Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and keep dreaming indians that you will intercept missile through naval sams. There is difference b/w theoraticals claims and claims verified through tests and experiments.
Such statements look good if applied to all departments of Govt.
One should start from the top to bottom; PM house, President house, NA, Provincial Assemblies...that is total of over 1000 seats and lots of politicians too with their 'allotted' budget, if one starts trimming them and then defence, then will everything become fine? I believe it will...
If a ASCM is just above sea 1-2 M it will be very hard for radar to detect it and when it does either too late or have to depend on CIWS ,you can call 10M - 15M above sea a sea skimmer its your choice .
Now that the Chinese have unveiled the new lollipop and there has been no holds bar here in this forum... stupidity shooting beyond roofs.. defying laws of nature aswell as Physics.. the thinks tanks... a few who are calculating momentum and claiming it to be K.E. with no restrictions of dimension of the measurements units... claiming active radar guidance a few claiming passive guidance.
I found this one the top of the chart.
Lets us be familiar with the "active guidance" of yours sir which some how picks the target where the parent radar fails to do so.
Are these missiles going to be used in our F22P frigate fleet of 4 (plus 6 frigates being built)
These are a great addition
If a ASCM is just above sea 1-2 M it will be very hard for radar to detect it
yes,its a weird missile...Let me know if you find a technical category for this one,i couldn't.
whats the price......???
Its free bro dont worry about it , use as much you want , no question ask by chinese as long as you keep india pakistan centric.
Who is disuputing the fact that missiles like exocet are harder to detect? I was replying to your idiotic assumption that only a missile flying at 1-2 m above sea level will be considered a true "sea skimmer" and even supersonic missiles sea skimming at level of 4 m is not a "true sea skimmer"..You should not make things up to prove your point..
The purpose of sea skimming is ultimately to reduce reaction time of defence systems enemy ship as much as possible..In this aspect,brahmos sea skimming at 4m at mach2+ will give much less reaction time than Exocet sea skimming at 1-2 m at subsonic speeds...Indian Navy is a buyer of both missiles and the price paid for brahmos is much higher than that of exocet..