fallen in with a caravan coming from Bukhara, and taking two of the merchants aside, to have questioned them on the doctrines of Islam, and they expounded to him their faith so persuasively that he became converted in all sincerity. He first revealed his change of faith to his youngest brother, whom he induced to follow his example, and then made open profession of his new belief ... Baraka Khan entered into a close alliance with the Mamluk Sultan of Egypt, Rukn al-Din Baybars. The initiative came from the latter, who had given a hospitable reception to a body of troops, two hundred in number, belonging to the Golden Horde; these men, observing the growing enmity between their Khan and Hulagu, the conqueror of Baghdad, in whose army they were serving, took flight into Syria, whence they were honourably conducted to Cairo to the court of Baybars, who persuaded them to embrace Islam. Baybars himself was at war with Hulagu, whom he had recently defeated and driven out of Syria. He sent two of the Mongol fugitives, with some other envoys, to bear a letter to Baraka Khan. On their return these envoys reported that each princess and amir at the court of Baraka Khan had an imam and a mu'adhdhin, and the children were taught the Qur'an in the schools. These friendly relations between Baybars and Baraka Khan brought many of the Mongols of the Golden Horde into Egypt, where they were prevailed upon to become Musalmans."
 
.
dear brother,
your post was really informative and i appreciate your effort to bring this topic amongst us but i think this is not the right place to discuss this matter since it is highly concerned with religion and mentions conflict between our Indian religion Buddhism and other religions and more than anything else this is the military history section so i request you to shift this to members club or the writers section for further discussion and i will be more than happy to discuss about religion over there as a religious scholar.

Thankfully yours
Sam Bajwa
 
.
People of Mongolia, the original Mongol homeland, follow Buddhism, an Indian-origin religion.
 
. .
Mongols were barbarians, but Islam changed their hearts and minds! Alhamdulillah! Islam is the truth!
 
.
dear brother,
your post was really informative and i appreciate your effort to bring this topic amongst us but i think this is not the right place to discuss this matter since it is highly concerned with religion and mentions conflict between our Indian religion Buddhism and other religions and more than anything else this is the military history section so i request you to shift this to members club or the writers section for further discussion and i will be more than happy to discuss about religion over there as a religious scholar.

Thankfully yours
Sam Bajwa

I appreciate your comments but my motive behind this post is to high light the historical facts and causes of mongol invasion, they wanted to wipe out muslims from world but eventually impressed by Islam and accepted it as their way of life.

Allah has promised that Muslim will be protected if they are true followers of Islam.

Back ground of mongol invasion was murder of Mongol Ambassadors by Muslim Ruler , the Changez Khan prayed and said " God of Muslims" help me to take revenge which was granted by Allah , because Allah is Rab ul Almeen ( God of all Human being).

Allah never help those who violate human rights
 
.
The Mongols were basically invaders.

They managed to capture wast Muslim territories, and destroyed many libraries and places of learning as a result - these libraries were amongst that largest in the world at that time and people traveled thousands of miles just to visit these ancient libraries.

Anyway, the invaders eventually converted to Islam....so it wasn't too bad!
 
. .
I appreciate your comments but my motive behind this post is to high light the historical facts and causes of mongol invasion, they wanted to wipe out muslims from world but eventually impressed by Islam and accepted it as their way of life.

Allah has promised that Muslim will be protected if they are true followers of Islam.

Back ground of mongol invasion was murder of Mongol Ambassadors by Muslim Ruler , the Changez Khan prayed and said " God of Muslims" help me to take revenge which was granted by Allah , because Allah is Rab ul Almeen ( God of all Human being).

Allah never help those who violate human rights

This is a fallacy!

The ambassador was extremely rude and acted barbaric. It was wrong to execute him because he acted this way, but it doesn't justify the murder of over 10 Million innocent Muslims at the hand of these Mongol savages!

The reason why the Mongols could destroy the city was because the leader invested too much money on personal luxuries and neglected the importance of national defence!

The army was weaker than what it could have been!

Luxuries and materialism made way for the mongol invasion and massacre of the innocent Muslims! But as Muslims we should never forget the sacrifices of those before us!
 
.
This is a fallacy!

The ambassador was extremely rude and acted barbaric. It was wrong to execute him because he acted this way, but it doesn't justify the murder of over 10 Million innocent Muslims at the hand of these Mongol savages!

The reason why the Mongols could destroy the city was because the leader invested too much money on personal luxuries and neglected the importance of national defence!

The army was weaker than what it could have been!

Luxuries and materialism made way for the mongol invasion and massacre of the innocent Muslims! But as Muslims we should never forget the sacrifices of those before us!

Dear ,

It is part of history , how can you deny it?

It is also fact that muslim army was weaken due Shia Sunni conflict , the shia prime minister invited Changez Forces after reducing the army, sorry to say.

The Destruction of Baghdad

In 1258, the first objective accomplished, Hulegu turned his army to the west into Mesopotamia and began the march on Baghdad. Since Hulegu had received the submission of all the petty warlords in Baiju's territory, the military governor was free to lead his tiumensoverland to link up with the main army. With further reinforcements from Christian Georgia, keen to be part of an attack upon Baghdad, Hulegu's force was virtually doubled. Demands for surrender were sent to the Caliph and refused.

The young man who currency reigned as the thirty­seventh commander of the faith was an unfortunately incompetent and cowardly individual by the name of Mustasim. His weaknesses were exploited by ruthless officials who had got used to running the city while Caliph Mustasim concentrated on spiritual affairs. As leader of the entire Sunni community he could have tried summoning Muslim armies from as far away as Morocco to defend Baghdad; instead he preferred the advice of his chief minister, Ibn al-Alkami, who assured him that the danger was not great and that the Baghdad defences were adequate. Ibn al­Alkami was at the same time sending secret messages to the approaching army, urging them to attack and describing the pitiless state of the Baghdad defences. Persian accounts of this treachery explain that the chief minister, a Shia Muslim, had been motivated by his resentment of the Caliph's persecution of his Shia brethren. In the meantime ambassadors rode back and forth, offering to pay tribute to Hulegu but refusing to surrender, while behind the city walls there was growing fear and confusion.

When Mustasim finally gave the order that the city should be defended properly, the Mongols were just a day's march away. A contingent of some 20,000 of the city's garrison rode out to confront the enemy, but as they camped in the fields in sight of the city walls the Mongols surprised them by smashing the dams and dykes nearby and flooding the encampment. Those who did not drown were cut to pieces by the Mongol heavy cavalry.

Meanwhile Baiju's tumens had occupied the western suburbs which, once filled with vast warehouses, had been the great commercial heart of the city. On the opposite side, in the eastern Shia suburbs, Hulegu's engineers were constructing a ditch and a rampart that eventually surrounded the city. On 30 January the bombardment of Baghdad began. Events had moved so swiftly that the bullock carts bringing up ammunition, hewn from the Jebel Hamrin Mountains, were still three days away. So the artillery units improvised with stumps of palm trees and foundations from the occupied suburbs. Seven days later the Mongols stormed and took the east wall. There they remained, as gradually the city surrendered. As the garrison filed out, laying down their weapons, they were led away and slaughtered one by one. The Caliph eventually emerged with his family and 3000 courtiers. On 13 February, the sack of Baghdad began.

Though the city had lost its commercial importance, it remained an important cultural, spiritual and intellectual centre. Within the city's walls were magnificent mosques, vast libraries of Persian and Arabian literature, the greatest university in the world, plus numerous palaces belonging to the Caliph and his family and perhaps one of the greatest personal treasures to be found anywhere. It was the greatest city the Mongols conquered in the Middle East, and into this oasis of civilization they brought sword and torch. None of the invaders set about their task with more relish than the Christian contingent from Georgia. The Eastern Christian community hiding inside their churches were spared, but the Muslim population, Shia or Sunni, were ruthlessly dispatched. Most of the women and children were herded together and transported to Qaraqorum, as was the wealth of the Caliph's treasure house.

As the mosques and palaces burned and the cries from the street echoed into the night, the Caliph and his family were treated to a banquet with Hulegu. Afterwards they were sewn up in the customary Mongol carpet and then trampled to death under the hooves of Mongol horses, and so ended the dynasty of the Abbasid caliphs that had survived for 500 years. The treacherous chief minister, Ibn al-Alkami, was rewarded by being allowed to retain his position under the Mongol rule. Persian accounts claim between 800,000 and 1 million killed within the city walls. At any rate, the stench from ******* corpses was so great that, not for the first time, the Mongols had to evacuate their campsites. Nevertheless, Persian historians tend to exaggerate the slaughter of Baghdad, for commercial evidence shows a thriving economy just two years later.

http://www.h-net.org/~fisher/hst373/readings/marshall.html

Muslim were always defeated with help of Muslims ie Northern Alliance helped US-NATO forces,Nizam helped British forces etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
The Mongol Invasion of Iraq: Lessons Never Learned

by Amir Butler

Last week, CBS's Sixty Minutes II program showed footage of American soldiers creating "human pyramids" from detained Iraqis. However, it should be remembered that Iraqis, and indeed Muslims in general, are no strangers to "human pyramids." The last time that such pyramids were built in the region was in the 13th century when the hordes of Hulagu Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan, sacked Iraq. After massacring entire towns and villages, they would assemble huge pyramids of human skulls as a reminder and warning that the Mongols were passing through. One can presume that similar sentiments – a need to send a "message" to would-be "insurgents" – underpin American atrocities in the region today.

In one of Karl Marx's more lucid statements, he is reported to have said, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." The American occupation of Iraq would be a farcical re-run of history were it not that the almost certain effects of that occupation will be catastrophic for both Iraqis and Americans.

The Mongol invasion began like the American invasion: with a disgruntled Shi'ite upstart aspiring to greatness. The Ahmad Chalabi of the 13th century was a character called Ibn al-'Alqami. Al-'Alqami was a minister in the court of the Caliph al-Musta'sim. Like Chalabi, al-'Alqami had desires of leadership of the land and, like Chalabi, he was not above soliciting the assistance of foreign powers to help – even if that assistance would come at great cost to his people or his nation. America was not a superpower in al-Alqami's time so he turned his attentions to the Mongols.

Al-'Alqami wrote a number of letters to the leader of the Mongols, Hulagu Khan, inviting him to invade the land, promising' his support and offering "intelligence" on the Caliph's armies, their strengths and weaknesses, and the overall lay of the land. It would, he assured the Mongols, be a cakewalk and within a short space of time the Mongol Empire could be extended into the previously impervious core of the Muslim Caliphate. At the same time, Al-'Alqami used his position to influence the Caliph to reduce the size of the army thus ensuring that the Mongol invasion would be guaranteed little resistance.

Hulagu accepted al-'Alqami's generous invitation to attack, pillage, and massacre. As per Mongol custom, he first issued a written threat to the Caliph: "When I lead my army against Baghdad in anger, whether you hide in heaven or in earth, I will bring you down from the spinning spheres; I will toss you in the air like a lion. I will leave no one alive in your realm; I will burn your city, your land, your self. If you wish to spare yourself and your venerable family, give heed to my advice with the ear of intelligence. If you do not, you will see what God has willed. Demonstrating what many conservatives might lament as the overall cultural decline since the 13th century, America sends her message to Iraqi insurgents by blasting AC/DC's "Hell's Bells" at them:

"If you're into evil you're a friend of mine,
See my white light flashing as I split the night,
'cause if God's on the left, then I'm stickin' to the right,
I won't take no prisoners, won't spare no lives,
Nobody's puttin' up a fight,
I got my bell, I'm gonna take you to hell,
I'm gonna get you, Satan get you.
Hell's Bells, Satan's comin' to you.
Hell's Bells, he's ringing them now.
Hell's Bells, the temperature's high.
Hell's Bells, across the sky.
Hell's Bells, they're takin' you down.
Hell's Bells, they're draggin' you around.
Hell's Bells, gonna split the night.
Hell's Bells, there's no way to fight, yeah."

Indeed.

The Caliph wasn't going to be intimidated. He refused the Mongol offer to surrender and decided to defend his city against their onslaught. While the Muslim armies put up a good fight, the reduced size of the army (due to the machinations of al-'Alqami) meant that they were no match militarily for the Mongols. Hulagu's armies killed everyone they found – the elderly, the infirm, the women, and the children. Nobody was spared their sword. Ibn Kathir, one of the scholars of Islamic History noted in his magnum opus, Bidaaya wa Nihaya, that the Mongols killed so many people that blood would be running down the street like rainwater. By some estimates, the number of dead exceeded 1 million.

After taking Baghdad the decision had to be made as to what would be done with the Caliph. The Mongols had a superstition which prevented them from spilling the blood of kings onto the earth. Al-'Alqami had no such qualms and suggested that rather than kill his leader with a sword, they should roll him and his family in carpet and then kick them to death. Al- Alqami volunteered for the task and proceeded to kick his former employer till he died. The Mongol Coalition of the Willing became strained at this brazen rejection of Mongol International Law. Berek Khan, a Mongol leader who had converted to Islam some years prior, pulled his men out of Baghdad in protest.

The death of the Caliph ushered in a new era of Mongol-imposed brutality on the majority Sunni population (back then, the Shi'a were still a minority in Iraq). However for all their cruelty, viciousness and relatively barbaric rules of engagement, the Mongols were pragmatic. They realized that men like al-'Alqami that would sell their people and nation to a foreign invader couldn't be trusted. If a man holds no loyalty to his own people, then how can he be trusted to hold loyalty to an invader and occupier? Al-'Alqami had hoped to be the Mongol's vicegerent in the region, but instead he became their slave. The sidelining of Chalabi would suggest that America has come to a similarly informed conclusion about the long-term usefulness of traitors, quislings and fifth columnists.

The Mongols understood what America is now learning: that the principle source of resistance to occupation of Muslim lands will always be religiously inspired. Therefore, any effort to dilute or subvert the practice of Islam in the lands under occupation was seen by the Mongols as a pre-requisite to maintaining the occupation. They therefore imposed a law over their subjects, which – like the law being conjured up by the US-led occupation – was essentially non-Islamic but couched into vague references and pseudo-Islamic terminology. The Mongols called their law al-Yasiq.

It is against this backdrop of occupation and foreign laws imposed on the population that one of the most influential and important figures in Islamic history would emerge. His name would be familiar to many people who follow the War on Terror, given that he is widely (though somewhat inaccurately) credited with having laid the ideological foundation for the so-called Wahabi movement. His name was Ibn Taymeeyah, or Sheikh-ul-Islam (The Scholar of Islam) as he has been affectionately known throughout the ages. When faced with the imposition of the Mongol's foreign systems of government and laws on the Muslim population, he rallied against the Mongols and those who had supported them, declaring that whoever implemented such laws was a disbeliever in Islam: "Whoever does this is an infidel who must be fought until he returns to the rule of Allah and His messenger. So no one other than He should rule neither minorly or majorly." This was the first time that a foreign system of belief had been forced on the heartland of the Muslim world, and Ibn Taymeeyah's lengthy fatwa provides the theological underpinning for Muslim resistance to man-made laws in every country in the Muslim world. He concluded by stating that defending the Muslim lands and expelling the occupying army is the second most important obligation of a Muslim after believing in Allah.

The reluctance of the Muslims to be satisfied with Mongol law presented a dilemma to their Mongol rulers. As long as the population was denied that right of self-determination, including determination of the laws by which they are governed, the Mongols could not subdue the population completely. At the same time, if the Muslims were ever granted this right then it would mean the instant end to Mongol hegemony in the region. Indeed, it was this desire to re-establish an Islamic state that drove every instance of Sunni resistance to Mongol rule from the moment they entered Baghdad. Today, it is this same desire that lies at the heart of the political instability in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Tunisia, Algeria, and most every country in the Arab world that has chosen secularism as its political path. The inescapable fact is that a Muslim cannot accept secularism without leaving his religion. As a complete way of life, Islam has no concept of "rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's." For this reason, the Bush Administration's attempt to force the round pegs of secular democracy into the square holes of Middle Eastern society is certain to fail and draw the same violent resistance as would the forcible imposition of shariah law on the United States.

By subduing Iraq, the Mongols also came to learn that the Islamic world isn't divided on the basis of nation-state or geographic region. The Prophet Muhammad described the Muslim world as a single unit and likened it to the human body in that if one part feels pain then all feels the pain. For this reason, when the Mongols sacked Baghdad and built human pyramids with the remains of the city's scholars and poets, it was as though that brutality had been meted out on the entire Muslim world. When Muslims in Jakarta, Sarajevo, Riyadh or Tunis see the scenes of American brutality in Iraq, it is as though it is being done to them. When they see photographs of Iraqi men being forced into simulated oral sex alongside grinning American servicemen and women, the rage they feel is as if that act was carried out on their own brother or their own father. Occupations cannot be maintained without subduing the population – whether physically, economically or psychologically – so the more that America continues its occupation, the more it will be forced to engage in brutality and the more that this brutality reaches the eyes of the Muslim world, the less secure that the world becomes for Americans and, indeed, Westerners in general. It doesn't matter how many times President Bush appears on Arab television offering mealy-mouthed apologies and assurances that the sexual humiliation meted out to the Iraqis, the brutality, and the sadism is not representative of America. The fact is that Arabs and Muslims like most people will judge President Bush and America not on what they say, but on what they do.

The turning point for the Mongol occupation came in September, 1260 when they had moved into Palestine. The Mamluks, a Muslim nation based in Egypt, had sent an army to confront them. Led by a general named Quduz, the army met the Mongols at a place called Ayn Jalut (Eye of Goliath) in Palestine. They would number 20,000 on each side, but the Mamluks would defeat the Mongols impressively, inflicting heavy losses on them and sending shockwaves throughout their empire. It was a turning point for the Muslims and broke the spell of Mongol invincibility. After the captured leader of the Mongol armies was brought to Quduz, he told him:

"Despicable man, you have shed so much blood wrongfully, ended the lives of champions and dignitaries with false assurances, and overthrown ancient dynasties with broken promises. Now you have finally fallen into a snare yourself."

The despicable men of the Bush Administration, so infatuated with their own messianic vision for the democratic revolution, so intoxicated with the hubris of empire, and so enslaved to the neo-Jacobin vision of "creative destruction" have fallen into the snare of thinking that they can do what no other society has been able to do: violently impose a foreign ideology on the Muslim world. The Administration seems to be clumsily treading a path well worn by the Mongols – from the "human pyramids" to the modern-day Yasiq to the rise of religious fundamentalism in response to occupation excesses. It took two years between the fall of the Caliphate in Baghdad to the defeat of the Mongols in Ayn Jalut. America has yet to meet her Ayn Jalut, but as the Muslim world continues to seethe and violence in Iraq escalates, that day may be fast approaching.
 
.
What irrelevance...

I am simply stating your fallacy and you post 2 irrelevant articles!
 
. .
Thanks for All This Information.
& Specially Thanks to ALLAH, who provide this oppurtunity to mangoles.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom