CNN Interview with Imran Khan: Assassination Attempt on the ex-Prime Minister by the Establishment and PDM

[Valiant]

The ranks within the establishment hold a strong grudge against the chief but are currently waiting for him to leave. so you wont see that theory physically play itself.
The day the new chief takes oath alot will be seen and most likely revealed.

The establishment entails the armed forces as well as the other associated institutions such as intelligence etc. I highly doubt that there would be mutiny against Bajwa but the resentment is widespread and pervasive. There are vastly different schools of thought as per my understanding

 

[HAIDER]

At some point, IK will have to present the evidence he claims to have on this assassination attempt that justifies his accusations on three people.

u get answers to your question .

 

[COOKie LOOkie....]

The establishment entails the armed forces as well as the other associated institutions such as intelligence etc. I highly doubt that there would be mutiny against Bajwa but the resentment is widespread and pervasive. There are vastly different schools of thought as per my understanding

There wont be a mutiny for sure if he retires on due time. Mutiny in general is not affordable with in the establishment.
Resentment is there without a doubt from lower yo upper ranks.
In the dust of war, one can hear various rumors and alot of miss-information.

 

[epebble]

So it was staged by IK?

She seems to be raising that suspicion since IK was very quick to name the PM, Interior minister and Military official as suspects, right from the hospital bed where he was taken after the injury. IK could have said Tom, Dick and Harry told me that the three suspects orchestrated this. But he is not saying that.

 

[COOKie LOOkie....]

She seems to be raising that suspicion since IK was very quick to name the PM, Interior minister and Military official as suspects, right from the hospital bed where he was taken after the injury. IK could have said Tom, Dick and Harry told me that the three suspects orchestrated this. But he is not saying that.

IK was so quick to name them because they have been openly threatening Imran. PDM folks have been so active in calling him out on national TV. (sar kuchalna, Fitna, waqt katam hogaya, islam dushman and sabak siqana wete their words)! those are open threats.
So ofcourse his first suspicion will be the Info Minister and the Prime minister. its writing all the wall.
Naming any tom dick or harry doesn’t imply here.

 

[epebble]

IK was so quick to name them because they have been openly threatening Imran. PDM folks have been so active in calling him out on national TV. (sar kuchalna, Fitna, waqt katam hogaya, islam dushman and sabak siqana wete their words)! those are open threats.
So ofcourse his first suspicion will be the Info Minister and the Prime minister. its writing all the wall.
Naming any tom dick or harry doesn’t imply here.

But calling names, even foul ones, is not the same as assassination attempt. May be character assassination. IK's language has also not been exemplary.

 

[Mirzali Khan]

The ranks within the establishment hold a strong grudge against the chief but are currently waiting for him to leave. so you wont see that theory physically play itself.
The day the new chief takes oath alot will be seen and most likely revealed.

How?

They are all on the same page.

 

[TheDarkKnight]

At some point, IK will have to present the evidence he claims to have on this assassination attempt that justifies his accusations on three people.

Evidence gets collected by a competent and impartial investigation only. Accusation do not require proof necessarily - that is why they are just accusations. FIR doesn’t require evidences.

 

[VCheng]

But calling names, even foul ones, is not the same as assassination attempt. May be character assassination. IK's language has also not been exemplary.

IK has never been known to be able to be diplomatic. At all. Ever.

 

[Ssan]

"What is your evidence, Sir?"

He presented none. He even backtracked on the number of people he accused, and accused the intelligence agency of videos, Very interesting.

Lets make it clear for the naive.

He has evidence- that of internal informants. After mentioning this, the army went on a purge to remove all pro PTI elements.

Ofc, he will not highlight this again. So he will say- look I pointed out what would happen well before this. And the motivation.

Becky is asking stupid questions- as if he would release what evidence he has.

 

[VCheng]

He has evidence- that of internal informants.

Hearsay is not evidence. And only has claimed ha has evidence. None has been shown yet.

 

[Ssan]

Becky to IK, "You continue to call this assassination attempt"...

WTF, IK should have jumped on her *** and asked her, was I not shot at and sustained bullet wounds? Was that for fireworks or entertainment?

How else would you classify this incident?

This goes to show the international media continues to be one of the most potent instrument of Western colonial agenda...

Exactly- he should have asked her- what would you call it?

 

[Clutch]

"What is your evidence, Sir?"

He presented none. He even backtracked on the number of people he accused, and accused the intelligence agency of videos, Very interesting.

I guess you do not know how the legal system works. You cannot and should not present the evidence in a public forum that may impact the disposition of a legal court proceeding.

 

[Ssan]

Hearsay is not evidence. And only has claimed ha has evidence. None has been shown yet.

Who says it is hearsay? Just that he has evidence from informants.

 

[Clutch]

IK has never been known to be able to be diplomatic. At all. Ever.

Code for.... NRO and appeasement of corruption.

Never!