What's new

Chinese offer $1.95bn plan to bridge Padma

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
Chinese offer $1.95bn plan to bridge Padma

Chinese offer $1.95bn plan to bridge Padma - bdnews24.com

Abdur Rahim Harmachi, Chief Economics Correspondent

Published: 2013-03-21 03:26:22.0 Updated: 2013-03-21 03:26:22.0
1 / 5
A Chinese consortium, backed by a government-owned bank, has officially proposed to channel $1.95 billion to bridge the Padma without interest and a payback period of 20 years.


It says the dream bridge connecting the capital with the southern and the south-western Bangladesh will complete in just three years.

The offer has estimated the cost of Bangladesh’s largest ever infrastructure project at $2.79 billion. A previous agreement with the World Bank had put the cost at $2.9 billion.

According to the latest proposal by the Chinese, Bangladesh will have to source the rest of the money – roughly 30 percent of the total spending – and appoint a firm to supervise the construction work. The fees for that firm will have to be paid by the government.

Bangladesh would require repaying $8.15 million a month for 20 years after an agreement is signed for the 6.15-kilometer multipurpose road-rail bridge.
Estimates have it that the bridge would boost the nation’s economic growth by up to one percent a year.

Under a consortium arrangement, the China Development Bank (CDB) would give the money with Sphere Energy Creations Beijing Ltd (SECA) being the lead agency, the proposal says.

It says the consortium would have the liberty of appointing contractors of its own choice for building the bridge if Bangladesh takes the fund it has offered. The Chinese will execute the construction, it says.

Amid uncertainty over whether the administration of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina would be able to start constructing the bridge before her five-year term expires later this year, the proposal could be seen as important, especially with the widely-held view in the government that a similar offer by Malaysia could be too expensive.

The ambitious scheme ran into deep trouble after the government in last January refused to continue bargaining with the World Bank for its $1.2 billion promised credit amid allegations of a “corruption conspiracy” involving Bangladeshi officials and executives of a Canadian construction giant, SNC Lavalin.

After the government ended the one-year long imbroglio with the Washington-based lender, co-financers Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Japan International Corporation Agency (JICA) also backed out of the project because of their obligation to follow in the footsteps of the lead donor in the project.

The ADB had committed $610 million in loans, Jeddah-based Islamic Development Bank $140 million and the Japan International Cooperation Agency $400 million with the rest of the finance coming from Bangladesh government.

While the government still sticks to its plan to start the massive construction with its own fund, Finance Minister AMA Muhith, speaking to bdnews24.com, says he considers the Chinese proposal “better” than the one by the Malaysians.

Even though the minister prefers the Chinese proposal, he is still optimistic that Bangladesh would be able to build the bridge with its own fund.

“We are making progress on that plan,” Muhith told bdnews24.com Tuesday. “I have spoken on the matter in Parliament. We will soon call tender for the bridge.”
The Finance Minister added: “We are not thinking of any other option at the moment.”

The proposal from the Chinese that landed at the Prime Minister’s desk last month says the lead agency SECA’s affiliates Sphere Energy Technology Beijing Limited and Sphere Energy Creations Australia Private Limited would be part of the consortium.

State-owned China Communications Construction Company (CCC), CREC 14th Bureau and CDGD are the other partners of the planned consortium.

SECA’s Executive Director Stephen Chong made the proposal in a letter to Hasina on Feb 25. The proposal envisages ‘a complete’ finance and construction option.

On Jul 12 last year, Chong had written to Economic Relations Division (ERD) and Bridges Division Secretaries expressing interest to bankroll the bridge.

Later on Sept 15, Minister Muhith and senior Bangladesh officials, while attending a meeting in Beijing, heard senior managers of the consortium companies.

The Feb 25 proposal to the Prime Minister referred to the two letters written to those Secretaries.

It promises building the bridge within three years and without changing the previous design in line with the original project plan.

Unlike Malaysia’s proposal, China said Bangladesh will fix toll rates for the bridge.

Earlier this month, Malaysia formally offered to invest $2.3 billion for get the project up and running.
 
.
Chinese offer is best to me and the self-help Bangladesh initiative is the worst option. Muith must be a crazy to think like he or BD can really do such a gigantic project. Talking big and doing big are two different things. Muhith will do better if he only talks, but does not really wrestle for the project with the strength of his foreign currency reserve. Money is not the only criteria to construct such a long multi-purpose bridge. BD does not evn have the money.
 
.
Can anybody tell me whats going on with this Padma bridge lately, i mean first it was the World Bank then i there was another thread running claiming $2.3 billion Malaysian Support n now its China???

Whats the significance of this project for BD n any progress so far???
@BDforever @Loki
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Can anybody tell me whats going on with this Padma bridge lately, i mean first it was the World Bank then i there was another thread running claiming $2.3 billion Malaysian Support n now its China???

Whats the significance of this project for BD n any progress so far???
@BDforever @Loki
Padma bridge is very important for development of our south-west part. it will increase communication within the country and it will boost our economy. So far still in the process of finalize, talk is going on with all parties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Padma bridge is very important for development of our south-west part. it will increase communication within the country and it will boost our economy. So far still in the process of finalize, talk is going on with all parties.

Strangely U didn't mentioned why WB left along with JICA and ADB.:unsure:
 
. .
Padma bridge is very important for development of our south-west part. it will increase communication within the country and it will boost our economy. So far still in the process of finalize, talk is going on with all parties.

South west BD, does that mean its bordering West Bengal???:what:
 
. . .
This looks like the best deal going.

China will provide 1.95 billion dollar loan to build the bridge and BD will pay 840 million dollar excess upfront but this will probably be over the 3 year construction phase of the project. I guess the 840 million dollar will be the profit that China will make as they should be able to construct the bridge cheaper than anyone else.

Unless there are any hidden nasty strings attached, this deal should be grabbed now!
 
.
This looks like the best deal going.

China will provide 1.95 billion dollar loan to build the bridge and BD will pay 840 million dollar excess upfront but this will probably be over the 3 year construction phase of the project. I guess the 840 million dollar will be the profit that China will make as they should be able to construct the bridge cheaper than anyone else.

Unless there are any hidden nasty strings attached, this deal should be grabbed now!

Chinese offer is not new. I seen in a thread where gov said it has got offer from malayasia,india and china except WB.
So it came by that string. I think within 1 or 2 weak gov will clear all this illusion of PB.
Deserving a better deal and construction should start right away.
 
.
Chinese offer is best to me and the self-help Bangladesh initiative is the worst option. Muith must be a crazy to think like he or BD can really do such a gigantic project. Talking big and doing big are two different things. Muhith will do better if he only talks, but does not really wrestle for the project with the strength of his foreign currency reserve. Money is not the only criteria to construct such a long multi-purpose bridge. BD does not evn have the money.

I know it will be risky...but there was a time, if I am not wrong, China did such project on their own, when they were not as developed as they are not. If we can't do it ourselves, why we are producing so many engineers every year. The minister must know better than you providing the whole amount ourselves. So why can't we? Why such a low confidence? We have to come out of these type of mentality.
 
.
I know it will be risky...but there was a time, if I am not wrong, China did such project on their own, when they were not as developed as they are not. If we can't do it ourselves, why we are producing so many engineers every year. The minister must know better than you providing the whole amount ourselves. So why can't we? Why such a low confidence? We have to come out of these type of mentality.

Financing it from internal sources is not feasible.

Discussed before many times.
 
.
Chinese offer is best to me and the self-help Bangladesh initiative is the worst option. Muith must be a crazy to think like he or BD can really do such a gigantic project. Talking big and doing big are two different things. Muhith will do better if he only talks, but does not really wrestle for the project with the strength of his foreign currency reserve. Money is not the only criteria to construct such a long multi-purpose bridge. BD does not evn have the money.

I know from very first day muhith talked against construction of PB by own finance. It was in
AL's manifesto so they are desperate to start it. I think they can start it by cutting the railway
portion. It will be cost effective. The next gov can build another only for railway or both.

I know it will be risky...but there was a time, if I am not wrong, China did such project on their own, when they were not as developed as they are not. If we can't do it ourselves, why we are producing so many engineers every year. The minister must know better than you providing the whole amount ourselves. So why can't we? Why such a low confidence? We have to come out of these type of mentality.

Even we have the money we will need foreign engineers to share their experience. Yes foreign dependency is not good as we seen in Jamuna Bridge.
 
.
So Malaysian loan hoax did not get water now Chinese loan fiasco. Man o man.....Awami propaganda pushers are utterly desperate.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom