What's new

chinese withdrawal

. .
China also claim and they also withdrew

There is no victory then as you people are claiming then , now is there ? . :D

There was no immediate word on the conditions decided for the mutual withdrawal of the troops, confronting each other on the heights since April 15.
 
.
A few PLA tents pitched in a strategic spot gave 1.2 billion Indians a heart attack and forced GOI to dismantle its forward bunkers. Great Sun-Tzu play by the Chinese.

Don't forget to vote for Congress! :yahoo:

watch it smartass. The congress is not like CPC. It is 'legitimate' for starters.
 
.
There is no victory then as you people are claiming then , now is there ? . :D

Nope there isn't. We didn't rush in with inadequate troops to retake an unstrategic position. You should learn from your big brother how wars are won :D
 
.
What a bunch of looser...Japan captured Chinese islands.....Entered in India and ran away after say that they are in Chinese land.....

SUPA POWA.....World is scared from Chinese
:omghaha::omghaha:
 
. .
Nope there isn't. We didn't rush in with inadequate troops to retake an unstrategic position. You should learn from your big brother how wars are won :D

Of course .

As for the other part , there is no victory on a no man's land :D
 
.
Btw reliable sources indicate that the chinese tried to patrol ladakh with their tin can fighters but all their fighters crashed while taking off, and chinese were afraid of being bombed by IAf and ran back...:lol:

Don't rely on gossip. The PLAN is still a formidable force. The conducted a protest action and hopefully India will take their protest seriously

Of course .

As for the other part , there is no victory on a no man's land :D

Indeed. Try telling the Pakistani COAS that :D
 
. . .
LOL at India shupa-powa retreating from your own territory and capitulating to Chinese demands after PLA coercive diplomacy!

Quid pro quo behind India-China de-escalation? - The Times of India

NEW DELHI: It seems there was some sort of "a quid pro quo" behind the mutual withdrawal of Indian and Chinese troops from the 16,300-feet face-off site in the Depsang Bulge area of northern Ladakh on Sunday evening.

With India furiously working the diplomatic channels ahead of foreign minister Salman Khurshid's visit to Beijing on May 9, in preparation for Chinese premier Li Keqiang's trip to India on May 20, two back-to-back flag meetings were held between local commanders at Spanggur Gap area between Daulat Beg Oldi and Chushul sectors on Saturday and Sunday afternoons.

By 7.30pm on Sunday, the two forces - with 30 to 40 troops each - had begun to withdraw from the 20-day-old standoff site along the Raki Nala, which India perceives to be 19-km inside Indian territory, after a handshake between the two local commanders at the fifth flag meeting held earlier in the day.

Though there was no immediate official word on what were the exact terms of disengagement but sources said "there was some give-and-take" to resolve the face-off. "There had to be some face-saver for the Chinese," said a source.

China, since the very beginning and through the first three flag meetings on April 18, 23 and 30, had remained adamant that India should dismantle its forward observation post at Chumar in eastern Ladakh since it overlooks Chinese highways and can detect any troop movement there.

India, in turn, was demanding that the over 32 Chinese troops, who had pitched tents at the face-off site and were getting their supplies through regular vehicular support, should return to their pre-April 15 positions. India was worried about the deep Chinese intrusion in the Depsang Bulge area, a table-top plateau, since it threatened to cut its access to around 750 sqkm area in the region.

The face-off site was just about 40-km south of the strategic Karakoram Pass, which is at the tri-junction of China-Pakistan-India borders, and overlooks the Siachen Glacier-Saltoro Ridge to the west and the Indian observation post in the Chumar sector to the east.

Though already angry with India's re-activation of advanced landing grounds at Daulat Beg Oldi, Fukche and Nyoma and building of other infrastructure along the LAC over the last four-five years, China had made the dismantling of the Chumar post as a pre-condition for de-escalation.

The Chinese, in fact, had earlier even tried to "immobilize" the surveillance cameras positioned at the Chumar post by cutting wires there. In June last year, Indian troops had intercepted two Chinese personnel on mules across the Chumar post. Though they were subsequently let off, with language being a barrier, China got hugely irritated about the incident. Holding that the two Chinese were from its revenue department, Beijing since then has been pressing hard for the Chumar post to be dismantled.

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

Don't forget to vote for Congress!
 
.
No bunkers dismantled mate. Thank heavens for CCP and PLA though. China has proven itself to be a responsible world power. Long live the People's Republic of China ! :china:

Not sure about responsible part. There was no reason to escalate at all.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom